Minister for the Middle East Tobias Ellwood caused astonishment when he made the claim in the House of Commons on Thursday.
The UN report, which provoked outrage after it was leaked earlier this week, found that 119 Saudi-led military missions in Yemen were linked to violations of international law. Its findings stoked fears that British-made arms sold to the Saudis may have been deployed to commit war crimes.
‘Revoke all licenses’
Britain’s arms sales to Saudi Arabia totaled £2.95 billion (US$4.23 billion) for the first nine months of 2015, and roughly £7 billion since Prime Minister David Cameron took office in 2010.
Amid mounting concerns that UK-made weapons have been used to bomb schools, hospitals, markets and other civilian targets in Yemen, Cameron has been urged to suspend all arms sales to the Gulf state. However, the government has failed to do so, and has left UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia unfettered.
“If the government takes the UN and international law seriously then it must revoke all licenses for arms to Saudi and call an urgent investigation into the abuses that have taken place,” he told RT.
“Elwood’s position seems to be that we should just take Saudi Arabia’s word for it – this is despite the fact it is one of the most violent and repressive regimes in the world. There needs to be an investigation that considers all of the evidence available.”
Addressing MPs in the House of Commons, Ellwood said he took the UN report’s allegations seriously. However, the Tory minister noted that its authors had not personally made their way to Yemen. He argued that the evidence of potential attacks on civilians was predominantly based on “hearsay” and satellite pictures. He also suggested that some of the devastation referenced in the report could have been caused by Houthi rebels, who are fighting the Yemeni government.
“We are aware that the Houthis, who are very media-savvy in such a situation, are using their own artillery pieces deliberately, targeting individual areas where the people are not loyal to them, to give the impression that there have been air attacks,” he said.
“That is not to exonerate Saudi Arabia from any of the mistakes it might have made, but it is why it is so important to have a thorough process to investigate absolutely every single incident.”
‘UK aiding and fueling destruction in Yemen’
CAAT’s Andrew Smith said arms firms have profited significantly from Britain’s close ties to Saudi Arabia.
“For decades now the UK has shared an almost entirely uncritical relationship with the Saudi regime. One group that has benefited is the arms companies, who have made millions from the bombardment,” he said.
“The UK may not be bombing Yemen directly, but it has been complicit in the destruction. By arming and supporting the Saudi regime it is aiding and fueling the destruction that is taking place.”
His comments come as a growing chorus of critics accuse the government of waging a proxy war in Yemen. As scrutiny of Britain’s involvement in Saudi-led military operations intensifies, campaigners and commentators insist that Britain is intervening in the conflict. They say that Britain’s arming of the Saudi-led coalition and provision of advice to Saudi military personnel amounts to covert warfare.
Britain sold over £1 billion worth of missiles, rockets and bombs to Saudi Arabia last summer despite evidence of war crimes committed by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen. Saudi Arabia revealed earlier this month that British and American forces are stationed in the control center from which military operations against Yemen are being directed.
However, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has refused to disclose how many British personnel are involved. The department insists Britain’s involvement is confined to advice and training geared at ensuring Saudi Arabia complies with international law.
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy
Comments are closed.