
Bernie Sandersâ recent speech in Utah, in which he outlined his views on the Middle East in particular, and foreign affairs in general, was little short of delusional. Certainly it was lackluster. Sanders labeled ISIS as the ultimate evil in the world today, but regrettably he gave no indication of recognizing that ISIS has been backed by our putative allies, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and probably even by the Mossad and the CIA as well.
Instead, Sanders took his playbook from the mainstream media, calling Syrian President Bashar Assad âa brutal, brutal dictatorâ and advocating a political settlement âto get Assad out of power.â He also mistakenly referred to the Syrian conflict as a âcivil war.â It is not. It is an invasion by foreign powers using terrorist mercenaries as proxies.
In 2014, the people of Syria voted overwhelmingly for Assad in the countryâs presidential election. As I have said numerous times, the moderates in Syria are the people who support their government. This is not hard to understand, given the choices before them. But it is something US presidential candidates, including Sanders, either cannot or will not recognize. Assad is a capable leader who has exhibited considerable wisdom and insight in a number of his public comments. For instance, he once observed, âThe West calls it âterrorismâ when it hits them, and ârevolution, democracy, freedom, and human rightsâ when it hits us.â He alsostated that:
Western officials have lost their credibility. They no longer have double standards; they have triple and quadruple standards. They have all kinds of standards for every political situation. They have lost their credibility; they have sold their principles in return for interests, and therefore it is impossible to build a consistent policy with them. Tomorrow, they might do the exact opposite of what they are doing today.
Assad is correct. Western officials have lost their credibility. But all Sanders can do is parrot the US State Department line that Assadâs a dictator! Assadâs a dictator! Polly wanna cracker, ack! And of course we get no acknowledgement that the Syrian leader has afforded protection to his countryâs Christian population.
Ironically, Sandersâ position on Syria doesnât seem to be distinctly different from Hillary Clintonâs:
#HillaryClinton : Destroy Syria for israel: âThe Best Way to Help israelâ Proxy in Syria https://t.co/dDoZ09LXVo pic.twitter.com/OMvKCDetUm
— Abbs Winston (@AbbsWinston) March 22, 2016
Sanders also asserted that, âPreventing Iran from getting the bomb will make the world a safe place,â but naturally he made no mention of Israelâs nuclear arsenal. I guess thatâs something you simply donât talk about on the US campaign trail, regardless of whether youâre Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders. Trump soiled himself in his speech before AIPAC on Monday night, but Sanders really hasnât done much better here.
I have been saying recently that we need a new political party in America, a party that will go by the name of the End Aid to Israel Party, or EAIP. There are crowdfunding sites out there where startup funding for such a party conceivably could be raisedâenough money at least to fund a candidate for a congressional election somewhere in the country. Maybe in 2018. Itâs something to be hoped for, at any rate, and it would be understood, of course, that candidates on the EAIP ticket would not be afraid to talk about Israelâs nuclear weapons and the huge, huge problem they pose for the world.
Sanders also got into the subject of the Israel-Palestine conflictâin fact it was probably the main point of his speech. And on this issue, just as with regard to Iran and Syria, he is equally lackluster and delusional. This is the point made by Steve Lendman in the article below. As Lendman puts it, Sandersâ âformula for peace isnât reality based,â and he is absolutely correct in that assessment.
Given the deficiencies in all the major presidential contenders, it seems that sadly we are left, as usual, with âno one to vote for.â Itâs down once again to a âlesser of two evilsâ election. This is why a new political party in America is so direly needed.
***
Sandersâ Written Remarks to AIPAC
AIPAC is a rogue lobbying group with enormous influence in Washington, one-sidedly supporting Israel at the expense of regional peace and Palestinian rights.
Sanders addressed its annual conference in spirit, not in person, delivering his remarks in written form â expressing longstanding support for a ruthless apartheid state run by hate-mongering Zionist zealots.
âIsrael is one of Americaâs closest allies,â he said, âand we â as a nation â are committed not just to guaranteeing (its survival), but also to its peopleâs right to live in peace and security.â
Fact: Both countries partner in each otherâs high crimes, Sanders failed to explain.
Fact: Israelâs survival isnât threatened. Its only threats are ones it creates. Sanders paid no heed to its longstanding reign of terror on defenseless Palestinians.
Fact: Calling their freedom fighters âterroristsâ mocks their dignity, humanity, and âright to live in peace and securityâ Israel systematically denies them.
Claiming as president heâll âwork tirelessly to advance the cause of peace as a partner and as a friend to Israelâ belies reality.
No peace process exists, not now or earlier going back decades. Israel rejects it out-of-hand, pretending otherwise, wanting historic Palestine for Jews only, its people denied their fundamental rights.
Sanders knows what he wonât explain, one-sidedly supporting Israel while pretending otherwise. His voting record belies his claim about being âa friend not only to Israel, but to the Palestinian people.â When did he ever introduce legislation supporting their rights? Never!
He backs naked Israeli aggression on the phony pretext of responding to Hamas rocket attacks, used only in self-defense.
Saying he âbelieve(s) that Israel, the Palestinians, and the international community can, must, and will rise to do what needs to be done to achieve a lasting peaceâ ignores what never happened before and wonât now.
Again, Sanders knows what he wonât say, maintaining the fiction of efforts for regional peace when none exist. Washington and Israel systematically undermine them.
His formula for peace isnât reality based. After decades of Israeli state terror, slow-motion genocide affecting an entire population, punctuated by intermittent premeditated wars, apartheid worse than South Africaâs, and governance of, by and for hate-mongering Zionist zealots, how can anyone believe  it wants peace and stability.
Sanders is like all the rest, demanding âHamas and Hezbollah renounce their efforts to undermine the security of IsraelâŠPeace has to mean security for every Israeli from violence.â
Saying âattacks of all kinds against Israelâ must end is code language for wanting Palestinians denied their international law guaranteed right of self-defense.
Adding âpeace also means security (and well-being) for every Palestinian,â their right to âself-determination, (and) ending âwhat amountsâ (sic) to the occupation of Palestinian territory, establishing mutually agreed upon borders, and pulling back settlements in the West Bank (like earlier) in Gazaâ ignores no possibility of achieving any of the above.
Sanders failed to explain Ariel Sharonâs so-called disengagement from Gaza transferred its settlers to stolen Palestinian West Bank land, displacing Palestinians from whatâs rightfully theirs.
It put Jews out of harmâs way ahead of three Israeli wars of aggression on Gaza â in 2008-09, 2012 and 2014, along with frequent aerial and ground assaults, an entire population terrorized and besieged for nearly a decade with no prospect for relief.
Sanders saying âeconomic blockade of Gazaâ must end ignores its political imposition, unrelated to security concerns.
Expressing rhetorical support for âa sustainable and equitable distribution of precious water resources so (both sides) can thrive as neighborsâ ignores his one-sided support for Israel for 30 years.
He willfully lied, claiming Israelâs 2014 Gaza war followed âweeks of indiscriminate rocket fire into its territory and the kidnapping of (its) citizens.â
Operation Protective Edge was planned months in advance, naked Israeli aggression unrelated to Hamas rockets (launched only in self-defense after repeated Israeli provocations) and nonsensical kidnapping claims.
Sanders canât get his facts straight, including false claims about Hamas âconstruct(ing) a network of tunnels for military purposes.â
Theyâre built as a vital lifeline, supplying goods essential to survive, restricted or prohibited by Israelâs suffocating blockade, one of many examples of its genocidal policy â what Sanders never explains.
His address featured numerous examples of misinformation and one-sided support for Israel. Rhetorically expressing concern for Palestinian rights rang hollow.
Throughout his political career, he never cared. Why should anyone believe he turned a new leaf.
Judge him and other politicians only by their voting record. Rhetoric is meaningless.

Richard Edmondson is an author, novelist, poet, and journalist whose writings often focus on Middle East issues, the Zionist lobby, and religion. His latest novel is The Memoirs of Saint John: When the Sandstone Crumbles, a story about an archaeological team doing a dig in Syria and set amidst the current conflict in the country.
In 2014 Richard attended an International Conference on Combating Terrorism and Religious Extremism, held in Damascus. The book is part two in the Memoirs of Saint John series.
Two other books by Richard are Rising Up: Class Warfare in America from the Streets to the Airwaves, relating his experiences founding and operating an unlicensed or “pirate” FM radio station in San Francisco in the 1990s, as well as a volume of poetry entitled American Bus Stop: Essay and Poems on Hope and Homelessness.
Richard is cognizant of the words of the early Christian writer Tertullian, who in the second century-basically prognosticating the fall of the Roman Empire-wrote: “We have made merry amid the ludicrous cruelties of the noonday exhibition.”
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Comments are closed.