First Mosul then Raqqa. How Washington targets civilians

by Mehmet Ersoy
Inside Syria Media Center

Yesterday, a monitoring group Raqqa is Being Slaughtered Silently published another footage of the aftermath of the U.S.-led coalition’s strikes on the city. Videos and photos show damaged buildings, bomb craters and fires.

In particular, shocking are the photos of children and adults injured because of the coalition: someone’s face is burnt, another man is bleeding while the other guy seems to be shocked and can’t move.

Meanwhile, conventional weapons don’t quite satisfy Washington In the previous week, ISIS-linked channel Amaq published a video showing white phosphorus shells hitting Raqqa. Using these munitions in populated areas is prohibited by the international law.

White phosphorus causes terrifying effects: contacting a human skin, it burns it to the bone, and if a person inhales the gas released during the burning, he would start choking and literally burn from the inside. It also ignites high temperature fires that are difficult to extinguish.

Notably, in an article concerning the accusations of the U.S. illegal methods of war, the New York Times refers to an official who on the condition of anonymousness told the newspaper that the coalition indeed has access to white phosphorus munitions, which, however, are not used against personnel. But as we see, their role is to fight civilians.

Besides, the spokesman for the U.S.-led task force Col. Ryan Dillon commented on the situation. According to him, white phosphorus is used for “screening, obscuring and marking in a way that fully considers the possible incidental effects on civilians and civilian structures”.

Tens of thousands of residents who still stay in Raqqa don’t seem to be considered civilians by the Pentagon. According to Unicef, 40,000 children are still trapped in the city, and their lives are in constant danger because of the coalition’s bombings and shellings.

Moreover, in the same NYT article, the Syrian government is accused of using white phosphorus against the militants during the battle for Aleppo. Isn’t it an example of the western hypocrisy?
Obviously, this is just the beginning of Raqqa’s destruction. During the operation on pushing ISIS out of Mosul, almost one thousand civilians were killed. The West proved how indifferent Washington is to deaths among the civilian population. And HRW’s call to think first of Raqqa residents, who have been suffering from ISIS for 3 years, will remain unheard.

Share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Tumblr


All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Some content may be satirical in nature. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within are full responsibility of author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on June 15, 2017, With 1015 Reads Filed under Coping, Health, Life, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

3 Responses to "First Mosul then Raqqa. How Washington targets civilians"

  1. Andrew_Bukanov(Russia)  June 16, 2017 at 1:31 pm

    This is the war criminal. I should say that Yankees became a total cowards, not warriors. All the last years they fought 3rd countries. From the skies. God sake you to meet Russians – the land under your boots will turn into the Hell. Filthy cowards and criminal foxes in the holes. You, modern “coward drone warriors” forgot the glory of your ancestors, till 1945. Shameful, stupid, coward, not skilled troops on the land – when we bring you down from the skies… Old America! Let it be the movie (Pearl Harbor), but what has happened to Modern “scarecrow” America? We, Russians, want a good, strong – country of Justice, Truth, Wise – America. Not this piece of smth.rotten and funny like now. Awake. People!

  2. JohninMK  June 15, 2017 at 4:02 pm

    This is an article that pulls no punches on the subject covering both this incident and similar ones in Iraq. In particular, when WP is used on areas containing civilians it apparently ceases to be an ‘incendiary or smoke agent’ and becomes under International law a chemical weapon. http://muricatoday.com/us-chemical-weapons-civilians-iraq/

  3. JohninMK  June 15, 2017 at 3:51 pm

    This was an action by the USMC who are currently the artillery arm of the SDF. The WP munitions appear to be standard issue 155mm shells intended to produce a lot of smoke to cover infantry movements.

    This action, along with sundry bombings of civilian targets, accidental or perhaps due to a sniper on the roof of a building containing civilians, is a sad reflection on the combat standards of the military. I do not specify US as this applies to many countries military and is not new.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network