UFO destroys Israeli weaponised satellite on the launch pad

53
1000

[Editor’s note:  The event depicted in the photographs below is not our conspiracy theory.  The UFO destruction theory of the “facebook” satellite, now that’s a conspiracy theory if I ever heard one, comes from NASA.  From their notes:

A. UFO
B. Airborne Laser weapons test on third stage booster?
C. Small nuclear explosion caused by lithium ion batteries shorting out. Or other nuclear source in the third stage guidance unit.
D. Not a kerosene  or hydrogen fuel fire as initial cause.

The satellite and its geosynchronous booster were intact until it is seen collapsing and producing a secondary explosion. Everything else is a kerosene fuel fire.

Either we have 3 UFO’s in the photos or they are aircraft landing lights???(referring to last set at the bottom)

This is what they believe and, being who we are, they couldn’t simply let it go without pulling the tail as it were.  We agreed, as we are inclined to do, to aid them in this task. g]

Launchpad explosions of rockets is a fairly common thing, after all, a rocket is really a bomb waiting to go off and even with very careful handling, they do sometimes blow up due to technical issues.

This explosion however is something altogether different. This was no mere explosion of a rocket while being fueled, this was a deliberate act of destruction.

Note that the explosion occurs near the top of the rocket, where there aren’t any fuel tanks, the explosion is also far hotter than would be caused by rocket fuel – note the bright white blob on the video bright enough to cause a lens flare (the four diagonal streaks). The rocket fuel burning comes several frames later and is quite different looking – the colours are reds and oranges with black and grey smoke, this is a secondary explosion where the rocket fuel was ignited by the primary explosion further up the rocket.

Now for the really shocking bit – the craft responsible for this destruction was caught in the video – a small spherical object that flies from right to left on the screen and appears to have fired some kind of laser or beam weapon at the rocket.

So now the big question is this: Just what had the Israelis built into that satellite that someone decided had to be destroyed before it could be placed in orbit? Our working theory is that it was some kind of weapon, quite possibly a laser as we received intelligence some time ago that a space based laser had been used to cause several mysterious explosions in Iran.

This is a story we will be delving further into and will report on further as we uncover more.

Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.01_[2016.09.02_04.41.12] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.01_[2016.09.02_04.42.16] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.01_[2016.09.02_04.42.57] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.01_[2016.09.02_04.43.17] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.01_[2016.09.02_04.43.34] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.01_[2016.09.02_04.45.12] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.01_[2016.09.02_04.45.29] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.01_[2016.09.02_04.45.45] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.02_[2016.09.02_04.46.02] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.02_[2016.09.02_04.46.30] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.02_[2016.09.02_04.46.53] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.08_[2016.09.02_04.47.50] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.09_[2016.09.02_04.54.52] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.13_[2016.09.02_04.49.39] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.13_[2016.09.02_04.49.57] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.14_[2016.09.02_04.50.10] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.14_[2016.09.02_04.50.10] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.14_[2016.09.02_04.50.28] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.14_[2016.09.02_04.51.12] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.14_[2016.09.02_04.51.35] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.15_[2016.09.02_04.52.57] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.19_[2016.09.02_04.57.05] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.19_[2016.09.02_04.57.44] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.20_[2016.09.02_04.58.10] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.20_[2016.09.02_04.58.29] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.24_[2016.09.02_04.59.12] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.24_[2016.09.02_04.59.35] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.24_[2016.09.02_04.59.50] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.25_[2016.09.02_05.00.12] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.25_[2016.09.02_05.00.29] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.26_[2016.09.02_05.00.48] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.29_[2016.09.02_05.01.32] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.29_[2016.09.02_05.01.43] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.29_[2016.09.02_05.01.55] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.30_[2016.09.02_05.02.16] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.30_[2016.09.02_05.02.27] Did an UFO destroy the Falcon 9 Rocket Un Ovni destruyo el cohete Falcon 9.avi_snapshot_00.33_[2016.09.02_05.03.01]

SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.15_[2016.09.02_06.16.33] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.19_[2016.09.02_06.17.06] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.21_[2016.09.02_06.17.24] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.22_[2016.09.02_06.17.48] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.23_[2016.09.02_06.18.02] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.25_[2016.09.02_06.18.34]SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.26_[2016.09.02_06.19.00] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.29_[2016.09.02_06.19.33] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.31_[2016.09.02_06.19.58] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_01.35_[2016.09.02_06.20.38] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_02.34_[2016.09.02_06.21.35] SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016.avi_snapshot_04.05_[2016.09.02_06.22.04]

 

53 COMMENTS

  1. It’s good to know that there are technically savvy patriots out there. Facebook’s Steve Zuckerberg claims that the satellite was for bringing better internet access for Africa. This one hurt in the pocketbook. I’m sure Africa will do well without you.

  2. For the sake of the easy route Id go with burning hunk of metal flying off of rocket. Glowing metal shards may look white from the heat lending to the term, white hot. Not to mention, if rockets are stubborn little vixens even when they work well, look whos operating that one.

  3. “Richard Parker, managing director of Assure Space, an underwriting agency, is waiting to see the cause of the explosion. If it is a design or manufacturing flaw or an operational error, launch rates for SpaceX flights may well go up. His firm had underwritten a launch policy on last week’s flight at 6 percent, he said.” From a NY times article today

    • A $285 million sale of the Israeli company Spacecom to a Chinese technology company fell through because of explosion and a 5 year contract with Facebook and Eulestat also has been canceled. Spacecom’s stock fell 9% the 1st day then 34% the next.

  4. Today Sputnik reports that the US has already spent 3.4 billion US-dollars for the use of the Russian Sojus-rockets. It says that with the failure of the SpaceX project, the United States will have to continue to use the Sojus rockets for several more years, before American rockets will be available that can bring astronauts up to the international space station and back. It is expected that with American rockets the price tag will be reduced by two thirds (67 percent).

    More: h ttp://de.sputniknews.com/panorama/20160903/312396462/nasa-russland-abhaengigkeit-teuer.html

  5. I did a slow-down of the video around 1:11, which shows an object heading for the rocket a split second before the explosion starts. I confirmed that all the relevant frames are shown above, but they aren’t in correct order. There is also an earlier segment that shows a small object flying quickly away from the launch area. The frames immediately after the explosion starts also seem to show an object come back on screen, then fly off. My first impression yesterday was that the object struck the rocket, but that’s not the case. At about the 3rd frame of the object’s approach, the explosion starts. So it must have “shot something” at the rocket. This was definitely some sort of attack.

  6. This gives me an idea… for the next rocket.

    Tell Netanyahoo and all the 9/11 perps (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Silverstein, etc.)and all NWO types who are wanted for their crimes against humanity, i.e. (Soros, Kissinger, Rothschilds, Rockefellers, GHWB, and circulating list of deviant minions, etc.) who know their time is up, that they will be taken to a safe haven off world if they will pay 50 million each (which is not much for them).

    As we watch it blow up in the atmosphere, we can all wave good riddance and then disperse their funds to good causes and all who have been infected by their low-life scum degenerate plans to kill us off.

    If this seems warped, they made me this way!

    • ROFLMAO!
      Thanks, it’s much too seldom I get a good belly laugh, midday. Don’t feel too alone, btw, they’re making most of us “this way”.

  7. I’m usually very skeptical about any UFO claims, with the one exception of the Foo Fighters of WW2. They were just seen too many times, by too many reliable witnesses who all told much the same story.

    And it looks like the Foo Fighters are back. Katy, bar the door!

  8. The ONLY drawback that I can see to this event is that the goy living and paying taxes in JUSA will just be forced to send more welfare payments to the world’s largest terrorist to refund the Jews for their loss of their satellite, something that we already paid for in the first place.

    On another note, once I heard who it belonged to and the alleged purpose of the satellite, the hair on the back ofy neck stood up. They do NOTHING benevolent for anyone at anytime, you can bet the farm that there’s a whole lot more to the story than helping to give mid hut dwellers Internet access to facebook, even though everyone knows that fb is nothing short of more surveillance tools.

  9. Couldn’t stop myself smirking at what I was looking, the first time I became aware…

    Imagine an israeli satellite that’s masquerading as a Facebook donation of free internet connections for the oppressed continent of Africa, being not insured AND paid by israeli govnt funds (that has nothing to do with internet conx, Facebook, free internet for Africa) AND gets blown up (for whatever cause/s) in America that had stopped funding an advanced israeli project on space lasers/ defence oriented research with a lot of US Govnmt civil servants and contractors aware of the entire 09/11 attack on ‘American Values’ getting a close-up view of an enemy’s secret military weaponised master stroke of technology that nobody else had ever.
    Pheeewwwwwww,,, must say my smirking wasn’t malicious. Just vengeful.

  10. One bird flyes behind the towers and also behinf the burning rocked.
    The UFO object in one of it’s passes, flyes behind the towers but in front of the rocket.
    Their dimensions on video are almost the same.
    If camera didn’t move, you can say that
    the dimension if the UFO object can’t be bigger than the bird.

  11. I was intrigued by what is happening here, and so I downloaded the video from “brightcove”. After that I was able to inspect the video frames one by one with the iMovie app. I found that there are 12 frames every half second, which gives the rate of 24 frames per second. During the first two seconds of a total of 37, you see a grey smoke emerge from the rocket in grayish clouds. A gas leak? An explosive mixture? Then the little »ball» emerges out from behind the logo placed in the upper right corner in frame no 55, and can be seen moving towards the left at constant altitude in frames 55, 56, 57, 58, which is when the explosion occurs (in frame no 58). The «ball» can still be seen in frame 59 when its position is seen directly above the tip of the rocket. After that it seems to be gone. But then a somewhat smaller ball emerges moving up at an angle to the right, and is last seen in frame no 73.

  12. Thanks Ian for an excellent bit of good news. It is so elating to see a bully take a good stiff knee to the groin.

  13. My first impression is that this unidentified object / orb is the same kind that has been documented by whistle blowers to have been plaguing ICBM from the onset (amongst others: Robert Salas). By 1989 everyone involved must have realized that ICBM’s were useless. This would point to non-human / interdimensional interference. Orbs have also been reported around the twin towers on 9/11 which could point to nefarious sources, although could also have been observing at the time. I see the Dragon Capsule at the top of the rocket being surgically cut off. My conclusion would be that the Dragon Capsule contained something of a similar threat as an ICBM. For those that want to go step further on the coming events and despair by the nefarious forces in the time frame till 8 November and beyond, I would suggest looking into the most recent interview of Simon Parkes titled: “SIMON PARKES RE PREPARE! FOR WHAT? WWIII, RESET, PLANET X OR ?” For a driving instructor / mere city councillor he has a very compelling and urgent perspective on events that may have been initiated with Space X explosion (with a huge disclaimer by me)

  14. Well I for one enjoyed the spectacular fireworks. The news it was an Israeli satellite and one they were rather fond of just makes it into a true celebration and the realization it does indeed appear to be something very high tech involved here which means somebody did it deliberately. Can it get any better?

  15. I found the video at the «Mirror» site UK, where you can see the top module toppling and falling seconds after the explosion :
    (0:37)
    But how far away from the launch pad was the position of the video camera?

    The explosion occurs at 0:02 (no sund).
    The first sound occurs at 0:14 (approximately)
    With the speed of sound at 340 m/s, we obtain a distance of roughly 4 kilometers.
    Which is about two and a half miles away from the explosion. And so we may surmise that the camera must have used a powerful telephoto lens.

    • Thanx for putting up your calculation.
      The object appears to me to be a bird of some kind. Don’t force me to prove if it’s a mocking bird, a nighting gale or a swallow, but it’s definitly not a bald eagle – but it could be a falcon just doing it’s thing – a UFB on it’s own spying mission doing a fly by. The distance of 4 km between the camera and the site of the explosion even suggests that the object is closer to the camera than the rocket site and therefor staying out of range of what comes next. If you connect the height of the object frame by frame you will notice a slight up and down movement typical of a bird flapping it’s wings very rapidly. Since the camera is absolutely steady (mounted) there is no influence in the flow of movement of the object as in hand held devices. So I’ll stay on the safe side and just call it an unidentified flying bird (UFB).

  16. I need to mention and it is highly relevant in light of events that in the 2003 NASA Columbia disaster on board was Ilan Ramon, a former Israeli air force pilot. He would have been Israel’s first astronaut in space. Obviously, there are some very powerful entities in the Universe that don’t want Israelis polluting the cosmos.

    • Yes Sikel, it seems as if other intelligent forces out there knows that Satan’s minions has been kicked from 109 othe countries in the past and surely doesn’t want them to get their stranglehold in outer space as they have througout earth today. We should applaud them for their intelligence, something lacking from current world leaders.

  17. “As far as the Israeli communications satellite industry is concerned, this is a very severe blow which could place the future of the industry in doubt if it is not dragged out of the mud,” said Isaac Ben-Israel, the chairman of the Israeli space agency.
    …. keep it in the mud……the “severe blow” dealt through the benevolent….let it bleed
    http://presstv.ir/Detail/2016/09/02/482794/Israel-Space-Agency-Amos6-SpaceX
    wikipedia…” Ben Israel has been a staunch supporter of —and by extension, critic of the Israeli government’s failure to continue to develop and implement after US funding was withdrawn from— the Nautilus Mobile Tactical High Energy Laser (MTHEL) to serve as a central component of the Israeli Air Defense Network…”

    • Well done, this is very close to the core of what is going on here. The Israelis are currently mad as hell about this, the rocket and satellite were not insured and had been financed by the Israeli govt. Someone just kicked Tel-Aviv squarely in the nuts and few would say it wasn’t long overdue and richly deserved.

  18. Suggestions/Corrections are welcome:

    Whatever that object was, it was moving VERY FAST – it did not behave like a video anomaly or light artifact!

    If video was shot at 60fps (frames per second) object was traveling at approx:
    4,750m/s [] 10,625mph [] Mach 22 [] 17,100 km/h

    If video was shot at 30fps (frames per second) object was traveling at approx:
    2,375m/s [] 5,312mph [] Mach 11 [] 8,550 km/h

    Calculations based on following assumptions:
    Length of Falcon 9 = 68.4m
    Area traversed by object (screen width) = approx. 2.5 x Height of Falcon 9 = Width of video
    Object uses approx 8 frames to traverse the width of video.
    Assuming object was very close to Falcon 9.

    Any object moving that fast at sea level (very dense air) will be subject to extreme thermal heating – most materials would glow white hot at such high Mach numbers so close to sea level.

    One can thus infer the following:
    ==========================
    One can’t say what that object is – but one can say what it’s NOT, it’s NOT a conventional object.
    Whatever that object is, a record of it doesn’t exist in the public domain.
    It DOES not obey conventionally known physical sciences principles.
    Unpublished materials & physical sciences principles MUST be at play here.
    Materials & physical sciences principles in the public domain can’t account for such astonishing performance characteristics.

    • My results are a little bit different.
      I have made an image per image analysis and precise measurement at pixel level on images.
      Screen width approx 2.5 x height of Falcon : True (I obtain x 2.32).
      The video is at 30 fps, and UFO traverse in 8 frames.
      With your quick approach speed is distance/time = 2.5 * 68.4 / (8-1)* (1/30) = 732 m/s about 2500 km/h ie Mach 2

      A more precise measurement shows apparent speed is 2500 km/h at the entry of the field of view on the right and 2000 km/h when exiting the field of view on the left, which leads me to think that the UFO has a curved trajectory

  19. Great story. Payback is a real bitch and you can bet this is the first installment for Israel nuking America on 9-11-01. From here on out this kind of correction will be served up frequently and the KM empire is going to be deconstructed piece by piece. It can’t happen fast enough. These PNACer Dualie scum thought they would never be found out. Everyone in the US Military and Intel now know and understand that Israel and the KM with the help of Meyers, Bush2, Cheney Rumsfeld, JCS, USAF, NORAD and FAA attacked America on 9-11-01. The wheels of secret justice and payback are now turning and cannot be stopped. Yes, payback on this is going to be a real bitch.

  20. NASA = Never A Straight Answer. UFO is not necessarily ET. Most if not all ‘UFOs’ are man-made.

    Russians & Nazis have/had ‘UFOs’ — as does U.S. For video of the SpaceX event and the UFO-type craft, see youtube.com/watch?v=2cmMdYWCeAo. From a comment:

    “Went to Google Earth, looked at 3D of Launch complex 40 where this occurred. The object enters just to the right of and above the Lox storage tank. In looking closely at original video, it definitely flew behind the three observable lightning towers (especially notable at third lightning tower at left). By my calculation, from where it entered at right side of screen above Lox tank to time it can be seen just behind third tower to the left takes approximately 23/100’s of a second.

    “If you use Google Earth ruler tool, place it directly above Lox tank and measure to end of third lightning tower, you get +/-500 feet. So, using simple math, 23/100 of a second (time it took to travel 500 feet) is to one second, as 500 feet is to 2,174 feet. Then one second is to 2,174 feet of distance as 60 seconds is to 130,400 feet of distance. And, 60 seconds is to 130,400 feet as one hour is to 7,826,000 feet. So, that is the distance in feet it would travel in an hour.

    “5,280 feet in a mile. Dividing 7,826,000 by 5,280 renders a supersonic speed of +/-1,480 miles per hour. That was no birdy. Once it leaves the left side, it then comes back in and leaves the area almost as fast as it came.”

  21. My alarm bells went off when I heard it contained Africa’s Facebook satellite. As we may know, no good is intended by FB to Africa, and FB is a 2-handled tool which can be turned against folks. Perhaps this is a let-off for Africa.

  22. the jews might think they are the chosen one’s but someone else has a different opinion. well done what ever power had the foresight to stop them. peace and justice for ALL . mylo

  23. This isn’t the first time something like this has happened, including the disabling at many US bases and mid air.

    Great frame by frame breakdown!

    • “This isn’t the first time something like this has happened, including the disabling at many US bases and mid air.”

      Yes correct jensingr – there was film of similar orbs destroying a US rocket reported by ex US military personnel in the Disclosure Project documentary.

  24. By the middle of the day yesterday some of these photos were circulating on the web, then the background that it was an Israeli satellite for Facebook and these pics of what does appear to be a ‘foo fighter’ well this story just isn’t gonna go away. Will be staying tuned for the updates!

  25. Those are cage balls that were accidentally kicked into the area from a nearby elementary school. The children responsible have confessed to foul play.

Comments are closed.