…by Jonas E. Alexis
Whenever New World Order agents and the controlled media make an extraordinary claim with little or no sound evidence, you can be sure that you are going to listen to bizarre things, really crazy things, and unthinkable things. You may want to grab your munchies and sit down for a while because you are going to have some fun.
This is why logic is an important tool because one needn’t be a rocket scientist or even an intellectual to realize that this world is full of nonsense. One can say that nonsense is one of the most salient features of the New World Order. In fact, once you put your thinking cap on, you will quickly realize that the New World Order is littered with inconsistencies, illogical leaps, and just plain claptrap. Logic is a dangerous tool because it can kill the New World Order and people who do not like deductive arguments and practical reason.
Here is a classic example. I wrote an article a few days ago about Donald Trump and historically argued that his stand on torture simply does not stand up to rational scrutiny. The article is scholarly documented and has no less than forty-seven references.
One commenter skipped all the references and even the arguments presented and marshalled a promiscuous and perverse attack on me personally and then VT. He didn’t even care about the actual issues being discussed at all. I seemed to have attacked the ideology of his idol. In response, he wrote that people like me support
“Satanic minded people like Sanders. By this, I mean they are never happy with anyone, not because they are perfectionists, as they never look in the mirror, but ‘transfer’ their own paranoia and sense of inadequacy to others, which materializes as a demand for a person and society that’s fit for angels, not humans.”
This is a self-defeating and ridiculous argument (if you want to call it that). This person obviously can never be happy about anyone criticizing people he likes. His response is a classic example of ad hominem attack, straw man, and red herring. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the article.
In other words, hard-core evidence will never convince a person with that kind of hubristic attitude. His mind is already made up. If you are trying to reason with a person like that, you are basically wasting your time because his mind is glued to an idea which wasn’t formed on the basis of reason but on the basis of feeling and probably ideology.
The promiscuous response assumes that I have some kind of animosity toward Donald Trump, when in fact my overarching point in all my articles is to challenge politicians and people of various stripes to apply practical reason in their thinking and in real life. The same goes for other politicians like Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. In fact, we have examined both Clinton and Sanders to the same effect. Another commenter declared:
“I am a woman… I have an IQ above average. I support Donald Trump. Every time an article such as this comes out, I send Donald Trump money, because I do not want him to read the crap written about him online and consider the fact it may just not be worth the effort. I suggest everyone else do the same.”
I again was completely shocked. Shouldn’t a person with an IQ above average focus her attention on what was actually said and at least look at the evidence and respond to it in a rational manner? If Obama starts propounding that torture is fine, should we just applaud him? Should we stay quiet? Did we support the Obama administration for allying with the Israeli regime in propounding fake evidence saying that Assad was using chemical weapons on his own people? There is a logical disconnect here. Which brings me to the central point.
Whenever logic and reason are not on your side, and whenever you have deliberately pledged allegiance to a wicked ideology, you can be sure that your destination will be the opposite of practical reason. The New World Order and its agents have already given us enough signs that this is the case. The recent debacle regarding the so-called Panama Papers is a classic example.
We all know that the New World Order and its agents have already signed a sort of diabolical pact to destroy Putin and the current Russian government. Anything will do: lies, fabrications, covert warfare, etc. We have seen how Jewish Neocons like Victoria Nuland have admitted that they spent five billion dollars destabilizing the situation in Ukraine. We have seen how Nuland herself told the EU to “fu$k” off. We have seen how Putin literally destroyed their diabolical plan in Syria. So, we expect them to be really, really mad. It is no coincidence that NWO agents would be behind this so-called Panama Papers.
For the sake of argument, let us assume for a moment that the paper is accurate. Even then, we are still confronted with insurmountable inconsistencies and illogical leaps. The anti-Putin machine declares that
“A network of secret offshore deals and vast loans worth $2bn has laid a trail to Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin… [T]hough the president’s name does not appear in any of the records…”
As journalist Robert Bridge rightly argues, “It is evidence that we have entered the latest dangerous phase of a concerted media campaign directed against Russia in general and Putin in particular – and just in time for this year’s legislative elections, which the West would certainly like to crash.”
Bridge moves on to ask that “If Putin was not mentioned by name in any of the 11 zillion Panama documents made public by the leaky database of Mossack Fonseca,” then how is it that the controlled media has universally lambasted him? Bridge again destroys the Zionist media by saying:
“Why is the West so obsessed with focusing its narrow attention span on Putin at the exception of corrupt Western leaders who only get passing mention in these hack pieces (incidentally, no American official is mentioned in any media reports regarding the Panama Papers, which is rather odd and certainly implausible since the US – as the 2008 Financial Crisis readily proved – has more than its fair share of individuals who double-park their illicit earnings in offshore havens).
“Here’s a big, fat clue: As the Telegraph dutifully reported on Monday, ‘David Cameron’s father ran an offshore fund which avoided paying tax in Britain by hiring Bahamas residents, including a bishop, to sign paperwork.’
“While it was really swell of the Telegraph and The Guardian to mention Cameron’s father among the Panama revelations, the glorification of David Cameron in these stories – despite these astounding findings – compared to the vilification of Vladimir Putin is outrageous.”
The evidence points to the conclusion that Gordon Duff was right on target again when he stated:
“The Panama Papers are a scam, real documents turned over to a Mossad run organization that now has dirt on even more people and more power to make a very nasty world an even darker and nastier place.”
If you think that Duff is completely wrong here, think about this for a moment. Let us suppose that Putin did hack at least $2 billion from offshore accounts. Do you really think that he is the biggest criminal on the block? Haven’t the Neoconservatives sent a six-trillion dollar bill to the American people?
Haven’t companies like Goldman Sachs been in the business of cheating the average American for years? Isn’t the Pentagon still training terrorist cells in Turkey? Isn’t the U.S. still manipulating the situation in Ukraine by sending “aid package” in the region? Should Putin be the first person to be going to jail? Or are we seeing again that the New World Order is failing miserably?
The so-called Panama Papers were supposed to demolish Vladimir Putin and Russia, but it probably will show that the diabolical system is naked. It also shows that the New World Order and practical reason are metaphysically mutually exclusive terms.
 I always cite sources for extraordinary claims for specific reasons.
 For the past ten years or so, I have met numerous people who have the same kind of attitude toward evidence and logic.
 Robert Bridge, “Panama leak reveals more about Western journalism than Vladimir Putin,” Russia Today, April 5, 2016.
 The NFL has been tax-exempt for decades and has garnered billions upon billions of dollars. No one ever thought that something is actually wrong. Myriah Towner, “National Football League gives up decades-old tax-exempt status as commissioner says it was a ‘distraction,’” Daily Mail, April 28, 2015.
 “Pentagon is ‘Actually Training Islamist Militants’ in Syria,” Sputnik News, April 2, 2016.
 “Ukraine to Receive Technology as Part of US Aid Package – Poroshenko,” Sputnik News, April 5, 2016.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.