PressTV: Mattis, Tillerson make US stance on North Korea more confusing

US Secretary of Defense James Mattis (L) and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arriving for a closed meeting of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, August 2, 2017. (Photo by AFP)
US Secretary of Defense James Mattis (L) and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson arriving for a closed meeting of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, August 2, 2017. 

The heads of US State and Defense Departments, Rex Tillerson and James Mattis, say they are pushing for a “peaceful pressure campaign” on North Korea, breaking with President Donald Trump who has warned Pyongyang of “fire and fury” amid an ongoing standoff.

“The US is willing to negotiate with Pyongyang,” the two secretaries wrote in a Wall Street Journal article published Sunday.

Titled We’re Holding Pyongyang to Account, the article described Washington’s priorities in tackling North Korea’s ballistic missile and nuclear weapons programs.

Mattis and Tillerson, however, failed to clarify the Trump administration’s stance and rather added more spins to an already complicated situation.

The two officials called their approach “strategic accountability” and touted it as a replacement for past administrations’ “failed policy of ‘strategic patience,’ which expedited the North Korean threat.”

Mattis and Tillerson also spoke of a peaceful pressure campaign, seeking the “denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula” without harming the people living there.

US President Donald Trump (L) and Vice President Mike Pence speak to the press on August 10, 2017. (Photo by AFP)

“We do not seek an excuse to garrison US troops north of the Demilitarized Zone. We have no desire to inflict harm on the long-suffering North Korean people, who are distinct from the hostile regime in Pyongyang,” they wrote.

However, in the same article, Mattis and Tillerson noted that the diplomatic process was backed up by a range of military scenarios.

“While diplomacy is our preferred means of changing North Korea’s course of action, it is backed by military options,” they added.

They did not clarify how Trump’s last week remark that North Korea “will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen” fits Washington’s seemingly peaceful agenda.

Many politicians have already advised Trump against resorting to military action, warning of disastrous consequences.

Tillerson and Mattis named China as one of the “many nations” that supported the diplomatic push by the US.

“Our diplomatic approach is shared by many nations supporting our goals, including China, which has dominant economic leverage over Pyongyang,” according to the op-ed. “This affords China an unparalleled opportunity to assert its influence with the regime.”

Trump had previously said that he was “disappointed” with China lack of action on North Korea and urged the country to do more as the North’s main trade ally.

Tensions between the two sides skyrocketed after the United Nations Security Council- unanimously, with support from China – adopted new sanctions against North Korea last week.

“The region and world need and expect China to do more,” Mattis and Tillerson wrote in their op-ed.

Following Trump’s inflammatory remarks last week, Pyongyang said it was “carefully examining” a plan to strike the American Pacific territory of Guam with its array of advanced ballistic missiles.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed

In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.

Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy

Comments are closed.