Mossadist philosopher and murderer Bernard Henry Levy gets pied in Serbia


…by Jonas E. Alexis


Bernard Henry Levy, who goes by BHL, is an interesting character. He is a flaming Zionist.[1] Like the New York Jewish intellectuals of the 1920s and 30s, BHL ended up rejecting Communism on the one hand but upholding radical Zionist views on the other.

In the late 1960s, BHL himself declared that he was “aligned with the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist movement of the time, but in my own ways…”[2] BHL’s “genius” lies not in the work he has produced as a public intellectual but in summoning some of the stupidest or dumbest statements ever uttered by a public figure.

For example, he once argued that Heinrich Himmler stood trial at Nuremberg![3] This idea was quickly challenged by French Jewish historian Pierre Vidal-Nacquet.[4] Levy’s “intellectual dishonesty,” says Vidal-Nacquet, “is properly unfathomable.”

This is not the first time that BHL has summoned his own invention and coming up with crazy ideas.[5] (He studied philosophy under Jacques Derrida, a Jewish philosopher who played an influential role in bringing about postmodernism into the West, most particularly at places like Yale University.[6]) BHL denounced Immanuel Kant as a madman![7]

BHL then lays the cat out of the bag when he concludes that his conviction is “the moral and spiritual tradition in which I grew up. For me, it’s the definition of Judaism. Being Jewish means having more obligations than rights.”[8]

And then this: “The Talmud is democracy in practice. The Jewish Nation invented the notion that the truth lies in the most heated argument.”[9]

First of all, BHL does not really believe that truth lies in the most heated argument. If that were the case, then why is my good friend Dr. Fredrick Toben still being prosecuted for challenging the tenets of the Holocaust narrative? Why did they put him in prison for months? Toben has been putting the Holocaust establishment to the test and is asking that he be judged on the basis of evidence and arguments, not on the basis of an ideology. As he has recently told me:

“If you take away my freedom to think and to speak, then you take away my humanity, and you commit a crime against humanity because TRUTH is my defence.”

Will BHL defend Toben? Will he tell Europe to stop harassing the man on stupid charges? Will he meet Toben on the basis of truth? Will he ever try to understand what Toben is actually saying? Of course not.

Obviously BHL is not really a philosopher who is interested in the pursuing the truth. He is interested in spreading an essentially Talmudic ideology in the West and the Middle East. That is why he finds it comfortable to write books such as The Genius of Judaism.

More importantly, if BHL is right in saying that the Talmud is democracy in practice, then by deduction BHL deludes himself into believing that he has been producing democracy in Libya. In other words, what is viewed as chaos and mayhem by any serious thinker is democracy for BHL. In that sense, BHL is indirectly and ideologically anti-reason.

Furthermore, if the Talmud is democracy in practice, what does it actually teach? The Talmud for example permitted a woman to molest a young boy because “the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.”[10] It also teaches that “a child less than nine years old cannot…be the object of sodomy” (BT Sanhedrin 54b).

But what about democracy itself? Does the Talmud teach it? Well, it depends on what you meant by democracy. For people like BHL, democracy means allowing The Chosen to kill, steal, and destroy whatever they do not like. The Jewish Encyclopedia, interpreting the Talmud, summarizes it best: “Only Israelites are men’ … Gentiles they classed not as men but as barbarians.”

“Judah ben Illai recommends the daily recital of the benediction: “Blessed be thou … who has not made me a goi [or Gentile].” It gets better: “He who smites an Israelite on the cheek is as though he has thus assaulted the divine presence…The Talmud outlawed the issue [or children] of a Gentile as that of a beast…The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed.”[11]

If BHL wants to tell us that this is democracy, then we have a serious problem. One can say that this is one reason why BHL promoted the destruction of Libya. The same BHL also advocated that the West must invade Syria, obviously for Israel.

What was really risible was that BHL reproduced the categorical lie that Assad used chemical weapons on his own people.[12] But there is more to this Mossadist philosopher than meets the eye and ear. BHL declared that Putin has never been interested in the truth and that the West should never let “a former KGB [strut] across the stage.”[13]

I just couldn’t hold my laughter here. BHL admitted that he was a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist, and now he is condemning Putin for being a former KGB! I guess BHL has good reasons to say that Kant is a madman because Kant would have almost certainly argued that BHL should be placed behind padded cells. Gordon Duff was absolutely right when he said that BHL is actually a “Mossadist philosopher.” BHL “is heavily scrutinized for his role in pushing for and supporting NATO’s 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia…”[14]

BHL has recently given a lecture in Belgrade, Serbia, talking about democracy again, and he literally got splashed by a pie-wielding writer by the name of Noël Godin. Godin, we are told, “has pied Levy at least seven times since 1985, the last time in 2015.” One observer tweeted:

“Pictures of Bernard Henri-levy getting pied in the face are some of the greatest moments of modern history.”[15]

Right after he was squashed, BHL said to a young man who was holding a banner: “Long live democracy in Belgrade.” This was actually a response to the banner the young man was holding which said: “Bernard Levy advocates imperialist murders.”

[1]  “Bernard-Henry Levy: I Have Never Seen an Army as Democratic as the IDF,” Haaretz, May 30, 2010; Attila Somfalvi, “Bernard-Henri Levy: Israel Secular Miracle,” Y-Net News, May 31, 2010.

[2]  Gary Wood, “Je Suis un Superstar,” Guardian, June 15, 2003.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Doreen Carvajal, “Philosopher Left to Muse on Ridicule over Hoax,” NY Times, February 9, 2010.

[6]  See for example E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1003-1004.

[7] Carvajal, “Philosopher Left to Muse on Ridicule over Hoax,” NY Times, February 9, 2010.

[8] “We Lost a Great Deal of Time in Libya because of the Germans,” Spiegel International, March 30, 2011.

[9] Attila Somfalvi, “Bernard-Henri Levy: Israel Secular Miracle,” Y-Net News, May 31, 2010.

[10] See Michael Hoffmann, Judaism Discovered (Coeur D’Alene: Revisionist History, 2008).

[11] For further studies, See Hoffman.

[12] Bernard-Henri Levy, “On Obama, Syria, Putin, the G-20, and a Week’s Wait,” Daily Beast, September 2, 2017.

[13] Ibid.

[14] “French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy pied in the face for 9th time,” Russia Today, May 11, 2017.

[15] “French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy pied in the face for 9th time,” Russia Today, May 11, 2017.

Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

Comments are closed.