Last week, Walesa, former president and ex-leader of the Solidarity social movement which toppled Poland’s communist system in 1989, warned that the actions taken by the country’s current government, elected last year, could lead to a civil war.
“If someone leads [the situation] to civil war, the other side will follow suit, and we will see. I have warned about the possible civil war from the very beginning, and if these people continue to behave themselves in such a reckless manner, then we will inevitably move in this direction,” the politician said, speaking on Polish television.
Walesa’s remarks were a response to a speech by Polish President Andrzej Duda. On August 28, at a church in Gdansk, Duda participated in a ceremony honoring the reburial of two members of the anti-communist underground killed in the 1940s. During the ceremony, Duda delivered a speech criticizing the former communist government, and said that the idea of the reburial “restores the dignity of the Polish state.”
Disagreeing with the president’s choice of words, Walesa stormed out of the church in protest. In response, ceremony attendees began yelling at Walesa, and shouting “Death to the enemies of the people!” The same day, unknown attackers assaulted members of the Committee for the Defense of Democracy, a civic organization formed in November 2015 in opposition to the Law and Justice Party government, which Committee members said had initiated anti-democratic reforms in the country.
In turn, coming out in support of the Committee, Walesa made his dramatic statement about the possibility of “civil war,” even admitting that it may be necessary to create self-defense groups to defend against attacks by pro-government mobs.
“This is a very serious matter, but apparently, I will have no other choice but to agree to a defensive organization, because the police does not protect those who are being attacked, who are being beaten up,” the former president said.
The conflict between Walesa and the current government has been building steadily since last year, when the conservative nationalist and mildly Eurosceptic Law and Justice Party won the presidency and then a parliamentary majority, allowing the party to form the government.
Opponents among Poland’s powerful pro-EU polity soon blamed the new government for adopting a series of laws they said had restricted freedom of the press and the independence of the judiciary, including the country’s constitutional court. The government and its supporters responded that their actions were meant to return control of Polish institutions to Polish hands, and urged Brussels not to intervene in the country’s domestic affairs.
Domestically, the new government’s policies led to protests, sometimes growing to several hundred thousand people at a time, which Walesa would personally help coordinate. In April, he declared that he was ready to bring people out to the barricades against the current government.
“When this demagogy and populism can no longer justify itself and people understand how they [the government] are harming Poland, it will be necessary to take a courageous decision, and, most likely, I’ll take it, and we will finish the work of this government, which does so much to harm Poland,” the ex-president said.
Walesa’s critics, including supporters of the government, have not rested in their efforts to discredit him, mounting a campaign to destroy the anti-communist hero’s reputation. Earlier this year, documents were found among the belongings of a communist era interior minister which supposedly proved that Walesa had served as an informant for the country’s secret police during the communist period.
Walesa first denied the allegation, but eventually admitted that he had met several times with counterintelligence (and not the secret police) until 1976.
Monitoring the ongoing political drama unfolding in Poland, Kiril Ozimko, an independent journalist and contributor to the online news and analysis portal PolitRussia, warned that effectively, Poland’s polity and civil society have been split into two camps: those supporting the government and those who are opposed.
“The opposition Committee for the Defense of Democracy is supported by pro-Brussels leftists and liberals, including the liberal Modern Party, the Polish Peasant Party, the Democratic Left Alliance and the Civic Platform. In turn, supporters of President Duda, Law and Justice leader Jaroslaw Kaczynski include nationalists, the right, conservatives, and Catholic movements (Piast, United Poland, the League to Protect Independence, and Poland Together).”
The political confrontation, Ozimko noted, “has created a visible rift in society.” In the presidential runoff election in May 2015, Duda defeated his Civic Platform opponent, Bronislaw Komorowski by only 1.5%, (51.5-48.5%).
What’s more, the journalist recalled, government supporters are concentrated in the country’s east, with their opponents based largely in the north and west of the country, effectively creating “a split in between west and east, though not as serious as the one in Ukraine.”
“Of course, the chances of the situation being brought to a civil war are unlikely,” the journalist emphasized. “But still, as the example of Ukraine has taught us, anything is possible. In any event, the escalation that is taking place today is driving the country in that direction.”
“For now, the most likely scenario is a split in society and a political crisis; the results of such a scenario would be is difficult to predict. But one thing is certain: Poland will not face events identical to the Ukrainian scenario.” This, Ozimko noted, has to do with Poland’s mono-ethnic, monolingual and almost uniformly monoreligious character, and the fact that nearly all Poles consider themselves part of the West, both geopolitically and civilizationally.
“Second, the positions of the government and the opposition are not radically different. Both are oriented to the West, and are equally unkindly disposed toward Moscow; both have been known to make revanchist statements and to wax nostalgic for ‘Greater Poland’, from the Baltic to the Black Seas, which could realistically be achieved only through the creation of a union with the Baltic states and Ukraine.” Ultimately, “the basic conflict between politicians relates only to some internal matters, such as control of the media and the Constitutional Tribunal,” the journalist explained.
Therefore, Ozimko noted, Walesa’s “loud statements are unlikely to have a basis in reality. Most likely, this is another attempt at regaining attention, which the politician lost over the years.”
“Nevertheless, even just political instability is still instability. And given Poland’s proximity to the Collective Security Treaty Organization [which includes Russia, Belarus, and four other post-Soviet states], Moscow must pay closer attention to the events taking place in this country.”
“The situation is only compounded by the fact that a large part of Poland’s population adheres to openly anti-Russian sentiments, and the fact that the country has NATO bases,” and soon a US missile defense base, to boot. “Therefore, for Russia, any conflict in a neighboring state, even a political one, cannot be met with indifference.”
“Perhaps Walesa is one of the few figures inside Poland who would benefit from a possible political crisis. But to Poland’s west such a crisis would be beneficial to many others; therefore, it’s something that Moscow would do best to keep a close eye on,” Ozimko concluded.
- Activities of Incumbent Polish Authorities Can Lead to Civil War
- Europeans ‘Abdicated Much of Their Sovereignty to Washington’
- Polish Politician Says NATO Should Arm Kiev With Advanced Lethal Weaponry
- Paranoia Over ‘Imminent Russian Invasion of Poland’ Gives Analysts a Good Laugh
- Naming Roads, Burning Bridges: Kiev Loses Friends Glorifying War Criminals
- Ruinous or Not, Washington Insists Europe Maintain Anti-Russian Sanctions