Daesh on brink of collapse in Iraq, Syria

Watch the interview at Press TV
Watch the interview at Press TV
Watch the interview at Press TV

Press TV has interviewed Kevin Barrett, an editor with Veterans Today from Madison, Wisconsin, about remarks made by Ammar Hakim, chairman of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, on recent gains by Iraqi forces against the Daesh Takfiri terrorists.

The following is a rough transcription of the interview.

Press TV: I’d like to pick up on that last point that was made by Ammar Hakim where he stressed that the age of using terror groups as a tool is over. What would you say to that?

Barrett: I think he may be a bit over-optimistic for talking about the long-term global view. But in terms of this plague of massive terrorism that’s been hitting the region and specifically the countries of Iraq and Syria, I think, he may be right that we’re going to see a significant improvement in the near future as Daesh collapses and as its whole approach is discredited.

Unfortunately, we are still in the midst of this destabilization of the region, which was planned as far back as the early 1980s. The Oded Yinon Plan out of Israel set out their intent to destabilize, balkanize, and generally take down the region, especially their neighbors, by splitting up these countries on ethnic and sectarian lines. And this program then was put into high gear with the public relations launch of the war on terror, their inside job in September 2001. And since then they’ve tried to take out seven countries in five years as General Wesley Clark said, and all seven of those countries are countries that are prone to threaten Israel.

Now that plan and that program is not yet finished. So, we do need to recognize that the further chances of Zionist mischief still exist. However, I do believe that it’s true that Daesh is on its last legs, and has zero support across the Muslim world. It’s really a group of neo-Kharijites who have stepped out of the house of Islam, and more and more people recognize it; so, that group has no future and I think Iraq and Syria are going to see better days.

Press TV: How much of that is imperative upon inter-regional unity, so to speak, where we’re seeing for example Iran, Syria, Iraq even Russia sort of chipping in to work together strategically to rid the region of this plague of terrorism.

Barrett: Well, it’s interesting, isn’t it, that this terrorism—which was created as a civilizational enemy at the Jerusalem conference on international terrorism in 1979 by Benjamin Netanyahu—was intended to unify the Western world behind Israel’s war on the Palestinians. That’s the whole purpose of the so-called war on terrorism. That’s why this plague of terrorism was invented.

And today we’re seeing a certain kind of blowback from that in which the genuinely anti-terror forces, which are also by and large the forces that are not totally under the control of the Zionists, are uniting to fight this Takfiri terrorist scourge. All this despite the propaganda that’s been put out by the Zionists and the Americans and their regional allies trying to divide Sunni from Shia Muslim and trying to balkanize the region.

There has been this process of uniting behind the platform that Daesh and these Takfiri terrorist groups are unacceptable. So, ironically it seems that the very instrument that was created to divide the region in service to Israel is now in fact being used more positively to unite the region independent from Israel.

All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. I agree that this whole terrorist theme does have to do with Israel(Zionism) and domination. But I disagree that the target is Palestine. The Palestinian gambit is a tool to create an international boogey-man(the new Gladio), not an end target. Russia is the end target. When we went into Afghanistan, we had a ‘reason’ that we could point to, along with an enemy (Evil Islam, provided by Israel). When we went into Iraq, it was BS and most knew it from the get-go. I told everyone that would listen that it sure looked like a military tactic known as a ‘pincer movement’ to me, to surround Iran. When Rummy said his intention was that we would never leave Iraq, I knew it was because we had other plans. Witness Cheneys’ remarks about why Bush1 didn’t go into Iraq in 91…because it would be a god-awful quagmire. Strangely enough, 10 years later that was all but forgotten. So Iran was the next target, with Syria as a stepstone…but the final target? Russia. 4/5ths of the world landmass, undisturbed natural resources and lots of undeveloped and under-utilized land. Corner the energy market, deny Russia the ability to sell it’s energy by controlling pipelines and other access, economically distress Russia until she capitulates. Put then Putin happened…or did he? Syria and it’s outcome will be the tell-all.

Comments are closed.