…by Jonas E. Alexis
“President Obama has ordered the Pentagon to find and kill the leaders of an al-Qaeda-linked group in Syria that the administration had largely ignored until now and that has been at the vanguard of the fight against the Syrian government, U.S. officials said.
“The decision to deploy more drones and intelligence assets against the militant group formerly known as Jabhat al-Nusra reflects Obama’s concern that it is turning parts of Syria into a new base of operations for al-Qaeda on Europe’s southern doorstep.
“The move underlines the extent to which Obama has come to prioritize the counterterrorism mission in Syria over efforts to pressure President Bashar al-Assad to step aside, as al-Nusra is among the most effective forces battling the Syrian government.”
One doesn’t know whether to laugh or to cry. Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that Washington ought not to support the so-called Syrian rebels precisely because there is basically no different between them and al-Qaeda or al-Nusra. In fact, Putin declared shortly after one Syrian rebel/terrorist cut the heart of a dead body and literally took a bite in 2013:
“You will not deny that one does not really need to support the people who not only kill their enemies, but open up their bodies, eat their intestines in front of the public and cameras. Are these the people you want to support?”
Washington and New World Order agents never listened. They continued to support terrorist groups in the region because Israel demanded that Assad be removed from power. Vladimir Putin extended his friendship to Washington numerous times and was even willing to work with US officials on fighting terrorism in Syria, but New World Order agents in the Pentagon and elsewhere ignored the generous offer, presumably because they knew too well that fighting terrorism in Syria meant that they would have to suspend their support for the so-called Syrian rebels.
As noted British journalist Robert Fisk has pointed out, “There are no ‘good guys’ among the Syrian warlords,” despite the fact that much of the West desperately and hopelessly tried to find them over the past four years or so. And for Washington to support those jihadists in Syria is “an aggressive and criminal act against” a sovereign nation, said Sara Flounders, Co-director of the International Action Center.
But Washington would almost certainly not be supporting those jihadists in Syria without direct orders coming from the Israeli regime. In fact, the International Business Times reported in 2014 that Israel indeed had “regular contact with Syrian rebels, including ISIS.”
And if you pay close attention to debacle in the region, ISIS has never once attacked Israel at all. Not once! Sure, they have made threats here and there for propaganda purposes, but we all know that ISIS and Israel are basically two sides of the same coin. If that sounds outrageous, listen to the title of this article by the Jerusalem Post: “Israel treating al-Qaida fighters wounded in Syria civil war.”
Israeli officials themselves made it very clear in 2015 that they were helping the so-called rebels. And the rebels themselves know very well that the Israel regime treats them like sons and daughters.
Similarly, the Daily Mail pointed out last July that Israeli commandos constantly rescued members of ISIS in Syria. The Mail itself reported that it was a deadly “deal with the devil.” (Sounds like the Mail was getting into theological trouble here. Have they ever heard of the phrase “Ye are of your father the devil?”)
So, Vladimir Putin and Bashar al-Assad must be laughing about the recent news that Washington is now attacking al-Nusra. Is the New World Order agenda now over? Is Washington now telling us that their plan in the region has failed miserably and pathetically?
Furthermore, is Obama throwing in the towel during his last few days in office? Is he sensing that Donald Trump will almost certainly make a workable deal with Vladimir Putin? Is he getting the feeling that Trump will no longer support the so-called Syrian rebels? Trump has declared,
“I’ve had an opposite view of many people regarding Syria. My attitude was you’re fighting Syria, Syria is fighting Isis, and you have to get rid of Isis.”
Trump has also said that it would be great if Russia and the United States to work together in order to “knock the hell out of Isil.”
If Trump means what he says, then the Neoconservative era in Syria is almost certainly over. People like Daniel Pipes will need to find a different job or career because it seems like both Trump and Assad will also come up with a reasonable solution in the region. This possibility has also sent shockwaves across the political spectrum in Britain. The Telegraph has recently reported:
“In a significant foreign policy split, officials admitted that Britain will have some ‘very difficult’ conversations with the President-elect in coming months over his approach to Russia. It comes after Mr Trump used his first interviews since winning the US election to indicate that he will withdraw support for rebels in Syria and thank Vladimir Putin for sending him a ‘beautiful’ letter.”
Theresa May and Boris Johnson, both flaming Zionists, are already worried that Trump, Putin, and Assad could form an alliance to defeat ISIS. The Telegraph again has said:
“The dramatic shift in US policy has prompted significant concern in the Foreign Office, and Britain will use the next three months before Mr Trump enters the White House to try to convince him of the importance of removing President Assad.
“Mr Johnson is expected to fly to the US within weeks to meet with senior figures in Mr Trump’s administration and make clear that Britain believes that Mr Assad must go.”
Do May and Johnson really think that Trump will even entertain the possibility that Assad must step down? Don’t they know that “Donald Trump’s team has ‘reservations’ about Theresa May’s Government”? Don’t they know that Trump said quite clearly that if the US attacks Assad, then the US will also have to deal with Russia, which will put the United States in a really dangerous situation?
And if Trump ends up attacking Assad, wouldn’t that violate virtually everything he has ever said about Russia and Assad? Trump said last July: “I think I would just get along very well with Putin. I just think so. People say what do you mean? I just think we would.”
You see, New World Order agents like May and Johnson again and again show that they have never been in the business of fighting terrorism. Never! In fact, Assad was one of the leaders who pointed out quite logically that the West is living in contradiction when it comes to fighting terrorists in the Middle East.
By supporting terrorist groups in the region and playing double standard, said Assad, the West is swimming in its own ideological quagmire. “In the past if I said anything,” said Assad, “people would say the Syrian president is disconnected from reality. Now it’s different. The West is becoming much weaker.”
The West has gotten weaker because it has been under the influence of an essentially diabolical ideology which gives its proponents no chance to have a clear thought in their heads. New World Order agents, said Assad, “don’t have a leg to stand on” because they pretend to fight terrorism when in fact they support terrorism. Assad declared:
“Isis (the Islamic State group) was smuggling oil and using Iraqi oilfields under American satellites and drones to make money, and the West was not saying anything. Whereas here the Russians interfered and Isis started to shrink in every sense of the word.”
Last September, said Assad, the US cooperated with ISIS in order to attack the Syrian government. “The ISIS troops attacked right away after the American strike. “How could they know that the Americans are going to attack that position in order to gather their militants to attack right away and to capture it one hour after the strike?”
No one can seriously refute this claim because the US again has worked with ISIS via the Syrian rebels/terrorists in the past. And this was one reason why Vladimir Putin has again and again condemned the New World Order ideology. He said:
“It seems, however, instead of learning from other people’s mistakes, some prefer to repeat them and continue to export revolutions…Just look at the situation in the Middle East and North Africa…
“It is irresponsible to manipulate extremist groups and use them to achieve your political goals, hoping that later you’ll find a way to get rid of them or somehow eliminate them.
”We consider that any attempts to flirt with terrorists, let alone arm them, are short-sighted and extremely dangerous. This may make the global terrorist threat much worse, spreading it to new region around the globe…
“It seems like someone would like to impose upon us some new game rules, deliberately tailored to accommodate the interests of the privileged few…
“Another threat that President Obama mentioned was ISIS. Well, who on earth armed them? Who created the necessary political climate that facilitated the situation? Who pushed for the delivery of arms to the area?”
Well, the people who are supporting Jihadists in Syria did not come from Russia or Iran or China or the Philippines. The people who actually pushed for the delivery of arms in Syria are none other than New World Order agents, who are swiftly losing the ideological war.
NWO agents have done their worst to discredit Russia and Assad; they have used all kinds of manipulations: deceptions, hoaxes, psychological warfare, and just plain lies. Big lies. Colossal lies. But Russia is still standing; Assad is still fighting; and NWO agents are morally and intellectually becoming obsolete.
NWO agents should get a copy of Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of World History and start reading it very carefully because Hegel was one of the geniuses of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries who saw history in a metaphysical sense.
Reason, says Hegel, will triumph, despite the fact that evil and wicked men (like NWO agents) aspire to impede it. It was Hegel who first postulated in a philosophical and satisfying way that no force is strong enough to destroy “the cunning of reason.” To Hegel, the metaphysical source of this “cunning of reason” is divine. Philosophy, if used properly, is one of the rational expressions of this “cunning of reason.”
Hegel seemed to have realized that the idea of an infinite past is incoherent. In other words, he philosophically knew that the universe must have had a beginning. If the universe never had a beginning, then it logically leads to the conclusion that the number of past events is infinite, and that obviously doesn’t make sense at all. In fact, this would be counterproductive to the historical method and scholarship.
History indeed had a beginning, and Hegel obviously realized that whatever began to exist has a cause. And for Hegel, the cause of this “world history” is “divine”:
“That world history is governed by an ultimate design, that it is a rational process—whose rationality is not that of a particular subject, but a divine and absolute reason—this is a proposition whose truth we must assume; its proof lies in the study of world history itself, which is the image and enactment of reason.
“The real proof, however, comes from a knowledge of reason itself; for reason appears in world history only in a mediate form. World history is merely a manifestation of this one original reason.”
History, says Hegel, is rational because “a divine will rules supreme and is strong enough to determine the overall content.” This “divine will” or providence is actually “wisdom, coupled with infinite power, which realizes its end, i.e. the absolute and rational design of the world.”
By submitting our will to the moral and political order and by pursuing the truth (no matter what the consequences) and conform our lives to it, we are actually participating in this “divine will.” But by deliberately rejecting the moral and political order and by attacking the truth, we are indirectly bringing pain, misery, and ultimately chaos to the world.
That is exactly what New World Order agents have been doing from time immemorial. They have literally destroyed countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, and they still want to destroy more. They have no remorse, and they do not want to apologize one bit. What was the ideological vehicle they used to destroy those countries?
The Neoconservative ideology, which we all know is a Jewish political and subversive movement. As flaming Jewish Neocon David Horowitz bragged:
“For nearly two hundred years, Jews have played a disproportionate role as leaders of the modern revolutionary movement in Europe and the West…By carrying the revolution to its conclusion, socialists would usher in a millennium and fulfill the messianic prophecies of the pre-Enlightenment religions that modern ideas had discredited.”
Horowitz got it right this time. But he got it wrong when he said that
“In four years, George Bush has liberated nearly 50 million people in two Islamic countries. He has stopped the filling of mass graves and closed down the torture chambers of an oppressive regime. He has encouraged the Iraqis and the people of Afghanistan to begin a political process that give them rights they have not enjoyed in 5,000 years. How can one not support this war?”
As military historian and retired career officer in the Armor Branch of the United States Army Andrew J. Bacevich argues,
“Apart from a handful of deluded neoconservatives, no one believes that the United States accomplished its objectives in Iraq, unless the main objective was to commit mayhem, apply a tourniquet to staunch the bleeding, and then declare the patient stable while hastily leaving the scene of the crime.”
You see, Horowitz will never tell the American people that the war in Iraq will cost the United States at least six trillion dollar, and no decent American with an ounce of common sense will put a stamp of approval of that debacle. Horowitz will never recount the true story of how the war destroyed livelihood and how it led to sodomy in places like Abu Ghraib. Why?
Well, that would ruin his entire diabolical weltanschauung.
That is one reason why Vladimir Putin got tired of those Neocons. That is one reason why he began to morally and politically cut them to pieces. As Kevin Barrett would have put it, God bless Vladimir Putin. Sure, he has his fault, as everyone does, but he has certainly made a positive impact on the political world.
 Adam Entous, “Obama directs Pentagon to target al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria, one of the most formidable forces fighting Assad,” Washington Post, November 10, 2016.
 “Putin Warns West On Arming Syrian Rebels: ‘Are These The People You Want To Support?’,” Huffington Post, August 16, 2013.
 Michael R. Gordon, “Russia Surprises U.S. With Accord on Battling ISIS,” NY Times, September 27, 2915.
 Nancy A. Youssef, “Pentagon Resists Obama’s New Plan to Work With the Russians in Syria,” Daily Beast, July 13, 2016.
 Robert Fisk, “No, Aleppo is not the new Srebrenica – the West won’t go to war over Syria,” Independent, August 4, 2016.
 “Protecting US-trained Syrian rebels? There’s no such thing as ‘defensive airstrikes,’” Russia Today, August 5, 2016.
 Johnlee Varghese, “UN Report: Israel in Regular Contact with Syrian Rebels including ISIS,” International Business Times, December 14, 2014.
 “Report: Israel treating al-Qaida fighters wounded in Syria civil war,” Jerusalem Post, March 13, 2015.
 Raphael Ahren, “Israel acknowledges it is helping Syrian rebel fighters,” Times of Israel, June 29, 2015.
 See “Syrian in Israeli hospital: ‘Most fighters know they will get good care here,’” Jerusalem Post, September 15, 2015; “Syria rebel leader meets with Israeli deputy minister in the Knesset,” Jerusalem Post, February 14, 2016; “Lebanese report: Israel arming Syrian rebels,” Jerusalem Post, July 10, 2015; “Two wounded from Syria war cross into Israel to be treated in hospital,” Jerusalem Post, May 26, 2015.
 See for example Jake Wallis Simmons, “Saving their sworn enemy: Heartstopping footage shows Israeli commandos rescuing wounded men from Syrian warzone – but WHY are they risking their lives for Islamic militants?,” Daily Mail, July 4, 2016.
 “Trump Likely to ‘Bargain’ With Moscow Over Sanctions,” Sputnik News, November 13, 2016.
 See Bethan McKernan, “Donald Trump signifies he will end US support for Syrian rebels despite their pleas to him for help,” Independent, November 13, 2016.
 Steven Swinford and Ben Riley-Smith, “Trump-Putin alliance sparks diplomatic crisis as British ministers demand assurances from US over Russia,” Telegraph, November 12, 2016.
 Steven Swinford, “Exclusive: Nigel Farage reveals Donald Trump’s team has ‘reservations’ about Theresa May’s Government,” Telegraph, November 13, 2016.
 Swinford and Riley-Smith, “Trump-Putin alliance sparks diplomatic crisis as British ministers demand assurances from US over Russia,” Telegraph, November 12, 2016
 Quoted in Annia Ciezadlo, “The U.S. Has Intervened In Syria, But Not In The Way You Think,” Huffington Post, November 7, 2016.
 See for example Maria Ari-Habib, “Syria Rebels Draw Closer to al Qaeda-Linked Group,” Wall Street Journal, September 29, 2016; Hannah Allam, “Syrian rebel whose group is linked to al Qaida visited U.S.,” McClatchy Newspaper, May 21, 2016; Mona Alami, “Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda,” USA Today, June 14, 2013; Michael Hughes, “U.S. Support for Al Qaeda-Linked Rebels Undermines Syrian Ceasefire,” Huffington Post, May 22, 2016.
 For a recent example see John E. Herbst, “Putin’s Murderous Syria Raid Set Him Back in Ukraine,” Newsweek, November 11, 2016.
 Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Lectures on the Philosophy of World History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975 and 1980), 28.
 Ibid., 30.
 Ibid., 35.
 See for example Murry Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005); Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar & Straus, 2007).
 Quoted in E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 966.
 David Horowitz, “Why We Were in Iraq,” Frontpage Magazine, March 20, 2013.
 Andrew Bacevich, Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed Their Soldiers and Their Country (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2013), 94.
 Ernesto Londono, “Study: Iraq, Afghan war costs to top $4 trillion,” Washington Post, March 28, 2013; Bob Dreyfuss, The $6 Trillion Wars,” The Nation, March 29, 2013; “Iraq War Cost U.S. More Than $2 Trillion, Could Grow to $6 Trillion, Says Watson Institute Study,” Huffington Post, May 14, 2013; Mark Thompson, “The $5 Trillion War on Terror,” Time, June 29, 2011; “Iraq war cost: $6 trillion. What else could have been done?,” LA Times, March 18, 2013.
 Mark Kukis, Voices from Iraq: A People’s History, 2003-2009 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011); Dana Priest and Joe Stephens, “Secret World of U.S. Interrogation,” Washington Post, May 11, 2004; for similar reports, see Jane Mayer, “The Black Sites: A Rare Look inside the C.IA.’s Secret Interrogation Program,” New Yorker, August 13, 2007; Craig Whitlock, “Jordan’s Spy Agency: Holding Cell for the CIA,” Washington Post, December 1, 2007; Jane Mayer, The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals (New York: Anchor Books, 2009); Mark Danner, Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror (New York: New York Review of Books, 2004); George W. Bush: War Criminal?: The Bush Administration’s Liability for 269 War Crimes (Westport: Praeger Pubishers, 2009); Lila Rajiva, The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2005); Rebecca Gordon, Mainstreaming Torture: Ethical Approaches in the Post-9/11 United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.