Russian FM Zakharova to NWO agent Boris Johnson: Stop your false accusation against Russia

"So, Mr. Johnson, you want to accuse Russia, don't you?"

"So, Mr. Johnson, you want to accuse Russia, don't you?"
“So, Mr. Johnson, you want to accuse Russia, don’t you? Then present the evidence. It’s that simple.”

…by Jonas E. Alexis


Journalist Finian Cunningham has recently called Boris Johnson a crazy clown with “buffoonish public antics” for good reasons.[1] In the same vein, Ian Greenhalgh and Gordon Duff have rightly said that Johnson “is a skillful exponent of the dark arts of lying, deceiving and misleading.” No kidding.

There is no doubt that Johnson is also a New World Order agent who has a penchant for things diabolical. That’s why he has carefully chosen to say that if Russia continues to support Assad, then the country needs to be “turned to ashes.”

If you don’t believe this, then pick up his book on Churchill and start reading it. He writes that Churchill had a “deep humanity and sympathy for other people,”[2] but he never tells his readers how Churchill bragged about liquidating millions of ethnic German civilians to death.

As we have argued elsewhere, Churchill was one of the strategic mass murderers in the twentieth century. He lied about Hitler. He signed pacts with the greatest mass murderer in the twentieth century (Joseph Stalin), literally starved millions of German civilians[3] and even Indians to death, and invented bold and categorical lies to marshal what one ought to call a diabolical plan. Churchill once chided that Palestinians are a bunch of “barbaric hoards who ate little but camel dung.”[4] Is this the man who had a “deep humanity and sympathy for other people”?

Churchill, we are told,

“unleashed the notorious Black and Tan thugs on Ireland’s Catholic civilians, and when the Kurds rebelled against British rule, he said: ‘I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes…[It] would spread a lively terror.’”[5]

At one point, “when an aide pointed out that Tito intended to transform Yugoslavia into a Communist dictatorship on the Soviet model,” Churchill, who was “profoundly impressed by Darwinism,” who took Darwin’s survival of the fittest very seriously, who “took a particular dislike, for some reason, to the Catholic Church, as well as Christian missions” and who gradually became, in his own words, “a materialist—to the tips of my fingers,”[6] declared: “‘Do you intend to live there?’”[7]

One writer declares:

“The massacres carried out by Churchill’s protégé, Tito, must be added to this list: tens of thousands of Croats, not simply the Ustasha, but any ‘class-enemies,’ in classical Communist style.

“There was also the murder of some 20,000 Slovene anti-Communist fighters by Tito and his killing squads. When Tito’s Partisans rampaged in Trieste, which he was attempting to grab in 1945, additional thousands of Italian anti-Communists were massacred.”[8]

Churchill made it clear that Hitler, not Stalin or Tito, was his primary target: “the defeat, ruin, and slaughter of Hitler, to the exclusion of all other purposes, loyalties and aims.”[9]

When Stalin and other Communist leaders were creating hell in Europe in the Bolshevik slaughter houses, perceptive observers began to get upset. Yet again Churchill’s response was astonishing:

“Why are we making a fuss about the Russian deportations in Rumania of Saxons [Germans] and others?…

“I cannot see the Russians are wrong in making 100 or 150 thousand of these people work their passage….

“I cannot myself consider that it is wrong of the Russians to take Rumanians of any origin they like to work in the Russian coal-fields.”[10]

In 1915, after provoking other nations to get into World War I, Churchill declared,

“I know this war is smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment—and yet—I cannot help it—I love every second I live.”[11]

Churchill’s wicked acts are rarely known among the public because people New World Order agents like Boris Johnson have desperately tried to obscure historical facts.

Maria Zakharova
Maria Zakharova

But Boris has been intellectually wounded by Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, a courageous woman who has caused political damage in the New World Order. Listen to this:

[youtube _uWIKqVNF78]

Zakharova has been making the same point that we have been trying to raise over and over: if you are going to make an extraordinary claim, then be willing to provide serious evidence.

But since New World Order agents like Johnson do not live in a rational world, they have to postulate lies, fabrications, and colossal hoaxes and deceptions. That’s how they have seduced the masses for decades. It is really a breath of fresh air that Russia is challenging that New World Order ideology. As Kevin Barrett puts in 2014:

“God bless President Putin, who is putting the fear of God into the New World Order.”

[1] Finian Cunningham, “Did UK Clown-Diplomat Boris Johnson Threaten Russia With War?,” Sputnik, October 14, 2016.

[2] Boris Johnson, The Churchill Factor: How One Man Made History (New York: Random House, 2014), 337.

[3] See E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 1201-1214.

[4] Johann Hari, “Not his finest hour: The dark side of Winston Churchill,” Independent, October 28, 2010.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Quoted in Ralph Raico, Great Wars & Great Leaders (Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2010), 59.

[7] Ibid., 85.

[8] Ibid., 95.

[9] Ibid., 81.

[10] Ibid., 95.

[11] Ibid., 101.

All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Sweet Guy, or Behave, or Renato Salomone – treenoise, or Martha Fyns, or Myrna Lomas, or whatever name you have morphed into,

    Your comments a few days ago regarding my character (such as “repressed homosexual”) were so disgusting and nasty that they were eventually removed by the general manager (I didn’t even ask them to do so). Even after that, you have adopted different names so that you can continue your rantings. Please understand that I have no intention whatsoever to answer to your ridiculous assertions.

    Let me just say that we are not living in the Middle Ages anymore. This is the information age. So, if you want to know whether I did get a degree in math and philosophy or not, call my school and they will tell you. If you want more reference, I graduated in December of 2002, with a degree in math and philosophy and with a special interest in science and history. I did get a master’s degree in education and even did teach in my own state (Florida) for six years. Your question regarding my credentials was so stupid that I honestly thought that I was not dealing with a person who is looking for the pursuit of truth but to try to make a nonsensical point.

    Finally, if you are right in saying that I am not qualified to talk about some of these issues, then Darwin himself was not qualified to be a scientist precisely because he never got a science degree(Yes, he did study the sciences on the side). Michael Shermer is not qualified to talk about The Mind of the Market because his degree is in psychology and the history of science. Charles Lyell, who revolutionized the understanding of the age of the earth with his Principles of Geology, studied geology intensively after he became a lawyer, but never got a degree in the sciences. James Hutton was not trained in geology, but in medicine and agriculture; he is known today for his theoretical model in the field of geology. Herbert Spencer, who coined the term “survival of the fittest,” was a self-taught engineer. I can go on and on.

    You are free to believe whatever nonsense you have concocted, but this is not the kind of place where you can decide to personally attack people you don’t even know. Now you can go away or stop making one nonsense after another. I honestly did not even feel at ease responding to your nonsense at all. But if you continue to violate the policy of the comments board, I will ask the manager that you be indefinitely terminated. Thank you.

  2. Richard Moore´s response appears to use the term “Professor” as adulation and respect, based on his valuation of the scholarly compositions of Jonas Alexis, that are published on VT.
    The title, Professor, is incremental in genuine universities, Asst. Professor, Associate Professor, Professor, Professor Emeritus. Some institutes of learning, above high-school graduate, assign the title, professor, to teachers who do not possess a doctoral-level diploma. Some universities assign the title, “Asst. Professor” to doctoral students, advanced in their program of studies, who serve as instructors in the same university.
    While Jonas Alexis does not publish a doctoral-level title with his name, his graduate-level education is well reflected in his scholarly articles. Regardless of Alesis´s major areas of concentration, whether teaching basket-weaving or teaching physics, his compositions reflect critical thinking, presenting the core of the subject, and effective summarizations.
    My opinion is somewhat based on my experiences, having taught for two universities, after earning a Ph.D. at a major state university, awarded June, 1971. My experience as psychologist since 1970 also has an influence on my opinion.

  3. Hello Professor Alexis. Trolls are out in full force. No worries even us guys from the street are getting bomb blasted. Must be some kind of fall campaign, to supress dissent, being waged to benfit by the dread few and the profiteers who benfit following them.

    Im starting to think your lessons are rubing off on me. I started to due some critical reading reguarding criticism on ‘Rise of a Nation’. It didnt take to long for me to realize that there is a underlying hand in the back lash. Maybe due to severe lack of academic discipline I baiked out of my research. Non the less I am going to go see the movie for myself today.

    There are some questions I am going to explore while viewing the movie. One is a question iv been asking myself lately. What happened to the Abuliton minded Christians prior to the U.S. Cival War? Being a reader of V.T. I have some insight to this question. Is the masters of Hollywood terfied of alternatives? Is what this move is conjering a break away from popular thinking in the U.S. And what is it that Black American as well as most Americans should consider when vewing alt films.

    Well Professor I brought this to your attion because you the expert. I have no dought you will beable to point out angles most of us wont see.

    Also Professor Alexis is there a sight where we can ask these kind of question. Your Facebook is long past due for a up date and im not much for Twitter.

    Well its a shot in the dark. I hope this reach you. Peace.

  4. If I was an FSB member I would do my best to publish the names and pictures and resumes of americans pilots that attacked Deir Ez Zor, as well as the chain of command who gave such orders, and would do it every day for all sorties that USA army and their “allies” conduct, with the same respective frenzy the Assad government and the rest are treated. With all the Hague accolades next to every story. USA army cannot forever be absolved of war criminality, they are not angelic beings incapable of it.

  5. @Jonas, first Renato Salomone – treenoise and now Behave but as the Chinese sage once said “Many enemies much honor” !

    This is precisely what you have saying in most of your articles that these NeoCon rats can not face the truth because the Talmudic ill moral ethics and false witness of this glorious reality does not permit them as it is incompatible with all things true.

    You will find that they always attack the messenger instead of the message in some futile attempt to distract attention from the message. None of these scum dare say that what you have written is false because they know the truth when they see it.

    You often present characters to be ethically slayed by always showing the contradictions in their own statements, and hence premise, then you proceed to show that these characters seem to be holding incompatible opinions in the same breath without their limited heads exploding !

    The answer to this I guess is not philosophical but rather financial, and these people are typical of those with a moral vacuum because they are on the take. It doesnt always take the form of money, to many sayanims a political pat on their heads is enough.

    So yes, they have not been able to disclaim the truth of your many articles which I hope someday may be compiled in a book form as a testimony of a lone man against falsehood.

  6. @Renato Salomone – treenoise

    Logos, “Ancient Greek philosophers used the term in different ways.”

    .. way long before Christianity.

    • @Jonas, I just learned that the term Alexis is closely related to the word Logos, loosely speaking a ‘messenger’.

      ‘Although the term “Logos” is widely used in this Christian sense, in academic circles it often refers to the various ancient Greek uses, or to post-Christian uses within contemporary philosophy, Sufism, and the analytical psychology of Carl Jung.

      Despite the conventional translation as “word”, it is not used for a word in the grammatical sense; instead, the term lexis was used.

      However, both logos and lexis derive from the same verb lego, meaning “count, tell, say, speak”‘

  7. Same stock like Churchill, what can one await form this ? Same ovar, same shit. It´s a big “family” of thugs and criminals like the mob.

  8. There’s a slightly modified old saying highly appropriate for people like B.J. : “In the age of Internet, before looking for idiots around either look in the mirror or go online first…”. The problem with all these B.J. guys (sorry if it sounds a bit raunchy) is that they do not understand – the time of myths and parasitizing on them is gone. Once and forever.

  9. Johnson “is a skillful exponent of the dark arts of lying, deceiving and misleading”(while masquerading as a nitwit). and openly admits to worship Bacchus (masquerading, as the god of wine) …a malevolence lies behind Boris Johnson proposing a country be “turned to ashes”, set to further that cause they all come together on… look at The Temple of Bacchus …and the keystone…” the largest keystone in the world. It could also be the most unusual on account of the minimum degree of the wedging angle”…, an expedition sent to “prop- up” one stone led by Richard Burton in 1870 …..the keystone would fall on its “phoenix” face it weren’t propped to keep it in position, until an opportune time, for the ready-to-go “Temple” nightmare they plan in Jerusalem, with “certain pieces” missing….a key-stone they would never admit to salivating over …and why they hate Hezbollah so as this key-stone, there is no substitute, is propped up in the heartland of Hezbollah and they think under their ISIS flag they can take it.. Hezbollah and true Islam are entrusted with more than any can imagine, while Christianity slept and failed to see written in the book of Acts Stephens words that led to his stoning, exposing hidden worship through the Star of Remphan in direct opposition to their claims…as is israel ….the phoenix rising from “the ashes” of Johnson’s reference…the past present and future in the now an understanding we must come together on…and we cant fail

    • the star of remphan aka Rothschilds red shield, paint it blue, flag of israel, the past is present…let this not be our planets future and the end of humanity

Comments are closed.