…by Jonas E. Alexis
In the previous article, we saw that Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov deconstructed the New World Order ideology with a bang. A big bang. But Lavrov was just getting started. He had more devastating things to say. He declared:
“Ironically, the American elite, which emerged as freedom fighters and separatists anxious to cast off the yoke of the British crown, had transformed itself and its state by the 20th century into a power thirsting for global imperialist domination. The world is changing, however, and – who knows – America might yet purify itself and return to its own forgotten sources.”
Again, Lavrov’s assessment has been thoroughly documented by the scholarly literature. We have been invading foreign countries around the world for over one hundred years, and virtually nothing good has come out of this “global imperialist domination.” In fact, this “global imperialist domination” has contributed to the decline of America and much of the West.
Lavrov specifically mentioned “the American elite,” but Lavrov must know that the people who control foreign policy in America are the Neoconservatives. As we have documented elsewhere, the Neoconservative movement is a Jewish political enterprise which seeks to turn America upside down.
As a number of scholars have argued, the Neoconservative goals are “in complete contrast to their patron saint, Ronald Reagan, and to the general cast of the American temperament as embodied by the Declaration of Independence.” The Neocons use “democracy” and “freedom” to kill and destroy peoples and nations, and they think that the world should prostrate before them all. If you think this is far-fetched, then let us again hear from Jewish Neocon Michael Ledeen:
“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace.”
This is not the first that that these people brag about being destroyers. Quoting Ledeen approvingly, Jewish Neocon Jonah Goldberg declared:
“Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.”
When countries like Iraq were really screwed up by the Neocons themselves, Goldberg wrote an article saying that “Iraq was a worthy mistake.”
Can the world afford these “worthy” mistakes? Does Goldberg mean to tell us that sodomy at Abu Graib was also a “worthy mistake”? Does “fu$king a kid” in prisons mean “a worthy mistake”? How about this: “150 inmates were crammed into cells designed for 24” at Abu Ghraib. The whole Abu Ghraib scenario was total chaos.
The Neocons don’t care about creating chaos precisely because they have metaphysically and categorically rejected Logos and all its manifestations. There are only two quick ways to fix the crisis: the Neocons must embrace Logos, or they have to make a commitment to the moral order, which provides the basis for political docility in the world. If they reject both proposals, then perhaps government officials need to think about reestablishing Sicut Judaeis non again. It was essentially a modus vivendi which kept the Khazarian Mafia in check in the Middle Ages and beyond.
Lavrov sees glimpses of hope, since the New World Order ideology is waning:
“The redistribution of the global balance of power continues. We are witnessing new centres of economic power and associated political influence come into being in the world…The formation of a polycentric international order is an objective process. It is in our common interest to make it more stable and predictable.”
If he is right, then we are seeing Hegel’s “cunning of reason” in the political sphere again. How? Well, New World Order agents think that the world belongs to them and that nothing moves unless they approve it.
Things are now moving, but Russia didn’t seek to get the Neocons’ approval this time. The Neocons and the Israeli regime wanted Assad gone, but Assad is still fighting and resisting the diabolical plan in Syria. Lavrov seemed to have made passing references to this when he stated:
“The sovereignty of states, their equality as the main subjects of international relations, was substantiated and approved within the Westphalian system that took shape in Europe in the 17th century. Currently, these traditional notions are being questioned in a number of Western countries.
“They are trying to secure for themselves, for example, the ability to interfere in other people’s affairs under the pretext of non-compliance with all sorts of unilaterally engineered human rights concepts like the so-called ‘responsibility to protect.’ We are against such a distorted interpretation of the most important universal international legal norms and principles.”
This is so true.
 See Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
 Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres, 2004), 12.
 Quoted in John Laughland, “Flirting with Fascism,” American Conservative, June 20, 2003.
 Jonah Goldberg, “Baghdad Delenda Est, Part Two,” National Review, April 22, 2002.
 Jonah Goldberg, “Iraq Was a Worthy Mistake,” LA Times, October 19, 2006.
 One prisoner at Abu Ghraib testified that he saw an officer ”fu$king a kid, his age would be about 15-18 years. The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets. Then when I heard the screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn’t covered and I saw [name blacked out], who was wearing the military uniform putting his dick in the little kid’s ass. I couldn’t see the face of the kid because his face wasn’t in front of the door. And the female soldier was taking pictures.” Cited in Mark Danner, Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror (New York: New York Review of Books, 2004), 243.
 Susan Taylor Martin, “Her Job: Lock Up Iraq’s Bad Guys,” St. Petersburg Times, December 14, 2003.
 See, Karen J. Geenberg and Joshua L. Dratel, eds., The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Lila Rajiva, The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2005);
 For a historical study on this, see E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008).
 See Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.