…by Jonas E. Alexis
You can’t make this stuff up. Israeli officials have been running around like wild buffalos saying that the West needs to disarm Syria of its chemical weapons once and for all. Nikki Haley, a representative of the regime and a thoroughly Zionist and mindless puppet, has stepped up to the plate and declared that the U.N. must act according to human rights principles.
This is too good to be true, and Haley is making our job really easy. Listen to her very carefully:
“Imagine you are the parent of a boy — a teenager. Policemen come to your home in the middle of the night and take your boy away. He is held without explanation for weeks. And when he finally comes home, your boy has all the marks of having been tortured. For a group of parents in Syria in 2011, this was not an exercise in imagination but a horrifying reality.”
Let us assume that Haley’s statement is true here. Then so what? Why can’t she use the same standard across the political spectrum? Why is she singling out Syria? Does she mean to tell us that she has never heard of a place called Abu Ghraib? Unless she missed it, then let us make the debacle in 2003 fresh again.
Torture, as we have exhaustively reported in numerous articles, was routine at Abu Ghraib. One prisoner testified that he saw one officer
“fu$king a kid, his age would be about 15-18 years. The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets. Then when I heard the screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn’t covered and I saw [name blacked out], who was wearing the military uniform putting his dick in the little kid’s ass. I couldn’t see the face of the kid because his face wasn’t in front of the door. And the female soldier was taking pictures.”
Torture was also routine in Afghanistan, where adolescents were beaten with hoses “and pipes and threats of sodomy.” These acts were not done in the dark. Cambridge University published similar reports in a book that is more than 1200 pages long. Psychiatrists like Terry Kupers admitted that these acts were accurate.
Did you know that people who tortured young boys at Abu Ghraib were overwhelmingly trained in Israel? Did you know that not a single one of these people has been brought to justice? Did you know that people like Dinesh D’Souza defended Abu Ghraib by saying things like “it reflects the sexual immodesty of liberal America”?
What would Haley say to the parents of the young boy who was sexually tortured? Can this woman tell us that she is in politics because she wanted to uphold the moral law? Or was she hired to do a specific job for the Israeli regime and Deep State?
Israel—A Friend of ISIS
Going back to the Israeli regime, they say that they want to remove chemical weapons from Syria, but they don’t want to talk about the incontrovertible fact that ISIS “has chemical weapons and uses them,” according to the Seattle Times. It states:
“There is growing evidence that deadly chemical agents are becoming part of the ISIS arsenal.
“The group used chemical weapons, including chlorine and sulfur, at least 52 times in Syria and Iraq, according to a study released in November by IHS Conflict Monitor, a London-based intelligence collection and analysis service.”
ISIS has used chemical weapons not once or twice but fifty-two times in Iraq and Syria! Neither the Israeli regime nor its puppets in the United States have ever said that the West needs to remove those weapons from ISIS. As Russia Today has rightly pointed out, “Why not all chemical attacks worthy of Western media attention”? More importantly, Israel has supported ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other terrorist cells in the region precisely because they are fighting against the Assad government.
There is another point that needs consideration here. Israel has hundreds of chemical weapons in their basement. When U.S. officials finally learned about Israel’s nuclear weapons, they were completely shocked because they had underestimated the regime. The officials admitted when they first saw some of those warheads,
“Our thought was ‘Holy shit!’ How could we have been so wrong? We always said, ‘So the Israelis got ten warheads? Okay. So what? Anybody can build those.’ All of a sudden we learned they’d become sophisticated. It blew everybody’s mind.’”
Others in the Reagan administration were “paranoid.” One official declared, “It was kept away from the people at Z Division [a special group that provides the United States Intelligence Community with information about foreign nuclear programs].”
Now get this: Israel does not allow international inspections! But the same regime is trying to police virtually every single country in the Middle East on nuclear weapons. Where is the logic of that?
Well, it is nowhere to be found. In fact, the Israeli regime is mad and sad because Western leaders are still reluctant to start World War III in Syria. It has been reported that even Theresa May doesn’t really agree with America bombing Syria because of the so-called chemical attack.
Do Chemical Weapons Logically Lead to Regime Change?
The last point that we need to consider is simply this—and here we are going to grant the perverse notion that Assad used chemical weapons. If we take the figure that the Zionist media has been propounding—roughly 90 people died because Assad used chemical weapons—then we are still confronted with an incontrovertible fact.
As the British newspaper the Independent has pointed out, “US-led coalition killed more Syrian civilians than Isis or Russia in March.” Noted journalist Robert Fisk has also reported: “If Trump cares so much about Syrian babies, why is he not condemning the rebels who slaughtered children?”
Finally, Donald Trump, as Chris Ernesto has argued, has already killed dozens of babies in four different countries: Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Syria. His administration has already made it clear that they want “strong” ties with terrorist states like Saudi Arabia. From March of 2015 to August of 2016, it has been reported that “2,280 Yemeni civilians killed by Saudi-led airstrikes.”
Again, no Western leader is running around and barking like Chihuahua and saying that the West has to do a thorough examination on the U.S. and the Saudi Arabia. As scholar Paul D. Miller of the University of Texas himself has argued:
“Strategically, it requires the United States to invest its time and resources policing a weapon this is not qualitatively different from conventional weapons. Morally, it amounts to a declaration that the United States cares more about the murder weapon than the murder victim.”
So, is it reasonable to conclude that Assad must go because “chemical weapons” were used? No. What must go are lies, deceptions, hoaxes and blatant fabrications by the Israeli regime. The regime wants nothing less than bloodshed, chaos, destruction, and complete annihilation of the Syrian people, and if politicians want to stop much of the chaos in the region, they need to stop listening to the mad man in Tel Aviv.
 “The Latest: Israel Says Assad Still Has Chemical Weapons,” US News and World Report, April 19, 2017.
 She has desperately been making a ridiculous case against Iran at the UN. Kambiz Foroohar, “Haley Wants Iran, Not Israel, at Core of UN’s Middle East Agenda,” Bloomberg, April 20, 2017.
 Curt Mills, “Haley: U.N. Must Act on Human Rights,” US News and World Report, April 19, 2017.
 Cited in Mark Danner, Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror (New York: New York Review of Books, 2004), 243.
 Susan Taylor Martin, “Her Job: Lock Up Iraq’s Bad Guys,” St. Petersburg Times, December 14, 2003.
 Alfred McCoy, A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, From the Cold War to the War on Terror (New York: Owl Books, 2006), 132.
 See for example Alissa J. Rubin, “Anti-Torture Efforts in Afghanistan Failed, U.N. Says,” NY Times, January 20, 2013.
 Karen J. Geenberg and Joshua L. Dratel, eds., The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004). For a comprehensive study, see Seymour M. Hersh, Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib (New York: Harper Perennial, 2005).
 See for example Lila Rajiva, The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2005), 167.
 See Robert Fisk, “Follow Torture Trail at Abu Ghraib,” Independent, May 26, 2004.
 Dinesh D’Souza, The Enemy At Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11 (New York: Broadway Books, 2007), 151.
 Molly Hennessy-Fiske, “ISIS has chemical weapons and uses them, experts say,” Seattle Times, April 19, 2017.
 “Why not all chemical attacks worthy of Western media attention,” Russia Today, April 19, 2017.
 Herb Keinon, “Israel wanted Assad gone since start of Syria civil war,” Jerusalem Post, September 17, 2013.
 See Avner Cohen, Israel and the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999); The Worst-Kept Secret: Israel’s Bargain with the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010); Michael Karpin, The Bomb in the Basement: How Israel Went Nuclear and What That Means for the World (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006); Seymour M. Hersh, Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal & American Foreign Policy (New York: Random House, 1991).
 Seymour M. Hersh, The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (New York: Random, 1991), 291.
 Tom Newton Dunn, “Split opens between Washington and London over Syria after Theresa May refused to back new strikes on Assad,” The Sun, April 11, 2017.
 Rachel Roberts, “US-led coalition killed more Syrian civilians than Isis or Russia in March, figures show,” Independent, April 3, 2017.
 Robert Fisk, “If Trump cares so much about Syrian babies, why is he not condemning the rebels who slaughtered children?,” Independent, April 16, 2017.
 Chris Ernesto, “Trump Has Killed Beautiful Babies in Four Countries,” Antiwar.com, April 18, 2017.
 “US wants ‘strong’ Saudi Arabia: Mattis,” Daily Star (Lebanon), April 19, 2017.
 Paul D. Miller, “Chemical Weapons Aren’t the Real Problem in Syria,” Foreign Policy, April 19, 2017.