NEO – America’s Elections, Cheap “Police State Theatre”



by Gordon Duff, VT Sr. Editor,   … with New Eastern Outlook, Moscow

Do we really have a Mr. Moneybags who is also Mr. Independent Tooth Fairy?
Do we really have a Mr. Moneybags Trump who is also the Mr. Independent Tooth Fairy?

[ Editor’s Note: Gordon drills down to the political bedrock on Trumpmania in his new NEO piece below, and takes no prisoners. We have been suspicious of Trump since the beginning, because we read him as a “constructed” candidate from the word go.

By that I mean he appeared to be a numero uno backed independent, when he was really a good pick for having an quietly backed ringer in such a poor field of Republican candidates, universally thought of as a wasteland of has beens and wannabes. It did not take a genius to sense a public mood of, “Any one but those we’ve already had”.

Trump also had an almost invisible staff, very little money coming in from declared contributors, and with his using the famous Trump mouth to get free press coverage, he was winning primary votes at the same spending cost of Sanders. That was another sign that he was not going to whiz away a ton of his own cash for a long shot gamble.

Clue number one came when some of his staff and advisers had to be made public and there were the NeoCon folks hedging their bet with “The Donald”, their not so dark horse independent Republican. Even the free publicity being generated over having the nomination stolen from him at the convention could be more manufactured drama, as we approach the cliffhanger showdown of Trump against the party establishment.

We are in the middle of an American version of a  political Roman circus, and if nothing else, it will be entertaining, like the rape charge put out against Trump that someone decided to play now. We had been expecting that. But Trump having to rape a babe would be like John D. Rockefeller having to borrow a quarter to take the bus. Ahhhh…I don’t think  soJim W. Dean ]


– First published  …  May 03, 2016

Who is the thumbs up really for?
Who is the thumbs up really for?

America today is a police state. Few doubt that, yet most assume that elections are honest and purposeful. That belief is not supportable by fact, nor is it a reasonable belief based on the realities of militarized police, evaporated voting rights, open corporate bribery and total surveillance.

It is probable that this election is a farce, a staged theatrical comedy, put on by the ruling powers who control the dozens of intelligence agencies, the bought and paid for Congress, the extremist courts and the militarized police army that occupies America. Let’s take a look at our sad state of affairs.

What if Donald Trump were being run for president, a man with no hope of winning, because of Bernie Sanders, a real reformer who would dismember the police state bureaucracy that now rules America?

What if Trump, hopelessly behind in the real polls, unelectable and hated in the “real world,” has bled off disaffected voters who would have put Sanders ahead of Clinton?

This is what Trump has done. Whether he knew it or not, and Trump is not the most “aware” person lapping at the trough, it is quite possible that organized crime, not just possible but very probable, has pushed this ego driven nut case into a failed run for the presidency to guarantee Hillary Clinton in the White House.

If you read some of the press, Americans are lining up behind Donald Trump and his promise to build a 100-foot wall around America, bomb Iran and cut wages to the bone. Truthfully some are, but also “truthfully” he is 20 points or more behind both Clinton and Sanders and is only winning the Republican nomination for one reason.

He is running against Ted Cruz, the foreign-born extremist that former House Speaker Boehner says is the embodiment of Lucifer himself.

Lindburgh with his new friends
Lindbergh with his new friends

This week, American presidential hopeful Donald Trump spoke to the world on his new foreign policy beliefs. His hand-picked advisory group, invariably pro-Israeli fanatics, coin the phrase “America first”, mindful of the pro-Nazi movement led by Charles Lindbergh prior to America’s entry in World War II. They obviously never went to school, or if they did, they didn’t study too hard.

Trump vowed to destroy ISIS, but he also vowed to destroy Iran as well, in order to prevent it from getting nuclear weapons. Of course, there is no evidence Iran had a nuclear program — a fact long backed up by both the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) and CIA intelligence assessments.

Trump, or his new handlers, simply made it all up. Where the judgment becomes dangerous, however, is in the failure by Trump to note recent claims by Iran that they prevented the fall of both Baghdad and Damascus to ISIS, claims that can be verified.

Trump’s belief he can destroy Iran and then go on to take on ISIS around the world, re-occupying Iraq and, of course, ending up uniting both ISIS and the current Shiite government of Iraq along with Iran, Syria, Russia and China against the United States in a shooting war Europe is quite ready to watch from the sidelines.

Trump’s policies, as pointed out by almost every analyst despite political leaning, would lead to another disastrous decade of grinding insurgency and disastrous occupation.

We have all been here before
We have all been here before

Real experts universally agree that, far from “making America great again,” the bizarre mishmash of isolationism and interventionism, all predicated on sound bites and hokum, would finish what began after the ill-fated 2000 election.

We would see the continued decline of the United States into third world “tin pot dictatorship” status. America would finally become the banana republic so many have predicted. But we are getting ahead of ourselves, just like Trump.

What is dangerous isn’t so much the things Trump says, which change from day to day, or that European leaders and American allies, not always the same folks, find his inconsistencies and clowning alarming. After all, George W. Bush was far worse, served two terms although quite probably never legally elected, and the world survived, or at least eventually it did.

Here, eight years later, the American stock markets sit near an all-time high, employment is at record levels, teen pregnancy has plummeted, crime is down and the economic bleeding brought about by the 2007-8 worldwide economic implosion remains a distant nightmare, as most American middle class families will never recover from Bush policies.

What also remains is the massive police state bureaucracy that Obama has left intact, something he may well have to answer for at some date in the future. Things have gotten “too good”, and Americans are ready for another “pump and dump,” perhaps to be brought on as an aftermath reaction to a strong dose of false flag terrorism. We’ve all been to that dance before, haven’t we?

Let’s look at reality, not “internet reality” but how things are. Most Americans or almost “most,” with current figures at 46%, not only hate Donald Trump, they fear him. Trump has attracted the white disaffected but also “attention deficit” electorate, a combination of mentally unstable, which in America you would think would be more people, uneducated and the lazy.

Is Trump being brought in to take America over the cliff again?
Is Trump being brought in to take America over the cliff again?

Trump’s domestic policies are insane. He is George W. Bush…all deregulation, filled with love and trust in the righteousness of the wealthy and powerful. He is willing to clutch onto any conspiracy theory or rumor as long as it allows corporate freeloading, big polluters and pushes down wages and workers’ rights.

What Trump is the anti-thesis of is Bernie Sanders, they are absolute and total opposites. Sanders, hated by many “Trumpites” as a “socialist Jew,” almost as bad as being a “Negro,” is the real deal.

Sanders is the only candidate to address reform, killing off the police state, ending organized crime’s stranglehold on Congress and eliminating “Citizens United.” Everything is about Citizens United. Suffice to say money runs everything in the US — everyone is for sale.

According to historian Charles Beard, in his Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, Columbia University Press, 1935, the framers of the constitution, men who were not the founding fathers but rather “counter-revolutionaries” answerable to London bankers, American government was put on the auction block long ago.

Charles Beard was one of the giants of American history with his Rise of American Civilization
Charles Beard was one of the giants of American history with his Rise of American Civilization

When in 2005, the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. the Federal Elections Commission voted in a landmark 5/4 decision to allow full and unfettered bribery by any “corporate” source, no matter the origin of funds, even from narcotics and human trafficking, the Constitution of the United States of America failed, as predicted by Beard.

Sanders and Clinton are sworn to overthrow “Citizens United,” which Trump and Cruz, perhaps because of organized crime ties, support. Were one to assume that Las Vegas gambling boss Sheldon Adelson, is “organized crime,” Adelson being the primary financier of the Republican Party, then the current election might well come into focus.

Even if you choose to ignore “gerrymandering” and attacks on voting rights, software-driven “vote flipping” has been proven over and over as the major force in American politics — proven but never reported, proven but unpunished, as is so often the case in police states.

What we do know is this, Sanders would have ended the $3 billion a year America gives to Israel. Let’s be honest, not to Israel but to Jews in Israel, not to fund a nation, but to perpetuate a military dictatorship that has disenfranchised and imprisoned its Palestinian majority despite 150 attempts by the UN Security Council to redress what every international legal expert agrees is a nearly 70-year history of war crimes.

Even clearer still is the violent opposition Israel has expressed against the election of both Sanders and even Hillary Clinton, though Sanders and Clinton enjoy almost universal support from America’s Jewish community. Explain that?

What it seems is that we have an election based not on political parties or political theory, but on “chaos theory” and the desire by an unseen but powerful group to orchestrate events. If Trump is being run to elect Clinton over Sanders, why? Who benefits?

In 2000, whatever theory about the events of 9/11 one were to ascribe to, the end result has been to create a total surveillance state out of America, where fear and hatred of government abuse is rampant and growing.

Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War that has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades and consulted with governments challenged by security issues. He’s a senior editor and chairman of the board of  Veterans Today, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. a jaded President Obama speaking at the WhiteHouse Correspondents dinner taking the piss out of an Establishment too vain to even catch their own ugly reflection in the mirror of truth as they cast a lying image before the masses to cover a hideousness of heart….. President Obama with the whole 28 pages within reach needs to be well assured of all he has backing him and strengthened instead of weakening to those staring him down and dismissing him…. he is still the President with the kill shot within his reach, and a window of opportunity too perfect to miss to save America from a sinking ship

  2. I would also have to disagree with the idea, which I have to admit I do
    not find plausible, that Trump is being run to counteract Bernie.

    “What if Trump … has bled off disaffected voters who would have put Sanders ahead
    of Clinton?”

    Well uh, “they” would have just “rigged” the process for Hillary, no? They wouldn’t
    need Trump for that. And it would not have been obvious at all, back then, that he could
    have done the job for “them” anyway.

    But no, “they” were so scared of the “Bern” that they resorted to this elaborate
    tactic to siphon votes from Bernie in the primaries. So the process is rigged
    but not so rigged that they can just do things a little more simply. Or perhaps
    they wanted the “theater” of it all. I don’t think so.

    “They” if anything, were planning on Bush v. Clinton, with either one acceptable,
    and Trump got in the way.

    • Speaking of siphoning votes, Kristol is going to run a third party candidate.
      This is with the intent of giving it to Hillary over Trump. Somehow he doesn’t
      seem to think the purpose of Trump’s nomination is to give the election to Clinton
      (after having been used to prevent the fearsome Bernie from becoming the nominee). No,
      he fears (correctly) that Trump would beat Hillary in an unrigged or “not rigged
      enough” general election, and is attempting to counteract that.

  3. Turned on this guy 4 days ago Mr. Duff. Sorry I couldn’t wait for you on this one, not that I ever supported him but turning on him meant turning on my own family. A little excerpt from my Facebook Fatwa ‘you all need to face facts, those of you who have not been zombified, there is no coming back from approving of this abomination [the Chumps picture is below] and every day I am more and more inclined to believe the best way to deal with his fans is in the same manner the living dead are dealt with on TV and in the movies, the day you are strong enough to face that cold hard fact is the day you have taken the first step in taking this world back from the living dead…’

    • I was thinking push the entire Black and Hispanic vote into the democratic camp, then Hillary and the Chump split the White vote and Hillary waltz’s into the White House but I was wrong. They are really going to put the Chump in the White House. From Many Moons, an insert and I know you know what that is, “ White house, Jim Crow” … When they gave him the nomination today it suddenly hit me like a ton of bricks, not only are they going to start a war with Iran,China and Russia, they are going to start a Civil war internally with Blacks and Hispanics. Very well, I’m prepared to pay the ticket for the trip there. Hope their prepared to pay the one for the return fare…

  4. Things may be rigged. If so, it is most probable that Trump does not know
    it. In the “real world” Trump utterly demolishes Hillary. In the
    “other kind” of world, Hillary wins.

    This article seems to be in tension with another you recently wrote:

    “Now that the long running Israeli-Saudi partnership is made public, this material
    (the 28 pages) is considered a devastating threat, one worth rigging a presidential
    election over and, if deemed necessary, assassinating any candidate who can’t be

    In that article you insinuate that Clinton (as well as Trump) might be someone who
    “can’t be controlled” in the relevant way. I am uncertain verging on highly doubtful
    that you actually believe that of Hillary. Clinton can be controlled and is under no
    risk of assassination by the “powers that be.”

    The only threat to the ruling class is Trump. You need only read the weekly standard
    and the endless diatribes over the past few months out of the Post and Times.

    Yes those articles could have been “placed there” so that the fake “outsider” would seem
    more of an outsider.

    But this is just tortured reasoning.

    If the election is going to be rigged, it is going to happen downstream. If it is rigged,
    you won’t be seeing Trump in the White House, as you rightly suggested in that earlier piece.

  5. I must make issue of your assertion that Trump’s “hand-picked advisory group, invariably pro-Israeli fanatics… never went to school, or if they did, they didn’t study too hard”. Hell Gordon, they didn’t need to study the subject matter to which your point refers. They wrote the book for the “pro-Nazi movement”. The Khazarian Joos planned it all. For the most part though, you are spot-on. It’s common knowledge that the elections are rigged anyway. The planners don’t even make a concerted effort to hide their lawlessness which could be the fuse for the rampant civil unrest that is edging closer to blast-off every day. Everything is going as planned. Divide and conquer.

  6. To: Gordon Duff: unrelated but IMPORTANT!! I tried to reach your offices several times to bring THIS to their Attention:
    The United States has signed a military cooperation agreement with Senegal that allows “the permanent presence” of American troops in the West African country.
    Sources familiar with the subject said the deal, which was clinched on Monday, would give US forces access to many areas in Senegal, such as airports and military installations, allegedly to respond to security or health needs.
    The agreement allows for “the permanent presence of American soldiers in Senegal” and aims to “face up to the common difficulties in security” in the region, Senegal’s Foreign Minister Mankeur Ndiaye said during the signing ceremony alongside the US Ambassador to Dakar James Zumwalt.
    This is NOT old news…..
    And Gordon, it is a bit shamefull, that VT DID NOT EVEN Mention this! Can’t quite believe that this one slid by your eyes. And the irony of it is, it came from an other reliably legitimate News source! This action, should have rated big time front page VT headlines, as it DOES verify that stupidity reigns, and “We’re still at it”!! There are more of these such tidbits out there, but looks like sometimes we have to find them by our
    efforts, in searching for the truth. Thanks for the ear…

  7. Been waiting for this article, thanks Gordon. The global planners have out done themselves, savage, jones, hanity, levin, beck, Limbaugh, house of cards and contested conventions, the spectacle is tremendously different than 2000/2008, if they are pushing Hillary, is it because she would accomplish what a Jeb! Presidency would have attempted?

  8. Beyond the basic, and therefore the obvious, I don’t feel comfortable discussing presidential politics. Donald Trump finally answered Bernie Sanders on climate change Monday–arguing that global warming is due to the thermal pollution produced by nuclear power plants. Hopefully, Trump and Sanders will talk soon. Predictions are another word for fantasies, but I”ll venture one: Biden and Sanders in 2016!

  9. I said this months ago, almost chapter and verse. Only now, as it comes closer, I’m not so sure that this won’t backfire. Obviously someone, somewhere, thought it a good idea to prop up someone who wants to be President about as much as I do…lol….Surely this was the only way possible for Clinton to even get a sniff. Yet when you stop and think about it…..where were all the Dems? Why none more grounded brought to the forefront? Just can’t put my finger on it. This seems all too simple but, maybe it points to how dumb downed the average American truly is.


Comments are closed.