Tillerson Loves Assad, Hates Putin, as Trump Foreign Policy Goes Berzerk

Moscow slams NATO’s traditional anti-Russia ‘ritual dance’ featuring debutant Tillerson

Editor’s note:  Thus far, Tillerson is the worst Secretary of State imaginable, essentially an ignorant hillbilly, a child of the Bush era oil corruption, running rampant playing shill to trumps “Great Dictator.”

 

Russia Today: Moscow says its “baffled” by the remarks of the US Secretary of State during his debut address at NATO HQ, spewing the same old mantra about “Russian aggression” to unite the alliance in the face of a common “threat” that requires additional spending.

Rex Tillerson arrived in Brussels to an expectant crowd of NATO foreign ministers, who eagerly waited to hear the US approach to maintaining the future of the alliance. Besides urging NATO members to contribute 2 percent of their GDP on collective defense, the US’s top diplomat reassured colleagues that Washington will back NATO against Russia.

“The US commitment to NATO is strong and this alliance remains the bedrock for trans-Atlantic security,” Tillerson said at his first ever meeting at NATO headquarters in Brussels. “The NATO alliance is also fundamental to countering both nonviolent, but at times violent, Russian agitation and Russian aggression.”

During his debut speech, the newly appointed US Secretary of State also emphasized that the United States is committed to supporting NATO’s capabilities in the collective defense. Separately, Tillerson also met with the NATO-Ukraine Commission, where he promised to maintain the Russian sanctions.

Tillerson’s remarks prompted a strong reaction from the Russian Foreign Ministry, which said it was “baffled” by the Secretary’s rhetoric, especially considering the timing of the remarks which came a day after the ambassadorial meeting of the Russia-NATO Council – the first such contacts in almost three years.

“They always have one thing on their mind: the ‘Russian threat’ myth, ‘Russian aggression’ slander and endless mantras about the need to confront it collectively,” the Ministry said.

READ MORE: Mattis & Fallon say NATO members must raise their game, accuse Russia of ‘interfering’

The ministry expressed disappointment that NATO decided to perform the traditional anti-Russia “ritual dance” a day after Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg called the talks with Moscow “frank” and “constructive.”

During the meeting in Brussels, NATO members agreed on a “dual track approach” to Russia. Such an approach, according to Stoltenberg, means maintaining a “strong NATO” with “credible deterrence and defense as a platform for engaging with Russia in a political dialogue.”

Stoltenberg acknowledged during the press conference on Friday that the military alliance “implemented the biggest re-enforcement to our collected defense since the end of the Cold War,” by “tripling” the size of the NATO response force in Europe, which saw the deployment of four battle groups to Poland and the Baltic countries.

WATCH: US troops, hardware depart for NATO sites in Eastern Europe build-up (VIDEO)

“We have established eight new headquarters in the eastern part of the Alliance and we are increasing defense spending. So, we are delivering on deterrence and defense, the strength pillar,” said the Norwegian.

Commenting on the two-tier approach, Moscow said that it’s essentially being forced to assume a confrontational stance in relations with NATO.

“We have a legitimate question: can we expect any constructive approaches in the Russian-NATO relations when the alliance is stubbornly sticking to its old patterns, when the United States and its allies are obsessed with building up their military presence at our borders justifying it with the necessity of ‘containing Russia’?,” the ministry noted.

“In fact, we are being drawn into a confrontational paradigm of relations based on the logic of military confrontation,” the ministry said.

Furthermore, the ministry noted that it sees “no signs” that NATO is willing to resume practical cooperation in areas where common interests overlap, such as security challenges and terrorist threats.

The foreign ministry statement summarized all the Russian concerns voiced on Thursday leading up to and following the NATO-Russia Council meeting, where the issues of Ukraine, NATO’s military buildup, and wider European security were discussed.

Moscow, for instance, briefed NATO on the deployment of two divisions in the Western Military District in addition to a mechanized infantry division in the Southern Military District. NATO for its part provided information on the implementation of the plan concerning the forward deployment on NATO’s eastern flank.

READ MORE: Russia increases nuclear sub fleet, combat patrols reach Soviet-era levels

Last month, NATO member nations also agreed to expand the alliance’s presence in the Black Sea. At the same time, apart from deploying troops to Eastern Europe and Poland, the US and NATO have actively built up anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems in Europe and on warships patrolling Russia’s borders.

Moscow’s envoy to NATO insisted that building bilateral confidence in such an environment is not possible until the alliance stops threatening and drops its policy of restraining Russia.

“It is not possible to build confidence until NATO abandons its military domination policy,” Russia’s Permanent Representative to NATO Alexander Grushko said on Thursday, according to TASS.

NATO members “were unable to answer the question how to combine that [security confidence-building measures] with their policy aimed at restraining Russia and demonstrating their military capabilities near our borders,” the envoy said.

“Dialogue for the sake of dialogue will not produce any results if no specific decisions are made and no steps are taken,” he added.

Prior to the meeting, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned that Brussels might use the Council’s platform to engage in confrontational games with Moscow.

“However, if our counterparts in the alliance tell us every time, ‘Yes, we will gather in the NATO-Russia Council, but we will only discuss Ukraine,’ that will be a continuation of this paranoid aggressive policy. NATO has nothing to do with efforts on the Ukrainian settlement,” Lavrov said according to TASS. “If the essence of these ideas is using the NATO-Russia Council for another confrontation, we do not want to indulge in such games.”

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

Related Posts:



All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Some content may be satirical in nature. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within are full responsibility of author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on April 1, 2017, With 2550 Reads Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

6 Responses to "Tillerson Loves Assad, Hates Putin, as Trump Foreign Policy Goes Berzerk"

  1. kaho  April 3, 2017 at 12:37 am

    This was the bottom line

    «Washington is now prepared to part with Ankara and side with its sworn enemies —
    — just to spite Assad. Nice defensive alliance. »

    of a recent RI-article.

    ( The Price of Partition, by Rudy Panko )

  2. Cosmodrome  April 2, 2017 at 4:55 am

    Those ministers in the group photo/video. It says “NATO ministers of Foreign Affairs”. Subversive language implying that they are Foreign Ministers OF Nato. But Nato does not have Foreign Ministers, countries do. This is how we are being brainwashed, little by little…

  3. davor  April 1, 2017 at 11:45 am

    NATO is the most embarassing thing that has happened to the Western empire, through NATO most of Europe learned what America is about, guns and corruption. If it wasn’t for NATO noone would ever learn of US heroin and oil incursions.

  4. Amelius  April 1, 2017 at 9:50 am

    The USG is a terrible joke. A total embarrassment. Their endless talk of “Russian aggression is pathetic beyond words. Boo hoo hoo, you [email protected]!n scumbags, after years of telling us how bad ISIS is, now Russia has shown the world what a real war on terror looks like and you’re crying about it. The USG is like a belligerent, spoiled child who is throwing a violent temper tantrum. It would be nice to see every US citizen refuse to pay one cent in taxes, until the entire government is replaced. One that will jail the current criminals, abolish the federal reseve and refuse to allow lobbyists to buy their own candidates. Seriously, what else can be done, without spilling blood in the streets? Something needs to be done. The USG has gotten worse than anyone could have imagined. They are a bunch of whores who are paid to speak total nonsense, to ensure the massive theft of public funds continues. War war and more war. If there’s no obvious enemy, we’all just invent one. Money in our boss’s pocket and a comfortable retirement plan for me. [email protected] everyone else.

    • Amelius  April 1, 2017 at 10:11 am

      The video suggests the USG is finally ready to allow Syrians to decide the fate of Assad. His approval rating amongst Syrians is more than double what Trump’s is in America and according to the last Syrian election, Assad’s approval rating is better than Obama’s ever was, too. If the USG is being genuine (I can’t believe I just said that) about finding a political solution in Syria, it might start with ending their continuing support for ISIS, al Qaeda and all the other head choppers. If the USG is ready for a political solution, they should remove themselves from the situation entirely, as their unwanted intervention has been illegal since day one. On the surface, the USG dropping its “Assad must go” mantra, seems like good news. I just wonder wtf they’ve got up their sleeves.

  5. frog  April 1, 2017 at 9:19 am

    Would you trust your young son to a man like Tillerson, who has corrupted that famous institution the Boy Scouts?
    Allowing gays and transgenders to run the camps, pleased my son paid no interest in joining.
    Check out Bros Nathaniel video.on Tillerman

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network