Trump’s Nationalism facilitating China’s rise to Global Leadership

Two billion people are represented at this China-India summit

by  Salman Rafi Sheikh,  … with New Eastern Outlook,  Moscow

Does Trump see himself as the Great White Power to the rest of the world?

[ Editor’s Note: This was an older NEO China piece that got lost in all the Trump hoopla, but is still a timely piece so I wanted to get it up. One of the major benefits of our partnership with NEO is that we were weak in Eurasia, so they were a perfect fit for us.

From a long-term Intel perspective, we knew that an economically successful China would eventually be tagged as a “threat”; and the US dogs of war would eventually be sent to do some 21st century gun-boat diplomacy. Obama announced his Asia Pivot in the middle of the Iran nuclear talks, but I have to admit I did not see the Ukraine coup coming.

Part of that was based on the EU having an $100-billion trade surplus with Russia, and its having been a rock solid dependable energy supplier. They had a win-win situation going. So I hope I live to see Merkel’s book come out explaining her reasoning for what I saw as a brain-dead stupid move given the other uncertainties that were on the table, the struggling EU and America’s regime-change wars.

Trump was not on the scene then, and he provides lesson to us all about wildcards coming in from stage left. We know now not to take Mr. Motor Mouth at face value over anything he says, as he seems to live in the moment, not the future. His bankruptcies are solid proof of that, where he just walks away from business carnage — and that is what has me worried most about him, his doing that to usJim W. Dean ]


China is no match to US military power, but it will concentrate on its defense and retaliation strike ability

– First published … January 30, 2017

Old Mao would never have believed what China has become, the export capital

While the new US president, Donald Trump, might have thought deeply about making “America great again”, the policies (read: “America First”) he has outlined to achieve this objective are likely to cause other consequences, most important of which is America’s further decline in the global arena and subsequent rise of China to what the latter’s leadership has implicitly called ‘playing the world leader.’

To this end, China is expected to receive significant support from both its rivals and allies. In Asia, for example, Trump’s nationalist rhetoric has received a response that points to a larger regional (read: “regionalization”) configuration taking place wherein China, followed by Russia, is playing an anchor role.

As a matter of fact, China’s militaristic response i.e., deployment of intercontinental missile systems, to Trump’s aggressive nationalist assertion and the heat it is creating with regard to the South China Sea has found a powerful friend in Russia, and together both of these countries are likely to challenge Trump-ism in its various i.e., military and non-military forms.

This is evident from the way Russia has not objected to or reacted against the deployment of missile systems near its border. On the contrary, Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for President Vladimir Putin, said in televised remarks on January 24,

“If this information is true, any military development in China is not perceived by us as a threat to our country,”

Similarly, in line with the Kremlin’s view, this deployment was seen by the Russian media as a response to US missile defenses in the Asia-Pacific and that China was sending a message to Washington, and not to Moscow.

“The missile’s dead zone is no less than three thousand kilometers so … Russia’s entire Far East and Western Siberia are not within the missile’s reach,” Konstantin Sivkov, president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Doctor of Military Science, was quoted as saying by the TASS news agency.

Clearly, China is perturbed by the Trump administration’s aggressive postures and is equally wiling to re-write its own rules of engagement, an important one of which is getting politically involved in regions and areas which until recently fell outside of the parameters of China’s “non-interference” principle (read: Chinese President Xi Jinping’s offer to mediate in the political solution of the Ukraine crisis).

China, first and foremost, is about doing business, not doing war

While some see in this offer a warning to Moscow that any attempt at improving relations with the US at China’s expense will face the prospect of Beijing reaching out to Russia’s foes, this is hardly the case.

Its primary reason is the military and economic regional blocks both China and Russia are seeking to build in the region and the policy of integrating other countries, including those which are currently allied with the US, in these blocks.

Therefore, far from a ‘warning’ to Russia, it is a message to the US that China is likely to speedily fill the space Trump’s nationalism and protectionism is likely to create in the world, especially in Asia.

Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from TPP has already created a big vacuum—and the only country economically capable of providing a suitable alternative to this deal is China. Through both the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, two proposed multilateral commercial deals that Beijing has so far championed as alternatives to the TPP, China is gearing up to further diminish the US role and position in the region—a region that has been previously called the epicentre of “Asian Century.”

Thus, the US` withdrawal from the TPP and its likely trade disputes with China and other countries in the region, which is an inevitable outcome of ‘America First’, means that the US is unlikely to take the leading role in shaping the economic integration of the region, thus leaving for China and its regional allies ample space to cover.

This would, in turn, boost Beijing`s strategic influence. As it stands, as one analyst has aptly stated, in today`s Asia, economics, strategic influence and security relationships are inseparable. If the economic future of regional countries rests more and more with China, it will help increase China`s strategic clout in the region too.

Trump walking away from the TPP left that door wide open for China to move in

On the contrary, while the US is least expected to abandon the region, Trump’s emphasis on re-negotiations of both military and economic ties with countries on individual basis is likely to cause more difficulties than ease its way.

Regional countries are not powerful enough to counter China on individual basis even if they have US support. TPP, for them, was the platform that they could use to counter-balance China’s expanding influence. The demise of TPP is, therefore, the opening up of a window for China to re-define regional dynamics as well as its role in the world.

Already, prompted by Trumps’ “protectionism”, China’s leadership has hinted about ‘playing the world leader.’

“If anyone were to say China is playing a leadership role in the world I would say it’s not China rushing to the front but rather the front runners have stepped back leaving the place to China,” said Zhang Jun, director general of the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s international economics department.

And China is accordingly gearing up to showcase its new role in the up-coming summit on its “One belt One Road” project in May, 2017. It is being seen as one opportunity for Beijing to project its leadership of global infrastructure and investment.

A diplomatic source familiar with preparations of the summit said China was likely to hold it at the same glitzy convention centre used to host the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in 2014, setting the stage for Xi’s most high-profile diplomatic event of the year. “China’s pretty much inviting everyone,” the diplomat said, according to Reuters.

The big question is will economic wars trigger military ones?

The demise of TPP, which is pretty much a clear manifestation of Trump’s protectionist “America First” policy, is, what John Kerry had called, a “giant step backwards” for the US’ erstwhile leadership in the world.

In the Obama administration’s plans, the TPP was to be a system building platform. Hence, having an evident geopolitical significance, it cannot be replaced by single bilateral trade agreements.

In this sense, the signing of a simple commercial deal with Washington would have a diminishing impact on the US’ regional allies. Unless it is matched by an Asia-Pacific-wide strategic initiative involving the US, which is unlikely to happen at this stage, China will face no major obstacle in its way of economic and military expansion in the region.

And as China Daily pointed in a cartoon, showing Trump digging a grave for TPP, ‘the US withdrawal from the TPP means it is unlikely to take the leading role in shaping the economic integration of the region, thus giving China more scope to do so.’

Trump’s protectionism is, therefore, setting the context for China’s ultimate rise to a leadership role — something that Russia and a number of other countries in the region might found less problematic and hegemonic than that of the role the US has been playing there for decades.

Salman Rafi Sheikh, research-analyst of International Relations and Pakistan’s foreign and domestic affairs, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.


Archived Reads 0
Previous articleThe Goy According to Hoenlein
Next articleExclusive: The Lynching of Hamza Yusuf
Jim W. Dean, Managing Editor

Jim W. Dean is managing editor of Veterans Today wearing many hats from day to day operations, development, writing and editing articles.

He has an active schedule of TV and radio interviews.

Jim comes from an old military family dating back to the American Revolution. Dozens of Confederate ancestors fought for the South in the War Between the States. Uncles fought in WWII and Korea. His father was a WWII P-40 and later P-51 Mustang fighter pilot. Vietnam found several uncles serving, a cousin, and brother Wendell as a young Ranger officer. His mother was a WWII widow at 16, her first husband killed with all 580 aboard when the SS Paul Hamilton, an ammunition ship with 7000 tons of explosives aboard, was torpedoed off the coast of Algiers.

He has been writing, speaking and doing public relations, television, consulting and now multimedia work for a variety of American heritage, historical, military, veterans and Intel platforms. Jim's only film appearance was in the PBS Looking for Lincoln documentary with Prof. Henry Lewis Gates, and he has guest lectured at the Army Command and General Staff School at Fort Gordon.

Currently he is working to take his extensive historical video archives on line to assist his affiliated organizations with their website multimedia efforts, such as the Military Order of World Wars, Atlanta, Sons of the American Revolution, Sons of Confederate Veterans , Assoc. for Intelligence Officers, the Navy League, Georgia Heritage Council, National Memorial Assoc.of Georgia.

Comments Closed


  1. The best thing China can do is not waste its money on fighting men — they can’t fight. There are, however, plenty in Asia who can: Russians, Iranians, Pakistanis, Afghans, Syrians, Kurds, Iraqis, Etc.

    China should produce huge stockpiles of weapons and store them all over the continent. Mass production is something they do well.

    If 100,000 tanks and 20,000 planes isn’t a deterrent, then what is?

  2. China has the vision to lead the consolidation of Eurasia. It will do so through trade and cooperation, mostly.

    America would do well to learn from this and consolidate the Western Hemisphere, where it could quickly and peacefully even incorporate all of the Latin countries one by one into the United States. Canada would soon follow.

    Instead the US tries to hinder the consolidation of Eurasia with chaos, and the merging if yhe Western Hemisphere with walls.

    • Sometimes the simple truths are the best. Look at the map of the World and imagine the paradise that could be built out if the Western Hemisphere if the money wasted on wars for Israel were spent on bringing it all into one country.

  3. In the commonwealth colony Australia to fix one small pothole on a two lane road requires approximately 8 – 10 council employees or contractors and twice the amount of equipment. This will cover an complete 8 hour shift. I dare to think that a road and traffic maintenance team in China will take a maximum of 2 hours with two guys and one truck involved – for the same job.
    The same Australian pothole will need repair again in less then 12 month.
    The rise to China’s global leadership has more to do with over regulation through governments in the west rather then trump’s nationalism.

  4. The Asian peoples seem to have a natural aptitude for subjects like mathematics, physics and science and engineering, subjects which are avoided like the plague by many spoiled American kids. We are no longer the innovator in many areas. Once the dictatorial grip was released from these peoples we begin to see fabulous achievements in many fields. For example only a few years ago they built a 30 story hotel in two weeks! This was accomplished by assembling it in parts in a factory, then assembling the structure at the site like an erector set. This is more efficient and safer than old fashioned construction in the U.S. where everything is exposed to weather and thieves and hundreds of trips increase costs. Even local yokels oppose this type of construction because it removes jobs from the local area. Watch this time lapse video of this building going up in China about four years ago:

Comments are closed.