If you were to ask me …
Do you support capitalism?
I would say …
I surely do not support usury-based capitalism, run by the international bankers, which makes them and their minions rich, but most others poor.
I support free enterprise, without usury. Usury enslaves, while free enterprise, without usury, not only frees people, but helps to make them prosperous.
Why has the term capitalism been conflated with the positive concepts of free enterprise?
For the same reason free trade deals are called free. For the same reason patriots are called fascists.
Such a perversion in terminology, such a misuse of words, is meant to deceive. The mass deception of the general public is rather easy when one owns and controls the major news media and publishing houses that produce dictionaries. You see, it’s an old commie trick to redefine words until any sensible or rational communication is all but impossible.
Who owns and controls this dark tyranny?
The International Banking usurers own and control the seven mega-corporations that own and control ninety percent of the mainstream media are the source of American tyranny.
The bankers also control the American institutions of Hollywood, TV, politics, education, churches, government, foundations, think-tanks, and the US surveillance state, and they are the progenitors and promoters of political correctness and the kids of antifa.*
*The ignorant children of the antifa movement have defaulted to hate; and like all criminals, accuse others of what they themselves are guilty.
And it is those usurious money changers who use their media to trade on the positive aspects of free enterprise, by making people think capitalism is free enterprise: while the only thing free about capitalism is the freedom it gives the warring psychopaths to kill or enslave us with usury.
Laissez-faire commerce is free enterprise that asks no favors from government other than to ensure a level playing field in all individual, private, commercial, and industrial business transactions. Such free enterprise is also known as the free market, private enterprise, and as is erroneously promoted – capitalism.
Capitalism is the means of creating money out of free air, lending it to governments, with repayment and usurious interest rates attached.
The source of US money – free air
You think it sounds impossible? I know what you mean, but it is a sad fact of life.
The literal definition of laissez-faire (from the French) is leave to be, which was a message to a monarch from private businessmen who had long grown exasperated with their government’s constant interference in private business affairs. These entrepreneurs were not asking for special governmental favors, but were instead were asking the US government to cease the favoritism being granted to the International Bankers of Europe, controlled by the infamous Rothschild Cartel.
The most egregious and insane governmental concession was allowing the foreign and private banking capitalists the power to create money out of thin air, to loan it to our federal government, and then to demand repayment of the principal, plus a usurious rate of interest.
One can easily see that in order to pay any part of that growing debt, national governments would have to take two nation-defeating actions.
Tax their citizens
Borrow more money
And as such governments sink ever deeper into debt to the criminal international bankers, those central governments are left with three options.
Tax their citizens more heavily, and institute severe austerity measures that eliminate all social welfare programs and infrastructure maintenance
Borrow even more money
Arrest the bankers for the criminal frauds they are and issue governmental money with no repayment or interest involved
The third option above, however, carries the heavy penalty of war from the nations trapped in the usurious grip of the international bankers.
It is ironical that the United States of America is the only country in history to have broken away from the bankers’ English war machine and then become the bankers’ most destructive enforcement arm ever known.
By virtue of the ownership and control of the Western media, the bankers tell us that their terrible destruction of nations is altruistic because of one or both of the two reasons below.
Those nations have cruel leaders
Those nations foster terrorism, which is a threat to the world, particularly the Western world
Of course what is never revealed by the Western media is the fact that the banker-controlled US/NATO combine of nations secretly creates, funds, equips, and directs various terrorist factions to make war on those sane nations that refuse to subjugate or enslave themselves or others in the Rothschild death trap, as America did long ago. It is not that the American and European nations are forcing their values onto the world, but the Rothschilds using the US/NATO militaries to force usury their on the world.
The US/NATO empire, however, has run its wicked course, while the axis of Russia and China has begun its ascension.
Blindly, the current Rothschild war plan for global dominance is as simple as it is remarkably stupid: eliminate both Russia and China as world-class military powers by using Ukraine, Syria, North Korea, or Iran as flash points for a nuclear war with Russia.
Apparently, the Rothschilds and their minions in the Deep States of the US/NATO empire have not yet realized that Russia, unlike Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Libya, and Syria, matches, if not exceeds, the military prowess of America and Europe put together.
Long ago, when the Soviet Union was perhaps the most evil empire on record, the American seer Edgar Cayce predicted that Russia would come out of its Rothschild inspired and financed communist nightmare to become the hope of the world.
As a patriotic American, I had long hoped that America would become the hope of the world, but instead she has become its scourge.
A fundamental transformation of America began during the 1861 to 1865 years of President Abraham Lincoln’s term of office.
It was then that the Rothschilds’ warmonger, Abraham Lincoln, guaranteed the bankers a nation without any sovereign states that held the powers of nullification (for their individual states).
In other words, no longer would our states hold the US Constitution power to nullify any of the unjust and unconstitutional laws of the central government for themselves. It was the era that America took a hard turn into the dark, without ever turning back into the light. It has been a devilish realm where Rothschild capitalism has freely reigned.
Lincoln’s war victory indirectly handed the United States to the Rothschilds’ death-dealing, poverty- generating, usury contrivance of a capitalist’s controlled socialism.
America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.
Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859)
The Civil War was purposely and cleverly misnamed from the very beginning of the War Between the States. A civil war is a war waged by militants who want to take over a standing government. The Southern states wanted no part of the federal government of America, with its high tariffs of goods imported from Europe.
The reasons for what is sometimes called the War to Prevent Southern Independence were the protective tariffs imposed on imported goods by Northern industrialists, who were financed and controlled by the Rothschild banking cartel.
The Tariff of 1816 was America’s first obvious protective tariff with the explicit purpose of giving the Northern industrialists an unfair advantage over their European competition. This tax on imports forced most Americans to buy the cheaper homemade items produced in the northern and western states.
The agricultural antebellum states in the South, however, were hard hit by the Tariff of 1816.
The major consumers of the South’s cotton, tobacco, rice, and hemp were the European countries, who quickly retaliated when learning of the US Tariff of 1816 by imposing their own tariffs on all American imports; and there went most of the markets the Southern plantation owners depended on.
Tariffs are a dangerous national policy, as they can easily lead to a trade war, and then a hot war. In fact, the US Tariff of 1816 did lead to a trade war, and then on to a hot shooting war, albeit an internal one.
For twelve years after the passage of the legislation authorizing the Tariff of 1816, the relationship between the Northern states and those of the South continued to worsen. But instead of instituting reconciliation measures to avoid hostilities, President John Quincy Adams took the opposite tack. In 1828, Adams and the US Congress drafted and passed an abomination of a tariff bill that was over forty percent harsher on the South, the Tariff of 1828. This legislation was so intolerable to Southern leaders, they uniformly called it the Tariff of Abominations. And it was. America had turned away from being good and she would pay a hefty price for that mistake. Christians would soon be killing more of their own kind than in all of America’s future and past wars combined.
An entire generation of young men would soon become cannon fodder due to the incompetence and raw evil of much older men in the US Capitol of Washington, DC.
Leading this demonic amalgamation of protective tariff supporters was our sixteenth president, Abraham Lincoln. The man even bragged he was an avid Henry Clay-Whig Party advocate. As the leader of the Whig political party, Henry Clay was well known as being in the deep pockets of the Northern industrialists, with his support of protective tariffs.
On November 6, 1860, when Abe Lincoln won the White House, the Southern assemblage of concerned leaders knew their constituents would not receive any small relief from the erroneous US tariffs with Lincoln as president. Forty-three days later, the sovereign state government of South Carolina exercised their rights under the US Constitution and drafted an … Ordinance of Secession from the Union.
The South Carolina secession was quickly followed by the sovereign states of Mississippi, Florida, Texas, Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana.
On February 8, 1861, governmental representatives of the above states announced the formation of the Confederate States of America, with its capital in Montgomery, Alabama.
As part of a newly formed sovereign nation (CSA), the governor of South Carolina repeatedly asked the now foreign government in Washington, DC, to remove its military troops from Fort Sumter, South Carolina.
Outgoing Pennsylvania Democratic president James Buchanan told the US Congress that he did not believe that the federal government had the right to stop states from seceding from the Union. But at the same time, he did not remove his Union troops from Fort Sumter, leaving that momentous decision to his soon-to-be successor, Mr. Abraham Lincoln.
Then on February 4, 1861, thirty-three states sponsored a hopeful Peace Convention at the Willard Hotel in Washington, where former president John Tyler was to be the presiding officer.
President John Tyler
By mid-February, the Convention delivered a set of peace proposals to Congress, which those sordid degenerates ignored. The stage was set for the man with a plan.
On March the 4th, Mr. Lincoln was sworn into office and he assumed a responsibility that he abused like no president before or since.
Mr. Lincoln not only ignored South Carolina’s pleas for the removal of US troops from Fort Sumter, he sent by ship supplies down the Atlantic Coast to fortify Fort Sumter.
Now, the South had to respond quickly before the supplies arrived at Fort Sumter. After all, the CSA (Confederate States of America) was a small nation with less than ten million citizens, with little to no industrial output to wage war.
Fort Sumter, South Carolina
The Confederate military took over Fort Sumter with no loss of life. But Lincoln had his casus belli and held the CSA responsible by firing on federal authority at Fort Sumter. Lincoln’s war would cost humanity over 750,000 Christian lives. It was a terrible, bloody Christians-killing- Christians war that never should have happened.
It has been said that the so-called Civil War was a crossroads of our national being, whatever that is meant to mean. But there can be no denying that the war wiped out an entire generation of young men, by a man who seemed to love war, but never fought in one or served a day in military service.
Lincoln often quoted the Bible, but he caused his fellow Christians to slaughter their fellow Christians.
What madness drove Lincoln to pursue such carnage?
Perchance Hillary Mayell, writing for the National Geographic News (see her article below), will give us some insight into the complex mind of Honest Ole Abe Lincoln.
Did Mercury in “Little Blue Pills” Make Abraham Lincoln Erratic?
for National Geographic News
July 17, 2001
Tales of the melancholia that dogged U.S. President Abraham Lincoln at various times during his life have been documented by historians and biographers and in Lincoln’s own correspondence.
Whether he suffered from a full-blown case of what today is called clinical depression is unknown. What is known, however, is that for a while, Lincoln took little blue pills to treat his condition.
Known as “blue mass,” the little blue pills were a 19th-century staple. They were prescribed for a host of ailments, including apoplexy, worms, child-bearing, tuberculosis, toothaches, and constipation.
The key ingredient was mercury—and the medication was well on its way to poisoning Lincoln when he stopped taking it in 1861, says a team of researchers in a study published in the Summer 2001 issue of Perspectives in Biology and Medicine.
“Cave of Gloom”
Lincoln lived in what a friend called “a cave of gloom.” His melancholy “was a matter of frequent discussion among his friends,” wrote William H. Herndon, Lincoln’s law partner and biographer.
Norbert Hirschhorn, a medical historian and the lead author of the new study, said of Lincoln: “There seem to be clear, qualitative changes in his underlying behavior during the 1850’s. The gloom becomes impenetrable. He becomes subject to towering rages and outbursts of bizarre behavior—jumping up suddenly and running out of the house for no reason, bursts of inappropriate laughter.”
To document the changes in Lincoln’s behavior, the authors of the study cited numerous accounts of friends and fellow lawyers who traveled the legal circuit with the man who became the 16th U.S. President.
Lincoln’s leaps to rage could be terrifying. One contemporary described his face in anger as “lurid with majestic and terrifying wrath.” Another described him as “so angry that he looked like Lucifer in an uncontrollable rage.”
During an 1858 debate with Stephen Douglas, his rival for a seat in the U.S. Senate, Lincoln became so enraged that he grabbed a former aide and shook him until his teeth chattered.
“Mercury poisoning certainly could explain Lincoln’s known neurological symptoms: insomnia, tremor, and the rage attacks,” said Robert G. Feldman, a professor of neurology, pharmacology, and environmental health at Boston University’s School of Medicine and Public Health, who was a co-author of the scientific report.
The reconstructed “blue pill” was a round gray pellet the size of a peppercorn. If taken at the normally prescribed dose of the time—one pill two or three times a day—it would deliver nearly 9,000 times the amount of mercury* that is deemed safe for people by current health standards.
*Mad as a hatter is a colloquial term used to suggest a person has gone insane from their mercury exposure in hat-making.
Mercury poisoning is known to cause nervousness, mood swings, irritability anger, and other emotional changes. Such mercury poisoning has always been difficult to reverse.
Perhaps Lincoln was not insane. It is, however, difficult to deny that he was emotionally disturbed.
Was Lincoln’s war one in which White men killed White men to free Black men?
No, and Lincoln said so many times.
In his first Presidential inaugural address, Lincoln stated …
I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so. And I have no inclination to do so.
In an earlier debate with Stephen Douglas, Lincoln said …
I will say then, I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social or politic equality of the White and Black races. I am not now or ever have been in making voters or jurors of negroes, or of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with White people.
And I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the Black and White races, which I believe will forever forbid the two races from living together on terms of social and political equality. And in as much as they cannot so live while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior. And, I as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the White race.
Following are random statements concerning Blacks made by Lincoln during his political career.
There is a natural disgust … for the idea of the mixture of the White and Black races.
A separation of the races is the only perfect preventative of amalgamation.
As long as Blacks continue to live with Whites, they constitute a threat to the natural life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of mixed breed bastards may, someday, challenge the supremacy of the White man.
The war was going against the Union on the 22nd of August, 1862. In a letter of that date, President Lincoln wrote to Horace Greeley and the New York Tribune, in which the President said …
If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it. And if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it. And if I could save it by freeing some but leaving others alone, I’d also do that. What I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because I think it helps in saving the Union.
One month later, on September 22, 1862, Lincoln had decided to go with the third option in his letter to Horace Greely: he would free some slaves, but not all.
Lincoln issued a preliminary warning that he would order the emancipation of all slaves in any state that did not end its rebellion against the Union by January 1, 1863.
The Emancipation Proclamation was issued as an EO (Executive Order) and was explicitly written to give life to the Union Army’s failing war efforts.
Lincoln knew the Southern slaves were aiding the Confederation’s military by doing the heavy, dirty work of digging trenches, cutting wood, and carrying ammunition and water. Lincoln also expected 200,000 slaves would escape to the Union lines and join his Northern Army.
Lincoln writing his EO, which historians have called the Emancipation Proclamation
President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation was a strategic stroke of military genius, and it came from a man who had never served in the military. But President Lincoln’s Proclamation can hardly be thought of as being one of the world’s most humanitarian efforts, as the EO only freed the three million slaves in the Confederacy, but it did not free the one million slaves* outside of the Confederacy.
*The Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution finally abolished slavery in America.
Had Lincoln really wanted to free the slaves he could have gone a long way in achieving that end, with much less lost of lives and treasure.
By the time Lincoln had assumed the presidency, slavery was dying a natural death in the Western world, as not being economically viable.
It cost the southern plantation owners more money to purchase, house, feed, cloth, and attend to medically, for the life of their slaves than what the industrialists spent with their low-salaried workers (often children), who labored for barely livable wages and were then thrown on the dungheap if they got sick.
If President Lincoln had pushed for legislation for the US government to buy the Southern slaves from the plantation owners and then freed them, he could have done a great good with far less money and death than what his war ended up costing Americans then and all Americans today. Please understand that the cost to Americans, ever since the Lincoln presidency, is not limited to the expense, destruction, injury, and deaths of his war. Lincoln burnt the template of how wantonly and cruelly tyrannical our future White House denizens could behave, with them all destroying parts of our Constitutional States’ Rights.
Lincoln imprisoned over 3,000 northern citizens who spoke out against his war, thus setting an example of what future presidents could get away with in times of war.
Additionally, Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus, thus granting to himself the enormous power to indefinitely hold anyone as prisoner without trial.
Lincoln had Northern newspaper editors arrested, and went so far as to actually draft a warrant for the arrest of Chief Justice Roger Taney.
Lincoln, the Great Dictator, even instituted a national income tax, to finance his war, against great and righteous opposition.
President Lincoln brought about the beginning of the end of the Constitution’s decentralization of central governmental power: the Separation of Powers and States’ Rights.
From Lincoln to Eisenhower the once sovereign states of America have lost power, until day, the very term States’ Rights is a pejorative.
Just on the subject of Executive Orders (EOs), Lincoln breached the separation of powers guaranteed by the US Constitution by making laws with his orders, when presidents are only empowered to enforce the legislation passed by the American peoples’ representative Congress.
In just four years in office, Lincoln issued forty-eight Executive Orders, while Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, and J. Q. Adams, combined, issued just twenty-six EOs during forty years of Office.
With Abraham Lincoln as an early despotic example and excuse, his following American presidents have collectively issued over 16,000 EOs, most being overreaching, and likely totaling hundreds of thousands of pages.
With so many Executive Orders becoming the law of the land, our White House has become the House of Rothschild – and the oppressive results of the federal government prove it.
Out of EOs have grown even more sinister presidential orders, some are even confidential. In that way Americans can be imprisoned by breaking laws they don’t even know exist.*
*Today Americans are burden with thousands of pages of Presidential Review Directives (PRDs), Presidential Decision Directives (PDDs), National Security Reviews (NSRs), National Security Directives (NSDs), National Security Presidential Directives (NSPDs) and even Homeland Security Directives, all having the full force and effect of law, and all in addition to EOs. Are you in danger of being arrested because you are in violation of any of the above laws?
Executive Orders should be kept to the internal affairs of the Executive Branch of government, while major policy initiatives should come from Congress.
The Rothschild control of America took a great leap forward as Lincoln began the process of making the office of the presidency tyrannical as he took unprecedented actions and steps outside the bounds of his office. The Rothschilds knew it would be far easier to control one power center (the US presidency) than fifty sovereign states.
One may wonder why scholarly propagandists and cover-up artists in universities and in the publishing world hide the terrible mistakes of Lincoln. I believe Professor Thomas J. DiLorenzo, PhD has the answer: They use their Lincoln mythology to advocate big government and other imperialistic wishes for the federal government. They say …
If Honest Abe did it, it must be OK.
Whoosises? They are the ones who reveal their abiding prejudice by their cavalier treatment of Lincoln.
But most of all, modern academics abhor the concept of allowing our states any real sovereignty. Such men and women do not seem to understand that the closer the ruling class is to its people, the more they care for those people.
Presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison felt that our states had the right to nullify (for their own states) unconstitutional laws. With such rights for our states, New York, California, and Illinois would soon be empty of hard-working, tax-paying citizens. And the poor homeless of such states would not be the problem, they would be the result of the problem – their states.
With sovereign states, no longer could the federal government tell the world …
Do as we say, or we’ll bring democracy (along with a lot of bombs) to your country.
But despite the destruction the Executive Branch of government has done to American ideals, an equal, or exceeding amount of ruin has been done to Americans by the other two branches of government: the legislative and judicial. The US Congress, Supreme Court, and the entire federal court system have all become embarrassments to those who have studied them.
Even the senior officers in our Army, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Navy are rabid Rothschild acolytes. They are stay-at-home militarists who have never experienced combat, but set in motion the propaganda they absorb at such schools as the US Army Command and General Staff College.
Most military officers, who have seen combat, have too much innate integrity to sell their souls for rank, privilege, and power.
America continued her hard turn into the darkest of shadows with all of the presidents who succeeded Lincoln. Such men as Theodore Roosevelt, our 26th president, like Lincoln, is widely considered one of our best and greatest presidents. He is even enshrined, like Lincoln, on Mount Rushmore. Roosevelt used the White House as his “bully pulpit” to issue more Executive Orders than all twenty presidents (other than Lincoln) who preceded him.
President Theodore Roosevelt
Teddy Roosevelt even formed a national police force, an idea that had always been rejected by US Congresses, and was abhorred by our nation’s founding fathers, and the American public as well.
By President Roosevelt calling his national police force an innocent investigative bureau of his branch of government, Teddy was able to avoid wide public resistance to his addition to America’s growing police state. In those days, citizens were wisely antipathetic to national police forces. Today, however, there is scarcely a US citizen who would suggest we do away with Teddy’s FBI, or even curb its bestial illegal practices.
But the worse was yet to come, but come he did. His name was Thomas Woodrow Wilson. And as our 28th president, Wilson imprisoned some 5,000 Americana who objected to his World War I, the war he had promised to avoid if he was elected as our president.
President Woodrow Wilson
It was Wilson who was the first to declare National Emergencies, in order to assume even more powers not granted to the Executive Branch, by either our Constitution or our Congress.
It was during the Woodrow Wilson administration that the Rothschilds instituted their Federal Reserve Act brought back income taxes, and then caused the American entrance into World War I.
Later came Woodrow Wilson on steroids. His name was Franklin D. Roosevelt, who died while in office, but not before issuing over 3,000 Executive Orders and making sure America got into World War II.
But why should I go on in this vain, as all subsequent presidents have only hardened the cast of America’s destructive mold – a matrix forged with the heat and hammers of the insane Rothschild tribe.
No, the mold cannot be altered, but it can be destroyed down to its base constituent elements and recast in the image that our founding fathers spoke, wrote, and dreamed of.
May God bless America throughout her coming attempt at a divinely inspired transformation such as our forefathers experienced.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy
Posted by Jack Speer-Williams on September 13, 2017, With 2654 Reads Filed under History, Life, Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.