London high-rise fire conspiracy: The 9/11 connection


By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

I published an article here yesterday about various suspicious aspects of the Grenfell Tower fire:

False flag tower “collapse” alert, re: London high rise fire 

But I didn’t really explore the million dollar question: Cui bono? Who benefits? It turns out that like the Twin Towers and the rest of the World Trade Center complex prior to 9/11,  Grenfell Tower may have been worth a whole lot more money destroyed than standing.

Grenfell Tower was full of poor and working people, with a high proportion of immigrants. Gentrifying forces are moving into the area, and the real estate sharks want the poor people (and the older buildings) gone.


The Grenfell Tower atrocity thus appears to have been another real estate scam, like 9/11, presumably perpetrated by the same general forces, if not the same actual criminal gang.

9/11 as real estate scam

Prior to 9/11, the World Trade Center Towers were condemned for asbestos. A court decision mandated that the Port Authority remove the asbestos that coated the steel frame members. That would have cost billions, perhaps double-digit billions – far more than the buildings were worth, since they had high vacancy rates, antiquated communications infrastructure, and were generally regarded as white elephants that the the City had been trying to get rid of for many years.

Then a good samaritan – a reputed organized crime figure who had made his fortune in the sex industry – purchased the World Trade Center in July, 2001, and doubled the terrorism insurance. That good samaritan, a certain Mr. Larry Silverstein – a close friend of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu –missed his usual breakfast at the top of the North Tower on the morning of 9/11/2001 because his wife reminded him about an appointment with the dermatologist. (His daughter made similar excuses for staying away that morning.) Silverstein hit the jackpot when the white elephant buildings were all demolished with explosives. He sued for double indemnity, on the basis that he had been “victimized” by two separate and unrelated terror attacks (the two planes that served as misdirection for the explosives) and got it, walking away with over five billion dollars in cash, plus rights to rebuild, on his roughly 15 million dollar investment.

So what kind of people run real estate scams in New York and London? Could it be the same kind of people who use false flag terror to demonize Muslims and mass-murder them (32 million since 9/11) in wars aimed at destroying Israel’s enemies?

Gilad Atzmon has aptly remarked that the List of 100 Worst Landlords in New York reads like a Bar Mitzvah guest list. (The #1 name is Silverstein, possibly a relation of Larry’s.)

Gilad once told me an interesting story about how easy it was for him to leave Israel and settle in London, even though he had very little money. Gilad plugged into the local Jewish network, which found him an extremely lucrative position in a big London real estate operation. Gilad’s job, as I recall, involved using statistics to find undervalued properties, which would then be bought up and monetized (in many cases, one assumes, by forcing out the poor people and gentrifying the properties.) Gilad said he quickly found himself making ridiculous amounts of money through this ridiculously easy “ethnic network” sinecure – so much money that it was a threat to his soul. So he quit in order to “keep it real.”

It is palpably obvious that the Kosher Nostra (or a faction thereof) played a major role in 9/11, and the lead role in the World Trade Center demolitions.

Did another faction just burn down Grenfell Tower?




All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. But seriously, isn’t it obvious that 911 was one of those “magic is real, miracles happen” Jew-magic kind of events?! Just imagine, how can over 100 floors of steal, class, concrete, including furnishing and fittings fall into their footprint and turning, in 8.4 seconds, into dust?! Puff! All gone!

  2. It looks increasingly like this event has nothing to do with 9/11. A fridge freezer failed and caught fire causing a chain reaction as I described below. The building was clad in, banned in the US/Germany as a fire risk, panels that were not fire proofed at a saving that could be as low as £5000. A local authority screw-up.

    Rather than terrorism, the underlying cause is actually Global Warming/Climate Change and the reduce CO2 mantra. This has forceded authorities to insulate their buildings, they never cared about the heat loses of these almost uninsulated buildings till now, against a lowest cost possible budget target.

  3. The block is owned by the Westminister City Council. So no private landlord but the council could have sold some of the flats in it, I don’t know. Another 4000 UK tower blocks are now being checked.

    It looks like the fire could well have spread so quickly as the new cladding on the outside included 6″ of inflammable foam and a 2″ air gap plus new windows, probably plastic as most are now in the UK. So as the fire caught hold in a flat, possibly a faulty electrical device, it melted the windows allowing the fire outside into the cladding and as it went up the building with the built in air ducts it in turn melted windows allowing the fire inside again into other flats. Domestic fires don’t come any worse than this. Only a sprinkler system in the flats could have stopped this.

    • Ooops, correction. The building is owned by Kensington and Chelsea Council. Sorry for the error.

  4. Just one of the many reasons insurance is a bad idea. Overall, the financial sense of it, only applies if there is a payout at some point. If someone was cold hearted enough to actually burn the building in the middle of the night, it still makes no sense to me. The backlash on this one is going to be different and if someone thought they would just do it and get away with it, they won’t.
    The payoff for 9/11 was much more than the building insurance. This does not compare.
    That the cladding was approved for use, is itself, a crime.

  5. As yet, no collapse.

    Did the explosives not detonate, or do the Brits just build better tower buildings?

    Or was 9/11 a scam?

Comments are closed.