U.S. Launches Airstrike on Pro-government Forces in Syria


[Editor’s note: This is the second time in 3 weeks that the US air force has struck Syrian government forces north of the vital border crossing at Al-Tanf.

Make no mistake, this is a blatantly criminal action as the US has never sought nor received permission to enter Syria, either from the UN Security Council nor the democratic Syrian government; therefore US military presence in Syria is, by itself, completely illegal and illegitimate.

Then, to compound the crime, the US goes and attacks the Syrian government’s forces, a blatant act of war. Russia has called a meeting of the UN Security Council over this matter. One can only shudder at the dangers posed by this US belligerence – what if the troops on the receiving end were Russians or Iranians, who are both fighting alongside the Syrians? We would be facing the prospect of direct conflict between the US and Russian and Iranian forces, a most dangerous escalation.

One might think someone in the US is trying to start WW3 in the Syrian desert.

The official US explanation of self-defense and de-escalation zone is utterly ludicrous, there is no agreement involving the US regarding de-escalation zones anywhere in Syria and how bombing Syrian troops for merely ‘approaching’ this area can in no way be seen as self-defence; let’s all it what is – the USAF functioning as air support for the terrorists and mercenaries  that currently hold the Al-Tanf crossing.

The border crossing at Al-Tanf if of great strategic importance, if it falls into Syrian government hands, it opens up a direct land route through Iraq to Iran and would allow far easier transport of troops and supplies from Iran to the forces fighting IS in Syria. If Al-Tanf falls to the Syrians, it would be a major blow to the opposition groups and greatly strengthen the Syrians and their allies. Ian]

U.S. Launches Airstrike on Pro-government Forces in Syria

The coalition’s presence in Tanf, on the Damascus-Baghdad highway, meant to stop Iran-backed groups from opening an overland route between Iraq and Syria

The United States launched an airstrike on Tuesday against Iranian-backed fighters who it said posed a threat to U.S. and U.S.-backed forces in southern Syria, in a new escalation of tensions between Washington and troops supporting Damascus.

The Pentagon, which has sought to stay out of Syria’s civil war to instead focus its firepower on Islamic State militants in Syria and Iraq, carried out a similar strike on May 18 that was denounced by Damascus.

A Syrian military source said the strike had caused deaths and material damage and showed the coalition was “in support of terrorism.” The Syrian military command warned against the dangers of escalation, the source added.

In recent days, the U.S. military has repeatedly warned massing forces to stay away from a so-called “de-confliction” zone near a garrison used by American special forces and U.S.-backed fighters around the southern town of At-Tanf.

The zone was agreed with Russia, Syrian President Bashar al Assad’s ally. Assad is also backed by Iran and Shi’ite militias.

“Despite previous warnings, pro-regime forces entered the agreed-upon de-confliction zone with a tank, artillery, anti-aircraft weapons, armed technical vehicles and more than 60 soldiers,” the U.S.-led coalition said in a statement.

It said the United States, via a military hotline with Russia, issued several warnings before the strike, which destroyed two artillery pieces, an anti-aircraft weapon and damaged the tank.

A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed the strike was carried out by manned U.S. aircraft.

“The Coalition does not seek to fight Syrian regime or pro-regime forces but remains ready to defend themselves if pro-regime forces refuse to vacate the de-confliction zone,” the statement said.

Still, the incident showed that the area around the Tanf garrison in southern Syria was under growing pressure.

Tanf is part of a region known as the Badia, which consists of vast, sparsely populated desert territory that stretches all the way to the Jordanian and Iraqi borders and was declared a military priority by Syria’s foreign minister earlier in May.

U.S.-backed rebel advances against Islamic State militants have allowed them to secure swaths of territory in the Badia, alarming the Syrian government and its allies.

U.S.-backed rebels took Tanf from Islamic State last year, and regional intelligence sources say they mean to use it as a launchpad to capture Bukamal, a town on Syria’s border with Iraq and an important jihadist supply route.

The coalition’s presence in Tanf, on the Damascus-Baghdad highway, was also meant to stop Iran-backed groups from opening an overland route between Iraq and Syria, the sources say.

In interviews with Syrian state-owned TV station al- Ekhbariya  broadcast on Saturday, Syrian soldiers vowed they would reopen the Baghdad-Damascus highway.

“Within a few days, you will find us at the Iraqi border, and we will achieve a great and historic victory in the history of this crisis – cleansing the entire Badia, liberating the Tanf road … and restoring the vital artery between Iraq and Syria,” said one of the soldiers interviewed by the state TV channel in the Badia area.

Western-backed rebels resumed on Tuesday a heavy barrage of rocket attacks on Iranian-backed militia outposts along the Baghdad-Damscus Baghdad highway.

The United States sought to keep all sides focused on battling Islamic State.

“The Coalition calls on all parties in southern Syria to focus their efforts on the defeat of ISIS, which is our common enemy and the greatest threat to regional and worldwide peace and security,” the statement said.

Archived Reads 0
Previous articleISIL terrorists attack Iranian Parliament in Tehran
Next articleVladimir Putin: NATO should be obsolete
Ian Greenhalgh

Ian Greenhalgh is a photographer and historian with a particular interest in military history and the real causes of conflicts.

His studies in history and background in the media industry have given him a keen insight into the use of mass media as a creator of conflict in the modern world.

His favored areas of study include state sponsored terrorism, media manufactured reality and the role of intelligence services in manipulation of populations and the perception of events.

Comments Closed


  1. Seems that the impetus for change in Syria might have waned a bit. Some reports suggest the threats to Qatar are as a result of that country pulling support for the head-choppers in Syria and moving closer to Iran. The Saudi/US narrative makes no sense at all. The US continues to murder Syrians so no change there.

  2. This “de-confliction zone” is a figment of US military imagination, as confirmed by Mr. Lavrov. There has not been any such agreement among the US, Russia, and Syria.

    How would the US like China, for instance, to set up a military base in Texas and warn the US not to venture within 30 miles or it will be attacked? You have some nerve, Mr. Pentagon!

  3. U.S. says…”The coalition calls on all parties in southern Syria to focus their efforts on….killing Syrians…er…I mean the defeat of ISIS… sorry, oh I don’t know what we’re saying…just follow our lead, or ignore it. Whatever! Hey driver get me out of here fast.”

  4. We are being led to believe Lavrov is playing catch up with events on the ground in the region surrounding al Tanf–pathetic. The Russian response has always been unbelievably ingenuous pretending they do not know what the US has been up to in al Tanf and S.E.Syria. What was the Russian response to the first US attack on pro-Assad forces entering the unilaterally designated and illegitimate “deconfliction” zone? Perhaps a little grumbling, but nothing above that. Why did Russia allow the US to set up a permanent base in al Tanf in the first place? What did they think would happen if they did not oppose US forces in al Tanf? What we have is a situation in which all the initiative has been seized by the US. The Russians are only reacting and in a most pathetic way. We can be sure the US will only escalate its attacks before extending its “deconfliction” zone futher west.

  5. So where are all of Syria’s missiles? They can shoot down jew jets but that can’t shoot down one wearing the stars stripes, red signifying the blood of millions of innocent men, women and children slaughtered by the U.S. government through its thugs, the military.
    Let’s see what happens when a U.S. F-16 gets shot down over Syria. Wanna bet the screaming Rethugnicans, who hate feeedom, want to escalate the war in Syria even more. As for supporting our troops…..I don’t.
    Your sons and daughters joined the military for a paycheck because they couldn’t find a job because your representatives voted to send jobs overseas. They did not enlist out of patriotic fervor, whatever that means, as if being a patriot means you have to enlist in a corrupt, murderous mercenary army.
    Ssyria has the right to defend itself against all invaders and that includes the American invaders as well. In fact the Syrian people have the right to attack and kill as many of invaders as they can.

Comments are closed.