Swedish Media Target Country’s Foreign Minister Following Her Remarks on Israel



January 15, 2016 is a day Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallström likely won’t forget for a good long while. It was the day she came under attack by media in both Sweden and Israel.

I have written about Wallström several times previously (see here, here, and here), and for good reason: she is one of the few public officials on the world stage today with the courage to speak the truth about Israel.

In November Wallström infuriated “the only democracy in the Middle East” by suggesting that the plight of Palestinians could be helping to fuel the pestilential takfiri ideology currently wreaking havoc in the in the region, even going so far as to speculate that it might–perhaps–possibly–have even been a factor in the Paris terror attacks. Angry statements denouncing her were issued at the time by various Israeli officials.

Apparently unperturbed by this uproar, Wallström went on, a few weeks later in December, to declare that Israel may be carrying out what essentially amounts to extrajudicial executions of Palestinians, and in doing so she once again managed to ignite the choler of Israeli officialdom–with Tzipi Hotovely, of the Foreign Ministry, adding her own howls to the general chorus.

Wallström, in Hotovely’s view, was guilty of “defamation of Israel,” and her statements about the extrajudicial executions “are distancing Sweden from the ranks of enlightened nations.”

Then earlier this month Wallström set off another Zionist tempest by again invoking the extrajudicial executions, but this time, in remarks before the Swedish Parliament, accompanying her observations on the matter with a call for an international investigation.

“It is vital that there is a thorough, credible investigation into these deaths in order to clarify and bring about possible accountability,” said the courageous Ms. Wallström on January 12.

Three days later, on January 15, the media firestorm began, with media outlets in both Sweden and Israel airing allegations of Wallström’s involvement in public corruption. Most of the outlets seem to give the hat tip for the “scoop” to Aftonbladet, and you can go here and here to access two articles on the foreign minister it published on that day.

But curiously, Dagens Nyheter quickly jumped into the fray with stories of its own–three of them altogether–all published on January 15, with additional, followup stories published since.

Dagens Nyheter and Aftonbladet are two of the largest newspapers in Sweden. Aftonbladet is owned by the Schibsted Media Group, whose shareholders include almost a who’s-who of American financial firms, including J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs. Dagens Nyheter is owned by the Bonnier Group, a privately-held media conglomerate controlled by the Jewish Bonnier family of Sweden.

That both concerns would publish exposés on Wallström on the same day certainly raises eyebrows, but curiously the Jerusalem Post, almost as if on cue, came out with a story on the Swedish foreign minister as well–also on January 15.

Under the headline “Swedish FM Wallstrom, Israel’s pariah, reportedly linked to corruption scandal,” the Post’s story is basically a rehash of what the Swedish media were reporting the same day, yet the article describes Wallström as “public enemy no. 1 in Israel” and includes the information, given almost gleefully one might think, that she “appears to be entangled in a brewing corruption scandal at home.”

So what is the great crime Wallström is supposed to be guilty of? To put it succinctly: renting an apartment.

I know, I know, it sounds pretty heinous, but key to keep in mind is that there is a severe housing shortage in Stockholm. Some people have to wait in line, literally for years, just to rent an apartment, and there is widespread suspicion that public figures, both inside and outside of the government, have used their influence to “jump the queue.”

One owner of rental property in Stockholm is the labor union Kommunal, also referred to as “Municipal” in some of the reports, and the charges are that the union, in exchange for political favors, has rented out apartments at below-market value to members of the ruling Social Democratic party.

If true, it would be tantamount to bribery, and would also violate a law stating that landlords are to make their rental properties available to all citizens equally on a first come-first served basis. “Jumping the queue,” thus, constitutes a violation of the law.

One of the few Swedish media outlets that publishes in English is The Local. In an article on January 15, the website gives Wallström’s response to the charges:

“Yes, I rent an apartment from Kommunal and when we spoke about it I got confirmation from the highest level that they followed all the rules and procedures in assigning apartments, and that I was not going to jump ahead of anyone on the waiting list,” she said.

“They lied to me about this… I am angry and disappointed,” she added.

In an article published three days later, The Local reported that Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven was standing behind his embattled foreign minister:

“I have been given information by Margot Wallström about how it happened and she has given it to media as well. I have no reason to believe anything other than that it is correct,” he said.

But one day later, The Local reported that an official “corruption probe” had been opened against Wallstrom:

Sweden’s national anti-corruption unit has announced it will launch a preliminary investigation following claims that the country’s foreign minister Margot Wallström was helped by a trade union to jump Stockholm’s queue for rent-controlled housing, while the city battles a record housing shortage.

On January 24, five days after Löfven’s comments, The Local reported on a new poll, commissioned by two Swedish media outlets, showing the Social Democratic party’s popularity plummeting to a “record low.”

In my last article on Wallström, published on January 13, the day after her remarks in the parliament, I wrote the following: “I don’t know how Walström’s comments are playing out with the Swedish public, but they certainly are winning her lots of admirers here in America.”

And I think that’s a true statement. In her comments on Israel, Wallström has demonstrated more courage in her little finger than all 535 members of Congress put together have shown in their entire bodies. That’s something Americans can’t help but admire. And this is the lady now under attack?–in an orchestrated campaign that began just three days after her call for an investigation of Israel?

We have to remember that whatever rental impropriety the Swedish foreign minster may have committed, whether deliberately or inadvertently, it probably pales in comparison to financial crimes or irregularities some of Schibsted Media Group’s stockholders are likely to have had a hand in–either in the hedge fund or subprime mortgage scandals or other shenanigans.

As for Wallström, regardless of any findings the “corruption probe” launched against her may come up with, I think she will emerge from all of this with her integrity intact and with many admirers still. And not just in America. Wallström, it seems, also has admirers in Israel, of all places–or at least one admirer at any rate.

“Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallström, one of the few ministers with a conscience left in the world, demanded that these killings be investigated,” wrote Haaretz columnist Gideon Levy on January 17. “There is no demand more moral and just than this. It should have come from our own justice minister.”

An investigation into the extrajudicial killings in Occupied Palestine should be pursued–absolutely, unequivocally and without any delay. Whether it ever will or not, is of course another question.

But a different yet somewhat related issue needs to be contemplated as well–by all concerned over the endless wars and the morass of depravity the West is sinking into at present–and that is the extent to which Zionist media outlets are willing to use character assassination as a weapon against public officials who openly criticize Israel.



All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Her people ( if they still conceive that they ARE a people ) better defend her and attack the Luciferian Talmudic attackers.

  2. I have a great admiration for Margot Wallström. I believe she can weather this storm in a tea cup because she is enlightened enough to know that the MSM is completly insane with vitriol toward anyone in a government position who is willing to share the obvious with everyone. The US and Europe are failing because of their allegnece to the aparthied state.

  3. Excellent article. No politician attempting to serve constituents and ever tell the truth about anything will ever be safe until the Khazarian Mafia’s hold on the Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM) is eliminated and the KM is de-fanged and destroyed top to bottom.

  4. And the Jews wonder why the goyim dislike them? Maybe they need to rein in Organized Jewry before it once again throws them under the bus.

  5. “West is sinking into at present–and that is the extent to which Zionist media outlets are willing to use character assassination as a weapon against public officials who openly criticize Israel.” they are not only willing, it has reached a level of a procedural matter, it is step-by-step approach and response, much like the USA foreign politics in-time using different levels of economic coercion. Look what happened to FIFA officials. Much of the world already knew there was a corruption, at least from getting USA the World Cup in 1994. But it wasn’t officially corruption until those guys in FIFA were willing to discuss banning Israel from international competitions. There is corruption practically in every country at almost all times, but the timing of playing that card tells a lot about animosity of certain political groups and options.

    • Right, and after that (if that doesn’t work) comes assassination (Olof Palme, Jörg Haider, and so forth) . . . It pretty much resembles a totalitarian dictatorship like the early USSR and Nazi-Germany.

  6. Zaguero, The Local reports as follows:

    “Her spokesman Erik Wirkensjö told TT that the minister has lived in the apartment since April and that it was offered to her during an informal discussion with the head of Kommunal. She later said she had terminated her lease and would be moving out.”

    A separate report in The Local, reports this:

    “She has repeatedly enraged Israel, starting with Sweden’s recognition of a Palestinian state shortly after she became foreign minister in October 2014.”

    Apparently she rented the apartment in April of 2015, but her getting on the wrong side of Israel dates evidently to October of 2014. So your theory may be correct. At the very least it’s a good deduction.

    • Thank you, Richard. Much appreciated.

      I’m just a fat, sloppy civilian, but I did go to Catholic school, and I like to think the sisters did a fairly good job of teaching me logic and deductive reasoning. I think it’s obvious to anyone who takes the time to study their evil carefully that the “members of the tribe” have a certain signature, a style, a hand, a way of doing things. They proceed in a certain modus operandi, and it usually works, so they seem to stick to the pattern. Strangely or perhaps not so strangely, they work much in the same way as a skilled band of grifters; first comes the bait, and then the hook.

      With all due respect to Wallstrom, that offer made in an “informal discussion” should have been a huge red flag; as my mother warned me long ago, if something seems too good to be true, that’s because it is. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.

  7. I would say this whole thing reeks of setup. First they rent her the apartment, then they pillory her for renting the apartment. This is classical Zionist manipulation, and it’s not even very subtle.

    The one vital piece of information I did not encounter in this article is *when* did she rent the apartment?

Comments are closed.