Destroying the Islamic State group could create a ‘radical Iranian empire,’ warns Henry Kissinger


[Editor’s note: When evil old bastard Kissinger speaks, the Arab world listens carefully, particularly in embattled Syria where VT’s governmental contacts have often cautioned me to remain vigilant of all things Kissinger speaks about.

Why? Simple, Evil old Henry is one of the most senior Zionists, one of the leaders of the international criminal cabal that runs Israel and has infiltrated Europe and the US to the extent that we are little more than puppets.

When Kissinger speaks, we should analyse his words carefully in order to discern the messages he is sending so we can analyse them to gain some insight into the Zionist agenda.

Here, Kissinger gives the game away abut the greatest fear of Israel and the Zionists – a contiguous and unified region under the control of strong and stable Arab states stretching from Iran to Lebanon. Of course, when he talks about this becoming an ‘Iranian radical empire’ he is emitting male bovine fecal matter in order to try to justify current and future US and Israel malfeasance to try to prevent Lebanon, Syria and Iraq freeing themselves of mercenaries and achieving peace and stability.

IS was created largely to destroy Syria and Iraq in order to prevent these Arab nations growing in strength, power and stability. The ultimate goal is the destruction of Iran, but Syrian and Iraq have to be taken out first. The Iranians are well aware of this and it is a large part of why they have been fighting alongside their Arab neighbours to defeat IS.

Kissinger has chosen this moment to speak out on this issue for the simple reason that the IS plan has failed, Syria, Iraq and Iran, with Russian help, are close to finally defeating IS.

So now we have evil old Henry trying to lay the ideological foundations for a new effort to do what IS failed to achieve and prevent Syria and Iraq from becoming peaceful, stable states and therefore major roadblocks in the path of the ultimate goal of destroying Iran.

Worryingly, any attempt to achieve through military force what IS failed to do would mean having to directly confront and do battle with not only Syrian and Iraqi forces, but also Iranian ones too, and possibly also Russian forces. China has also stated ti will back Iran to the hilt.

This is worrying because it raises the spectre of not just proxy mercenary forces, but US and allied military forces being pitted against those of Syria, Iraq, Iran and Russia.

World wars grow out of regional conflicts, so we have good reason to be worried. Ian]

The New Arab
Destroying the Islamic State group could create a ‘radical Iranian empire,’ warns Henry Kissinger

Destroying the Islamic State militant group could lead to an “Iranian radical empire,” former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger warned.

The 94-year-old former senior diplomat made the remarks in an article titled ’Chaos and order in a changing world’.

“In these circumstances, the traditional adage that the enemy of your enemy can be regarded as your friend no longer applies. In the contemporary Middle East, the enemy of your enemy may also be your enemy,” he wrote in an article published on CapX.

“The Middle East affects the world by the volatility of its ideologies as much as by its specific actions.

“The outside world’s war with Isis can serve as an illustration. Most non-Isis powers – including Shia Iran and the leading Sunni states – agree on the need to destroy it. But which entity is supposed to inherit its territory? A coalition of Sunnis? Or a sphere of influence dominated by Iran?” he questioned, using an alternative acronym for IS.

“The answer is elusive because Russia and the NATO countries support opposing factions. If the Isis territory is occupied by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards or Shia forces trained and directed by it, the result could be a territorial belt reaching from Tehran to Beirut, which could mark the emergence of an Iranian radical empire,” Kissinger added.

Iran has had a heavy influence in several conflicts across the region.

In Iraq, the Popular Mobilisation Forces – more commonly known in Arabic as al-Hashed al-Shaabi – are financially and militarily backed by Tehran in the fight against IS.

Meanwhile in Syria, Iran sides with the embattled Bashar al-Assad.

Archived Reads 0
Previous articleSyrian War Report – August 11, 2017: Government Forces Liberate 1,300km2 Near Jordanian Border
Next articleBalfour’s shameful legacy: UK Government must say sorry and protect Christian churches in Palestine
Ian Greenhalgh

Ian Greenhalgh is a photographer and historian with a particular interest in military history and the real causes of conflicts.

His studies in history and background in the media industry have given him a keen insight into the use of mass media as a creator of conflict in the modern world.

His favored areas of study include state sponsored terrorism, media manufactured reality and the role of intelligence services in manipulation of populations and the perception of events.

Comments Closed


  1. Destroying the Islamic State group could create a ‘radical Iranian empire,’ warns Henry Kissinger As usual these jackasses have got it all backwards. Destroying the Islamic State would unempower the NWO radical global criminals. If they lose this card then the only major card they have to play is their WWIII card with NK and MSM as their paid partners in crime. They are already desperately trying to build up the value of their NK WWIII card for all it’s worth but on close scrutiny it’s not even worth worrying about as they prepare to go all in on a bluff.

  2. I do not have any special knowledge about the topic, but of course Kissinger is an old acquaintance through many years [of standard news media]. And as a result, reading about Kissinger as a “Zionist” seems wrong to me. But of course many would like to call him that – which I would not doubt – though this would be more as part of polemics than anything else. Or so it seems to me.

    « NOV 22 Henry Kissinger’s Contempt for Jews
    More revelations from newly released State Department transcripts exposing Henry Kissinger’s contempt for Jews and his indifference to the plight of Soviet Jewry. It’s obvious by those remarks that Kissinger was projecting. Recall that he wished to reduce Israel “to historical proportions” and said that it wouldn’t be America’s concern if a holocaust of Russian Jews occurred.

    Jewish groups are self-serving ‘bastards,’ Kissinger told aide

    Israel Hayom »

    • Of course Kissinger is a Zionist. Don’t forget, the Zionists do not value any human life, Jewish or otherwise. They were the ones who formulated the plans for the Nazi persecution and elimination of the Jews from Eastern Europe.

    • If Kissinger hadn’t gotten Noxon to send Israel air support in 1973, they would have lost the wars and they wouldn’t even be there today. Without Kissinger Israel would have been wiped out and gone.

  3. It’s inevitable.

    It is also the best possible outcome, so everyone can just get used to it.

    Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Palestine, and Jordan had never been independent until the British and French made them “independent” after the defwat of the Ottomans.

    Initially there were disconnected settlements here during the Stone Age. The Dog was domesticated in Nortgern Iran/the Caucuses, enabling more efficient hunting and vetter protection. Then came pottery and weaving. Small grains were domesticated and bread was invented.The horse was domesticated in Western Iran.

    All of these inventions together allowed a group of disconnected states to form during the Bronze Age — cheif among them the Medes and the Babylonians.

    Then came Steel and the Wheel. These were apparently invented separately in China, but their application in the Middle East put everything from the Indian border to the Nile Valley under one empire — the Achamenians. All of the countries between Iran and the Mediterranean have since been part of some empire ot other since then.

    • After the Achameneans (Iran) came Alexander and the Saleucids (Greece) then the Sassanids (Iran) then the Romans (Italy) then the Abbassi (Arabia) then The Mongols(Mongolia) then the Ottomans (Turkey) then the Allies and the Soviets (England/France/America/Russia) then the Zionists (America)..

      The American empire in this region has proven itself to be by far the most destructive and relies on War, Chaos, Autocracy, Corruption, de-education, repression, and debt. This is now fully exposed and no amount of propaganda will convince a majority of the native population of Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Or Iraq that this is anything but true. The only exceptions are the Kurds and the Israelis.

      This region has been fought over by empires because it is a breadbasket — the original breadbasket. The Fertile Crescent. The Cradle of Civilisation. Yet under Americab management it is unable to feed even its own people, forcing them to walk on foot to Europe.

      So the Americans have failed where others have succeeded. The Turks are hated and will also fail. The Italians, Greeks, English Arabiabs and French are themselves colonies of the US and will be rejected.

      That leaves Iran and Russia.

    • Russia is struggling to hang on to its own 11 time zones and faces challenges from the American Empire in Central Asia, the Caucuses, Eastern Europe and within its own vast bulk. It would prefer a friendly and peaceful alliance from a distance with these countries.

      That leaves Iran as the only power able to bring peace and stability, rebuild, defend, educate, and bring back the refugees.

      The alternative that Kissinger is proposing means more refugees flowing into Europe. How many more? There are 1.6 billion Muslims and it is the fastest growing religion. There are 380 million Arabs. Inly 17 million of them reside outside the Middle East and Africa. By 2025 tgere will be 450 million Arabs. They can’t feed thenselves now. How will they do so when there are 70 million more? If their current decline is stopped immediately there will be 70 million of them with nothing to eat in 2025. You can get to Europe on foot, or take a bus or a boat.

      Muslim refugees in Europe will also breed and multiply and will form a sizeable anti-American voting bloc in Europe, making the disappeaeance of America from the Middle East and the weakening of its institutions in Europe, inevitable.

      So Mr. Kissinger’s recommendation to maintain this region in the Empire by continuing to support the current chaos, simply delays and worsens the inevitable outcome.

      It is time for the US to get out of these countries altogether and dig its trenches at the Turkish , Jordanian, Istaeli and Egyptian borders.

    • Iran has shown them that it is possible to have a democracy, defend yourself, and have a solvent economy to employ and feed your population.

      Throughout its long long history of civilisation and empire Iran has left minorities alone to practuce their religion and culture and language. This along with security, infrastructure, education, healthcare, a workable system of laws and finances and economic opportunitues is all that anyone wants. America has failed to provide it to these people. Iran can enable them to provide it for themselves.

      What is so radical about that, Mr. Kissinger?

      His retort, if any, will have a statement about the “security of Israel” in the first paragraph.

  4. The world will be a better place when that decrepit and hideous, cancerous tumor – [email protected] off and dies. I hope he’s terrified to meet his maker, because by the looks of him it won’t be long. Speaking of long, presidents have come and gone over the last few decades, but Hank’s parasitic and disastrous influence has remained as a permanent fixture. I hope this POS didnt have kids.

  5. This man us a cancer. His assets should be seized and he deported
    I doubt at 94 he writes at all. Most probably his African house boy writes while prancing around naked dancing to “hava nigila”. Give the old fart another glass of Mogan David wine.

  6. ‘This is worrying because it raises the spectre of not just proxy mercenary forces, but US and allied military forces being pitted against those of Syria, Iraq, Iran and Russia.’

    Not to mention China.


    Imagine fighting Russia and China (on alternate days, if we prefer. I expect they’d be happy to accommodate us). Of course, there’s that menacing Taiwan (and don’t forget Macao) to bring into the equation, so the Chinese would have their gazillion hands full…. Wow. And how could I have forgotten Hong Kong ! All formidable, potential alllies of ours !

    • Yes, China is also under pressure from the US, as you have mentioned in Hong Kong, Uyghuristan/XinJiang, Taiwan, Tibet, and North Korea.

      The US should compare the way Russia prevented Syria getting invaded with the way China prevented N Korea from getting invaded.

      Russia destroyed Syria to save it. It cost many lives and many billions for Russia to do so. Syria is far from saved, there are American troops building permanent bases there. The Kurds are pushing to become an “independent” CIA petrostste, ISIS is still around and if Kisdinger gets his way, will continue to be around. Half the population is displaced, and the country is flattened.

      China saved N Korea by transferring nuclear missile technology to it. It cost them nothing, No N Koreans walked over the open border for asylum, not a single brick moved a fraction of an inch.

      While Trump bombs Syria for amusement while dining, He rants about committing national mass-suicide and orders more research and development on missile interceptors.

      GUESS WHICH APPROACH RUSSIA WILL TAKE IF IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO DEFEND IRAN FROM AMERICAN INVASION. I will give you a clue: It won’t involve years of war with an uncertain outcome, on their doorstep, billions of costs, more sanctions on Russia, dead Russian soldiers, and millions of Iranian refugees.

Comments are closed.