Newsweek: Vladimir Putin Challenges the Deep State

How would NWO agents feel if a country in the Middle East starts bombing their citizens indiscriminately, killing babies and destroying livelihood? How would they feel if a country in the Middle East destroys at least four European countries in less than two decades? Wouldn’t they nuke that county at the earliest opportunity?

“The international situation does indeed require improvement. This calls for restraint, wisdom and responsibility.”

…by Jonas E. Alexis


Newsweek has recently declared: “Putin has adopted a deliberate strategy to directly challenge the liberal international order led by the United States.”[1] We all know what the “liberal international order” is by now.

If Newsweek means to say that Putin has stopped the New World Order ideology in Syria, then the answer is yes. If they mean to say that Putin is not accepting the New World Order narrative, which involves perpetual wars for Israel and the Deep State, then the answer is again yes. Putin has once again fleshed out his understanding of a fair political world this way:

Russia opposes attempts to destabilize and weaken international relations, as this could lead to a chaotic and ever less controllable slide towards greater tension in the world.

“We support joint action to ensure a democratic and fair world order based on strict respect for the norms of international law, the United Nations Charter, recognition of the unquestionable value of cultural and civilizational diversity, national sovereignty, and the right of all countries to decide their futures freely, without external pressure.

“The international situation does indeed require improvement. This calls for restraint, wisdom and responsibility. I would like to reiterate that Russia supports joint efforts to resolve the real problems facing the entire international community today.”

Putin’s plea “for restraint, wisdom and responsibility” implies practical reason in the political landscape. In other words, NWO agents cannot just go to the Middle East and start destabilizing one country after another.

How would they feel if a country in the Middle East starts bombing their citizens indiscriminately, killing babies and destroying livelihood? How would they feel if a country in the Middle East destroys at least four European countries in less than two decades? Wouldn’t they nuke that country at the earliest opportunity?

Moreover, how can the Israeli regime continue to violate international law without any consequence whatsoever? How can they get away with attacking a sovereign nation, namely Syria?[2] Who’s going to hold them accountable for their immoral acts? The Deep State? New World Order agents?

Newsweek didn’t stop here. They moved on to say: “That global system helped end the historical pattern of devastating wars among major powers and brought much of the world an unprecedented era of peace and prosperity since the end of World.”[3]

Can these people be consistent in at least one article? Do they really believe that the liberal international order “helped end the historical pattern of devastating wars” in Europe and elsewhere? Aren’t these people living in an imaginary world?

We hate to beat a dead horse here, but if Newsweek is going to vomit lies and fabrications to their readers, then we must again mention recent invasions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now Syria. Do they mean to tell us all that the New World Order ideology “helped end the historical pattern of devastating wars” in Europe?

You see, the New World Order ideology morally and politically crippled nations like Germany and England after World War II, and now chaos looms virtually everywhere. Angela Merkel is just a puppet, and Theresa May is just a Zionist.

Putin is basically saying that if no one challenges this New World Order ideology, then the West is in real trouble. In short, Newsweek has good reasons to hate Russia and Vladimir Putin. Putin is not letting the New World Order get away with murder in the Middle East.

[1] Ken Gude, “How Putin Undermines Democracy in the West, Chapter and Verse,” Newsweek, March 18, 2017.

[2] “Syria complains Israeli airstrikes violated international law,” Times of Israel, March 17, 2017.

[3] Ibid.

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within this post are the full responsibility of the author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on March 18, 2017, With 4030 Reads Filed under World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

6 Responses to "Newsweek: Vladimir Putin Challenges the Deep State"

  1. El Clandestino  March 23, 2017 at 11:41 am

    “The term deep state, or derin devlet in Turkish, originated in 1950s Turkey, refers to a secretive network of influential members of government agencies or the military that operates outside the democratic system.”
    -Kevin Barrett

    This also explains a lot of what has been happening in Turkey recently, including the decision to shoot down the Russian plane.

  2. ayelyahbenjamin  March 19, 2017 at 5:21 pm

    As a charter, a constituent treaty, all members are bound by its articles….and here is their room to move…. “All members are bound” not the organization ” or runaway “body” running the show …..and it is just that, to puff them up when in fact the “organization body” has a proven record of failure to respect the equal rights of its member states because they are not held to account as in Article 2.1 The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.
    Article 103 of the Charter states that obligations to the United Nations prevail over all other treaty obligations……. Not when the United Nations breaks its obligations and uses the treaty to suit itself…that would prove a “strict respect for the United Nations Charter” Mr President
    …..obligations do not prevail over all other treaty obligations when as an organization the body has been taken over……pick up the United Nations Charter, its preamble and move it to clean space away from the filth it now sits in

  3. US-First  March 19, 2017 at 7:23 am


    “How would they feel if a country in the Middle East starts bombing their citizens indiscriminately, killing babies and destroying livelihood?”

    For the fun of invading and destroying Lebanon, warmongering Zionist Lukudists might take their noses out of the photo-album of The Sabra and Shatila massacre and their fingers off their privates and ask themselves two simple questions for which we can be sure they have no logical answers against their swaggering, cocky and grandiose notion of invincibility. Just what missiles does Hezbollah possess in its arsenal and how many Israelis are they prepared to sacrifice on the gory altar of Zionist atrocities for an illegal invasion?

    The abduction of a few soldiers was enough to start a war in 2006 and now without any rational provocation Lieberman is on record as being prepared to take it out on Lebanese citizens in a Bushite ‘Shock and Awe’ attack. “Shock and Awe to Awe Shucks” as I said before may well be the pay-off for Israeli pay-loads by a now very formidable Hezbollah. The Tree of Knowledge in the back garden of 10 Downing Street blocked a well-aimed IRA mortar that came as close to taking out the British War Cabinet in February 1991 at the height of another illegal Middle East war. What particular or specific IRAN missile fired by Hezbollah will bring Israel to its senses and the very real prospects of Israeli media headlines vilifying “The Murders Among Us’?

    • US-First  March 19, 2017 at 7:31 am

      Final question should read as Wiesenthal’s 1947 book title “The Murderers Among Us’?

  4. wjabbe  March 18, 2017 at 7:59 pm

    Fear is among the most powerful human emotions. It is almost like the roles of the former Soviet Union and the current U.S. have been reversed. Fear is being used against our population by our now totally corrupt government to induce constant hatred for the new Russia, all as a lie to justify an endless arms race. What broke the former Soviet Union? My understanding is they went broke. Interestingly we are a thread from broke today. All of our bases should be shut down along with other massive spending reductions lest we fall into anarchy. Fools are taking America Train down a track at full speed to a massive train wreck. The average citizen has not realized yet what is about to happen. This is why they want us disarmed. No government can survive on borrowed and printed money.

    • wjabbe  March 18, 2017 at 8:04 pm

      Frankly an economic crash of America might be a blessing.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network