Must See: SouthFront, Syria Ceasefire. Strategic Implications

"Vital and reasonably fair, a great piece of work"g

…from SouthFront

On February 22, the US and Russia released a joint statement on the Terms for a Cessation of Hostilities in Syria and proposed the ceasefire commence at 00:00 (Damascus time) on Feb.27, 2016.

The ceasefire is to be applied to those parties that have indicated their commitment to and acceptance of its terms and does not apply to ISIS Jabhat al-Nusra, Ahrar ash-Sham and other terrorist organizations designated by the UN Security Council.

The sides involved in the conflict should indicate their commitment to the ceasefire by no later than 12:00 (Damascus time) on Feb. 26, 2016. In turn, Russia and the US will exchange pertinent information and develop procedures necessary for preventing clashes between the sides committed to the ceasefire.

The International Syria Support Group (ISSG) Ceasefire Task Force, co-chaired by the US and Russia, has been also established under UN auspices. The Ceasefire Task Force includes Russian and US political and military officials and the UN Office of the Special Envoy for Syria (OSE) as secretariat.

The primary functions of the Task Force are:

  • delineate the territory held by “ISIS”, “Jabhat-al-Nusra” and other terrorist groups
  • ensure communications among all parties to promote compliance and rapidly de-escalate tensions;
  • resolve allegations of non-compliance;
  • refer persistent non-compliant behavior by any of the parties and to determine appropriate retaliatory actions.

The formal side of the statement brings up an issue hidden by the main stream media. If the main task force and the ceasefire agreement is set up between the US and Russia, who with whom is in war in Syria? The Russian military grouping is the only force arrived Syria upon the official request of the Syrian government. Thus, according to the international law, the US is an aggressor seeking to seize the Syrian land with hands of its regional partners and proxy forces. It should be noted that Turkey doesn’t play any significant role in the settlement of the conflict because the Erdogan regime isn’t an independent international actor.

The US’s decision speed to agree with the ceasefire shows that the US-led block has really faced a threat of military defeat in Syria. The US-led block can’t dictate terms to Syria and Russia. On the other hand, the Syrian Arab Army and its allies need time to regroup forces and facilities to continue the fight against terrorists.

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Some content may be satirical in nature. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within are full responsibility of author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on February 23, 2016, With 2960 Reads Filed under World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

3 Responses to "Must See: SouthFront, Syria Ceasefire. Strategic Implications"

  1. rockwool  February 23, 2016 at 5:09 pm

    SouthFront is mostly a lot of hot air, it’s a news service.

    If you’ve read any of their “analysis”, like the recent one on Turkey, they only count the number of hardware and show some organizational structure of the armed forces; things you can find on Wiki.

    Like kids count passing police cars, no analysis or hardly any, just pure journalism of the worst kind.

  2. Cold Wind  February 23, 2016 at 1:57 pm

    Russia has just legitimized the US role in Syria, something the US could not do for itself. While it is likely true Assad has signed on to the agreement (we suppose Russia gave him little choice), what does this mean for Syria, its ultimate sovereignty, and the future of northeast Syria? The US will likely become a permanent resident in Syria’s northeast. We’re talking about a heavy military presence here and possible guerrilla warfare forever against Assad.

  3. Altimometer  February 23, 2016 at 12:52 pm

    There are questions we should demand answers, yet spin will provide omission of the whole truth if any by the those in the msm.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network