FBI Director Fired: Is the US a Mafia Controlled Dictatorship?

The FBI's James Comey has bipartisan backing behind him. Trump does not. Will Trump's gamble crash and burn?

Even the Russian Ambassador, Sergei Lavrov was surprised by the firing of FBI Director James Comey. Perhaps we are finally to the point of a Constitutional crisis. There is no recourse in the US. There is no rule of law. No one can indict the President, even if he commits a potential felony, such as witness intimidation with tweets on Twitter.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/861592420043157504

The key is Congressman Devin Nunes who leads the Trump-Russia investigation. Will anyone force Nunes to recuse himself from the Congressional investigation because of his lack of impartiality?

Still, something is wrong with this whole story, the Russia portion. Trump was heavily involved with the Russian mafia. He was also monitoring the oligarchs for the Russian government according to the  Christoper Steele dossier. Trump profited from the Russian mafia and oligarchs with his condominium sales and has deep mafia ties. So, is the Trump-Russia investigation a non-starter because it is a lie – not investigating the mafia connections and not investigating the many other issues with the current administration, including the potential rigging of the 2016 election?

The election was a lie. The GOP stole it. The election was stolen through vote purges/theft – Cross Check, votes added on electronic voting machines such as in Wisconsin and voter disenfranchisement with faulty equipment in Democratic districts, as happened in Detroit, MI. There was also foreign/domestic sponsored “Fake News” being targeted at domestic voters using Cambridge Analytica/SCL. The now former director of the FBI swayed the election in Trump’s favor with a public disclosure of questions regarding Hilary Clinton’s emails that turned out to be a non-starter too- and cost Clinton votes, while former New York City, Mayor Rudy Giuliani potentially knew about the FBI disclosure in advance – the October surprise. Perhaps yesterday Comey was no longer useful to the Trump Administration, as the pressure in Congress is building. Or was Comey quickly becoming a liability, seeing the Trump White House for what it is, so he had to be let go?

The Democratic Primary was also stolen by Hilary Clinton, as is being revealed in a lawsuit.

Currently, the US is a virtual dictatorship, with no one truly elected in the White House, and leading the once democratic country.

South Korea just had an election and the people voted – they now have an elected President, Moon Jae-in. They have a democracy. We did not have a real verifiable election here in the US, as the recount was blocked every step of the way by the GOP and Trump attorneys. Now, we have a virtual despot leading the US.

When thinking about the FBI, the FBI cannot investigate the President. I know. I called back in 2003 during the ramp up to war in Iraq. I asked the FBI directly, over the telephone, if they could investigate Former President George W Bush’s conflicts of interests relating to the Iraq War. The woman who answered the telephone said something to the effect of, while I would like to investigate the President, we have no jurisdiction to investigate the President. I was directed to call the Secret Service Agency which also made no sense.

Only Congress can investigate the President. Currently the person leading the Trump-Russia investigation is Congressman Nunes. Thinking about this “investigation,” who knew what when, does anyone care that election was stolen, and not by Russia, but by the GOP? Does anyone care that the big threat with Mike Flynn was not so much Russia, but Turkey, his largest benefactor, a now dictator controlled NATO member that is leaning more radical Islamic? Does anyone care if Giuliani and Michael B. Mukasey, the former U.S. Attorney General are assisting in the defense of Reza Zarrab, who was charged with conspiring to evade U.S. sanctions against Iran, money laundering and bank fraud in connection with the President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan? Does anyone want to investigate if this case connected to Flynn in any way?

Russia did try to sway the election for Trump, as was seen with the day to day favorable coverage on RT. Did Trump team members talk with the Russians regarding sanctions before being officially in office? Probably. Was Trump even truly elected? Probably not.

What is needed is a special prosecutor to examine the vote theft and the rigging of the 2016 election.

We currently sit with a mafia controlled leader in office because there is no one powerful enough to investigate how his group came into power.

We can examine the Russia ties over and over. Until we get to Alfa Bank connection and the members of Russian mafia who were financially backing Trump, in addition to the Russian government, those with years of ties to Trump, there is no real Trump-Russia investigation. The oligarchs are in opposition, for the most part, to the Russian government, that is why the Russian government tasked Trump to monitor them.

Are the Russians the problem? Not completely. Why have we allowed this election fraud to go on? As we sit, day in and day out listening to the media go back and forth, no one touches the true issue, the one that could bring this whole facade down – the election that was fraudulent and the despot in the White House, that really is controlled by the mafia, both Russian and otherwise.

So, we now have the mafia running the United States with their front man in the White House, and there is no real investigation into how this happened. Perhaps no one cares. Maybe the FBI is the one that was ready to investigate how the mafia came to power in the US – probably not – but, they may have jurisdiction and have investigated the mafia for years.

Sally Yates had powerful testimony on Monday regarding Trump and Flynn.

According to the Mother Jones article, Why the Sally Yates Hearing Was Very Bad News for the Trump White House by David Corn, “The conclusion from Yates’ testimony was clear: Trump didn’t dump Flynn until the Kislyak matter became a public scandal and embarrassment. The Justice Department warning—hey, your national security adviser could be compromised by the foreign government that just intervened in the American presidential campaign—appeared to have had no impact on Trump’s actions regarding Flynn. Imagine what Republicans would say if a President Hillary Clinton retained as national security adviser a person who could be blackmailed by Moscow. “

This too is somewhat of a surface argument. If the election was a fraud, then why did the “Justice Department” not investigate.

Can the DOJ really be counted on?

If Trump is really unelected, do any of our laws really matter?

Perhaps that is why there is no recourse for witness intimidation of Sally Yates.

Attorney and former criminal investigator. Seth Abramson‏ (@SethAbramson ) said on Twitter, “The president is committing a serious felony (witness tampering) in full view of the American public. What’s the media going to do about it?”

What is the media going to do about it? Does the media prosecute felonies?

Trump’s tweet, “Ask Sally Yates, under oath, if she knows how classified information got into the newspapers soon after she explained it to W.H. Counsel,” clearly may be construed as a way of threatening Yates and may be considered felony witness tampering, if it was meant to “influence, delay, or prevent” Yates testimony.

Representative Ted Lieu is asked, “Did @POTUS violate 18 USC 1512, which prevents “intimidation” of a witness to “influence” testimony in “official proceeding”? #SallyYates” on Twitter. Again, who can investigate this?

Here is the law in question:

18 U.S. Code § 1512 is a federal law against witness tampering and intimidation that states:

(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to—
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;

In another tweet that same day, Congressman Lieu says that the FBI Counterintelligence can investigate the President and his associates? Is that abdicating the responsibility of Congress?

Everything done in the media is damage control for Trump.

On Monday, Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s testimony was also “demystified.”

From Mother Jones: “On March 5, Clapper was interviewed by NBC News’ Chuck Todd on Meet the Press and asked if there was any evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. “Not to my knowledge,” Clapper replied. Since then, Trump and his champions have cited Clapper to say there is no there there with the Russia story. Trump on March 20 tweeted, “James Clapper and others stated that there is no evidence Potus colluded with Russia. The story is FAKE NEWS and everyone knows it!” White House press secretary Sean Spicer has repeatedly deployed this Clapper statement to insist there was no collusion.

“At Monday’s hearing, Clapper pulled this rug out from under the White House and its comrades. He noted that it was standard policy for the FBI not to share with him details about ongoing counterintelligence investigations. And he said he had not been aware of the FBI’s investigation of contacts between Trump associates and Russia that FBI director James Comey revealed weeks ago at a House intelligence committee hearing. Consequently, when Clapper told Todd that he was not familiar with any evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, he was speaking accurately. But he essentially told the Senate subcommittee that he was not in a position to know for certain. This piece of spin should now be buried. Trump can no longer hide behind this one Clapper statement.”

As we sit here and watch the back forth, consider these questions, what if this is just a reality TV show for the mafia controllers of the US, far right technocrats and others, and if we are currently dealing with a virtual dictatorship?

Do any of our laws matter then? Will anyone be prosecuted? Probably not the President, unless there is a change in Congress.


All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Ann, I think what we are all trying to say here is that our country is in disorder, and disintagrating rapidly, by design of course. Sort of like Lybia without the bombs. While all are.busy pointing fingers at all, there are a few other hands, with sticky fingers, busy stuffing our tax dollars where ever they can fit them, before the ship goes down.

  2. The day before 911, I think it was Rumsfeld, on national TV told us that 3 TRILLION$ could not be accounted for by the DoD. The next day at the Pentagon a group of accountants met to sort the mess out. I think they numbered 30. All were murdered by what ever caused the explosion which happened to hit the room they were meeting in.
    Anyway, the events of 911 went so well that the 3 TRILLION $s were no longer news, and forgotten. Well, not too long ago, maybe it was the summer of 2016, it was announced by the media that it was not 3 any more, but 6 TRILLIONS can’t be found. or accounted for at tbe Dept. of Defense. Some folks just love the number 6. AnyaY the media mumbled something about the cost of war, and Afghanistan, and we forgot what the story was all about, and slept well that night.

  3. Here’s the deal. On 9/11/2001 we watched on TV the murder of 3,000. and said nothing. The laws of physics were ignored, explained away by idiot commentators. Common sense died that day. It was replaced by the not so patriotic Patriot Act. Once “they” realized how stupid we actually are “they” grew teeth, and “they” haven’t stopped eating yet. Now they are feeding on our treasury adding trillions, at interest, at a pace that is not sustainable.We do nothing because we’re terrorized by the bullshit that comes into our homes every minute via television. Our protectors, the cops, kill more of us every year, but that’s ok, 16 years ago the poor soul had a DUI, he was a bad guy. Better him than me. Right? Since WW2 the USA has murdered millions. Look it up. Why? For who? Who benefits? “They” have a license to kill, rape, and destroy. We gave this license to them. We are complicit.

  4. Not sure if Mafia is a good word for it. When we reference “the mob” it harkens to the days of Tommy guns and the birth of the “insurance industry”and underground gambling. I would use “international criminal enterprise” or “fake politicians”. Those who run for public service based on the false pretense of serving the people when actually they serve corporate interests which are increasingly rogue and …”Above the Law”. Vetting our politicians has never been a strong suit for the US, but that is where the problem is. A senate seat is a golden ticket and the group of them form self protecting “rules of engagement” among them. That is a mob. But the activities are larger than the term. Infested with snakes, is the condition, and money is the food. Remove the food.

  5. Dr. Susta, Good! I had been waiting for someone to say outright what I had suspected for so long. Some people, a whole lot of people, have been trying very hard to conflate the two so they become inseperable in the mind of the public. It looked so obvious from my end, a matter of “hide in plain sight”. I NEVER have enough of the truth!

  6. Sorry to tell you that since the Revoutionary war debt fell due and couldn´t paid back your beloved “Constitution” is overwritten secretly by congress and other thugs. Since then the country is under secret martial law prolonged every year by congress. Guess who let south and north fight against each other ? The same thugs financed always both sides of wars to suck a lot of money.

    • Ann Diener – I meant to say how informative your article is and how you pinned the crucial point of the gap between Putin and the oligarchs. The references to Russia are deliberately skewered by the Democrats to implicate Putin and the Kremlin when the wheel-dealer Oligarchs are anti-Russia goons who pilfered everything they could lay their hands on and even flaunted brazen chutzpah in a serious bid to control the Duma. Certain oligarchs did tow the line but they were few and far between. Be strong.

  7. “Russia did try to sway the election for Trump, as was seen with the day to day favorable coverage on RT…”

    Oh, come on! Only an insignificant fraction of the US electorate follows RT, and the Russians know it.

  8. I’m not convinced that the Russian government had anything to do with Trump’s election. If they did, he sure as hell hasn’t done anything for them that could be considered as favourable. During his campaign, Trump expressed the necessity of mending US-Russia relations for the benefit of both countries. I don’t think any sane person opposed that idea. Nevertheless, his supposed opposition used such suggestions to paint Trump as a Russian stooge. When Trump risked global security by belligerently attacking Russia’s Syrian allies, his supposed opposition sang songs of praise for him in the MSM. Either Trump totally lied about his foreign policy intentions during his campaign, which is entirely possible. Or, his intentions were genuine, until he took office and realized how powerful the forces pushing for war with Russia, really are. Both scenarios are equally realistic, as far as I’m concerned, and neither scenario is good.

    • Last night, CNN brought on a number of different analysts and I must have heard “Russia”, 300 times over the course of 20 minutes. The Trump-Russia investigation is a farce. I know this, because if they really cared about foreign interference in US elections, they would need to consider every US politician that has pandered to Israel at AIPAC conventions. They would need to consider who the king makers on both sides of the election are and the influence they wield on all levels of government. They would see that the 100+ joos that organized and sponsored Trump’s campaign, provides much more evidence to suggest that Trump is an Israeli agent and not a Russian one. They would realize the fact that having Kushner in a position of such power presents a massive, multi-faceted, conflict of interest.

    • The investigation would review all the favourable things that Trump has done for Israel since he’s been in, like blackmail the UN to remove a legal report that charged Israel with being an apartheid state, and bombing a Syrian airbase the day after 90 rabbis petitioned him to do so. The investigation would consider all favourable things Trump has done for Israel, and weigh that against the favourable things that Trump has done for Russia. The investigation would compare whatever evidence they had tying Trump to Russia, against evidence that ties Trump to Israel. On the surface, I imagine the results of such a comparison would lead to an obvious conclusion.

  9. I tried to ask this question before on VT and never got an answer (too hot I suppose). Is Russia (and Putin) the same as the Russian Mafia (that was exiled to the US)? Everyone is investigating Russia, and ignoring the oligarch based Russian Mafia. Are they one and the same or not?

    • N.O. (Nawlins or New Orleans): NO…! Russian Kosher Nostra oligarchs are NOT Putin/Russia.

      Is that a definitive enough answer for you? As per the burning questions of “Home Alone 2”: Have you had enough? Or are you ready for more? No matter…

      If you regularly read VT articles (past, present & future), then you’ll see that VT’s semi-well-proven working hypothesis on 2016 U.S. election skewing & rigging is that Russian, Israeli & U.S. Kosher Nostra oligarchs (i.e., gangsters) skewed & rigged the 2016 U.S. elections — with Macedonian troll-dominated robosite fake news, other fake news (e.g., AJ), Republithug voter purges of Dummycrook voters, U.S./Israeli intel channelling of “leaks” (not “hacks”) to Bibi/Rotten-Child/Israeli-oriented WikiLeaks, and symbiotically-controlled Comey/FBI public statements about ‘the more competent evil’ (Hillary). Hillary & Dummycrooks were and are CLUELESS about this stuff.

      So, the answer to your question is “NO!” — as per VT articles (and as per others’/my independent research & experiences). “Have you had enough? Or are you ready for more?” ;-).

  10. How about Ken Starr for special prosecutor? He could try to out do himself in spending money and still come up empty handed as he did with Slick. A special prosecutor sounds good but is not good because who is independent enough to do the job and still expect to live through a retirement age? The Mafia are powerful folks. As far as I know they are not known for complying with laws when it comes to enforcing agreements or dealing with people they don’t like.

Comments are closed.