…by Jonas E. Alexis & Mark Dankof
Stephen Kinzer, a journalist and a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University, said last February that we must all thank Russia for saving Syria. Kinzer added that “Moscow has shown itself better able to make strategic choices than we are.”
NATO obviously knows this. It has been reported that they are scared of Russia’s intrepid and strategic move. “The Russians are able to move huge formations and lots of equipment a long distance very fast,” said US Lieutenant General Ben Hodges. General Hodges obviously finds himself in a quagmire because the US foreign policy does not make sense at all. Kinzer again said similar things back in February:
“American policy toward Syria was misbegotten from the start of the current conflict five years ago. By immediately adopting the hardest possible line—‘Assad must go’—we removed any incentive for opposition groups to negotiate for peaceful change. That helped propel Syria into its bloody nightmare.”
Kinzer proposed that the United States should have worked with Russia in fighting ISIS. “This may seem eminently logical, but the very suggestion is hateful in Washington. It violates a central precept of the liberal/conservative, Republican-Democrat foreign policy consensus: Russia is our eternal enemy, so anything that promotes Russia’s interests automatically undermines ours — and that goes double for Iran.”
The very suggestion is still hateful because Washington is being guided by an essentially satanic ideology, which has its headquarters in Israel. Let us not forget that it was the state of Israel which first declared that Assad must go. When the regime took that diabolical step, then marionettes and zombie enablers in America began to repeat the same mantra. Other terrorist states such as Turkey and Saudi Arabia swiftly jumped on the ideological bandwagon. Kinzer wrote:
“We would have been more secure as a nation, and might have contributed to a more stable world, if we had followed Russia’s foreign policy lead in the past.
“The government Moscow supported in Afghanistan, run by Mohammad Najibullah from 1987-92, was more honest and progressive than any that has ruled Afghanistan since American-backed forces deposed Najibullah. Later, Russia urged the United States not to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein. They were right both times, and we were wrong.
“In Syria, Russia is right for a third time… No military solution is possible in Syria. Continued fighting only adds to the toll of death and horror. Russia wants a negotiated settlement. We are reluctant, because our so-called friends in the region want to keep fighting.”
Indeed. But who are the “so-called friends”? Kinzer never addressed that issue because that would almost certainly have gotten him into trouble. But he is certainly right in saying that Russia, as chairman of the NATO Military Committee General Petr Pavel himself has said, does not pose a threat to any country in the Baltic region. NATO is mad and sad because Russia is obviously ruining their ideological plan in Syria and elsewhere.
Kinzer failed to mention the “so-called friends,” but we will not make the same mistake here. Those “friends” are again Israel, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Kinzer should get some credit for indirectly deconstructing the Zionist narrative. He argued elsewhere that the “media are misleading the public on Syria.”
If you think Kinzer is just dreaming here, listen to this title by the Observer: “As Assad Continues to Wipe Out Syria, State Dept. Dissenters Confront Obama.” This is really stupid. According to the article, Assad is so mad and psychotic that he is destroying his own country! The article never even suggested that Assad, along with Iran and Russia, is fighting ISIS and al-Nusra in the region.
The article never even remotely pointed out that Assad was democratically elected. But since NWO agents in Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Washington want more bloodshed in the region, they have to come up with essentially Faustian propositions to destabilize Syria. As Gordon Duff has argued last month, both Israel and Turkey “nearly burned down the world in 2013.” If you think that Duff is wrong, then listen again to Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld way back in 2003:
“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”
Well, the Israeli regime cannot destroy Logos, and that’s an encouraging thought. In the end, they will inexorably show that Hegel’s “cunning of reason” was absolutely correct: Logos will triumph. But Israeli officials are so mad that they have explicitly declared that they prefer ISIS over Iran (or Assad). In fact, Israeli intelligence Chief, Major General Herzi Halevy, has made it very clear that Israel does not want ISIS to be defeated in Syria at all.
From a rational and historical point of view, this is totally unacceptable precisely because Iran hasn’t invaded a single country in over one hundred years. In fact, Iran has been reaching out to the West for decades. As historian Gareth Porter has meticulously documented in his book Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare, the so-called Iranian threat is just a colossal hoax and a big lie manufactured by the Israelis.
Think about it for a moment. The Israeli regime has been saying that Iran aspires to have nuclear bombs since 1979! In his 1995 book Fighting Terrorism, Benjamin Netanyahu risibly predicted that Iran would acquire nuclear bombs within “five to seven years at most…”
Netanyahu, who generally acts like a complete psychopath who hasn’t realized that his previous comments have been recorded, is still marshalling the perverse claim that Iran is “the most dangerous terror state.” Iran obviously humiliates Netanyahu by engaging in the fight against ISIS in Syria. But no worry: the United States still charges that Iran is “the top state sponsor of terrorism,” even though the United States knows very well that Iran is fighting ISIS in Syria.
So, we are living in an intolerable world—a world that is devoid of practical reason and Logos in the political atmosphere. As St. Athanasius articulated centuries ago, a metaphysical rejection of Logos is the essence of Satanism. And when Satanism rules, all hell breaks loose: what is rational becomes irrational and what is irrational becomes the norm.
In a Satanic world, lies become the truth, and truth becomes a relic of the past. And the Zionist media have done a great job perpetuating lies as gospel truth. Kinzer has indirectly talked about this. “Coverage of the Syrian war will be remembered as one of the most shameful episodes in the history of the American press,” he said.
It is indeed shameful because NWO scumbags still want more chaos in Syria and Russia, despite the fact that thousands upon thousands of precious people have already lost their lives and livelihood. They still want to demonize Russia. As Ted Carpenter has rightly put it,
“The announcement that NATO would deploy four battalions of troops to the Baltic republics and Poland is merely the latest evidence that Western officials are utterly tone deaf about how their actions are going to be received in Moscow.”
Well, people are waking up, and even Italian Defense Minister Roberta Pinotti said last February that if NATO fails to dialogue with Russia, then NATO will regret it. Pinotti seems to have a point here, since it was reported that “more than half (57 percent) of Germans polled do not support sending the German military to defend other NATO members ‘such as Poland or the Baltic states.’”
What is your take again, Mark Dankof?
Dankof: The general public in Europe and the United States has a pivotal opportunity now to launch a wholesale political revolt against the New World Order elite using our respective countries assets in both lives and money to pursue its Zionist and Globalist agenda. This revolt would be across the political spectrum ranging from Left to Right. There has been preliminary evidence of the emergence of this coalition in the last 15 years of Neo Conservative military expeditions and ongoing disasters in the Middle East and Africa.
Now that these evil endeavors have reached the stage of lunacy involved in the American/EU/Israeli supported military intervention through surrogates in the Georgia/South Ossetia crisis of a few years ago, the coup d’etat in Ukraine in February of 2014, the use of Sunni Wahhabic terrorists in the illegitimate attempt to overthrow the Assad regime in a clash which threatens an American clash there with Russian military forces, and the ongoing deployment of American and NATO military assets in Eastern Europe ever closer to Russian borders, more people recognize the very real threat of an ignition of World War III if these policies continue to ratchet up the risk of an overt war with Putin and Russia that could easily escalate to the unthinkable.
This risk will escalate radically and at exponential speed if Clinton is elected in 2016, as Patrick Slattery and I discussed the other evening on RBN radio. The risk is still there, although lessened, if Trump takes office in January of 2017. In any event the Left-Right anti-NWO alliance needs to resist this tragedy with every ounce of its strength.
It is the core issue for Americans and Europeans interested in not merely their own true national interest, but in the literal survival of life on this planet.
The last chance to avoid the apocalypse is Now.
Alexis: Great assessment. If the Left-Right anti-NWO alliance does not resist this diabolical tragedy, then Assad, with Russia’s help, will continue to do the dirty work in Syria. Even the Washington Post has recently admitted:
“The IS forces dealt an embarrassing setback to the Syrian army near the militants’ self-styled capital of Raqqa with a swift counteroffensive that rolled back incremental gains by troops loyal to President Bashar Assad.”
In the meantime, VT will continue to expose the forces that post beneath the surface. Our thanks and gratitude again go to Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff and many others for getting involved in this fight for so long. In 2014, Duff, like a military soldier (he went to Vietnam) who vowed to protect his country from foreign and domestic enemies, cut the New World Order to pieces by saying that its agents like John McCain and Sheldon Adelson and others are part of “a world-wide criminal organization.”
That assessment still holds true to this very day.
 Stephen Kinzer, “On Syria: Thank you, Russia!,” Boston Globe, February 13, 2016.
 “‘As fast as they want’: US commander says Russia outpaces NATO in deployment capabilities,” Russia Today, June 21, 2016.
 Kinzer, “On Syria: Thank you, Russia!,” Boston Globe, February 13, 2016.
 Herb Keinon, “’Israel wanted Assad gone since start of Syria civil war,’” Jerusalem Post, September 17, 2013.
 “Obama says Assad must go to end Syria civil war,” Times of Israel, November 19, 2015; “Kerry says Assad must go, timing down to negotiation,” Jerusalem Post, September 9, 2015; Steven Horowitz, “Assad Must Go!,” Times of Israel, November 6, 2015.
 “Interview with Prince Turki bin Faisal: ‘Saudi Arabia Wants Downfall of Assad,’” Spiegel International, June 17, 2013; “Saudi Arabia, Turkey Discussing Unlikely Alliance To Oust Syria’s Assad,” Huffington Post, April 13, 2015; Mick Krever, “Saudi Arabia official: If all else fails, remove Syria’s Assad by force,” CNN, February 13, 2-16; Salman Rafi, Saudi Arabia’s obsession with removing Assad may prove self-destructive,” Asia Times, February 16, 2016; “Sweet Dream? Saudi Arabia Mulls Removing Syria’s Assad by Force,” Sputnik News, February 14, 2016; “Saudi offers Russia deal to scale back Assad support,” Jerusalem Post, August 7, 2013.
 Kinzer, “On Syria: Thank you, Russia!,” Boston Globe, February 13, 2016.
 “NATO Commander Admits There’s No Threat of Russia Invading the Baltics,” Sputnik News, June 21, 2016.
 Stephen Kinzer, “The media are misleading the public on Syria,” Boston Globe, February 18, 2016.
 Austin Bay, “As Assad Continues to Wipe Out Syria, State Dept. Dissenters Confront Obama,” Observer, June 17, 2016.
 Nabih Bulos, “Syria’s Assad wins third term as president in landslide victory,” LA Times, June 4, 2014; “Bashar al-Assad wins re-election in Syria as uprising against him rages on,” Guardian, June 4, 2014; “Bashar Assad wins Syria presidential election with 88.7% of vote,” Russia Today, June 4, 2014.
 “The War Game,” Guardian, September 21, 2003.
 Adam Taylor, “Israeli defense minister: If I had to choose between Iran and ISIS, I’d choose ISIS,” Washington Post, January 19, 2016; “‘I prefer ISIS’: Iran’s terror infrastructure is greater threat to Israel – defense minister,” Russia Today, January 20, 2016.
 See for example Trita Parsi, Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007); A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012); Ervand Abrahamian, The Coup: 1953, The CIA, and The Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations (New York: The New Press, 2013); Stephen Kinzer, All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2008).
 Gareth Porter, Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare (Charlottesville, VA: Just World Books, 2014).
 Scott Peterson, “Imminent Iran Nuclear Threat? A Timeline of Warnings Since 1979,” Christian Science Monitor, November 8, 2011.
 Benjamin Netanyahu, Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1995 and 2001), 123.
 Tovah Lazaroff, “Netanyahu: Iran deal gives nuclear weapons to most dangerous terror state,” Jerusalem Post, April 11, 2015; Carol Morello and William Booth, “Netanyahu warns that Iran is building terrorist cells worldwide,” Washington Post, October 1, 2015.
 “State Department: Iran is top state sponsor of terrorism,” Times of Israel, June 4, 2016.
 For an excellent treatise on this, see E. Michael Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars, July/August 2015.
 Kinzer, “The media are misleading the public on Syria,” Boston Globe, February 18, 2016.
 “‘Despite 400,000 civilians killed in Syria, US State Dept wants military action against Assad,’” Russia Today, June 17, 2016.
 Ted Galen Carpenter, “NATO Must Stop Crowding Russia,” National Interest, June 15, 2016.
 “Italy to NATO: Talk to Russia Now, or Regret it Later,” Sputnik News, February 18, 2016; for similar articles, see “NATO ‘Refining’ Baltic, Black Sea Presence, Seeks Bigger Mediterranean Role,” Sputnik, June 23, 2016.
 Kyle Mizokami, “Why Russia has NATO on the ropes,” The Week, April 29, 2016.
 For recent development, see “Phantom dangers, imperial networks: How Pentagon sees the world,” Russia Today, June 22, 2016; “NATO aims to feed fears by painting Russia as ‘treacherous enemy’ – Russian Defense Ministry,” Russia Today, June 16, 2016; “‘NATO seeks encircling Russia in Cold War 2.0,’” Russia Today, June 15, 2016; Rebecca Kheel, “Senators push vote to condemn Russia’s ‘reckless actions,’” The Hill, June 22, 2016.
 See for example Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
 For a scholarly study on this, see John J. Mearsheimer, “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin,” Foreign Affairs, September/October 2014.
 For recent development, see “The Looming US War on Russia,” Sputnik, June 22, 2016.
 See Brendan Cole, “Nato bolsters Baltic defences with 4,000 troop deployment ‘in response to Russia,’” International Business Times, June 13, 2016; “NATO ‘Refining’ Baltic, Black Sea Presence, Seeks Bigger Mediterranean Role,” Sputnik, June 23, 2016.
 See for example Justin Raymondo, “Rehearsing for World War III,” Antiwar.com, June 8, 2016. Zionist outlets have already blamed Russia for the conflict: “Putin Ratcheting Up Tensions With NATO in High-risk Bid to Assert Russian Influence,” Haaretz, June 21, 2016; “Mounting Evidence Putin Will Ignite WWIII,” Observer, February 11, 2016; “Slouching toward World War III,” USA Today, February 18, 2016.
 “Syrian Democratic Forces Kill Daesh Unit Commander in Manbij,” Sputnik, June 20, 2016.
 Philip Issa and Susannah George, “Islamic State militants push back in Syria, Iraq and Libya,” Washington Post, June 23, 2016.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.