[Editor’s note: The phrase ‘too little, too late’ immediately springs to mind when reading that Obama intends to take action over the Russian interference that ‘elected’ Donald Trump.
Obama failed to act decisively when there was still time to prevent Trump becoming President-Elect; whether this was due to a lack of nerve on his part or due to bad advice from his circle of advisors is not clear, probably a bit of both. Neither is it clear what action Obama can now take that would positively affect events.
What slim hopes survive of stopping Trump from entering office lay more with the senior Republicans such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham than they do with the seemingly weak and vacillating Democrats.
Ironically, it is their outmoded Cold Warrior mindsets that are motivating the Republicans to turn against Trump. They still see Russia as the main enemy of the US and as Trump was ‘elected’ due to Russian interference, then that is all the reason they need to oppose him.
The side effect of this is that, by derailing a Trump regime before it got started, they would be saving the US and perhaps the entire world from the very great risk of being dragged into a Third World War, as desired by Trump’s Zionist masters. Ian]
Times of Israel
Obama vows ‘action’ against Russia over election hacks
US President Barack Obama pledged Thursday to take action against Moscow, hours after his administration suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin had personally authorized the hacking of Democratic officials’ email accounts in the run-up to the presidential election.
“I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections… we need to take action and we will,” Obama told National Public Radio, according to excerpts from an interview.
“At a time and a place of our own choosing. Some of it may be… explicit and publicized; some of it may not be… Mr. Putin is well aware of my feelings about this, because I spoke to him directly about it,” he added.
The White House had also assailed President-elect Donald Trump himself, saying he must have known of Russia’s interference, and asserting it was “fact” that such actions helped Trump’s campaign.
Spokesman Josh Earnest said that “only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities,” repeating the words from an October US intelligence assessment.
Obama’s deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, connected the dots further, saying it was Putin who was responsible for the Russian government’s actions. “I don’t think things happen in the Russian government of this consequence without Vladimir Putin knowing about it,” he told MSNBC.
No proof was offered for any of the accusations, the latest to unsettle America’s uneasy transition from eight years under Democratic Obama to a new Republican administration led by Trump. The claims of Russian meddling in the election also have heightened already debilitating tensions between Washington and Moscow over Syria, Ukraine and a host of other disagreements.
The explosive accusation paints Putin, the leader of perhaps the nation’s greatest geopolitical foe, as having directly undermined US democracy. US officials have not contended, however, that Trump would have been defeated by Hillary Clinton on November 8 if not for Russia’s assistance. Nor has there has been any indication of tampering with the vote-counting.
The Kremlin flatly rejected the claim of Putin’s involvement, with Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissing it Thursday as “laughable nonsense.”
The dispute over Russia’s role has been fueling an increasingly public spat between Obama’s White House and Trump’s team that is threatening to spoil the delicate truce that Obama and Trump have forged since Election Day.
Although the president and president-elect have avoided criticizing each other publicly since Trump’s win, their aides have been more openly antagonistic. Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s senior transition adviser, said it was “breathtaking” and irresponsible that the White House had suggested Trump knew Russia was interfering to help his campaign.
That led Earnest, the White House spokesman, to unload Thursday, arguing that Trump, who has dismissed the CIA’s assessment of Russian interference, should spend less time attacking the intelligence community and more time supporting the investigation that Obama has ordered.
Earnest said it was “obvious” Trump knew what Russia was doing during the campaign, pointing out that Trump had encouraged Moscow during a news conference to find Clinton’s missing emails. Trump has said he was joking.
“I don’t think anybody at the White House thinks it’s funny that an adversary of the United States engaged in malicious cyber activity to destabilize our democracy,” Earnest said. “That’s not a joke.”
US intelligence officials have linked the hacking to Russia’s intelligence agency and its military intelligence division. Moscow has denied all accusations that it orchestrated the hacking of email accounts of Democratic Party officials and Clinton’s campaign chief, John Podesta, and then leaked them to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks.
Trump and his supporters insist the Democrats’ outrage about Russia is really an attempt to undermine the validity of his election victory. Rep. Peter King, a Trump ally and New York Republican, called it “disgraceful” as he spoke to reporters amassed in Trump Tower after meeting with the president-elect.
“Right now, certain elements of the media, certain elements of the intelligence community and certain politicians are really doing the work of the Russians,” King said.
There has been no specific, persuasive evidence shared publicly about the extent of Putin’s role or knowledge of the hackings. That lack of proof undercuts Democrats’ strategy to portray Putin’s involvement as irrefutable evidence of a directed Russian government plot to undermine America’s democratic system.
Secretary of State John Kerry defended Obama’s handling of the issue during the heat of the presidential campaign — a stance now criticized by some Democrats as too weak — but said he wouldn’t comment on whether Putin was involved.
“People need to remember that the president issued a warning,” Kerry said. “But he had to be obviously sensitive to not being viewed as interfering on behalf of a candidate or against a candidate or in a way that promoted unrealistic assessments about what was happening.”