Assange, Wikileaks and how Israel enslaved the British


[Editor’s note: Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive… 

While few would dispute that a tangled web surrounds his public image, many fail to discern that Assange is practising deception; in fact, it is his raison d’etre, he and his Wikileaks organisation are a front for what the CIA correctly identified as a “hostile intelligence service”; VT will go further and identify them as Israel’s Mossad.

Furthermore, the unstinting support given to Assange and Wikileaks by Nigel Farage and his UKIP party is a clear indicator that they too, are serving Israeli masters and have been ever since they appeared on the British political scene in the 1990s.

Let us step back in time to the mid-90s, a time when Britain was coming to the end of a 15 year rule by the Conservative Party, most of it under Margaret Thatcher. The Labour Party was undergoing a resurgence due to the leadership of John Smith and the disarray within the Conservative Party caused by the thorny issue of the EU and the Maastricht Treaty.

Labour Party leader Neil Kinnock had failed to win the 1992 election, largely due to poor handling of the media and a failure to sell Kinnock to the British people – he was too Welsh and too ginger and Labour never managed to market him effectively, the popular support within the electorate was there but the marketing savvy was lacking.

The Conservatives under Thatcher in the 1980s had transformed British politics by hiring the prestigious Saatchi and Saatchi PR firm and making politics more about the image presented to the public than actual policies. Kinnock’s failure in 92 began a new phase in the history of the Labour Party as party insiders realised that, to beat the Conservatives they had to play the same game where PR spin was king and policies a distant second in importance.

John Smith replaced Kinnock and was hugely popular both with his own party and the British electorate, he was seen as a near certainty to win the 1997 election – sadly he died of a heart attack in 1994 and was replaced by the man who today is best remembered as the war criminal that followed George W Bush into wars in Afghanistan and Iraq like a faithful lap dog, one Tony Blair.

Tony Blair was an Israeli asset from the moment he first entered politics under the sponsorship of Zionist Jew Levy Mendelsohn, a man Blair would make Lord Levy shortly after becoming Prime Minister. In partnership with Peter Mandleson, a close friend of the Rothschilds, Blair destroyed the Labour Party, turning it into ‘New Labour’ and moving it from a left wing, socialist party to a centre-right, populist puppet that emulated the PR spin tactics of the 1980s Conservatives while slavishly following the directions of their Israeli masters.

All the other New Labour leaders were stooges too, Jack Straw, Gordon Brown, all of them, only John Prescott remained from the old, socialist Labour and he likely only got to remain because he knew where the bodies were buried, so to speak.

Under Blair and New Labour, Britain entered a new and shameful period where we functioned as the 51st state of the USA and our armed forces became an adjunct of those of the US, dutifully working alongside the Yanks to fight the War On Terror in Afghanistan and Iraq and share in the heroin, oil and stolen resources profits.

During the Blair years, the Conservative party fell into utter disarray under a series of unpopular and ineffective leaders such as William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith (yes, no-one remembers them in Britain either), torn apart by a deep divide over the issue of Britain’s membership of the EU. Out of this divide came Nigel Farage and UKIP.

Farage, a former City banker, formed UKIP in order to attract away from the Conservative Party those who were referred to as ‘Euro Sceptics’ and wanted Britain to either leave the EU entirely or at least change drastically the nature of Britain’s membership of the EU. With the benefit of hindsight, it is now clear that Farage and UKIP was an Israeli operation to weaken and destabilise the Conservative party, thus allowing Tony Blair and New Labour to enjoy almost 15 years in power. Thus, Britain became an Israeli puppet.

While UKIP never became a major force in British parliamentary politics, they served a vital role in the Israeli takeover.

By 2010 and the election of David Cameron, Israeli control had been completely solidified; Cameron had been an Israeli asset since at least the early 90s and he continued to follow Tel-Aviv’s orders every bit as obediently as Blair had before him. 

Fast forward to 2016 and the infamous referendum on membership of the EU, now universally referred to as ‘BREXIT’. Cameron dutifully did as he was ordered and lost, Farage won, a clear case of Israeli controlling both sides and ensuring they get the result they desired – Britain out of Europe, thus destabilising both the EU and Britain itself.

Having served their roles and achieved their assigned tasks, Farage and Cameron both retired from politics post-BREXIT, Cameron to enjoy his vast personal wealth, Farage to float around the fringes of politics, occasionally sticking his head up to support his fellow Israeli stooges – best evidenced by his visit to the US during the last election in order to make a few speeches praising his good pal Donald Trump.

So now you have the background to where we are today in Britain, a nation where the ruling Conservative Party is every bit as much under Israeli-control as New Labour had been under Blair, meaning we have been under the Zionist thumb for the last 20 years.

A glimmer of hope does exist in the form of Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, a true socialist of the old Labour party who has been attacked and slandered at almost every turn as an anti-semite and labelled as ‘unelectable’ by the British media, despite enjoying massive popular support amongst the British people. Of course, Corbyn is no anti-semite, he is simply labelled that because he is not an Israeli asset, the first leader of either the Labour or Conservative parties for over two decades who is not a puppet of Tel-Aviv. 

Corbyn has attempted to purge the Labour Party of it’s Blairites, those who have taken the dirty shekel proferred by the Zionist criminals. That task remains incomplete, hence we have witnessed many attacks on Corbyn from within his own party. Sadly, if he loses the upcoming general election, Corbyn will probably not get the chance to complete the purge of the Blairites as a challenge to his leadership of the party will almost certainly arise. 

In recent weeks, Tony Blair himself has mooted a potential return to politics, this is a clear indicator that the Zionists are concerned that Corbyn has had at least a measure of success in his campaign to rebuild the Labour Party into it’s original, socialist form and remove the Israeli hegemony it has been enslaved under; hence they are threatening to reintroduce their faithful servant Blair and use him to undermine Corbyn while dividing the Labour party in much the same way they used their boy Farage to deeply wound the Conservatives in the 1990s.

When Assange stepped onto the balcony of the Ecuadorean Embassy this week and gave his ‘can’t forgive or forget’ speech and stating that ‘the war is far from over’ he was reading directly from the agenda set for him by Tel-Aviv. The Swedish rape charges that have just been dropped were a complete fabrication, part of a psyop designed to lend credibility to Assange, to paint him as a real deal fugitive from justice who was the sworn enemy of ‘the powers that be’.

Of course, this is a total inversion of the truth, Assange and Wikileaks along with the British government, the British media and the British Establishment are all on Tel-Aviv’s payroll, all faithful servants, willing conspirators and faithful partners in crime to that evil Zionist regime. Farage too, although now relegated to the sidelines, remains ready, waiting and more than willing to continue to serve those same masters. Ian]

Daily Beast
Wikileaks: Inside the Farage-Assange-Trump Connection

When Julian Assange sought refuge in 2011 at an embassy in the heart of London, only one of Britain’s political parties was willing to offer support to the exile in their midst.

Nigel Farage’s U.K. Independence Party, which seemed a fringe movement at the time but became the driving force behind Brexit, swung into action and campaigned against the demand that Assange be returned to Sweden for a police interview on allegations of rape.

Farage and his UKIP colleagues have spoken out publicly in support of Assange numerous times since 2011, but leaked emails seen by The Daily Beast reveal the true extent to which the party apparatus tried to assist the founder of WikiLeaks, which the head of the CIA has since described as a “hostile intelligence service” that cooperated with Russian agents.

The episode raises further questions about links between Farage, Assange and the Russian government. Farage, who is also a favored friend of U.S. President Donald Trump, was spotted emerging from a meeting with Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy in March.

Internal UKIP memos reveal the relationship went back much further: Assange and his lawyer were given the opportunity to contribute directly to speeches given by UKIP on the floor of the European Parliament while branches of the party in and around London were told to send activists to protest against Assange’s proposed judicial surrender to the authorities.

“We need bodies,” read an email request sent to local UKIP associations asking them to send two or three people each as an “astroturf” protest against Assange’s plight when he appeared in court in London in January 2011.

Farage and his UKIP colleagues also reportedly met privately with Assange’s lawyer Mark Stephens, who was repeatedly offered the chance to help craft the party’s words on the case, according to the leaked emails.

Stephens was asked if he or Assange would like to meet a UKIP member of the European Parliament, Gerrard Batten, on January 31 that year “in order to discuss bringing out issues in the case.”

He was asked again if he wished “to include a few points to get the message across” on February 5, 2011, before Batten was due to speak in the European Parliament. Batten asked Stephens again if he had “any points that you feel I should or should not mention in the few minutes I get to speak” on February 11.

Batten addressed the European Parliament, standing at Farage’s right hand, on February 14, 2011,. where he raised the prospect that Assange was being mistreated because he was “a political dissident.” He returned to the case in June 2011, telling the parliament in Brussels that the U.S. “need him locked up somewhere” while they work out how to prosecute him.

The UKIP MEP also made a submission on behalf of Assange in his case against extradition, which went all the way to Britain’s Supreme Court in 2012. Last year, Batten wrote on his blog that Assange’s stay in the embassy of Ecuador had been tantamount to “arbitrary arrest and imprisonment.”

When news broke on Friday that Sweden would no longer pursue the allegations against Assange after a seven-year standoff while he hid in an embassy out of the reach of British law enforcement, Batten told The Daily Beast he had never taken a position on the guilt or innocence of Assange.

“I don’t really have a view about Mr. Assange. My involvement with him was regarding my opposition to the European Arrest Warrant,” he said. “At the time, eminent British lawyers who looked at it said this would never make it to an English court—these kind of accusations. It didn’t sound very sound in the first place.”

Assange hailed Sweden’s decision to stop pursuing the allegations and celebrated the release of Chelsea Manning—one of the first major WikiLeaks leakers—in a speech from the balcony of the embassy in London’s Mayfair.

“We have today won an important victory, but the road is far from over. The proper war is just commencing,” he said, promising to accelerate the distribution of material about the CIA. The standoff will continue because there is still an outstanding warrant for Assange’s arrest over skipping bail.

Batten told The Daily Beast he had attended Assange’s lavish 40th birthday party in 2010 but had not met with him since. He said he does not recall whether Stephens or Assange took up his offer to help with his speeches. He also said he had received no donations from anyone connected to WikiLeaks or the Russian government. “If only these people would offer me money, I’d have the luxury of refusing it,” he said.

UKIP has repeatedly denied co-operating with Russia, Russian front organizations, or taking funds from the Kremlin—which would be illegal under British law—but Farage, who was one of the first foreign politicians to meet with Trump after his election, has called for improved relations between Russia, Britain, and the U.S. He also described Vladimir Putin as the foreign leader he most admires.

Last week, Farage refused once again to answer questions about his recent visit to see Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. “That has nothing to do with you,” he snapped at a Die Zeit reporter. “It was a private meeting.”

He has claimed that he met Assange as a journalist—not as a political go-between—but no interview has appeared since the March 9 meeting.

In the same interview, Farage also failed to disclose whether he received payments for his regular appearances on RT, a news channel funded by the Russian government, which paid Assange to produce his own show in 2012.

The secrecy surrounding Farage’s meeting with Assange, prompted speculation that he may have been sent as an emissary from someone in Trump’s orbit. Farage is close to Trump, he has also met the political operative Roger Stone who claimed to have a back-channel to Assange last summer.

Farage has denied that he was carrying a secret message to or from Assange, whose WikiLeaks organization has been accused of influencing the result of last year’s U.S. presidential election with the help of Russian hackers.

One of the UKIP candidates contesting Britain’s election next month told The Daily Beast that there is nothing suspicious about the attitude towards Russia taken by Farage and his party. Nigel Sussman, the parliamentary candidate for Edmonton in North London, says it’s a natural meeting of minds.

“Russia is very credible and commonsensical—and UKIP is very credible and commonsensical,” he said. “There’s a synergy of views there.”

Sussman has a more intimate view of Russia than most British politicians. He traveled to Crimea last month as a guest of the Russian parliament, who paid for internal flights, accommodation and food. Sussman says he paid for his own round-trip flights to Russia.

Sussman, the chair of UKIP’s Ilford association, who was on the trip with another former UKIP candidate, met with the local pro-Russian officials and toured the streets of former eastern
Ukraine talking to local residents accompanied by cameras from Russia’s state-owned TV Channel 1. Although most of the international community regards Moscow’s covert occupation and annexation of Crimea following as stage-managed vote as illegal and illegitimate, based on his interviews, Sussman says: “Crimea had a perfectly legitimate referendum in my opinion.”

As a result, he has submitted a report to UKIP’s National Executive Committee, which calls for a policy change—demanding that sanctions should be lifted against Russia.

“As far as I can see there don’t seem to be a lot of people standing up for Russia right now,” he said. Is UKIP the most pro-Russian party? “Yes, I think it is.”

Sussman is, however, hopeful that Trump will ease relations between Moscow and the West. “I have high hopes for Trump because Trump is going to meet Putin. I think he has said it plain: he wants to be friends with Russia. That sounds like an eminently sensible position for God’s sake!”

The UKIP candidate insisted that there was no evidence that Putin’s regime had helped Trump into office, although the U.S. intelligence community is on the record and unanimous in its conviction that Russia tried to influence the outcome. He also explained away Moscow’s reported munificence towards Marine Le Pen. “What happened was Le Pen tried to get a loan from French banks and none of the French banks would lend her any money—and that’s outrageous… It’s a bit like UKIP, I mean God help us!”

The bottom line: Le Pen’s party received millions of dollars in loans in 2014 from a now defunct Russian bank, and, whether coincidentally or out of conviction, her minions, too, endorsed the Crimean annexation.

The two representatives from Britain on the Crimea tour this year were not joined by any members of Le Pen’s National Front, but the guests included an unlikely array of minor party politicians like Jaroslav Holik from a Czech party with links to Le Pen, or the son of Serbia’s Vojislav Seselj, who was acquitted of war crimes and crimes against humanity by a United Nations tribunal in the Hague.

“It’s a collection of odds and sods; far left or far right will do, as long as they are open to some Russian support. Some of these are full Russian puppets like the Serbian Radical Party,” said Neil Barnett, the chief executive of Istok Associates, a corporate intelligence and investigations consultancy.

There is evidence that Russia helped UKIP secure Brexit—using its army of online trolls and bots—but there is no proof of collusion or direct funding from the Kremlin, or assistance from WikiLeaks.

Arron Banks, the British businessman who was once UKIP’s biggest donor and set up the unofficial Brexit campaign group Leave.EU, says he has a good relationship with Russia—including long boozy lunches with the Russian ambassador—but says there has been no monetary donation either directly or through his array of offshore companies.

Banks, who was pictured in the entourage that met Trump with Farage in the days just after Trump won the election, gave an extraordinary interview to the Observer newspaper in London last month in which he admitted that his Russian wife had the profile of a Russian spy, then suddenly denied that Russia had bankrolled Brexit—unprompted—and repeatedly defended Putin.

“What you’re talking about is the degree to which the Russians actually—let’s say they influenced the Brexit vote. Say I’m pro-Putin. Nigel said he’s not anti-Putin, if that’s the right word. But all we’ve said is that there are elements of what Russians do that we don’t disagree with. We don’t agree with everything they’re doing, like murdering journalists in the street,” he said.

This “joke” is typical of Banks, who ensures it’s hard to know exactly how seriously his words should be taken at any given moment.

When his old pal Farage was spotted leaving the Ecuadorian embassy in March, original reports said it was unclear why he had been inside the building—not least since Farage claimed to have forgotten.

A newspaper later reported that he had indeed been holding secret talks with Assange, and Banks wrote on Twitter: “Well he didn’t go for drinks with the ambassador did he?”

Another multi-millionaire with loose-lips, like Trump, Banks seems to revel in offering glimmers of a sprawling axis that runs from Washington D.C. to Moscow via London—and a tiny sliver of Ecuadorian sovereignty.

Whether Assange makes it outside the embassy in the coming days or if he continues to hide from justice—the game of shadows will continue.

Archived Reads 0
Previous articleRosenstein and Mueller are Dead
Next articlePravda: Articles of impeachment for Donald J. Trump
Ian Greenhalgh

Ian Greenhalgh is a photographer and historian with a particular interest in military history and the real causes of conflicts.

His studies in history and background in the media industry have given him a keen insight into the use of mass media as a creator of conflict in the modern world.

His favored areas of study include state sponsored terrorism, media manufactured reality and the role of intelligence services in manipulation of populations and the perception of events.

Comments Closed


  1. Scotland’s most famous quote?

    Yet Clare’s sharp questions must I shun; Must separate Constance from the Nun–
    O, what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive!
    A Palmer too!–no wonder why I felt rebuked beneath his eye: 535
    I might have known there was but one, Whose look could quell Lord Marmion.’

    «separate» –> divide and conquer
    «his eye» –> the illuminati
    «Lord Marmion» = Donald Trump?

    (yes, there are parallels in history — not sure I got it right)

  2. 1) UKIP was created to destroy the BNP. Farage has boasted about being successful in doing so. The destruction of the BNP was necessary in order to carry out the destruction of the UK through mass 3rd world immigration.
    2) As both Labour, under Blair, and the Conservatives since Heath, have been owned by Israel, the phony Left/Right illusion was going to be continued regardless of which party won. The benefit of Blair was that the destruction of the UK through even greater mass 3rd world immigration, could be carried out faster.
    3) International observers declared the vote in Crimea to have been fair.
    4) The issue of Crimea wouldn’t have become an issue if the Rothschild’s pit bull NATO had not carried out a coup d’état in Ukraine and ramped up the military on Russia’s borders.
    5) There are a lot of people who admire Putin. While he, like any other leader of a powerful country, is not to be trusted, he is the only one that appears sane when compared to the rest.

  3. I don’t understand why those who seem to think that Russia “stole” Crimea from Ukraine don’t read a history book and realize that Crimea belonged to Russia for over 200 years before the communists of the Sovieet Union “GAVE” Crimea to Ukraine back in the 1950s. Naturally, since a majority of Crimeans are of Russian descent, they wanted to go back to Russia–and they voted to do just that. And while I’m writing about Crimea–what about some years ago when Great Britain fought the Crimean War to try to get Crimea from Russia? What was that all about? Did the Rothschilds want Crimea to belong to Great Britain or what? (And Britain obviously didn’t win–and a multitude lost life or limb, and it was a bloody mess of a war. (Florence Nightingale could attest to that!) Crimea is back where it wanted to be, and it would be nice if people who really care about history acknowledged that.

  4. Who are the parties responsible for the creation of the E.U. in the first place? VT reported some time ago the CIA was directly involved.
    What is the ultimate goal of the European Union? Part of a larger effort for a one world government/.NWO.
    The EU government in Brussels is known to be corrupted and compromised, filled with pedophiles and probably every other form of perversion. Junker the drunker has time and again proven that like Trump, one should engage their brain before putting their mouth in gear. Junker has become an embarrassment to all Europeans.
    The driving force that has taken front and center is the uncontrolled immigration from the middle east and Africa, often causing major problems throughout Europe, especially in Germany, Britain and France but Sweden as well to the point where Sweden is now expelling a great number of immigrants. Good for them.
    The people of Europe view this uncontrolled mass immigration as a weapon against them to dilute the white population into one that will be so fractured and splintered so as to wreak and chaos havoc throughout Europe.

    • Ian, Lets face it the people of Britain are having their own problems with unchecked immigration. Just take a walk down the main streets of any town and get a good look. London itself has become a hell hole of “no go zones” for Brits. Tensions are at an all time high not only in Britain but throughout Europe and many current leaders such a Merkel are in deep trouble. LePenne lost due to the fact the zionists were worried about her popularity and decided to act so they found a political nobody, Macron and presto! He’s the new savior of France. Merkel and her party on the other hand are both finished.
      From my perspective the creation of the EU was part of the larger NWO plan just as the North American Trade Union was. Once all these separate organizations were in place, they would all merge into one gigantic world government.

    • all points correct sir, it also comes with some extras like immigrants that work are slave labor bringing costs down to big corporations and endless supply of labor, whilst citizens too lazy to work become state dependant as per NWO goals, and the immigrants that don’t work put pressure on the state, so the state increases taxes to cater for this, causing countries to head towards bankruptcy and require ECB ‘loans’ to assist……and those east Europeans here that come to work get low paid (but more than back home) and leave their own countries short of working men/women, causing a lack of employable people at normal rates in their homeland, so it’s forced on those countries to take the migrants due to demand of workers required in say, Poland……it’s all a game to these paedos in Brussels…..also, as per my name suggests, I can tell you Brussels itself is the European centre for human trafficking and paedophilia in Europe…..”what are the chances of that happening eh”??

  5. Oh my! Must admit, it never occurred to me that Blair could be an Israeli asset. But everything he did and “achieved” is exactly in line with someone who is just that. Big revelation. They have to leave a few real people in, not everyone can be a cardboard cutout. That’s why Prescott continued. No one questions his credentials and his authenticity gave the whole gang the same aura. That is very subtle manipulation. Good revelations.

    • Hi dude, Blair eh…..a lot of folk we’re duped by that piece of piss, surprised you never cottoned on to him around Dr David Kelly’s ‘suicide’ re. WMD in Iraq or his posing pics with Jimmy Saville, or better still, long before he became PM he was charged for soliciting in a male public toilet under his middle name… for being a Jew asset…..most of Westminster are whether they know it or not but personally I believe Blair is a Vatican puppet, a wannabe Jesuit, he converted to Catholicism a long while back in his tenure as PM, or just after, and the Vatican is just another player in the NWO, similar agenda as others, similar desires but as with ALL the players they compete with each other so sometimes certain points of their agenda has similar desired outcomes as others……so Blair wanting to head a Remain campaign tells me he’s either more for the Vatican or acting out an Israeli fantasy to undermine Labour even more……or possibly his narcissism is so strong he just wants to be in the limelight and try to regain some ‘good’ legacy value his narcissism keeps telling him how ‘great’ a PM he was…..either way, someone’s bank rolling him… as long as he’s getting paid he’ll do anything…..even ‘glory-holes’ if need be

    • Thanks P Hunter. Just heard that the couple Blair are doing stuff in Albania! WTF? Apparently Blair now fancies him the prince of the Albanians under the gentle protection of Soros, and Cherie is the lawgiver plenipotentiary for Albanian courts! And Wesley Clark is there fracking the shit out of the country. You really can’t make this up! I guess Tony feels that Britain is not for him anymore since half the country at least think he is a war-criminal. So he does what Israeli assets always do, move to another country and start another nefarious operation to destabilise and make money. A NWO climber for sure.

  6. It was a link to VT & Ian Greenhalgh postings re the frauds of Julian Assange & Edward Snowden, that led to US gov’t & Mike Pompeo’s CIA, asking Sweden to cancel the ‘Assange rape charges’ so the Assange & Snowden hoaxes could be wound down

    The VT link was presented at high-level to Trump’s personal lawyers, the Trump White House & US Attorney General Jeff Sessions … It was VT that woke up Trump’s team to the fact that, Snowden & Assange who had started to bash Trump over the Comey affair, in fact have CIA handlers & remain on a CIA-Mossad leash

    VT-quoting memo on Comey scandals, that moved Trump & US gov to unroll Assange, is on PasteBin, ‘DOJ Dossier Memo – James Comey hid crimes of law firms defrauding client millions’ … Assange may be the key one who helped murder Seth Rich who foolishly ‘leaked’ to CIA-Mossad Wikileaks, Seth Rich not realising that a major purpose of the Assange-Snowden-Greenwald hoaxes, is to rat-trap i.e. identify silence destroy real dissidents who contact them or the UK Guardian, NY Times etc

  7. Wikileaks being a Mossad front makes sense.

    Along with many others I did a lot of work on the NI peace process. My perspective on Brexit, and I think that most people in the UK would agree with me, is that it didn’t have anything to do with Israel or Zionism. It was about regaining control of UK sovereignty, including immigration. The Brits, like the 85% of counties in the US that voted for Trump, don’t want foreign immigration forced on them that they don’t want.

    I don’t doubt that Israel was glad to see the EU weakened. But for the vast majority of people in the UK who supported Brexit, which I also supported, Israel had nothing to do with it.

  8. I wanted Brexit…..because ever since the day paedo Ted Heath signed us up to the paedo EEC/EU club I despised it (with our without Farage/Mossad’s ‘help’ – I would have voted out back in the 70’s if we had the chance) – now back to the jew control of Britain, as you know ever since the Rothschilds landed here and screwed people over in the Napoleonic wars (albeit rich elitists) we have been under City of London satanic Babylonian influence……time to flush the 6 pointed suppository down the pan… it any wonder history shows them to have been kicked out of 100+ nations in their time, hence why they wanted the Balfour declaration giving them a land of their own….Isra’hell….I mind as a youngster in the late 60’s and 70’s all the phrases like ‘as tight as a jews arse’ and many others that a liberal of today would deem…….wait for it…….anti-Semite……..Jezza should have stuck with his original principles of wanting out of the EU……shame he tried to appease the Blairites in his party and clearly read the mood of the nation wrong….he clearly fell for the BBC narrative and polls of a landslide in favour to remain…..if he stuck to his original beliefs…….he’d be streets ahead in the polls and the Blairites would have been hounded out by public support from all the Brexiteers that would have swung over to him away from Farage

    • Good article, although I’m still not 100% convinced Assange is an Israeli/CIA asset.
      He may be though, I need to study more on that topic.

      Your are however wrong on Brexit.
      Cameron did as he was ordered by Rothschilds, but they thought the public would NOT vote for Brexit and were could off gaurd when the public did actually vote for it!!!! Cameron ended up with egg on his face and was basically forced by the Rothschilds into resigning.

      Remember it was the Zionist Rothschild and other bankers that created the EU in the first place.
      Although they used two world wars to weaken Europe and get it under their control (more, or less) – it was still too fractured and thus hard to manage. They did not just want complete control over Europe, but centralized control financially, economically and in every other way.

    • No, I am correct on Brexit, they got precisely the result they wanted, just as they did in the Scottish referendum. Neither poll can be trusted, just as no poll in Britain or America or Europe for that matter, can be trusted anymore, they simply manipulate the voting tallies.

    • Gordon and Veteran…..Rothschild wants Brexit so they can profit from a Euro currency destruction and remain safe and sound in the entity of the City of London, their Financial arm (not London City, but the city of London, a square mile of Kosher stench within London devoid of British Law, whatever good British Law is??)……the big nose boys see it as another game of divide and conquer….while us Brexiteers simply want away from all the other Rothschild puppets in power in the other members of G7’s in Europe and especially the unelected uneducated eurocrats…..problem is for us Brexiteer’s….we’re still stuck with RKM here and alas…. it so happens what we want they seem to want also…..for different reasons

    • correction…..Ian….not Gordon (I’m sure it said Gordon Duff 5 mins before I responded….alzheimers eh…..must be the chemtrails getting me at last

    • Gordon, forget about polls for a moment.

      How is it possible that the bankers who control Britain were not also the same bankers who initially helped create the EU?

      How is it possible that the EU is good for Britain (or any country in Europe for that matter).

      That is what I would like to know.

    • Paedo hunter, the Rothschilds could have used dollars to “profit from a Euro currency destruction”, why pounds in an “independent” Britain, not that Britain ever used Euro’s as their currency even when they were a member of the EU.

      The Rothschilds – which remember are an international banking family found all over Europe – control the value of all currencies. They created the EU, the Euro and the resulting debt crisis Europe finds itself in today which is only made even worse by the existance of the EU. Why do people here keep thinking the bankers wanted Britain out of the EU (Brexit)?

    • Vet_Friend – this bonnie lassie from Scotland who regularly posts in regards to paedophilia sometimes has some other interesting articles in Regards to Assange etc on her blog….also if you have the time you can peruse her articles on paedophilia in Scotland and how the likes of Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon like to cover it up…..basically Edinburgh has been known as paedo and homosexual central in Scotland for decades…..and ask anyone over the age of 40 about Edinburgh and we all say the same…..full of homosexuals in legal circles (judges, police and freemasons) and the streets are full of heroin addicts (hence the original Trainspotting movie….it’s no coincidence)

      She does some good work……on zero budget…..and all her posts regarding paedophilia are actual cases of Scottish State cover ups….it’s rife and puts Jimmy Saville’s exploits to shame what goes on her in political circles….and you thought it was all tartan and whisky

    • Vet_Friend…..who said they use Sterling to profit… don’t need currency to profit…..just ‘short’ it on electronic trades for starters…..dollars, pounds, yuan….makes no difference……and Rothy’s won’t even be doing that…..they’ll profit from all the ‘action’ that comes from any change in demographics…..physical or cultural change…….it’s not all cut and dried in my comments……I could explain a lot more but it would take years to absorb….and I don’t mean that in disrespect to you….it IS that long to describe if you don’t already know the mechanisms of the ‘system’…..and they know far more than me even though I know a lot…….let’s cut to the chase here and summarize…..Israel is the problem, fake jews from centuries ago are the problem, Private banking is the problem…..the fake jews from long ago own the banks and screwed everyone over centuries and coerced greedy Brit politicians (possibly blackmailed thru paedophilia), to allow an act that gave Palestine at the time British occupied) to the fake jew bankers as they had nowhere to go they could call their own as the land/area they occupied centuries ago no longer exists with borders….the city of London is their Financial base, Isra’hell is their stolen ‘homeland’ and Washington/USA is their muscle puppet….because their Talmud tells them so as well as their ‘God’…..the Prince of Light

  9. Would the Chelsea Manning video have been leaked elsewhere anyway, and that’s why wikileaks put it out as a sort of pre empire strike?

  10. Very telling. Thanks for sharing, Ian.

    This Julian Assplunge saga has, to me, never quite passed the smell test. Wiki’s “leaks” are taken as The Spoken Word among alt media, and I too got caught up in it until Gordon, several years ago, started exposing Wiki as a Stratfor/Mossad controlled op, a’ la Alex Jonesenberg/InfoWhores.

    The slimy Khazars/Zionists are truly masterful at controlling any given narrative, but not slick enough to slide by the uber professional VT team of White Hats.

    Every damn time I doubt Gordon — and it’s been more than a few — I end up with egg on my face (which is still better than being golden shower-ed in a presidential suite in Moscow 😉 )

    • Hallett’s work is farcially bad and the man himself is either utterly insane or an op. I know people who have tried to work with him and the man is just too crazy. I wouldn’t know where to begin pointing out all the ludicrous nonsense in Hallett’s work, therefore better to ignore all of it as just more effluvia in the stream of media crap we have to wade through.

Comments are closed.