…by Jonas E. Alexis
The Neo-Bolsheviks are currently in deep dodos. A former member of the 9/11 commission by the name of John F. Lehman has recently declared that there was incontrovertible evidence showing that Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11. Lehman said:
“There was an awful lot of participation by Saudi individuals in supporting the hijackers, and some of those people worked in the Saudi government.”
Where is Georgy boy when you need him? When the Neocons were spreading the virus that Saddam had WMDs, Bush declared quite explicitly:
“I’m going to kick this sorry mother fu$ker all over the Mideast.”
John Prados, co-director of the Iraq Documentation Project, noted that the record plainly “demonstrates that the Bush administration swiftly abandoned plans for diplomacy to curb fancied Iraqi adventurism by means of sanctions, never had a plan subsequent to that except for a military solution, and enmeshed British allies in a manipulation of public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic designed to generate support for a war.”
Jewish Neocons such as Richard Perle, David Wurmser, and Douglas Feith crafted a policy for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in which they advised him to “focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq—an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right.”
Bill Kristol even informed the Clinton administration that “Saddam Must Go.” Even before going to war, Donald Rumsfeld declared, “Sanctions [against Iraq] are fine, but what we really want to think about is going after Saddam. Imagine what the region would look like without Saddam and with a regime aligned with U.S. interests. It would change everything in the region and beyond it. It would demonstrate what U.S. policy is all about.”
As it turns out, Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. Saudi Arabia is an accomplice. Will Bush ask Obama to “kick this sorry mother fu$ker all over the Mideast”?
Will the Neocons ask the current administration to nuke them? Will Jonah Goldberg start saying that we need to pick up this “crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business”?
Although I do not agree with the Neocons, they will make at least a rational point if they even remotely suggest that Saudi Arabia ought to pay for this treason. But if they continue to defend the terrorist state, as they have done in the past, or if they remain silent throughout this period, then this would be another infallible sign that they are working with a really diabolical system.
In response to the fact that Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11, Lee Smith of the Jewish Neoconservative flagship The Weekly Standard has recently declared that “the Saudis have been a valuable partner in fighting Islamic terrorism, providing intelligence that prevented attacks on the United States.”
In a similar vein Jewish Neocon Max Boot declared last month that Saudi Arabia “remains as vital as ever to the health of our trading allies in Europe and Asia.” Boot even concluded that “we can’t simply abandon them out of spite or out of unrealistic hopes that Iran will suddenly shed its ‘Death to America’ mantra.”
You see, this diabolical equation can only work for special cases, namely, for terrorist regimes that people like Boot and Smith like. It can never work for countries like Iran because the Neo-Bolsheviks have a different agenda for those countries, despite the fact that Iran hasn’t invaded a single country in centuries.
It is reported that the FBI itself has “80,000 files on possible Saudi links to 9/11,” but those files mean nothing to the Neocons because they still consider Saudi Arabia an ally. I have been able to find one Neocon who actually says that Saudi Arabia is a terrorist state. David French of the National Review declared,
“We’ve long known that our so-called alliance with Saudi Arabia has put us in bed with the devil. It’s time the American people learned how evil that devil truly is.”
Well, Mr. French, who has been persuading the American people that Saudi Arabia is a friend and ally? Who is really behind this diabolical system? French obviously cannot answer those questions because that would put him into trouble. In fact, when the war in Iraq turned out to be a complete disaster, French, instead of writing a letter of apology, wrote an article entitled: “No, I’m Not Sorry for Supporting the Invasion of Iraq.”
In other words, evidence after evidence will never convince people like French.
We do know that Israel and Saudi Arabia have worked against the interest of America in the past, particularly when the United States was trying to come up with a peaceful resolution with Iran. Gordon Duff again was right on target when he reported that both Israel and Turkey “nearly burned down the world in 2013.” In fact, the Neocons did convince the Bush administration that Saudi Arabia was a friend and not a foe.
What we are seeing again and again is that the so-called war on terror is a smokescreen. It was and is still being spearheaded by the Neo-Bolsheviks, who obviously want to create chaos all over the Middle East and much of the West. They demonize countries they do not like and then praise countries that espouse their essentially Talmudic ideology.
Saudi Arabia is a terrorist state? Nah, they say. It is a friend and ally. Iran is trying to come up with a peaceful resolution with the United States? Nah, they again propound. Iran is up to something.
This is obviously an intolerable situation, and the Neo-Bolsheviks and their great grandparents have been persecuted throughout the centuries not because of who they are but because of what they do and practice.
But whenever you hear either a puppet or a Neocon talk about “Iran’s unstoppable march toward dominance,” you can be sure that he is a complete buffoon who has been paid to say crazy and dumb things, for Iran has never been reaching out to the West for decades, all to no avail.
Moreover, Daesh terrorists have been secretly treated at Turkish hospitals, and no Neocon or puppet has said a damn thing about this. And those losers want to talk about “Iran’s dominance”? These people certainly need to get a copy of philosopher Harry G. Frankfurt’s book.
 “Saudi officials were ‘supporting’ 9/11 hijackers, commission member says,” Guardian, May 12, 2016.
 Michael Isikoff and David Corn, Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War (New York: Random House, 2006), 3.
 Dan Froomkin, “The Two Most Essential, Abhorrent, Intolerable Lies of George W. Bush’s Memoir,” Huffington Post, November 22, 2010.
 Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 1053.
 Quoted in Conor Friedersdorf, “The Real Radicals of the Iraq War: Its Proponents,” Atlantic, March 6, 2013.
 Lee Smith, “Hit Job,” Weekly Standard, May 2, 2016.
 Max Boot, “The State of Saudi-U.S. Relations,” Commentary, April 19, 2016.
 “FBI has 80,000 files on possible Saudi links to 9/11 – report,” Russia Today, May 12, 2016.
 David French, “Can We Handle the Truth About Saudi Arabia and 9/11?,” National Review, April 12, 2016.
 David French, “No, I’m Not Sorry for Supporting the Invasion of Iraq,” National Review, August 14, 2014.
 This is why Civilta Cattolica declares that people like him should never be allowed to get involved in politics precisely because they will destroy the political order.
 Bob Dreyfuss, “The Israel-Saudi Alliance Against the US-Iran Talks,” The Nation, October 25, 2013.
 Ivan Eland, “Saudi Arabia: Friend, Foe, or Neither?,” CATO Institute, August 13, 2002.
 Mohammed Nuruzzaman, “Iran’s Unstoppable March Toward Dominance,” National Interest, May 12, 2016.
 See for example Trita Parsi, A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012); Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007); Gareth Porter, Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare (Charlottesville: Just World Books, 2014).
 “EXCLUSIVE: Daesh Terrorists Secretly Treated at Turkish Hospital,” Sputnik News, May 13, 2016.
 Harry G. Frankfurt, On Bullshit (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005). In his subsequent book, Frankfurt states: “bullshitters, although they represent themselves as being engaged simply in conveying information, are not engaged in that enterprise at all. Instead, and most essentially, they are fakers and phonies who are attempting by what they say to manipulate the opinions and attitudes of those to whom they speak. What they are about primarily, therefore, is whether what they say is effective in accomplishing this manipulation. Correspondingly, they are more or less indifferent to whether what they say is true or whether it is false.” Harry G. Frankfurt, On Truth (New York: Knopf, 2006), 3-4.