Who will the Rothschilds and the oligarchs pick in this dizzying election?

1
1561
Lady de Rothschild
Lady de Rothschild

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

You just have to love how the Powers That Be have changed or rigged the political process and moved the mass media into a particular direction at will. You just have to give them some credit because they are really smooth at dazzling decent Americans and teaching them what to think. And once they change the rules, their lackeys obediently follow them.

Remember how in 2008 Lady de Rothschild quickly left the Democratic Party for a season and supported John McCain?[1] Remember how Mrs. Rothschild hypocritically and risibly called Obama “an elitist” and said that McCain ought to be the president of the United States?

Well, Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild has switched sides again. She is picking Hillary. She has conducted a fundraiser for her long-time friend. She’s been supporting her since the 1990s.[2] Mrs. Rothschild said, “‘Let’s make it a nice night for her and show her our love.”[3]

Obviously something fishy is going on. Even Campbell Brown of CNN was confused because Hillary’s policies are not that much different from what Obama has been implementing. Sure, there are points of tensions, but both Hillary and Obama fundamentally have a kindred spirit.

The big question is this: why did Mrs. Rothschild make the big move? Is it possible that people like her think that they can turn the political dial in their favor? Apparently they do. And if history teaches us anything, the Rothschild family is synonymous with economic thievery and political corruption. The German Jewish poet and literary critic Heinrich Heine himself declared back in 1841:

“Money is the god of our time, and Rothschild is his prophet.”[4]

Zionist historian Niall Ferguson himself cites in his book The House of Rothschild: “No one does more to further the revolution than the Rothschilds themselves…and, though it may sound even more strange, these Rothschilds, the bankers of kings, these princely pursestring-holders, whose existence might be placed in the gravest danger by a collapse of the European state system, nevertheless carry in their minds a consciousness of their revolutionary mission. I see in Rothschild one of the greatest revolutionaries who have founded modern democracy.”[5]


In many ways, they founded “modern democracy” by destroying the old system and replacing it with Mammon.

rothschild-rigWho will the Powers That  Be choose?

“Rothschild…destroyed the predominance of land, by raising the system of state bonds to supreme power, thereby mobilizing property and some income and at the same time endowing money with the previous privileges of the land. He thereby created a new aristocracy, it is true, but this, resting as it does on the most unreliable of elements, on money, can never play as endurably regressive a role as the former aristocracy, which was rooted in the land, in the earth itself.”[6]

The Clintons and the Rothschilds
The Clintons and the Rothschilds

Ferguson notes that “not only had the Rothschilds replaced the old aristocracy; they also represented a new materialist religion.”[7]

This “materialist religion” is money, and the Rothschilds have used it to shake the political landscape for centuries.

So, the presidential election is rigged, and one party is just as morally corrupt as the other. Dana Milbank of the Washington Post actually got it right when he said that “Everybody knows that, behind closed doors, politicians often sell themselves to the highest bidder.”[8]

The Republican Party, as Milbank pointed out, sold themselves to Jewish mogul Sheldon Adelson, the man who was accused of spreading prostitution and organized crime in places like Macau, China. Steven Jacobs,

“The former CEO of Adelson’s highly profitable casinos in the Chinese enclave of Macau… is suing because he claims to have been sacked for trying to break links to organized crime groups, the triads, and for attempting to halt alleged influence peddling with Chinese officials.”[9]

Jacobs charged that Adelson’s covert operation in Macau is basically “loan sharks and prostitution,” and this “prostitution strategy had been personally approved by Adelson.”[10] Macau is almost like Berlin in the 1920s and early 30s, where prostitution and organized crime become the law.

Welcome to Macau
Welcome to Macau

In Macau, we are told, “gaming revenue has now roared ahead of Las Vegas and Atlantic City combined,”[11] and it is safe to say that Adelson specifically chose Macau because morality or practical reason is out of the equation.

“More than three-in-five gamblers in Macau come across the border in mainland China and they’re losing money at a rate the world has previously never seen.”[12]

Adelson, an Israeli firster, gave more than $100 million to the Republican Party in 2012.[13] Adelson also

“gave some $250 million to Birthright Israel in the last decade, spends a reported $33 million a year covering the losses of the free Israeli daily he owns, the fiercely pro-Netanyahu Israel Hayom, and is a main backer of such right-wing causes as the Zionist Organization of America, the Republican Jewish Coalition and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s This World Values Network.”[14]

If we turn the table around, we can clearly see that Hillary Clinton is embroiled in almost the same mess. George Soros—the man who is behind the Black Lives Matter movement, the man who helped destroy the Russian economy in the 1990s, the man who is behind the so-called refugee crisis in Europe—has donated at least $8 million to Hillary.[15]

Haim Saban is another donor of the Clinton campaign. Saban’s “three ways to be influential in American politics” are pretty straightforward:

“Make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets… By far his most important relationship is with Bill and Hillary Clinton. In 2002, Saban donated five million dollars to Bill Clinton’s Presidential library, and he has given more than five million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.”[16]

Saban meant it when he said: “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.”[17] Saban, we are told, “is unabashedly pro-Israel and, according to people who work with him, harbors a wariness of Arabs that may stem from growing up as a Jew in Egypt.”[18]

Saban is attached to Hillary because Hillary has promised him that should Iran attack Israel, “We . . . will . . . obliterate . . . them. Four words, it’s simple to understand.”[19]

Saban calls Iran “rogue state that is supporting killing our men and women in Iraq; that is a supporter of Hezbollah, which killed more Americans than any other terrorist organization; that is a supporter of Hamas, which shot twelve thousand rockets at Israel.”[20]

Saban had a major influence on Ehud Barak, former Israeli Minister of Defense and Deputy Prime Minister in Benjamin Netanyahu’s second government from 2009 to 2013. Throughout his political career, Barak supported Israel’s slaughter of the Palestinians.[21]


trumpDonald Trump and former Playboy Bunny Karen McDougal

It has recently been reported that Donald Trump had an extramarital affair with a former Playboy Bunny by the name of Karen McDougal. The owner of National Enquirer, David Becker, who is reported to be a friend of Donald Trump, paid McDougal $150,000 to keep her quiet.[22] Much of the media acrimoniously declared again that Trump is a morally wicked person—and rightly so.

But the media machine is actually disingenuous again and again. When will they ever talk about Bill Clinton’s long history of degrading and raping women? When will they ever talk about Hillary being implicated in the whole debacle? I mean, Bill had a sexual relationship in the White House at least “nine confirmed times, several of which Hillary was at the White House at the time”

Bill also had a close relationship to Jeffrey Epstein, the man who has been charged of raping underage girls. From 2001 to 2003, Bill flew on Epstein’s private jet twenty six times. He and a number of academics such as Lawrence Krauss, David Gross, Gerard t’Hooft, Frank Wilczek, Martin Nowak, and even Stephen Hawking, visited Epstein’s island, which is commonly known as the “island of sin.”[23]

“Tales of orgies and young girls being shipped to the island, called Little St. James, have been revealed as part of an ongoing lawsuit between Epstein and his former lawyers Scott Rothstein and Bradley Edwards.”[24]

Epstein has even poured thousands upon thousands of dollars on the Clinton foundation.[25] Epstein was also a friend of Donald Trump. Trump declared then:

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”[26]

If decent Americans understand what’s going on here, wouldn’t they be careful in positing extraordinary assertions about a particular candidate without examining all the facts?

There is another issue that is hardly discussed in the political landscape. For the past one hundred years or so, ideologues from Marquis de Sade to Sigmund Freud and Wilhelm Reich advocated a promiscuous lifestyle and encouraged their followers to subvert the moral order. Freud himself declared quite explicitly:

“Sexual morality—as society, in its extreme form, the American, defines it—seems to me very contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life.”[27]

So, if morality is to be abandoned and that people ought to pursue “an incomparably freer sexual life,” how in the world can they really say that Trump or even Bill is wrong? Who are we really kidding?

It gets even interesting because the sex culture is now saying that Trump’s extramarital affair is wrong. I thought extramarital affairs were wrong only to people who hold traditional values!

The sad news is that not a single media outlet has ever condemned Hollywood for saturating young and precious young people with the idea that one ought to pursue a “freer sexual life” at any cost.

The sex industry has been saying that producing pornographic films such as Deep Throat, The Devil and Mrs. Jones, The Crash, A Dangerous Method, Cosmopolis, etc., is “democracy” and “freedom” and is never morally wrong, despite the fact that study after study shows that those movies have had a devastating effect on the culture.[28] Now get this (this was way back in 2004):

“It was reported that a local porn queen received college credit in her art class at the University of Southern California for an exhibit of hard-core ‘performance art.’ The class project that earned her rave reviews was undressing in front of the class and performing sex acts with two other women using vibrators.”[29]

Candice de Russy is a former professor and a trustee of the State University of New York. She argued that “sex toys, ‘bondage sex,’ and even ‘pedophilia art’ are now topics being taught in women’s workshops on campus, English literature classes, art departments, and in new centers of ‘lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender studies’ at a growing number of respected colleges on the campus of SUNY.”[30]

There is more. De Russy pointed out that courses or topics were and probably still are being offered on subjects such as

“Sodomy, Miscegenation, and the Impossibility of Privacy, along with a performance by a Los Angeles drag queen known as Vaginal Crème Davis. A previous conference on the same campus, ‘Revolting Behavior: Challenges to Women’s Sexual Freedom,’ promised to offer ‘cutting-edged scholarship in the field of lesbian sadomasochism’ and ‘how to’ manuals for lesbian sex, and booklets on how to dispose of razors and other instruments used in ‘cutting rituals.’”[31]

The University of Michigan once offered an English course entitled “How to Be Gay: Male Homosexuality and Initiation.” And Eve Ensler’s The Vagina Monologues are still being praised on college campuses. The whole point of The Vagina Monologues, as E. Michael Jones points out,

“is to break down the natural sexual reserve and modesty of the largely female teenage performers and audience as a prelude to colonization. It was a classic instance of sexual liberation as political control….

“Modesty is the first defense against the arousal of passion; it facilitates rational moral control of sexual impulse, but modesty was deliberately violated and ridiculed by the people putting on the [Vagina Monologues].”[32]

You see, none of these issues has been reported fairly and truthfully because the regime wants to bury decent Americans beneath an avalanche of hoaxes, deceptions, fabrications, and just plain lies.

The sex industry needs to stop using double standards and accepts some responsibility for the sexual debauchery they have created. They despise morality and attack it viciously in the school curriculum, in higher education and even in films, but they embrace it whenever they want to attack their enemies.

The sex industry praises people like Michel Foucault, who bragged, “To die for the love of boys: What could be more beautiful.”[33] Focault declared:

“The Faustian pact, whose temptation has been instilled in us by the deployment of sexuality, is now as follows: to exchange life in its entirety for sex itself, for the truth and sovereignty of sex. Sex is worth dying for. It is in this (strictly historical) sense that sex is indeed imbued with the death instinct.”[34]

But if a politician attempts to “grab [women] by the pussy,” he has committed a wicked act! As the old cartoon character would have said: “It just don’t add up!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqk0eFDCNR0


[1] Chris Rovzar, “Insanely Wealthy, Titled Aristocrat Thinks Barack Obama Is ‘Elitist,’” NY Magazine, September 17, 2008; Kate Linthicum, “Obama elitist, says Lady Rothschild,” LA Times, September 18, 2008.

[2] Christi Parsons, “Hillary Clinton raises funds at Martha’s Vineyard parties while Obamas dine elsewhere,” LA Times, August 21, 2016; Dan Keating, “Here are the 146 donors who have supported all six of the Clintons’ federal races,” Washington Post, November 19, 2015.

[3] Amy Chozick and Jonathan Martin, “Where Has Hillary Clinton Been? Ask the Ultrarich,” NY Times, September 3, 2016.

[4] Quoted in Niall Ferguson, The House of Rothschild: Money’s Prophets—1798-1848 (New York: Penguin Books, 1998), 17.

[5] Ibid., 16.

[6] Ibid., 16-17.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Dana Milbank, “GOP candidates kiss up to billionaire Sheldon Adelson,” Washington Post, April 1, 2014.

[9] Chris McGreal, “Sheldon Adelson faces new scrutiny as documents challenge his testimony,” Guardian, May 9, 2016; see also “A Former Sands Exec Has Accused Sheldon Adelson Of Personally Approving Prostitution At His Macau Resorts,” Business Insider, June 28, 2012; John L. Smith, “Big Trouble in Sheldon Adelson’s Little China,” Daily Beast, May 5, 2015; Edvard Pettersson, “Adelson May Have to Answer Ex-Macau Chief’s Casino Firing Claims,” Bloomberg, April 20, 2015; Alexandra Berzon and Kate O’Keeffe, “Sands Suit Alleges ‘Prostitution Strategy,’” Wall Street Journal, June 29, 2012; “Sheldon Adelson to Face Allegations of Graft, Ties to Chinese Organized Crime in U.S. Court,” Haaretz, May 23, 2015.

[10] Quoted in Evan Osnos, “Sheldon Adelson and Macau,” New Yorker, July 3, 2012.

[11] “Macau’s seedy casino war turns to gold,” Sydney Morning Herald, September 22, 2009.

[12] Ibid.

[13] J. J. Goldberg, “Could Sheldon Adelson Empire Be Toppled by Lawsuit?,” Jewish Daily Forward, May 12, 2015.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Kenneth P. Vogel, “George Soros donates $8 million to boost Hillary,” Politico, January 31, 2016; see also Fredreka Schouten, “George Soros backs pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC,” USA Today, October 24, 2013.

[16] Connie Bruck, “The Influencer: An Entertainment Mogul Sets His Sights on Foreign Policy,” New Yorker, May 10, 2010.

[17] Ibid.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Ibid.

[20] Ibid.

[21] See for example Norman Finkelstein, This Time We Went Too Far: Truth and Consequences of the Gaza Invasion (New York: OR Books, 2010); Method and Madness: The Hidden Story of Israel’s Assaults on Gaza (New York: OR Books, 2014); Ian Black and Ian Cobain, “Israeli minister Ehud Barak faces war crimes arrest threat during UK visit,” Guardian, September 29, 2009.

[22] “National Enquirer protected Donald Trump from Playboy model’s infidelity claims: report,” NY Daily News, November 5, 2016.

[23] Catherine Ostler, “Jeffrey Epstein: The Sex Offender Who Mixes with Princes and Premiers,” Newsweek, January 29, 2015.

[24] “Tales of orgies and young girls being shipped to the island, called Little St. James, have been revealed as part of an ongoing lawsuit between Epstein and his former lawyers Scott Rothstein and Bradley Edwards,” Daily Mail, January 6, 2015.

[25] See James Patterson and John Connolly, Filthy Rich: A Powerful Billionaire, the Sex Scandal that Undid Him, and All the Justice that Money Can Buy – The Shocking True Story of Jeffrey Epstein (New York: Little, Brown & Company, 2016).

[26] Maureen Callahan, “The ‘sex slave’ scandal that exposed pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein,” NY Post, October 9, 2016.

[27] Quoted in Peter Gay, Freud: A Life of Our Time (New York: W. W. Norton, 1998), 143.

[28] See for example Gary Wilson, Your Brain on Porn: Internet Pornography and the Emerging Science of Addiction (Kent, CT: Commonwealth Publishing, 2015); William M. Struthers, Wired for Intimacy: How Pornography Hijacks the Male Brain (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2009); Gail Dines, Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality (Boston: Beacon Press, 2010); Pamela Paul, Pornified: How Pornography Is Damaging Our Lives, Our Relationships, and Our Families (New York: Times Books, 2005); E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (South Bend; Fidelity Press, 2000).

[29] Jim Nelson Black, Freefall of the American University: How Our Colleges Are Corrupting the Minds and Morals of the Next Generation (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2004), 190.

[30] Ibid., 191.

[31] Ibid.

[32] E. Michael Jones, “The Vagina Monologues at Notre Dame: Who Has the Most Famous Vagina in History?,” Culture Wars, April 2003.

[33] Quoted in Mark Lilla, The Reckless Mind: Intellectuals in Politics (New York: New York Review of Books, 2001), 157.

[34] Quoted in E. Michael Jones, “Twilight for the Oligarchs, Part II,” Culture Wars, November 2016.


Loading...

EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

1 COMMENT

  1. Rothschilds probably buy both candidates. That way there is no risk of loss, just like their fiat currency system. When you’ve been printing money out of thin air and loaning it to governments for centuries, money is no object.

Comments are closed.