Are George Soros and Saul Alinsky Satanists?

Saul Alinsky
Saul Alinsky

…by Jonas E. Alexis


At the very beginning of his manifesto Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, Saul Alinsky got straight to the point:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—Lucifer.”[1]

Rules for Radicals is about political strategies, psychological manipulation, and how to start a covert enterprise and deception. Alinsky got it right when he said that “the most practical life is the moral life and that the moral life is the only road to survival.”[2]

But throughout Rules for Radicals, Alinsky posits one statement after another which deconstructs this very proposition. For example, rules 3 states: “Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.”[3]

Fourth rule: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.”[4] Alinsky obviously knew that his opponents may bring certain arguments which are probably incontrovertible or irrefutable. But the best way to deal with those irrefutable arguments is to ridicule them without substance.

Alinsky also knew that if you cannot refute certain arguments, then attack the person’s character, and if he jumps on the bandwagon, then you’ve got him. If you can distract your opponent from his main point, says Alinsky, then you’ll have a chance of destroying his arguments.

So, if some idiot or mush-head tries to get you distracted with completely silly arguments or disgusting statements about your character, ignore him. As the saying goes, do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you’re going to be just like him.

Thirteenth rule: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”[5]

None of these principles are congruent with the moral order. Alinsky undermined his own mines by saying, “The basic tactic in warfare against the Haves is a mass political jujitsu.”[6] What are some of the strategies of this “political jujitsu”? Well, simple: “You can club them [the Haves] to death with their ‘book’ of rules and regulations.”[7]

Right before he passed away in 1972, Alinsky declared during a Playboy interview:

If there is an afterlife, and I have anything to say about it, I will unreservedly choose to go to hell.”

What is interesting here is that George Soros published Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals in 2014 in places like the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia through his George Soros’s Open Society Foundation.[8]

The Open Society Foundation even “promoted [Rules for Radicals] with an event in Skopje, the nation’s capital, livestreamed around the nation on the Internet.”[9]

What does that tell you about Soros? Is he really promoting democracy and freedom in those countries? Or is he trying to use his money and power to promote an essentially wicked system, as in the case of Black Lives Matter?


Jim W. Dean has said that Soros is “the man who refuses to die and join his victim.” He obviously knows that if he didn’t get arrested for destroying the Russian economy in the 1990s, then he can do the same covert activity in other countries. Soros is not willing to submit his will to the moral and political order, therefore he has to act outside practical reason.

This inevitably makes Soros and his enterprise irresponsible, dangerous, and diabolical. This is one reason why he continues to support a flood of so-called refugees to Europe. “By failing to help refugees,” Soros wrote last year in the Financial Times, “Europe fails itself.”[10] As a result, Soros admitted last month that he is in the process of investing at least $500 million “in migrants.”[11]

Soros got it backwards. He should have said something like this: “By funding the Syrian terrorists who are trying to overthrow the Syrian government, and by attacking Russia, the West (myself included) is responsible for the refugee crisis.”

But Soros cannot say things like that because his ideological weltanschauung does not allow him to see the obvious. If Brother Nathanael Kapner is right, that Soros is “an evil Rothschild agent,”[12] then he is a New World Order agent. As such, we should expect him to reproduce the work of Satanists like Saul Alinsky. As F. William Engdahl pointed out last year, Soros is using his “democracy promotion” to advance a subversive movement in Europe. Soros, “the notorious magnate,”

“created a network of foundations and instigated a series blatant regime changes in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet republics after the collapse of the USSR. Now his foundations are up to their eyeballs in promoting propaganda serving the US-UK war agenda for destroying stability in Syria as they did in Libya three years ago, creating the current EU refugee crisis.”[13]

In short, Soros, like Alinsky, is against metaphysical reason. In that sense, he is a Satanist in disguise. He is right in line with oligarchic companies like Goldman Sachs.

[1] Saul D. Alinsky, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals (New York: Vintage Books, 1971), ix.

[2] Ibid., 23.

[3] Ibid., 127.

[4] Ibid., 128.

[5] Ibid., 130.

[6] Ibid., 152.

[7] Ibid.

[8] “George Soros is translating Saul Alinsky into different languages,” Free Republic, October 14, 2014.

[9] Rod Dreher, “Saul Alinsky, A Gift From America?,” American Conservative, October 3, 2016.

[10] George Soros, “By Failing to Help Refugees Europe Fails Itself,” Financial Times, July 17, 2015.

[11] George Soros, “Why I’m Investing $500 Million in Migrants,” Wall Street Journal, September 20, 2016.

[12] Kapner declares that Soros “built his Rothschild alliance” through people like Richard Katz (“Former head of Rothschild Italia and an officer of NM Rothschild & Sons in London. Katz is now a member of Soros’ Quantum Fund committee”), Nils Taube (Partner of the Rothschild investment group St James Place Capital which now belongs to Nathaniel Rothschild, son and heir of Jacob Rothschild. Taube is also a member of Soros’ ‘Quantum Fund’”), and Michael Cicure (“Michael Cicurel. He is the manager of Rothschild’s Societe Generale Bank & has a seat on the board of Rothschild & Cie Banque”).

[13] “Welcome to Europe! Soros Adding Fuel to the Fire of EU’s Refugee Crisis,” Sputnik News, December 18, 2015.

Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.

5 Replies to “Are George Soros and Saul Alinsky Satanists?

  1. Another superb article in a long chain of some of the very best VT has to offer. Amazingly accurate and insightful. These satanic scum are attempting to attain their Globalist NWO and create hell on Earth. Highest commendations for exposing these major cutout doofuses anointed by Satan to destroy mankind.

  2. Whatever else George Soros does, but he’s for sure working hard on two things: spreading chaos and creating a “new race” (one facilitates another). The chaos is obviously temporary, and won’t be needed after the new race – a mixed in the worst way, progressively genderless, oblivious of its past (therefore not carrying of its future), standardized society of 24/7 electronically controlled humanoids emerges for Controllers’ utter delight. The polite name for such tremendous “achievement“ of humanity is “NWO”, though certain rude and narrow-minded individuals insist on calling it “cattle farm”. NWO by definition is Satanic (in all senses of this word), so anyone consciously contributing to its advance is a Satanist, though Controllers themselves prefer more romantic : “a Globalist”, “a Light in the Darkness”, …, “H-> Clitnon Kaine”. Convert all letters in the latter banner in reverse alphabet and add them up. The “magic” number (some call it quite differently) talks for itself.

  3. “Lest we forget” ..Protocol 5 ” Our kingdom will be distinguished by despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word.
    For a time perhaps we might be successfully dealt with by a coalition of the goyim of all the world: but by this danger “we are secured by the discord” existing among whose roots are so deeply seated they can never now be plucked up. We have set one against another the personal and national reckonings of the goyim”
    ….”never” is hubris…Truth uprooting and plucking up the harvest through seeds of discord sown among the nations tearing through barriers deeply rooted in religion…. the harvest of lies ends “the discord” their kingdom, in direct opposition survived on…

  4. These scumbags are untouchable. Who will bring them to justice? It seems the only option is to wait until all these ugly bastards meet in the same place and…These parasites will never be satisfied with what they have and will continue the war path until someone puts them out of our misery.

Comments are closed.