…by Jonas E. Alexis
Russia continues to show ISIS that they will have to taste their own bitter medicine in Syria. Since last September, the terrorist group which was purported to decimate the Assad government is now being decimated by Russia. Evgeny Lukyanov, the deputy head of Russia’s top security body, has said:
“We estimate that at the beginning of our operation Al-Nusra Front and Islamic State possessed about 80,000 fighters, of whom 28,000 (35 percent) have already been eliminated. This is [the result of] our actions together with the Syrian Army.
“There were people predicting that it [Russia’s anti-terrorist operation in Syria] would result in another Afghanistan or something like that. That would never be. There are only limited military plans.”
It is pretty obvious that New World Order agents do not like what Russia has been doing in Syria and elsewhere. Their plan was to remove Assad from power as soon as possible, but Assad is here to stay. He ain’t moving.
Obviously NATO does not like that. Obviously that is one reason why they have been moving to Russia’s borders illegally. What’s even more risible is that they move to Russia’s territory unlawfully and then turn around and blame Russia for being “aggressive”! Perhaps Russia needs send NATO an ultimatum saying that they have the military mechanism to control them.
In any event, Russia, Lukyanov added, has changed the political equation in Syria, and “only those politically motivated could deny that fact or interpret it differently.”
We all know by now who those “political motivated” are. They are New World Order agents and Satanists who simply refuse to act according to the dictate of practical reason in the political firmament. They want bloodshed by all means, and they are not going to be ripped by anything logical or sensible.
As we have shown in the past, one of those flaming Satanists is none other than Jewish Neocon Daniel Pipes, who postulate in 2013 that the West needed to support both the Assad government and the Syrian rebels/terrorists so that they could end up killing each other. Lest you think that Jonas E. Alexis is just taking Pipes out of context, listen to Pipes’ own words again:
“The West should prevent either side in the civil war from emerging victorious by helping whichever side is losing, so as to prolong their conflict. This policy recommendation of ‘helping whichever side is losing’ sounds odd, I admit, but it is strategic.”
Whether Pipes likes it or not, he is indeed a Satanist wearing a nice suit. Robert D. Hare would probably call him a thorough psychopath because he has obviously buried his conscience beneath the avalanche of a diabolical ideology. Pipes’ essentially Talmudic statement would almost certainly make Antorn Lavey blush.
Pipes also proves that the Ayatollah Khomeini was right on target when he advanced “the Great Satan” idea to describe how America has been used to subjugate “the deprived and oppressed people of the world.” Khomeini continued to say (and his lecture was delivered in 1980!):
“There is no crime America will not commit in order to maintain its political, economic, cultural, and military domination of those parts of the world where it predominates.
“It exploits the oppressed people of the world by means of the large-scale propaganda campaigns that are coordinated for it by international Zionism. By means of its hidden and treacherous agents, it sucks the blood of the defenseless people as if it alone, together with its satellites, had the right to live in this world.”
But Pipes is far from alone. There are other Satanists out there who have already taken a similar view. We have already examined the work of Jewish Neocon Jonah Goldberg, who said explicitly:
“Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.
“The United States needs to go to war with Iraq because it needs to go to war with someone in the region and Iraq makes the most sense.
“There is nothing we want to see happen in the Middle East that can be accomplished through talking around long tables festooned with bottled water and fresh fruit at Swiss hotels, that cannot be accomplished faster and more permanently through war. But there is plenty that cannot be achieved by such gabfests that can only be achieved through war.
“Wouldn’t an invasion of Iraq result in instability in the region? Yes. But in this context, instability is more likely to be good than bad.”
What are the results of picking up “some small crappy little country” and throwing it “against the wall”?
Well, you get a six-trillion dollar war, which has already begun to suck the blood out of virtually every single American. You get sodomy in places like Abu Ghraib. You get soldiers literally raping little kids in front of their mothers. You get women being gang-raped by U.S. soldiers in places like Iraq. You get U.S. soldiers ignoring “sexual abuse of boys by Afghan allies.” You get at least 360,000 U.S. soldiers coming home with brain injuries. You get terrorism boiling up virtually all over the Middle East.
You finally get a mad man and a psychopath from Tel Aviv telling us all that the 9/11 attack was good for Israel because it opened the door for New World Order agents to perpetuate useless and aimless wars for Israel. What if you resent this diabolical enterprise, particularly the debacle in Iraq?
Well, Jewish Neocon David Horowitz will have a word with you. Horowitz will have to tell you this:
“[T]his is a war whose aims and purposes make it very hard to understand how anyone who is a supporter of human rights, or who believes in freedom, could be against it. In four years, George Bush has liberated nearly 50 million people in two Islamic countries.
“He has stopped the filling of mass graves and closed down the torture chambers of an oppressive regime. He has encouraged the Iraqis and the people of Afghanistan to begin a political process that give them rights they have not enjoyed in 5,000 years…”
This is absolutely madness. What Horowitz ends up saying here is that what is bad for the rest of the world is good for Neocons like him, and what is good for the rest of the world is bad for the Neocons. In other words, it is a complete reversal of the social and moral order.
What a coincidence that St. Paul had already dealt with people like Horowitz in the first century and said that they “both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men.”
As St. John implicitly articulates, reasonable people will always be at war with people like Horowitz because they have metaphysically and categorically rejected Logos and have embraced an essentially diabolical system which has crippled them morally, intellectually, and spiritually. This is one reason why they have been persecuted through the centuries, and the history books are full of cases where their rebellion against authorities led to one bloody retribution after another.
Jewish historiographers Heinrich Graetz and Solomon Grayzel write that when Jewish revolutionaries revolted against Rome and slaughtered 240,000 Greeks on the island of Cyprus in 115, the Greeks in return slaughtered virtually every Jew on the island. This was not an isolated case. From A.D. 66 to A.D. 135 and beyond, Jewish rebellion led to one sad reprisal after another. E. Michael Jones writes,
“The normally docile Jews in Egypt were also seized with revolutionary fervor, indiscriminately massacring Greeks and Romans. After plundering towns near Alexandria, the Jews boldly attacked the Roman army under the general Lupus.
“In their first encounter, the revolutionary spirit of the Jews triumphed over the military experience of the Romans, and Lupus fled. When terrorized Greeks and Romans took to ship on the Nile, the Jews followed them bent on revenge.
“The historian Appian, living then in Alexandria, wrote an account that ‘gives some idea of the terror excited by the Jewish populations.’ The Jews ‘are said to have eaten the flesh of the captive Greeks and Romans, to have smeared themselves in the skins torn off them.’”
What is the solution to all this mess? People ought to be trialed and punished for their crimes. The problem is that we have been allowing what Preston James calls “The Khazarian Mafia” to rule the West without any regard to the moral law. If Ted Bundy can go to jail and be executed for killing a couple of people, why aren’t we putting the “Khazarian Mafia” behind bars? What are we to do if they continue to slaughter thousands upon thousands of people in the Middle East and elsewhere in the name of “democracy” and “freedom”?
Perhaps it is time for the West to go back to Sicut Iudeis non, which is counter-revolutionary and which protected the West for centuries against the racist and diabolical ideology of the criminal gang.
 “Russia killed 28,000 militants in Syria, third of all ISIS forces – Russian deputy security chief,” Russia Today, May 24, 2016.
 Dave Majumdar, “Why NATO Should Fear Russia’s Mysterious Terminator Fighting Vehicle,” National Interest, May 25, 2016; see also Pepe Escobar, “Beware what you wish for: Russia is ready for war,” Russia Today, May 22, 2016.
 “Russia killed 28,000 militants in Syria, third of all ISIS forces – Russian deputy security chief,” Russia Today, May 24, 2016.
 Daniel Pipes, “Support the Syrian Rebels?,” National Review, May 12, 2013.
 Robert D. Hare, Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us (New York: The Guildford Press, 1993).
 Quoted in E. Michael Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars, July/August, 2015.
 Quoted in Conor Friedersdorf, “The Real Radicals of the Iraq War: Its Proponents,” Atlantic, March 6, 2013; for similar stories, see also “Women Tortured And Raped In Iraqi Prisons, Human Rights Watch Says,” Huffington Post, February 6, 2014.
 David Lazarus, “Iraq war cost: $6 trillion. What else could have been done?,” LA Times, March 18, 2013; Michael B Kelley and Geoffrey Ingersoll, “The Iraq War Could Cost More Than $6 Trillion,” Business Insider, March 14, 2013; Bob Dreyfuss, “The $6 Trillion Wars,” The Nation, March 29, 2013; “Iraq War Cost U.S. More Than $2 Trillion, Could Grow to $6 Trillion, Says Watson Institute Study,” Huffington Post, March 14, 2013.
 For scholarly studies, see Karen J. Geenberg and Joshua L. Dratel, eds., The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Lila Rajiva, The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2005); Mark Danner, Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror (New York: New York Review of Books, 2004); Dana Priest and Joe Stephens, “Secret World of U.S. Interrogation,” Washington Post, May 11, 2004; for similar reports, see Jane Mayer, “The Black Sites: A Rare Look inside the C.IA.’s Secret Interrogation Program,” New Yorker, August 13, 2007; Craig Whitlock, “Jordan’s Spy Agency: Holding Cell for the CIA,” Washington Post, December 1, 2007. Jane Mayer, The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals (New York: Anchor Books, 2009).
 John Vibes, “Classified Evidence: US Soldiers Raped Boys In Front Of Their Mothers,” MintPress News, December 19, 2014.
 Brian Ross, Maddy Sauer, and Justin Rood, “Victim: Gang-Rape Cover-Up by U.S., Halliburton/KBR,” ABC News, December 10, 2007.
 Joseph Goldstein, “U.S. Soldiers Told to Ignore Sexual Abuse of Boys by Afghan Allies,” NY Times, September 20, 2015.
 Gregg Zoroya, “360,000 veterans may have brain injuries,” USA Today, March 5, 2009.
 Jessica Stern, “The Invasion of Iraq Was an Engine of Terrorist Growth,” U.S. News & World Report, March 20, 2013; http://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/files/cow/imce/papers/2013/Terrorism%20after%20the%202003%20Invasion%20of%20Iraq.pdf; see also “Iraq is still bleeding 10 years after Saddam Hussein’s capture,” Telegraph, December 12, 2013; Becky Evans, “Has the War on Terror failed? Number of terrorist attacks QUADRUPLE in decade after 9/11,” Daily Mail, December 4, 2012.
 “Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good for Israel,” Haaretz, April 16, 2008.
 For a scholarly study on similar issue, see John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Staus & Giroux, 2007).
 David Horowitz, “Why We Were in Iraq,” FrontPageMag.com, March 21, 2013.
 For a historical study on this, see E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008).
 Heinrich Graetz History of the Jews, Vol. 2 (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1896), 397; Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews: From the Babylonian Exile to the Establishment of Israel (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947), 180.
 Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 48.
 E. Michael Jones has an entire chapter on this issue in Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014).
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.