Actress and neuroscientist Mayim Bialik is a Zionist (XXXX)

10
1837

mayim-bialikMayim Bialik

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

There is no doubt that Jewish actress Mayim Bialik understands logic and the historical method. There is no doubt that she has the sophistication to look at the long history of Zionism and realize that it is a wicked ideology and political movement.

Bialik has a Ph.D. in neuroscience and things like basic historical facts should not be a big problem for her to understand.But since she is living in an incoherent and essentially diabolical system, she has to propound one nonsense after another. Here is Bialik at her best:

For those of you who refuse to follow me and discourage others from doing so because I am a Zionist (as if that’s a crime!!), I highly recommend you look up Zionism in a dictionary rather than using the definition perpetrated by anti-Semitic media and leaders.”

Bialik moves on to say that the true definition of Zionism is the belief that Jews like herself need an “autonomous homeland. If you don’t want to follow me because I believe in that, by all means don’t.”gordon-duff

This is really a spit in the face of the entire historical record. Does Bialik really think that this is why people of all stripes have been complaining about Zionism? Bialik is making even Jewish historians like Ilan Pappe and Benny Morris look bad.

Here is what we are proposing to Bialik: she should consult the historical record and see what Zionism actually has done over the past sixty years or so. For example, in an interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz in 2004, Israeli historian Benny Morris declared:

“A Jewish state would not have come into being without the uprooting of 700,000 Palestinians. Therefore it was necessary to uproot them. There was no choice but to expel that population.

It was necessary to cleanse the hinterland and cleanse the border areas and cleanse the main roads. It was necessary to cleanse the villages from which our convoys and our settlements were fired on.

“The term `to cleanse’ is terrible. I know it doesn’t sound nice but that’s the term they used at the time. I adopted it from all the 1948 documents in which I am immersed. I feel sympathy for the Palestinian people, which truly underwent a hard tragedy. I feel sympathy for the refugees themselves. But if the desire to establish a Jewish state here is legitimate, there was no other choice.”[1]

Morris is the author of the Cambridge historical text The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited, in which he documents throughout that raping Palestinian girls and women was rampant in 1948.[2] Other Jewish scholars such as Ilan Pappe have documented the same thing.[3]

Pappe even goes so far as to say that there were numerous documents which Morris did not discuss in his studies precisely because those documents would have obviously ruined the prevailing vision that Israel “waged a ‘moral’ war in 1948 against a ‘primitive’ and hostile Arab world…”

One can say that 1948 was the year in which Darwinism met Zionism. In other words, it was survival of the fittest. The Palestinians had to be ethnically cleansed and died. Mothers had to weep for their children and poor Palestinians had to make way for “The Chosen.”

palestinians2

But raping Palestinians during that time would not have been possible had England and America proceeded to help Zionist organizations.[4] Christian Zionist organizations also played a big role in building a Zionist kingdom in Israel.[5]

So it is really disingenuous for Bialik to even insinuate that Zionism is just about having an autonomous homeland, free of terrorism and threats. And does Bialik really believe that The Occupation, which Pappe calls “the biggest prison on earth,”[6] is legitimate?

And what about Operation Cast Lead (2008-2009), Operation Pillar of Defense (2012), and Operation Protective Edge (2014)—Israeli wars which obliterate Palestinian men, women and children?[7]

And if this isn’t wicked enough, what about Gilad Sharon, son of Ariel Sharon (Prime Minister of Israel), saying that Israel needs “to flatten entire neighborhoods in Gaza”?[8] Gilad was just warming up:

“There should be no electricity in Gaza, no gasoline or moving vehicles, nothing. Then they’d really call for a ceasefire. Were this to happen, the images from Gaza might be unpleasant – but victory would be swift, and the lives of our soldiers and civilians spared.”[9]

If a person resists this diabolical enterprise, would Bialik call him or her an anti-Semite? If that is the case, then Bialik is actually making “anti-Semitism” a rational position. As E. Michael Jones succinctly puts it,

“An anti-Semite used to be someone who didn’t like Jews. Now it is usually someone whom Jews don’t like.”[10]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-VFPxh_KJY


[1] Ari Shavit, “”Survival of the Fittest? an Interview with Benny Morris,” Haaretz, January 9, 2004.

[2] Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 210-249.

[3] Ilan Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (Oxford: One World, 2006), kindle edition.

[4] See Donald M. Lewis, The Origins of Christian Zionism: Lord Shaftesbury and Evangelical Support for a Jewish Homeland (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013); Stephen Spector, Evangelicals and Israel: The Story of American Christian Zionism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008); Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement: The Dramatic Story of the Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine (Danvers, MA: Dialog Press, 1983 and 2009); Timothy P. Weber, On the Road to Armageddon: How Evangelicals Became Israel’s Best Friend (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2004); Stephen Sizer, Christian Zionism: Road-map to Armageddon? (Downer Groves: IVP Academic, 2006).

[5] For further research, see Paul Boyer, When Time Shall Be No More: Prophecy Belief in Modern American Culture (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992); Daniel N. Wojcik, The End of the World As We Know It: Faith, Fatalism, and Apocalypse in America (New York: New York University Press, 1997); Stephen D. O’Leary, Arguing the Apocalypse: A Theory of Millennial Rhetoric (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998); Victoria Clark, Allies for Armageddon: The Rise of Christian Zionism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007).

[6] Ilan Pappe, The Biggest Prison on Earth: A History of the Occupied Territories (Oxford: One World, 2016).

[7] See Norman Finkelstein, Method and Madness: The Hidden Story of Israel’s Assaults on Gaza (New York and London: OR Books, 2014).

[8] Gilad Sharon, “A decisive conclusion is necessary,” Jerusalem Post, November 8, 2012.

[9] Ibid.

[10] E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1063.

Biography
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He is currently working on a book tentatively titled, Kevin MacDonald’s Abject Failure: A Philosophical and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and White Identity. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

Comments are closed.