Syrians face toxic time-bomb of radiation, poison and pollution

Campaigners say Syria has been sullied by war, as cocktail of cancer-causing and radioactive chemicals leech into the ground and fill the air

A handout picture downloaded on February 16, 2012 from the Syrian opposition Local Coordination Committees in Syria photoblog on February 15 is said to show wounded opposition activist Khaled Abu Saleh standing in front of flames and black smoke billowing from the bombed oil pipeline in the flashpoint city of Homs. Activists saying government forces bombed the pipeine from the air and the regime blames “terrorists” for the explosion which set it on fire.

Middle East Eye
Syrians face toxic time-bomb of radiation, poison and pollution

Syria faces public health catastrophes that will linger for decades due to toxic rubble dust, oil fire pollution and the US-led coalition’s use of depleted uranium weapons on Islamic State targets, campaigners have warned.

The US last week admitted it had fired armour-piercing DU ammunition in its war against IS, and had hit not only military targets but also un-armoured civilian targets such as oil trucks, and despite promising otherwise.

Meanwhile, health and environment experts say rubble and dust produced by years of bombing and fighting in built-up areas could have huge health impacts, as fine particles thrown into the atmosphere cause numerous respiratory illnesses, and add to pollution caused by the bombing of oil infrastructure.

The Dutch peace organisation PAX said the use of DU was storing up health problems similar to those that have ravaged neighbouring Iraq since the wars of 1991 and 2003.

Cities such as Fallujah have experienced huge spikes in cancers and deformities among newborns following the widespread use of DU weapons by US and allied forces.

“As was the case in Iraq, [Syrian] civilians have expressed fear over potential exposure to depleted uranium, considering the fact it’s a radioactive, toxic material,” PAX’s Wim Zwijnenburg told Middle East Eye, after a recent visit to the oil-producing area of Qayyarah in Syria.

“No state would ever accept any depleted uranium exposure in peacetime and therefore depleted uranium is heavily regulated. We do not see why these regulations should be thrown overboard in conflict.”

Poisoned wells

Zwijnenburg said the threat of DU sickness added to other pollution crises caused by the destruction of oil wells taken over by IS.

“It was apocalyptical to see the landscape filled with burning oil wells, dried up oil tar and blackened earth,” he said.

According to Zwijnenburg, seven wells were still burning, but were expected to be out within two months.

Nevertheless, there are still major concerns from humanitarian organisations over the health impacts of the fires, Zwijnenburg said.

Thousands of makeshift oil refineries have sprung up in Syria, posing environmental and health risks to nearby communities.

Oil fires posed immediate health threats through acrid smoke as well as environmental damage, Zwijnenburg said, due to the production of toxins such as carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen and particulate matter.

“The long-term impact of soil and groundwater would need to be addressed and clean-up and remediation of sites is needed to prevent exposure of civilians to hazardous materials as a result the fall-out of the smoke and oil pollution,” Zwijnenburg said.

Turned to dust

Richard Sullivan, of King’s College London’s conflict and health research group, meanwhile said Syria was already suffering through the “enormous impact” of toxic chemicals thrown into the air by five years of war.

According to Zwijnenburg, an estimated 60 per cent of buildings in Syria have been heavily damaged or destroyed since 2011, releasing toxic substances from rubble including cancer-causing asbestos and heavy metals.

The Toxic Remnants of War network said the pollution effects were both “ubiquitous and under-studied”.

“When buildings are [hit] by munitions or damaged through pressure waves generated by explosions, building materials are pulverised, generating large volumes of dust,” said researcher Andy Garrity.

Exposure to such dust “can have both physical and chemical impacts on health” as they contain mixtures of common building materials, such as cement, metals, polychlorinated biphenyls, silica, asbestos and other synthetic fibres.

Electrical hardware commonly found in buildings are also potential contaminant sources, Garrity said.

The effects of rubble exposure vary, from immediate irritation of the eyes, nose, throat and skin, to lung diseases such as pneumoconiosis.

Polychlorinated biphenyls are believed to cause cancers.

Emilia Wahlstrom, an environmental disaster expert for the UN, said immediate humanitarian responses to war often focused on short-term threats, while environmental and health complications were often overlooked.

But she said seemingly immediate issues, such as rubble blocking aid convoys, were also long-term problems, as rubble released toxic materials into the soil and contaminated water supplies.

A depleted future

Environmental crises from two major wars in 1991 and 2003 continue to sicken large numbers of civilians in Iraq, and present a worst-case scenario for the future of Syria.

Cancer rates in Iraq are significantly higher than pre-1991 levels in areas such as Fallujah and Basra, while birth defects are also reported – one study says 15 per cent of babies born since 2003 suffer congenital deformities.

The heavy use of depleted uranium has been cited as a major factor in these health crises – although no government has specifically acknowledged its effects, and PAX says it has found no links between DU and birth defects.

While PAX said the majority of the 2003 depleted uranium strikes were outside, or on the outskirts of, heavily populated areas, “those strikes that were in towns and cities often saw proportionately more DU used”.

Late last year, PAX released a report with the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons, based on “the chance release of targeting data” from 1,116 attacks in Iraq by A-10 ‘tank-buster’ jets between 20 March and 15 April, 2003.

The data revealed the US and UK fired 116,000kg of depleted uranium ammunition in more than 1,000 locations.

Depleted uranium is a poisonous heavy metal, and also slightly radioactive. DU burns up when it hits a target, and the resultant compounds can spread across a wide area.

“Significantly, the data confirm that only 33 per cent of the A-10s’ targets were tanks or armoured vehicles, with the weapons also used against light vehicles, buildings and unmounted troops,” the report said.

PAX’s Zwijnenburg said he feared the same could happen in Syria unless the US coalition halted its use of DU munitions.

“This will put more burden on affected communities already struggling with the direct impact of the war on their health and wellbeing,” he said.

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Some content may be satirical in nature. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within are full responsibility of author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on February 22, 2017, With 634 Reads Filed under World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

One Response to "Syrians face toxic time-bomb of radiation, poison and pollution"

  1. Dr. Abu-Bakr Susta  February 22, 2017 at 8:37 pm

    Depleted Uranium (DU) is actually NOT-So-Depleted Uranium (NSDU). NSDU (or DU) contains 42% of the fissile isotope of U-235 as does ‘undepleted’ uranium.

    U.S. use of NSDU and other indiscriminate weapons in Fallujah (Iraq) was a war crime of massive proportions, for which U.S. officials will probably never be brought to justice. Compared to what the U.S. did in Fallujah, what the Syria-Russia-led coalition did in Aleppo was benign.

    In Iraq (especially Fallujah & Basra), as per the article, “15 per cent of babies born since 2003 suffer congenital deformities.” For hundreds of years if not longer (due to the half-life of U-235), cancer risks and congenital deformities in Iraq will NOT decline.

    What the author does not mention are the rates of cancer for U.S. veterans and congenital deformities for babies fathered by or born to U.S. veterans — several times higher than normal.

    Due to the above risks, some/many U.S. soldiers being deployed to Iraq were told to get pregnant or to father babies BEFORE being deployed.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network