…by Jonas E. Alexis
Two of the most frivolous and irresponsible charges that were leveled against Putin when he began to challenge the New World Order were that 1) he was Hitler reborn[1] and 2) that he would not sit down and have a frank dialogue with people who disagree with him.
The Ukrainian journalist Vitaly Portnikov, editor and the columnist of the Israel’s most-popular Russian-language newspaper Vesti and Moscow-based Evreiskie novosti, perversely declared last year:
âDialogue with Russia is possible only if the West approaches it as âa normal countryâ and refuses to âindulge [Moscowâs] madnessâ that Russia must have a veto over the actions of Russiaâs neighbors.â
Nothing could be further from the truth. Portnikov can get away with saying crazy things like this because he is obviously an Israeli agent. He also has to ignore everything Putin has said and done and come up with a patently incoherent system. How is it incoherent?
In his October 2014 speech, Putin again put the intellectual equation on the lap of New World Order agents by saying:
âWe will have a free discussion afterwards and I will be happy to answer your questions and would also like to use my right to ask you questions. And during the upcoming discussion let someone try to disprove the argument that I just set out.â
Bang! Putin here just answered the New World order complaints and propaganda in just two sentences.
In a democratic society or in a rational universe, frank dialogue, arguments and counter-arguments are to be presented and discussed without threat of reprisal, and people of reason will ally themselves with the truth.
The West was able to produce people like Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, Kant, Hegel, precisely because the West was essentially framed in a rational world which views truth as the ultimate pursuit in any discipline. The Greeks used to call it logos.[2] As Plato puts it in The Republic:
âAnd donât you think that being deceived about the truth is a bad thing, while having a grasp of the truth is good? And donât you think that having a grasp of the truth is having a belief that matches the way things are?â[3]
So, the logical equation is pretty simple: truth is good and ought to be pursued at all cost, and lies and deceptions are bad and evil and ought to be avoided at all cost.
As a corollary, having a grasp of the truth and following the truth wherever it may lead is actually freedom. As Christ told some of his listeners: âYou will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.â
Obviously Putin was going back to practical reason and the traditional history of the West when he asked his listeners to have a frank dialogue, where arguments and counter-arguments presented, refuted, or defended.
How did New World Order agents respond? Well, none of them could logically and contextually refute any of the points that Putin raised throughout his speech.
In fact, it got so bad that Putin had to ask BBC journalist John Simpson, âHave you any common senseâ? This was a response to Simpsonâs comment that Russia is an aggressor. Putin literally decimated the poor guy with one fact after another, which obviously left the audience in complete shock. NWO agents probably realized after that event that they should never get into a âfact competitionâ or political debate with Putin. And they never did.[4]

In his speech, Putin argued that whenever New World Order agents âneed to justify illegal interventionâ to topple âinconvenient regimes,â they use all kinds of illegal activities under the flavor of âdemocracyâ and âfreedomâ and then âblackmailâ any leader who disagrees with them. He added:
âIt is not for nothing that âbig brotherâ is spending billions of dollars on keeping the whole world, including its own closest allies, under surveillance.â
This again is an implicit attack on the diabolical ideology which both Israel and the United States have been pursuing for years.[5] But this diabolical ideology has never brought moral or political docility. It has brought nothing but chaos, said Putin:
âInstead of settling conflicts it leads to their escalation, instead of sovereign and stable states we see the growing spread of chaos, and instead of democracy there is support for a very dubious public ranging from open neo-fascists to Islamic radicals.
âWhy do they support such people? They do this because they decide to use them as instruments along the way in achieving their goals but then burn their fingers and recoil. I never cease to be amazed by the way that our partners just keep stepping on the same rake, as we say here in Russia, that is to say, make the same mistake over and over.â
In other words, NWO agents think that the world isnât watching what they are doing. They deliberately delude themselves into thinking that they are acting rationally, when in fact their evil work has been exposed over and over.
âDouble standards,â Putin argued, is not and never has been the way to move forward. âOur partners expressed agreement, but a little time passed and we ended up back where we started. First there was the military operation in Iraq, then in Libya, which got pushed to the brink of falling apart. Why was Libya pushed into this situation? Today it is a country in danger of breaking apart and has become a training ground for terrorists.â
After exposing the so-called Syrian rebels as a terrorist cell, after linking them with other terrorists such as ISIS, Putin added:
âIn Iraq, after Saddam Hussein was toppled, the stateâs institutions, including the army, were left in ruins. We said back then, be very, very careful. You are driving people out into the street, and what will they do there?
âWhat was the result? Tens of thousands of soldiers, officers and former Baath Party activists were turned out into the streets and today have joined the rebelsâ ranks. Perhaps this is what explains why the Islamic State group has turned out so effective?
âRussia warned repeatedly about the dangers of unilateral military actions, intervening in sovereign statesâ affairs, and flirting with extremists and radicals. We insisted on having the groups fighting the central Syrian government, above all the Islamic State, included on the lists of terrorist organizations. But did we see any results? We appealed in vain.â
Putin had to pull the New World Order cat out of the bag by saying: âthis kind of unstable construction has shown its inability to fight the real threats such as regional conflicts, terrorism, drug trafficking, religious fanaticism, chauvinism and neo-Nazism. At the same time, it has opened the road wide for inflated national pride, manipulating public opinion and letting the strong bully and suppress the weak.â
If Putinâs speech is not an explicit attack on the New World Order and its diabolical agenda in the political sphere, then nothing is. New World Order agents, Putin said, are âincreasingly divorced from reality and are in contradiction with the worldâs diversity.â
NWO agents, as we have relentlessly argued in the past, have no respect for law, practical reason, and ultimately the truth. In that sense, they are essentially satanic. In one way or another, some writers have indirectly and unintentionally pointed this out.
For example, Christopher A. Preble has lamented that the United States has a long tradition of âengaging in subterfuge, misdirection and/or outright deceptionâ in the political realm.[6] And this goes back to World War II: âDuring World War IIâŠPresident Roosevelt referred to Joseph Stalin as gentle âUncle Joeâ to polish the Soviet leaderâs public persona in the United States.â[7]
Keep in mind that Roosevelt was polishing the man who had previously slaughtered at least ten million people within less than ten years! By 1937, Stalin had already starved and executed as many as ten million peasants.[8] This period in historyâfrom 1929-1937âis known as the Red Holocaust.[9] By 1938, a total of 9.7 million perished, and from 1939 until 1953, another 9 million lost their lives.[10] From 1937-1939, Stalin executed 50,000 clergymen alone.[11]
Stalinâs terrorism began as early as 1918, when âhe ordered the execution of all suspected counter-revolutionaries. Stalin burned villages in the countryside to intimidate the peasants and discourage bandit raids on food supplies a decade before he became Red tsar.â[12] Lenin himself said that the Soviet government was built âdirectly on force, not limited by anything, not restricted by any laws, nor any absolute rules.â[13]
Even after World War II, Stalin did not stop terrorizing the peasants.[14] Minority groups such as the Greeks, Germans, Turks, Orthodox Christians, Lithuanians, and Vlasovites also fell prey to Stalinâs ethnic cleansing.[15]
So, it was morally irresponsible for Roosevelt to align with the man who brought about the greatest mass killing in history. But as the saying goes, those who do not know their history are condemned to repeat it. The United States is still allying with terrorist regimes like Saudi Arabia and Turkey. As we have seen in the past, Turkey is in bed with ISIS,[16] and ISIS has been known to literally bury âalive dozens of defectors who fled Iraq battlefield.â[17]
Now here is the rub: Human Rights Watch has recently reported that Turkish border guards have been shooting at Syrian refugeesâmen, women, and children who they say are fleeing the war zone.[18]
Imagine the reaction in the entire world if any Western country happens to do exactly that. Wouldnât the Soros of this world go berserk? Again, we are continuing to face enormous contradictions, and those contradictions are possible only in a diabolical universe. As Preble again puts it,
âMore often, though, U.S. partnerships with questionable characters harm Americaâs moral standing while doing little (if anything) to improve U.S. security.â[19]
The pathetic thing is that NWO agents think no one is smart enough to discover this diabolical plan. They really think that all Western leaders are zombies. Look at how they thoroughly neutralized to Angela Merkel. Look at how they brag about this in various ways.[20]

Merkel was used as a marionette, but now she has to deal with at least â40 terrorism suspectsâ who may have âentered the country with refugees.â[21]
Once again, had Merkel listened to Putin, she wouldnât have found herself in this mess. Had she allied with the man whom Kevin Barrett has said is putting âthe fear of God in the New World Order,â she would have been much happier today. Much of the country would have loved her.
But because Merkel has made a pack with the New World Order, Germany has already lost faith in her.[22] Last January, they were even asking her to quit over the handling of the refugee crisis,[23] which has created nothing but chaos in Germany and elsewhere. The only people who benefited from this chaos are the Soros of this world.
Putin was wise enough to banish Soros from entering Russia. After all, Soros, along with other Jewish oligarchs such as Jeffrey Sachs, did play an enormously powerful influence on the destruction of the Russian economy in the late 1980s and 1990s. As E. Michael Jones puts it,
âSachs was put in charge of Yeltsinâs band of Chicago Boys and together they orchestrated a looting expedition of the likes of which the world had not seen since the Reformation. By the time it was over, 225,000 state owned companies would be auctioned off at pennies on the dollar of their real value.
âAfter Yeltsin opened the Russian economy to their predations, Chicago Boys like Stanley Fischer, who was managing director at the IMF at the time, and Lawrence Summers of the Clinton Administration and soon to be president of Harvard University, rushed in and sank their teeth deeply into the carcass of rich state owned companies.
âThe value of those companies was transferred to a âclique of noveaux billionairesâ who came to be known as âthe oligarchs.â The oligarchs then teamed up with the Chicago Boys and âstripped the country of nearly everything of value, moving the enormous profits offshore at a rate of $2 billion a month.â State-owned Russian companies were âprivatizedâ at pennies on the dollar. Yukos, which now earns $3 billion a year in revenues, was sold off for $309 million.â[24]
That looting expedition left Russians, as The Nation itself put it back in 1998,
“worse off economically. The privatization drive that was supposed to reap the fruits of the free market instead helped to create a system of tycoon capitalism run for the benefit of a corrupt political oligarchy that has appropriated hundreds of millions of dollars of Western aid and plundered Russiaâs wealth.”[25]
[1] See for example Paul Johnson, âIs Vladimir Putin Another Adolf Hitler?,â Forbes, April 15, 2014; Garry Kasparov, âVladimir Putin and the Lessons of 1938,â Politico, March 16, 2014; âHitler, Putin and the first lesson of history,â Daily Mail, February 11, 2015; âLithuanian President: ‘Comparisons between Vladimir Putin and Hitler are spot on,ââ Independent, June 24, 2014; Charles lane, âIs Vladimir Putin truly a modern-day Hitler?,â Washington Post, March 5, 2014; Ian Traynor and Ewen MacAskill, âDavid Cameron warns of ‘appeasing Putin as we did Hitler,ââ Guardian, September 2, 2014; Michael B. Kelley, â12 Prominent People Who Compared Putin To Hitler Circa 1938,â Business Insider, May 22, 2014; âReport: Hillary Clinton Says Putin Behaving Like Adolf Hitler,â NBC News, March 5, 2014.
[2] See for example Eva Brann, The Logos of Heraclitus (Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books, 2011).
[3] Plato, The Republic (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 116.
[4] “Westâs Refusal of Dialogue May Lead to Ukraineâs Membership in NATO â Putin,â Sputnik News, May 23, 2015.
[5] See for example Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras and Ewen MacAskill, âNSA shares raw intelligence including Americans’ data with Israel,â Guardian, September 11, 2013; Jeff Stein, âIsrael Flagged as Top Spy Threat to Us. In New Snowden/NSA Document,â Newsweek, August 4, 2014; Gili Cohen, âNSA File Reveals Israel Behind 2008 Assassination of Syrian General,â Haaretz, July 15, 2015. Glenn Greenwald, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2014).
[6] Christopher A. Preble, âWhy Cover for Saudi Arabia?,â National Interest, April 22, 2016.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Steven Rosefielde, Red Holocaust (New York: Routledge, 2010), 40.
[9] Ibid., 50.
[10] Ibid., 20.
[11] Ibid., 125.
[12] Ibid., 42.
[13] Quoted in Paul Craig Roberts, The Neoconserative Threat to World Order: America’s Perilous War for Hegemony (Atlanta: Clarity Press, 2015), 195.
[14] Rosefielde, Red Holocaust, 46.
[15] Ibid., 79-80.
[16] âWiretapped calls reveal communication between Turkish officers and ISIS â report,â Russia Today, December 24, 2015.
[17] âISIS buries alive dozens of defectors who fled Iraq battlefield â reports,â Russia Today, May 11, 2016.
[18] â’Truly appalling’: Turkish border guards continue to shoot Syrian refugees, HRW says,â Russia Today, May 10, 2016.
[19] Preble, âWhy Cover for Saudi Arabia?,â National Interest, April 22, 2016.
[20] See for example Nir Gontarz, âIsraeli Diplomat in Berlin: Maintaining German Guilt About Holocaust Helps Israel,â Haaretz, June 25, 2015.
[21] âGerman Police: 40 Terrorism Suspects May Have Entered The Country With Refugees,â Huffington Post, May 11, 2016.
[22] Peter Foster, âHow Germany fell out of love with Angela Merkel,â Telegraph, February 12, 2016; âThe Lonely Chancellor: Merkel Under Fire as Refugee Crisis Worsens,â Spiegel International, November 2, 2015.
[23] âAlmost half of Germans want Angela Merkel to quit over her handling of the refugee crisis,â Independent, January 31, 2016.
[24] E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 1352-1353.
[25] Janine R. Wedel, “The Harvard Boys Do Russia,” The Nation, May 14, 1998.

Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Comments are closed.