Will cyber-false flag, blamed on Russia, kill internet freedom?

By
Kevin Barrett
-
2
1290

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

In the new False Flag Weekly News (watch it above – click HERE for story links) Professor Tony Hall and I broke down the recent staged terror events in Istanbul and Berlin; examined the neocon panic over their lost war in Syria; and dissected the pathetic USIC “Russia hacked the election” drivel. All of these cases show how internet truth-tellers are annihilating official lies – sowing consternation in the hearts of the liars.

Truth is leaking out through millions of cracks in the official stories

As I wrote yesterday in “Insane USIC report blames Russia for telling the truth,” the real purpose of the “blame Russia for election hacking” gambit is the demonization of alternative media.

Real alternative media – not the Alex Jones controlled opposition stuff – have been exposing false flags almost as fast as they can be fabricated. Nobody much believes the official version of anything any more. As we reported in the above FFWN broadcast, even Orthodox Outreach Rabbis are turning into “holocaust deniers!“

The USIC report sets the stage for labeling alt-media truth-tellers as “enemies of the state.” The next step could be major pushback against us – maybe even a major takedown attempt. An FFWN fan emailed this prediction:

This from todays NY Times …The Russian leader, the report said, sought to denigrate Mrs. Clinton, and the report detailed what the officials had revealed to President Obama a day earlier: Mr. Trump’s victory followed a complicated, multipart cyberinformation attack whose goal had evolved to help the Republican win. The 25-page report did not conclude that Russian involvement tipped the election to Mr. Trump. The public report lacked the evidence that intelligence officials said was included in a classified version, which they described as information on the sources and methods used to collect the information about Mr. Putin and his associates. Those would include intercepts of conversations and the harvesting of computer data from “implants” that the United States and its allies have put in Russian computer networks.

Could Orwell have imagined this type of newspeak/doublespeak in its audacity? What have we learned here? 
 
1) that Putin masterminded a “complicated, multipart cyberinformation attack whose goal had evolved to help the Republican win.
2) But…apparently The 25-page report did not conclude that Russian involvement tipped the election (why mention it if it was ineffective)
3) And importantly this “report lacked the evidence that intelligence officials said was included in a classified version”
4) And in fact we learn that it was the US that has been engaged in cyber warfare as the so called evidence came from “intercepts of conversations and the harvesting of computer data from “implants” that the United States and its allies have put in Russian computer networks.
 
I am convinced that the next false flag will be a cyber attack that f***s up the internet, blamed on Russia, since Russia just kicked US/Saudi/Israeli ass in Syria. They will use this as a pretext to kill whats left of internet freedom… that is my prediction. And i think it will come shortly after inauguration.

I hope this prediction is wrong. But you’d better watch False Flag Weekly News now, while you still can, just in case.

Biography
Kevin Barrett
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

He is host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard driving weekly radio show funded by listener donations at Patreon.com and FALSE FLAG WEEKLY NEWS (FFWN); a audio-video show produced by Tony Hall, Allan Reese, and Kevin himself. FFWN is funded through FundRazr.

He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin; where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.
http://www.truthjihad.com
[email protected]

DISCLOSURES: All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

2 COMMENTS

  1. This depends on us if we let them censor us faster than we can type.After all the censors are always one step behind and the messages are already out before they can delete them.Or they must kill the whole net which is impossible now, or must have 1:1 censors on us. Remeber what happend with the Gutenberg-press and the Bible ?

  2. You’re right, Dr. Barrett. It’s likely that rather sooner than later such attempt, aimed to restrict the Internet freedom, will be made. But it won’t be an easy decision for elite. There’s a reason why they’ve been tightening the grip on masses slowly, for decades, diversifying methods of enslavement, exercising “different strokes for different folks”, paying special attention to the youth (besides the traditional “gourmet” interest…). It’s much more preferable for them to jump to the final, unmasked phase after society is “cooked enough”. One thing is printing fake money and fabricating terror in the form of non-stop occult-charged false-flags to “condition” the population (still less than 10% of which understand that those are false-flags) – all behind the scene. And another is to start taking the masks off, knowing that putting them back will be impossible.

Comments are closed.