Brief and Turbulent History of the Khazarian Mafia in Russia and Asia

14
8

ho chi

…by Jonas E. Alexis & Thomas Dalton

 

If flaming Neocon David Horowitz is right, that the Khazarian Mafia and their puppets “have played a disproportionate role as leaders of the modern revolutionary movements in Europe and the West,”[1] then one shouldn’t be surprised that the same wicked people have tried to bring down Russia over the centuries.

According to Horowitz, over the centuries the Khazarian Mafia and their gangsters have attempted to “fulfill the messianic prophecies of the pre-Enlightenment,” which always created trouble in Europe. Those “messianic prophecies” were arguably hatched from Talmudic mores and customs, and they have brought nothing but misery upon the world. The Revolution of 1848, The Russian Revolution, Mao’s Great Leap Forward, Ho Chi Minh’s communist movement in Vietnam, Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, and more recently perpetual wars in the Middle East are classic manifestations of those “messianic prophecies.”

Virtually all the major Asian countries were infected by those ideological viruses. Moreover, many of the Asian revolutionaries were dragged into these messianic prophecies without even really understanding what was going on. Oh Chi Minh in particular had a superficial knowledge of Russia before 1920. In fact, he knew very little about the October Revolution. In fact,

“Confucian scholars and revolutionaries such as Phan Boi Chau, Phan Chu Trinh, Huynh Thuc Khang, Tran Qui Cap heard of Russia through the Tsushima naval battle in 1905. Ho Chi Minh lived in Paris without knowing that Karl Marx, Lenin and Trotsky had lived there. He did not know that Lenin founded a school for revolutionaries near Paris in 1911.

“He learned some lessons of history on the revolutionary of 1848, the Commune de Paris (1871), and socialist revolution after World War I from Jules Raveau. Ho Chin Minh became Communist without neither knowing Karl Marx nor reading his Communist Manifesto and his Das Kapital. He confessed that nationalism led him to Leninism and to the Comintern [Communist International].”[2]

But once Ho Chin Minh had fallen under Lenin’s spell, everything changed. He even admitted in his journal that he did not even understand the Leninist movement and its ideological terms, but “by reading them again finally I was able to grasp the essential part. What emotion, enthusiasm, enlightenment and confidence they communicated to me! I swept for joy. Sitting myself in my room, I would shout as if I were addressing large crowds: ‘Dear Martyr compatriots! This is what we need, this is the path to liberation!’”[3]

Soon, Lenin became Ho Chi Minh’s

“father, master, comrade and advisor. In the 20th century Ho Chi Minh was the first Vietnamese to introduce Marxism-Leninism into Vietnam…Some Russian terms were Vietnamized and used in Vietnam since the 1920s. We have:

“xa hoang (tsar), Bon-xe-vit (Bolshevik), Men-xe-vit (Menshevik), ku-lac (kulak), Xi-ta-ka-nop (Stakanov, Xo-viet (Soviet), Kom-so-mon ) Kommunistticheskii Soyuz Molodezhi), etc.”

Ho Chi Minh was so enthralled by Lenin’s ideology that he specifically chose the Russian name Lin.

To make a long story short, Lin was obviously a victim of “messianic prophecies.” As Civilta Cattolica had predicted more than a century ago, whenever a country or individual or groups of people reject metaphysical Logos, they will inexorably end up being ruled by the Khazarian Mafia and their corrosive ideology. Lin, who obviously knew very little about the Catholic Church, ended up hating it and persecuting its adherents around 1954.[4] But his terrorist activity began to create panic around 1945 and 1946.

“In the rural areas many tri, phu, dia, hao (intellectuals, rich people, landlords, local notables) were beheaded or buried alive… Ho Chi Minh’s Communist competitors such as Le Hong Phong, Ho Tung Mau, Tran Phu were detained or killed by the French.”[5]

Once again, this is not all. The “messianic prophecies” moved to Cambodia, where they grabbed Pol Pot by the hair and taught him how to liquidate his population. Pot was trained as a Communist and ended up killing 1.7 million people. He eventually committed suicide.[6]

What were the purpose of all those “messianic prophecies”? Death and destruction. Their apologists wanted to raze countries to the ground and reduced them to rubble. As the revolutionary Jew Willi Munzenberg put it,

We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western Civilization stink! Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.”

The Khazarian Mafia obviously wanted to make Russia in particular “stink.” That’s what the Bolshevik Revolution was basically about. But obviously they failed. Vladimir Putin has recently conflicted the “messianic prophecies.” But how did the Khazarian Mafia end up creating chaos in Russia? Professor Thomas Dalton has the story.


lenin2
Vladimir Lenin

Thomas Dalton: America’s relationship with Russia is obviously of great political importance, but it also is highly revealing—particularly with respect to global Jewry. But to put the situation in context, we need a bit of history.

Russia came into being in 1547 under Ivan the Terrible, but was not a recognized world power until the early 1700s.  When the United States of America was founded, it was anxious to establish good relations with all major nations, Russia included. Thus came a series of important Russian treaties, most notable being the US-Russia Trade Pact of 1832, under Czar Nicholas I. This guaranteed “reciprocal liberty of commerce and navigation” on both sides, and allowed mutual entry of citizens.  For the rest of the 19th century, it was the basis for peaceful and friendly relations between the two growing world powers.

But the Jews of Russia were not happy. They wanted more access to power and greater legal rights there, but the czars were having none of that.  Then in 1881, some Jewish anarchists and a few accomplices managed to assassinate Czar Alexander II.[7] His son, Alexander III, inaugurated a series of reprisals and pogroms against the Jews, which persisted until his death in 1894. He was succeeded by his son, Czar Nicholas II—the last czar of imperial Russia.

In any case, Russia’s Jews hated all the czars, and wanted nothing more than to bring down the despised House of Romanov. So, in time-honored fashion, they appealed to their international brethren for help.

First, Jewish American media was more than ready to assist. The Jewish-owned New York Times obliged by exaggerating every news story out of Russia.  The killing of 47 Jews in 1903, for example, became “the Kishinev massacre” in which “120” died.  In March 1905, the NYT reported on their “6,000,000 cringing [Jewish] brothers in Russia.”

If this sounds like another holocaust—it was.  Literally. In November of that year, American Jew Simon Wolf “appealed to President Roosevelt,” asking “how long the Russian holocaust is to continue.”  By March 1906, Russian Jews were subject to “systematic and murderous extermination,” according to the NYT.  (Sound familiar?)

On 18 September 1911, a Jewish assassin, Mordekhai Gershkovich, murdered Russian Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin.  This naturally brought even harsher recriminations from Czar Nicholas, including the halting of entry into his country of all American Jews.

For American Jews, this was the last straw.  They were determined to attack Russia by abrogating the Trade Treaty of 1832.  Beginning in early 1910, a handful of American Zionist Jews—including Louis Marshall, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, Henry Morgenthau Sr., and Louis Brandeis—applied fierce pressure to Congress and President Taft.

The New York Times cooperated by running Jewish horror stories out of Russia, to sway public opinion. To make a long story short, they succeeded, and Taft signed the abrogation bill on 20 December 1911. Thus did the American government, for the first time ever, capitulate to international Jewry.[1] The situation has only grown worse since then.

Russian Jews, though, were just warming up. Quarter-Jew Vladimir Lenin joined forces with full-Jew Leon Trotsky to establish the Bolshevik party in 1903.  It was dominated by Jews, and they took advantage of the ouster of Nicholas II in February 1917 to launch their own Bolshevik revolution in October, thus taking charge of the nation.

In early 1919, the London Times reported that “of the 20 or 30 leaders who provide the central machinery of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% are Jews.”  In 1920, Winston Churchill wrote that “the majority of the leading figures are Jews.”  It was the Jewish Bolsheviks who, in July 1918, brutally murdered Nicholas II and his entire family. And it was this Jewish-Bolshevik threat that motivated Adolf Hitler to enter politics.[8]

Via Lenin and Trotsky, Jews ruled Russia through the early 1920s. Then in 1922 non-Jew Joseph Stalin, working in conjunction with two Jews, Lev Kamenev and Grigory Zinoviev, pushed out the ailing Lenin.  Stalin then proceeded to purge Soviet leadership of Jews, and by the late 1920s he had largely succeeded.  By then, the Russian people had had their fill of Jews, and the bad taste has lingered to the present day.

But the Jews never lost their hatred of Russian society. Working through Franklin Delano Roosevelt and then Harry Truman, American Jews did everything possible to threaten, punish, and intimidate the Russians.[9] Though allies in WW2, we quickly parted ways, and we have viewed them ever since as “the enemy.”

This brings us to the present day.  Ever since Putin first came to power in 2000, he has proven himself largely immune to Jewish-Zionist machinations—much to their chagrin.  He is not openly hostile to the Jews, and generally seems to be on good relations with them.  But he does not buckle to their demands.  Putin puts Russia first. 

Putin can afford to be generous because Jewish influence in Russia is minimal.  He must deal with the “oligarchs”—nearly all Jewish billionaires—but the military, government, and media are mostly free of their influence.  Russia has only 0.13% Jews among its population, well below the global average of 0.18%, and only a fraction of America’s 1.8%.  This allows Putin sufficient independence of thought and action.

America’s “allies,” by contrast, must yield to Jewish-Zionist demands even if their own nations are relatively free of them, simply because the US applies so much financial and military leverage to keep them in line.  Any nation outside this sphere of influence—Russia, China, Iran, Syria, North Korea—is viewed as an enemy and a threat.  The problem is not that they actually threaten true American interests—they don’t—but simply that they don’t cave in to US demands.

Of course, we never hear it this way from our American media.  They are, more than ever, dominated by Jewish-Zionist influence.  The top six media conglomerates—which include all the major news channels—are Jewish or Zionist controlled:

Time-Warner (Bewkes, Zucker), Disney (Iger), 21st Century Fox (Murdoch family), Viacom (Redstone, Daumann), CBS (Redstone, Moonves), and Comcast/NBC (Roberts, Cohen, Lazarus, Greenblatt). Arthur Sulzberger owns and runs the NYT. Weymouth and Baron run the Washington Post.  Murdoch runs the Wall Street Journal.  Zuckerman runs the NY Daily News.  Newhouse runs the Conde Nast empire.  On the tech side, we have, of course, Google (Brin and Page), Facebook (Zuckerberg and Sandberg), Oracle (Ellison), and Dell (Dell).  I could go on and on.[10]

The Jewish-American media machine loves to have enemies, and so it focuses on Russia, China, and the Muslims. These are perpetually demonized.  Congress, which is bought and paid for by the Jewish Lobby, complies with antagonistic legislation and verbal belligerence.  Obama, whose rise to power was funded by Jews out of Chicago, falls right in line.[11]

And the military, sadly, takes any enemy it can get, simply to justify its own vast budget and sheer existence.  Thus, all the key players align, and we have perpetual war against “terrorism,” against “Putin the dictator,” and against “Chinese imperialism.”


[1] Quoted in E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 966.

[2] David Lan Pham, Ho Chi Minh, 1890-1969 (Bloomington: Xlibris Corporation, 2007), kindle edition.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Pierre Brocheux and Claire Duiker, Ho Chi Minh: A Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 486.

[5] Pham, Ho Chi Minh, kindle edition.

[6] John Gittings and Mark Tran, “Pol Pot ‘killed himself with drugs,’” Guardian, January 21, 1999.

[7] For a scholarly study on similar issues, see for example Erich Haberer, Jews and Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995). Other scholars have tried to recount similar things, though they always remove themselves for their implications. See for example Michael Miller, Rabbis and Revolution: The Jews of Moravia in the Age of Emancipation (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011).

[8] Even Arno J. Mayer of Princeton points to the fact that the disproportionate Jewish involvement in Bolshevism gave some credence to Nazi Germany. Arno J. Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The “Final Solution” in History (New York Pantheon Books, 1988).

[9] See for example John Koster, Operation Snow: How a Soviet Mole in FDR’s White House Triggered Pearl Harbor (Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2012); R. Bruce Craig, Treasonable Doubt: The Harry Dexter White Spy Case (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2004). Many Jewish scholars are now saying that FDR was a flaming Zionist. Richard Breitman and Allan J. Lichtman, FDR and the Jews (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013).

[10] For further studies, see Joel Stein, “Who runs Hollywood? C’mon,” LA Times, December 19, 2008; Neal Gabler, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood (New York: Anchor Books, 1988 and 1989); Jack Gottlieb, Funny, It Doesn’t Sound Jewish: How Yiddish Songs and Synagogue Melodies Influenced Tin Pan Alley, Broadway, and Hollywood (New York: State University of New York, 2004); Emily D. Bilski, Berlin Metropolis: Jews and the New Culture, 1890-1918 (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1999); Nathan Abrams, The New Jew in Film: Exploring Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Cinema (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2012); Josh Lambert, Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2014); Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004); Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).

[11] Tom Hundley, “Barack Obama: The first Jewish president?,” Chicago Tribune, December 12, 2008; Jeffrey Goldberg, “Barack Obama Is Such a Traditional Jew Sometimes,” Atlantic, March 11, 2012; Ari Shavit, “Jeffrey Goldberg to Haaretz: ‘Obama Is the Most Jewish U.S. President Ever,’” Haaretz, March 19, 2013; Dave Boyer, “Obama’s boast: ‘I am the closest thing to a Jew that has ever sat’ in the Oval Office,” Washington Times, June 2, 2015.

[i] For a detailed discussion, see my article “The Jewish hand in the world wars” (part I):  www.inconvenienthistory.com

 

Archived Reads 0
SHARE
Previous articleSaudis confess defeat in Yemen
Next articleYitzhak Rabin’s son warns Donald Trump: Same kind of ‘incitement’ spurred murder of my father
Jonas E. Alexis

Jonas E. Alexis graduated from Avon Park High School, studied mathematics and philosophy as an undergraduate at Palm Beach Atlantic University, and has a master's degree in education from Grand Canyon University.

Some of his main interests include the history of Christianity, U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book ,Christianity & Rabbinic Judaism: A History of Conflict Between Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism from the first Century to the Twenty-first Century.

He is currently teaching mathematics in South Korea. He plays soccer and basketball in his spare time. He is also a cyclist. He is currently writing a book tentatively titled Zionism and the West.

Alexis welcomes comments, letters, and queries in order to advance, explain, and expound rational and logical discussion on issues such as the Israel/Palestine conflict, the history of Christianity, and the history of ideas.

In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, Alexis asks that all queries be appropriately respectful and maintain a level of civility. As the saying goes, “iron sharpens iron,” and the best way to sharpen one’s mind is through constructive criticism, good and bad.

However, Alexis has no patience with name-calling and ad hominem attack. He has deliberately ignored many queries and irrational individuals in the past for this specific reason—and he will continue to abide by this policy.

Comments Closed

14 COMMENTS

  1. I read that – much more plausibly, imho, that Pol Pot was poisoned (killed, anyway) found lying dead on his ‘pit’, shortly before he was due to testify in a court. The US had cherished and sponsored him while he was fighting against Charlie, but bumped him off to prevent his testifying to his sponsorship by them. And all those crocodile tears we get from the West about Pol Pot’s genocidal activities !

  2. Jonas,
    Thanks for all you do. Do you think that the Khazarian rabbis have, through the centuries, looked at the messianic prophecies of the Old Testament and have taken it upon themselves to fulfill them, or to seemingly fulfill them, in order to turn a great part of Christendom to look upon the Jews with favor, because these christians feel that these Jews are fulfilling New Testament prophecies as well? Is it a case of hopeful Christians being fooled by seeming fulfillments brought about by unscrupulous and conniving men?

    • mississippi kid,

      I’m not sure if I completely understand the question, but let me do my best. From a theological standpoint, the rabbis never took the Old Testament seriously. In fact, the Talmud is a complete repudiation of both the Old and New Testament. In other words, if the rabbis took the Old Testament seriously, then they would have accepted Logos incarnate. Here’s what Christ told them: “If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me.”

  3. Thanks again Jonas. Another great article exposing the khazarian mafia and the cancer upon the earth it represents. I admire yours and Dr. Prestin Jame’s work exposing this criminal, morally defunct creed. I can’t say religion, or race because I feel neither apply. The jewification of the US has destroyed a once great nation and it’s no wonder the world hates it. Its no wonder many people are expatriating, myself included. Fortunately for Russia, it has escaped it’s clutches for the most part.

  4. With respect to the statement that “Stalin then proceeded to purge Soviet leadership of Jews, and by the late 1920s he had largely succeeded,” Thomas Dalton meant to say that Stalin intended to liquidate people like Trotsky, and then his own “collaborators, Kamenev and Zinoviev. But it took some time. Into the 1930s, they still had a few Jews, such as Kaganovich and Yagoda, who ran the Cheka/NKVD. Yagoda was out by 1936. Kaganovich survived long-term, but not many other Jews, to my knowledge. I suppose I should have said ‘by the late 1930s,’ to be more correct.” No, we are not denying that Stalin’s extermination camps were run by what is now known as the Khazarian Mafia. Point well taken: we should have expanded on what we meant.

  5. Ho Chi Minh initially appealed to the US to help establish a “western” type system in Vietnam; however the US decided to support French colonialism instead, leaving Ho Chi Minh nowhere to turn for liberation support but the Soviet Union.

    Remember that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

  6. Yes, the “jews” run hollywood, and they are the same satanic cult that control the content of 99% of movies, music videos, cartoons, etc. which they use to influence the population. Including Disney!

  7. During Russia’s infancy, an american naval officer came over to help build their fledgling navy. His name was John Paul Jones, yes THAT John Paul Jones.

  8. This article should be in the History books – with an emphasis on the Vietnam War but I believe Ho was more a nationalists than a Leninist. Each of us has read someone in history at the precise time of their lives and the ideology of that other person – hits Home on what you believe in – at that time of — your life. Its like Ya – thats what I mean . If Stalin was a Jew – We’d all be speakin German or Hebrew by now and since there are sooo many Jews in American Agencies – I wonder why that language isn’t offered to HS students — Maybe America’s Students — need not apply !

  9. Another excellent article in a continuing stream that explains the tortured history of Russia since the Khazarian Mafia inspired murder of the Tsar and his family by their Bolshevik Cutouts. This is naturally suppressed history and how refreshing it is to see this openly declared so that anyone interested can learn and understand the secret machinations of KM evil which have been determining much of recent history, especially the violent world terrorism and war against the Third World by America since WW2. Highest commendations are due for this fine work.

  10. This arrested behavior is not about to succeed in any manner other than expose the naked emperor, as is being done now. The rats switched sides so fast to try and survive a bit longer.

  11. Jonas – great article. You may have already done so – but I highly recommended reading “Cultural Insurrections” by Professor Kevin MacDonald, phd. It is AMAZING and I am sure you will enjoy and glean from it.

    • jonnbrown,

      I’ve read MacDonald’s Cultural Insurrections and his other works on Judaism. He has many good insights. Unfortunately, I have have parted company with him because many of his ideas are philosophically and morally untenable, too much to detail here. I have addressed them elsewhere. MacDonald is a sort of reincarnation of Wilhelm Marr, the man who tried to examine Judaism and its political implications from a purely secular perspective. It’s like trying to examine Islam and Christianity without their founders, an outrageously impossible task. MacDonald’s views on morality are congruent with what Darwin wrote, and Darwin himself had to live in contradiction in order to maintain many of his views. MacDonald does believe that Jewish behavior is genetic, a contradiction that cannot be defended intellectually, particularly if one seeks to condemn the bevahior. He is right in line with David Duke in this regard.

      I have heard somewhere that MacDonald is writing a book, and hopefully he’ll address some of those issues in a logical way. I look forward to reading it and interacting with him.

Comments are closed.