Analyst: Warming in Russia-Turkey relations to persuade other countries to negotiate

Oh how times have changed; few could imagine Putin and Erdogan shaking hands in friendship just a few short months ago.
Oh how times have changed; few could imagine Putin and Erdogan shaking hands in friendship just a few short months ago.
Oh how times have changed; few could imagine Putin and Erdogan shaking hands in friendship just a few short months ago.

We are living in very interesting times, interesting because, to quote Dylan ‘the times they are a changin…’

Change is everywhere in geopolitics right now with the major shift of power away from the US-NATO-EU-Israel-Saudi-Gulf States ‘Axis of Evil’ as I like to refer to them due to their creation of the bogus ‘War On Terror’ among other reasons. The decline of the Axis is concomitant with a rise in the power of Russia and it’s allies in Iran, China and India.

Perhaps the defining moment of this shift in the balance of power, the tipping point, came when Erdogan took advantage of whatever that coup really was in order to purge the pro US-NATO elements within Turkey and to align himself with Putin’s Russia. The key lesson we have learned in recent weeks has been that Erdogan is a very smart cookie indeed, he has played the game of politics like a chess grandmaster and now finds himself aligned with the rising rather then the declining power bloc. The rat successfully jumped ship. Clever rat.

This article predicts the new power bloc formed by the Russia-Iran-Turkey will bring new peace and stability to the Middle East. I agree, and I might even go further and postulate that the potential exists for this new alignment of the world’s powers to bring an end to the ‘War On Terror’ that has defined geopolitics since 9-11 and thus usher in a new era of global peace and stability. One can only hope….



Analyst: Warming in Russia-Turkey relations to persuade other countries to negotiate

The warming in relations between Russia and Turkey is capable of persuading the key powers in the region to negotiate and come to terms, the director of the International Institute of Newly-Established States, Aleksey Martynov, has said about the outlook for bilateral relations and the government coup attempt Turkey saw one month ago.

“The meaning of the warming in relations between Russia and Turkey is not active repentance of the Turkish state, although the apologies have been pronounced,” he said. “The meaning is that Russia has managed to achieve the understanding of other key countries in the region regarding the need to seek agreement with each other. The future of the whole region lies within the triangle Russia-Iran-Turkey.”

“The triangle is one of the most stable figures in geometry, in which there is no place for other world policy actors, including the United States,” Martynov said. “This rings alarm bells. For the first time over 25 years the United States is absent from such a format in a region that it considers a zone of its strategic interests.”

“The affair has gone very far. In Turkey, calls have been heard at a rather high level for leaving NATO,” Martynov said. “That Turkey will not be allowed to leave NATO easily is a different matter. Turkey’s membership of the alliance is critically important for the United States.”

“After the well-known events that led to the death of the pilot of a Russian plane Turkish fighters downed over Syria, after the unprecedented worsening of Russian-Turkish relations, which through Turkey’s fault had come to a point of being severed the public mind grew rather skeptical about the future of bilateral relations,” Martynov recalled. “Now it’s one month since the abortive military coup in Turkey. Those events have fundamentally changed the way the Turkish leaders and the leaders of other regional powers see the current events. As is known, the driving force of that affair was outside Turkey, it was overseas. It goes without saying that this circumstance had a sobering effect on the Turkish leadership and the leaders of countries in the entire region of Asia Minor, Central Asia and the Middle East in general.”

Russia and Turkey develop understanding over Syria and Black Sea

“At their meeting in St. Petersburg on August 9 the Russian and Turkish leaders discussed not only the economy,” Martynov said. “One has the impression that the main issues on the agenda were Syrian settlement and Black Sea issues, to be more precise, Russia’s jurisdiction over Crimea. It looks like both parties have the understanding.”

“In Baku, the negotiations by the leaders of Russia, Iran and Azerbaijan on August 8 concerned not just economic projects, but also cooperation by the Caspian states, the vision of the situation in Syria and the future of Trans-Caucasia,” Martynov said. “The situation in Trans-Caucasia was most possibly discussed with Turkish counterparts.”

Martynov believes that Armenia “put the full stop at the end of this negotiating process when its President Serzh Sargsyan held talks with Vladimir Putin in Moscow.”

“I won’t be surprised if Russian peacekeepers will appear in Nagorno-Karabakh soon and this will put an end to the confrontation,” Martynov said, adding that it was his personal opinion.

“Nobody is capable of giving international guarantees. This explains why this complicated conflict, brimming with nuances, is going on,” Martynov said. “Nobody recalls these days that the territories the Armenian side put under control at the beginning of the Karabakh conflict were taken over temporarily, until the emergence of firm guarantees in the negotiating process. In those days, at the end of 1980s and early 1990s nobody had anticipated that the negotiating process would last more than 20 years.”

“The presence of Russian peacekeepers can provide tangible guarantees, should both parties agree to such a solution,” Martynov said. “I believe that neither Iran nor today’s Turkey will come out against this. If so, Russia will be able to turn a new page in the history of a whole region of Asia Minor, Central Asia and the Transcaucasia, where our country plays a leading role.”.

Assistant Managing Editor
Ian Greenhalgh is a photographer and historian with a particular interest in military history and the real causes of conflicts.

His studies in history and background in the media industry have given him a keen insight into the use of mass media as a creator of conflict in the modern world.

His favored areas of study include state sponsored terrorism, media manufactured reality and the role of intelligence services in manipulation of populations and the perception of events.
DISCLOSURES: All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. There is a select group of people, and families with great wealth who look upon our world as theirs. They are now called globalists. Nationalism is making a come back. This is a very good thing. So, is it wise, maybe even necessary to eliminate such people, and the extended families? All for “the common good of the herd” (their words not mine). I fear if not we are doomed to fail. Why are they untouchable? Why are they not arrested? Is the(ir) World Court without teeth? It is always good news when a terrorist leader is KIA. Would it not be better, even great news to hear that a terrorist leaders leader was killed in action.

  2. Do not forget Iraq. In time I see Iraq throwing the US, and the west overboard. The alliance of eastern nations will, should be: China, Russia, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan. India has been thouroughly poisoned and will eventually be taken down by her own. Nations just like the people must plan for the fall of the dollar inorder to cushion their citizens against the tragic (but necessary) and, immense disorder that comes with it, in order to rebuild as smoothly, and orderly as possible. It is not end times. Let us say a new beginning. After all, modern man existed well for centuries before “the dollar”, and will flourish after.

  3. I see it as part of the International community that realizes America must fall in order to achieve some sort of Peace in the World. And who better to run that agenda than Putin. His ideology has been diplomatically confronting as many countries around the ME/EU/Asia/S America that will listen – what has 15 years of American Terrorism brought to the World Table – tons of money for the right corporations and paid-off leaders in 100 countries but 1/2 the world is still a – shit whole. American Globalization is only for Me Me Me while Putin sees it at a World Globalization for the World . Of course it would serve Russia, China and few others more financially but I’m thinking that this World Globalization would be a shared type of unification instead of this Selfish one.

  4. I agree with you Ian. Even though it’s hard to see how Turkey and Russia will find common grounds in Syria, their different stance on Assad is just one example. Then we have the kurds as well as the support for ISIS by Turkey. Much of this has to have economic dependancies as well. There are people in Turkey making a lot of money on the present situation.

    What seem to currently really unite Turkey and Russia are common adversaries (the Axis of Evil) and here the logical addition of Iran as well will potentially make a very powerful regional alliance. This is not going to come about in a hurry since some time is needed to forge such an alliance. For extra spice, add China to the stew.

    However, the very thought of a potential Turkey-Russia-Iran (and why not China too) alliance approaching is likely going to generate panic in the Axis of Evil. I’m expecting some real insanities out of Pentagram as a result. The satanists don’t have much time to act either.

Comments are closed.