I have been accused of seeing false flags everywhere. And that accusation is not entirely specious.
Like most of the 55 leading public intellectuals I brought together for my False Flag Trilogy, I am suspicious of official narratives of galvanizing, shocking, hyper-mediated events. The history of Operation Gladio, a US-NATO program that staged virtually all of the most spectacular “left-wing terrorism” of the Cold War era, proves that such suspicions are often well-founded. And don’t get me started about 9/11-anthrax, Gladio B, and the invention of “radical Islam” as a civilizational enemy to replace communism and justify US wars for Israel, massive military budgets, and expanded government policing powers.
False Flags are a fact of life. That’s why Tony Hall and I co-host False Flag Weekly News.
The recent ultraviolence in Charlottesville does bear some of the hallmarks of a contrived event: It was shocking, spectacular, hyped by mainstream media, and seemingly designed to cast blame on a demonized “other” (in this case, the alt-right white nationalist movement). Additionally, it could be seen as furthering a “strategy of tension” pitting left against right, multiculturalism against racial nationalism, Bernie Sanders extremists against Donald Trump extremists, and so on.
But does that mean the violence was phony, staged, nonexistent, didn’t happen? I don’t think so.
My latest radio guest Jonathan Revusky says we should assume that any alleged spectacular incident that is said to have taken place in public, within view of large numbers of people, but which lacks sufficient corroborating visual evidence, should be assumed to have never happened. Examples, according to him, include the Bataclan nightclub massacre, the Nice truck attack, and the London Bridge vehicular assault.
But it looks to me as if the Charlottesville ultraviolence, including the vehicular homicide, were sufficiently visually documented. So we may assume that in this case, the authorities, and their propaganda mainstream media, are more or less telling the truth.
The driver of the vehicle could conceivably be a mind-controlled patsy. Individuals who incited the streetfighting – on both sides – could be Cointelpro provocateurs. But the violence was almost certainly real, not staged.
But some of my readers, listeners, and viewers disagree. Here is an email from one of them:
I have not looked into the Charlottesville events, but I am sure you are (or soon will be), in preparation for Fridays False Flag Weekly News show.
Just noticed something that probably is of interest. One of the recordings of the car seemingly plowing through the crowd and creating no end of theatrical drama is by Alexander Rubinstein.
Here a link to the video, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealAlexRubi/status/896429257865482241. The same video can be found on YouTube:
I suggest downloading a copy, just in case it should vanish down the Orwellian memory hole.
What can actually be observed, besides a lot of screaming and turmoil? Is it an actual incident, or a theatrical performance? Hoax methinks, but you make up your own mind.
Who is this Alexander Rubinstein? Judging by the name alone is probably Jewish, which in my book translates to a possible follower of the Talmudic religious practice of lies and deceit. Jewish (whatever that is) or not, he may be a tool or possibly an agent of an entity in pursuit of psychopathic and inhumane objectives.
Rubinstein is also affiliated with RT America, and have in that capacity been placed at the forefront of events on prior occasions. At the Trump inauguration, street riots “spontaneously” erupted in Washington, District of Criminals, setting cars aflame, shattering window facades and the usual token-actions well suited for video-reporting. Alexander Rubinstein was there, at the forefront. What are the chances that he just happened to be there, unless the events were planned, and he was somehow a participant?
Coincidences do happen, and claiming to have observed a pattern ought to be based on far more than two observations. However, we know all to well from past observations, that the same individuals are used repeatedly at staged events. As in the case of Richard Gutjahr, who appeared twice in the same role at two events 8 days apart, it was very obvious that he was somehow a tool for the organizers of the events, and that the two events was likely orchestrated by the same entities. I sense the same is the case with Alexander Rubinstein. It smells distinctly Gefilte-fishy to me…
At the DC event, Rubinstein was arrested with many others. I understand as a likely complicit to the events (possibly considered not merely complicit, but perhaps one of the perpetrators or instigators of the events?). After much pressure by media, those arrested was set free, which strongly suggest he (and others) may be been protected by powerful interests.
Don’t know whether you have observed it, but as I see it, RT seem to be under the control of the (((usual suspects))). It becomes obvious when you observe not only their obsession and bias with anything Holohoax-related – they support this tale of Jewish imaginations 100% and pursue their Big Lie with extreme vigilance. What is far more telling is, that anything and anybody who seek to raise awareness about the current control system (global banksterism), are immediately assigned (ahistoric) smear labels such as “Nazis” and portrayed as extremely vile and evil.
If RT merely sought to protect the Holohoax tale from falling apart, at least it could be understood as a policy in tune with Russian geo-politics and national interests, as the tall stories which have since become associated with the Holocaust brand of the 1970’ies originally stemmed from Soviet era war propaganda. But RT’s incessant “warfare” on the few ethnic Europeans who voice criticism of Jewish domination and indeed supremacy in and over Europe, America and elsewhere, and most often have sane, traditional and conservative views based on concepts of self-determination of nations and peoples, certainly is not helping Russia in its gigantic struggle to protect itself from the insanity which has gripped the so-called “West”.
Hope these observations may be of use to you.
I disagree with H’s analysis on several counts. First, this video does not look phony to me – and there are plenty of other videos out there that seem to corroborate it.
Second, just because an RT guy with a Jewish name happened to film this incident as well as one prior Trump riot, does not mean that the journalist or RT are hoaxing us. Rubinstein could have filmed two such incidents due to his being assigned this kind of stuff by RT. Unlike the “terror attacks” in Nice and Munich, the demonstrations and clashes Rubinstein covered were openly announced in advance and completely foreseeable.
The Richard Gutjahr case was different. Gutjahr, a photographer married to one of Israel’s top black ops people, was miraculously well-placed on a balcony to film the “beginning” of the Nice truck attack, then (along with his daughter) showed up to film the Munich shopping mall shooting one week later. As for Rubinstein, there is no evidence that he was miraculously well-placed for the Charlottesville event, nor any evidence of possible ties to Zionism or Israeli intelligence (at least that I am currently aware of). And I don’t think we should suspect him of “Talmudic evil” just because he has a Jewish name. That is prejudice, i.e “pre-judging.”
As for RT being co-opted by Zionists, I agree that there are some grounds for suspicion. Since RT founder Mikhail Lesin was murdered in a Washington, DC hotel room in November 2015, one week before the big 11/13/15 Paris false flag, RT has backed away from exposing the truth about 9/11 and follow-up false flags. No longer will you find RT putting out hard-hitting truth telling like 9/11 and Operation Gladio:
But that does not make all RT reporters, even those with Jewish names, part of some grand Zionist conspiracy.
So I am still waiting for convincing evidence that the events in Charlottesville were dramatically different from what the MSM is reporting. Feel free to reply in the comments section with references to any such evidence.
Dr Paul Craig Roberts has provided a link to two individuals, Faith Goldy and Jason Kessler, who were present / organized the event.
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.
He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS, and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin; where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.