Trump Fail: The F35 Worse Than Ever

3
10

Fuel systems Airmen work on top of the jets to remove, repair, inspect, install and modify aircraft fuel systems. (U.S. Air Force photo/Senior Airman Andrea Posey)

 By: Dan Grazier

Electronics Used to Justify Cost Not Delivering Capabilities

Ineffective as a Fighter

Ineffective as an Interdiction Bomber

Ineffective as a Close Air Support Platform

Navy’s F-35 Unsuitable for Carrier Operations

Price Tag Is the Only Thing Stealthy about the F-35

Combat Effectiveness at Risk

Can the F-35 Be Where It’s Needed, When It’s Needed?

F-35 Reliability Problems

Officials Hiding Truth about F-35’s Problems and Delays from Taxpayers

Moving Forward

Conclusion

The F-35 still has a long way to go before it will be ready for combat. That was the parting message of Dr. Michael Gilmore, the now-retired Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, in his last annual report.

The Joint Strike Fighter Program has already consumed more than $100 billion and nearly 25 years. Just to finish the basic development phase will require at least an extra $1 billion and two more years. Even with this massive investment of time and money, Dr. Gilmore told Congress, the Pentagon, and the public, “the operational suitability of all variants continues to be less than desired by the Services.”

Dr. Gilmore detailed a range of remaining and sometimes worsening problems with the program, including hundreds of critical performance deficiencies and maintenance problems. He also raised serious questions about whether the Air Force’s F-35A can succeed in either air-to-air or air-to-ground missions, whether the Marine Corps’ F-35B can conduct even rudimentary close air support, and whether the Navy’s F-35C is suitable to operate from aircraft carriers.

He found, in fact, that “if used in combat, the F-35 aircraft will need support to locate and avoid modern threat ground radars, acquire targets, and engage formations of enemy fighter aircraft due to unresolved performance deficiencies and limited weapons carriage availability.”

Read more at Project Oversite

Archived Reads 0
SHARE
Previous articlePress TV Debate: America’s Warmongering Aimed at Iran
Next articleHow Trump became the Russian Mafia’s bitch (Updated)
VT
VT uses this General Posting account for general posts. It is managed by editors Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff who often share posts from other confirmed sources along with general information with our readers.

Comments Closed

3 COMMENTS

  1. Apparently wild turkeys can out maneuver this overpriced flying Edsel. A plane that was designed from the onset for aggression not defense. Of course Washington borrowed all the money for it from the RKM, making this project nothing more than another weapon for their own use.
    With all the problems this flying Corvair has though it may never actually see anything close to a combat situation should be a relief to anyone flying this overpriced pig.
    If this were an automobile, Ralph Nader would be all over it like flies on s***. A car company would end up in receivership with its stock plummeting below penny stock status, its reputation in the dumpster and the CEO forced to commit hari kari. However in this case no one is responsible and no one is held to accounting. The contractors responsible for this aeronautical farce will continue to make billions and even more now with Drumpf in the White House.

  2. The F35 has fulfilled its mission beautifully. That is… a bottomless rathole that devours billions, thus enriching the MIC more than it had even dreamed. Oh yes, the f35 has done its job well.

    • That’s it, in a nutshell. It’s all about the money and screw the taxpayers.
      And they didn’t even use K-Y.

Comments are closed.