Rose McGowan against the Khazarian pedophile, orgiastic gangsters in Hollywood

23
331

Will she eventually address the real issue?

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

Rose McGowan is apparently realizing that the entertainment industry gave her some pills which morally put her to sleep for years, and now she seems to realize that being a Hollywood star cost her dearly.

McGown got involved in movies like Devil in the Flesh, and now she is apparently seeing that her path in the business industry was morally tragic. McGowan was known as “a sex symbol” when movies like Devil in the Flesh came out.

McGowan is obviously “psycho-analyzing” herself. After she was raped by a Hollywood producer—and she is pointing two fingers at Harvey Weinstein—she seemed to have had an epiphany. She suddenly realized that rape is a really bad thing, despite the fact that Hollywood has been applauding it since its inception and despite the fact that McGowan herself was implicitly making it permissible in movies like Devil in the Flesh. In fact, it was McGowan who was sexually seducing teachers and boys in that particular movie and mercilessly trying to kill them.

McGowan, like Agave in Euripides’ The Bacchae, seems realize that sexual liberation can never lead to true happiness and freedom; it can only lead to moral enslavement and sometimes death. That was indeed what Agave learned. Euripides’ The Bacchae is pertinent here because it does deal with issues that we human beings are all familiar with: lust and unbridled passion.

Pentheus, who is the king of Thebes in the play, observes that once Dionysus has unleashed sexual debauchery among women in particular, the culture is doomed and sexual destruction ensues.[1] In an attempt to put an end to this moral decay, Pentheus plans to capture Dionysus. And he did.

When Dionysus, the god of sexual excess and debauchery, was finally captured, he told Pentheus that he got Pentheus under his wings. How can Dionysus get me under his wings, reasons Pentheus, when I got him locked up?

To make a long story short, Dionysus asks Pentheus if he would like to see the women dance naked on the mountainside. Pentheus says: “Aye, indeed! Lead on. Why should we tarry?…That would I, though it cost me all the gold of Thebes!”

In other words, what man would say no to being able to see naked women? Shocked by Pentheus’s lustful desires, Dionysus responded,

“So much? Thou art quick to fall to such great longing.”

Dionysus hinted that this would probably lead to Pentheus’s own death, but since lust makes one blind, Pentheus could not realize that he was carrying his own casket.

In the end, Dionysus led Pentheus to the mountainside. He found what he was looking for, but the naked women, being possessed by Dionysus himself, ended up tearing Pentheus apart, leading him to a tragic death.[2] Pentheus got what he wanted, but it cost him his own life.

The moral of the story? Excluding morality in any artistic enterprise is an infallible sign that the culture is heading for destruction. Hollywood and the entire entertainment industry broke the moral code and things have never been the same. A little historical background here.

Film and cultural historian Robert Sklar writes that before 1910, “The movies were as completely in the hands of respectable, established Anglo-Saxon Protestant Americans as they were ever to be.”[3] Although there were many Jews in Hollywood before that period, they did not have much influence in the film industry.

All of that changed, though, starting in the 1920s and ‘30s and continuing through the 1970s. Movies during that era “called into question sexual propriety, social decorum and the institutions of law and order.”[4]

By the 1930s, a group of Catholics could no longer tolerate the increasing degeneracy Hollywood was pushing in the movies, so in 1933 they created the Catholic Legion of Decency (later renamed the National Legion of Decency). Their goal was to put pressure on filmmakers to stick with the traditional values.

Sklar writes that before the National Legion of Decency, Jews in Hollywood “had always tried to give their public as much sexual titillation as contemporary morals would allow…producers had no qualms about tossing aside the [Decency] code and hanging on to their audiences by offering more sex stories, risqué language and glimpses of nudity than they had ever dared before. One reason why the Legion of Decency campaign proved so quickly effective in mobilizing support was that the general run of movies had never before been so clearly in opposition to traditional middle-class morality.”[5]

When Hollywood was confronted with the Legion of Decency rules, the producers quickly pointed out that “without sex and crime pictures, there wouldn’t be enough patrons to sustain a movie business.”

“Granting this, [the Legion of Decency leaders] sought to devise a formula that would keep sex and crime pictures within moral bounds. Their solution allowed for a fairly wide leeway in depicting behavior considered immoral by traditional standards—adultery and murder, for example—so long as some elements of ‘good’ in the story balanced what the code defined as evil.

“This was the formula of ‘compensating moral value’: if ‘bad’ acts are committed, they must be counteracted by punishment and retribution, or reform and regeneration, of the sinful one. ‘Evil and good are never to be confused throughout the presentation,’ the code said. The guilty must be punished; the audience must not be allowed to sympathize with crime or sin.”[6]

The Legion of Decency proved successful—encouraging Hollywood to “direct its enormous powers of persuasion to preserving the basic moral, social and economic tenets of traditional American culture”[7]—until the end of World War II.

Then, tempted once more by the profit that could be gained by the risqué, producers began to reformulate their subtle attacks. They turned their attention to

“settings that provided the full opportunity to raise the pitch of excitement on the screen, to amaze, frighten and even to sexually arouse…At its most basic level, sound was noise, and noise itself could be a source of thrills. Hollywood did not tear down its boudoir sets overnight, but the possibilities of sound attracted filmmakers more and more to noisy settings.”[8]

Once the Legend of Decency was out of the equation, Hollywood began to unleash pornographic films such as Deep Throat (1972). And since pornography is an essentially Jewish business,[9] it was no coincidence that Jewish revolutionaries attacked every single moral law in America in order to produce filth as “art.”[10]

In short, Hollywood has been operating under the principle that morality is a relic of the past. Hollywood actors and actresses have never challenged that principle. In fact, the very same people who are currently condemning Harvey Weinstein were producing movies which put them on Weinstein’s ideological platform.

For example, Anna Paquin has recently come out supported Rose McGowan for her bravery. But Paquin cannot explain to us what she meant when she started describing her sex scenes in movies:

Actually, it’s not really uncomfortable because we’re all like kind of cozy and friends. It’s like, ‘Oh, I’ll put my leg there, you put your hand there. It’s OK, whatever.’ I’ve had sex with several cast members on the show—obviously, on camera.”

Keep in mind that Paquin has a husband, Stephen Moyer. The stunning news is that Moyer “has even directed Paquin in sex scenes with other actors.”

If you think that Moyer and his wife are acting in a disgusting way, just hold on. Moyer had this to say about some of those sex acts:

‘In a funny way, I feel like — without revealing too much — it’s quite interesting for us as a couple because we’ve kind of gone to places where a lot of people don’t get to.

“’There are moments where I’ll be watching on a monitor [and say], ‘Oh, Joe, just move your hand up towards Anna’s breast. Good. And can you move your right thumb just a little bit …? Great.’ And then I’ll go, ‘Babe, babe, enjoy it.’ I’m certainly talking to her as ‘babe.’ ‘Darling, go for it.’”

In her zeal to promote bisexuality, Paquin declared, “I’m Anna Paquin. I’m bisexual, and I give a damn.”

Now, how can these people seriously condemn Harvey Weinstein and at the same time continue to leave in a world where they assume that morality, as Michael Ruse would have put it, is just “flimflam”?

If that’s the kind of world they want to live in, then Scholar Molly Haskell was right when she argues in her book From Revenge to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies that Hollywood is “the propaganda arm of the American Dream machine.”[11] If you think Haskell is wrong, then listen to David Cronenberg: “Every time I kill someone in my movie, I’m rehearsing my own death.”[12]

—————————————————

The “Butt-man”?

Unfortunately, many naïve actors and actresses have locked themselves in the same “propaganda arm” and have inexorably been rehearsing their own moral death. More importantly, the Khazarian pedophile cult has used “propaganda arm” to unleash sexual debauchery in America through movies, and sometimes even through magic.[13] This has had devastating consequences over the years. As E. Michael Jones writes at the end of Monsters from the Id: The Rise of Horror in Fiction and Film:

“By following our illicit desires to their logical endpoint in death, we have created a nightmare culture, a horror-culture, one in which we are led back again and again to the source of our mysterious fears by forces over which we have no control. It is a little like watching the Texas Chainsaw Massacre over and over again and watching the hippies drawn inexorably to their doom in the uncanny house that has become not a place of refuge, but of slaughter instead. That house is our culture.

“We are all being led into that house of horrors by a mysterious force over which we seem to have no control. That force is our conscience. The only way we can escape its clutches is by admitting that what it has to say about our guilt is true.”[14]

No one can fight his conscience and win. And no artistic life is possible without morality. This is one reason why Hollywood actors and actresses are failing. They want to be sexually liberated, but they don’t want to give people like Weinstein the same permission. It is morally wrong at all time and place, they say, to rape someone.

Once again, here Hollywood actors and actresses are not talking about precious and naïve children, who will end up watching gratuitous and subversive movies anyway? Who is going to fight for those children? Why are Hollywood directors, producers, actors and actresses morally raping them? Listen to Bob Pittman, one of the founders of MTV:

“Our core audience is the television babies who grew up on TV and rock & roll…The strongest appeal you can make…is emotionally. If you can get their emotions going, [make them] forget their logic, you’ve got ’em…At MTV, we don’t shoot for the 14-year-olds, we own them.”[15]

—————————————————–

We should all strongly support McGowan for standing up against people like Weinstein. But she doesn’t really want to get to the heart of the issue because that would ruin much of her career.

In any event, even fighting people like Weinstein is a hard thing to do in Hollywood. McGowan has been extremely vocal in dethroning Weinstein, his company, and actors who remained silent when she was actually raped. Ben Affleck got his start in Hollywood because of Weinstein, who produced the movie Good Will Hunting.

McGowan, who appeared in the movie Going All the Way with Affleck, said that she told him that Weinstein had behaved inappropriately, but Affleck remained silent throughout the years. According to McGowan, Affleck knew very well that Weinstein was abusing women. In fact, she quoted Affleck saying, “GODDAMNIT! I TOLD HIM [Weinstein] TO STOP DOING THAT.”[16]

Now Affleck is giving the impression that he knew nothing about Weinstein’s history. He said he was “saddened and angry” about the Weinstein debacle, which “made me sick.” McGowan responded by saying, “You lie.”[17]

Quentin Tarantino has also come out and declared that “For the last week I’ve been stunned and heartbroken about the revelations that have come to light about my friend for 25 years Harvey Weinstein. I need a few more days to process my pain, emotions, anger and memory and then I will speak publicly about it.”

This is complete nonsense. These people really want us to believe that Weinstein’s long history of abusing women, as the Daily Beast itself puts it, happened “in a vacuum”![18] Newsweek has even reported that Weinstein “was known in Cannes for his wild parties featuring orgies and cocaine.” Newsweek quoted le Parisien saying: “Each year, he hosted parties with orgies and cocaine. Harvey even had a widely talked about nickname: the Pig.” If that were so, then why did Seth MacFarlane have to make a joke about Harvey Weinstein on this very issue way back in 2013? Why did Seth Rogen have to tell The Hollywood Reporter that virtually everyone knew about Weinstein?

———————————————–

McGowan has been attacking a powerful force in Hollywood. For that reason, Twitter has suspended her account. It was right after she posted something about Ben Affleck.[19]

Obviously Hollywood has good reasons to be concerned about bad reports on Ben Affleck because Justice League is scheduled to be released next month. If Affleck is viewed as a morally wicked person, that may hurt the movie.

In fact, “Some Twitter users demand Ben Affleck step down as Batman one month before ‘Justice League’ debut.” Makeup artist Annamarie Tendler, who is married to comedian John Mulaney, declared that Affleck groped her. She said:

I would also love to get an apology from Ben Affleck who grabbed my ass at a Golden Globes party in 2014. He walked by me, cupped my butt and pressed his finger into my crack. Like most women in these situations I didn’t say anything but I have thought a lot about what I’d say if I ever saw him again.”[20]

Affleck has now been named “buttman.”[21]

Here is our message to actors and actresses who have been “saddened” by Harvey Weinstein’s behavior. Will you help crack down the porn industry in Hollywood? Will you stop producing filth as “art”? Will you stop dismissing morality as the basis for true art? Will you tell Netflix owners to stop corrupting the young and restless with “innocent” shows like Jessica Jones and more recently Gerald’s Game? Will you tell women to dress modestly? How about movies such as Focus, A History of Violence, Basic Instinct, M.F.A.? Will they ever talk about The Wolf of Wall Street, which essentially shows that capitalism, the Rothschild, and pornography are concentric circles?

If these people do not have enough balls to tell the truth, if they continue to sell themselves for money, power and fame, then we are not impressed with their reactions to Harvey Weinstein because we all know by now that Weinstein is just the tip of the iceberg. Actors and actresses also need to formulate a serious response to fashion designer Donna Karan, who killed the Hollywood casting when she said:

“You look at everything all over the world today and how women are dressing and what they are asking by just presenting themselves the way they do. What are they asking for? Trouble.”[22]

McGowan responded to Karan by saying: “Donna Karan you are a DEPLORABLE Aiding and abetting is a moral crime. You are scum in a fancy dress.”[23] Do you see how she subtly used morality to dismiss Karan’s point?

And why doesn’t McGowan address the real issue? Why couldn’t she give her readers a reasonable explanation for her 1998 MTV VMAs dress, when she was obviously titillating rapists? Can she explain that to us? Keep also in mind that McGowan’s dress was labeled “the most iconic dress to ever grace MTV’s red carpet.” McGowan herself described the dress as “funny. It made me laugh.”

It’s “freedom” for McGowan to titillate rapists, but it’s not “freedom” for rapists to accept and act upon the titillation? She seduces rapists, and at the same time she expects them to keep their pants up? Who is that woman fooling? It gets even more laughable when “Since City: A Dame to Kill For” star Eva Green Weinstein made “an inappropriate advance.” Green has said quite bluntly that she has no problem with exposing herself in films. So, should she start refunding millions upon millions of fans who saw Sin City and indeed 300:  Rise of an Empire?

These people obviously need to get  at least an ounce of common sense.

————————————————

In any event, McGowan and others need to wake up to the fact that they cannot exclude morality from the political dynamic in Hollywood at all. To do so will lead to intellectual death or insanity. It is the same thing with the pornographic industry.

If it is “morally” imperative to make pornography widely available, if it is part of “democracy” and “freedom” to accept smut—no matter how bestial or misogynistic—then why is Weinstein wrong? Do these people mean to tell us that pornography is harmless? As scholar Gail Dimes puts it:

“Extensive scientific research reveals that exposure to and consumption of porn threaten the social, emotional and physical health of individuals, families and communities, and highlights the degree to which porn is a public health crisis rather than a private matter.”[24]


[1] The women perform their sexual rites on the mountainside, usually on Mount Parnassos above Delphi. See for example E. R. Dodds, The Greeks and the Irrational (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1951), 270-278.

[2] For a cultural interpretation of this tragedy, see for example E. Michael Jones, Dionysos Rising: The Birth of the Cultural Revolution Out of the Spirit of Music (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1994).

[3] Robert Sklar, Movie-Made America: A Cultural History of American Movies (New York: Vantage Books, 1994), 33.

[4] Ibid, 175.

[5] Ibid., 174.

[6] Ibid.

[7] Ibid., 175.

[8] Ibid., 176.

[9] See for example Nathan Abrams, “Triple-exthnics,” Jewish Quarterly, Winter 2004; E. Michael Jones, “Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos,” Culture Wars, May 2003.

[10] See Josh Lambert, Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2014); Nathan Abrams, The New Jew in Film: Exploring Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Cinema (Piscataway: Rutgers University Press, 2012).

[11] Molly Haskell, From Revenge to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), 2.

[12] Quoted in Stanley Wiater, Dark Visions: Conversations with the Masters of the Horror Film (New York: Avon Books, 1992), 62.

[13] See for example Hugh B. Urban, Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and liberation in Modern Western Esotericism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006); Sissela Bok, Mayhem: Violence as Public Entertainment (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1998); Dorothy G. Singer and Jerome L. Singer, Imagination and Play in the Electronic Age (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005); Joy D. Osofsky, ed., Children in a Violent Society (New York: The Guildford Press, 1997); Dave Grossman, On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society(New York: Back Bay Books, 1996).

[14] E. Michael Jones, Monsters from the Id: The Rise of Horror in Fiction and Film (Dallas: Spence Publishing, 2000), 279.

[15] Quoted in Quentin J. Schultze, Roy M. Anker, et al, Dancing in the Dark: Youth, Popular Culture and the Electronic Media (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1991), 192.

[16] Cara Buckley and Melena Ryzik, “Rose McGowan Attacks Ben Affleck Over Harvey Weinstein: ‘You Lie,’” NY Times, October 10, 2017.

[17] Ibid.

[18] Nick Schager, “Hollywood’s Heinous ‘Casting Couch’ Culture That Enabled Harvey Weinstein,” Daily Beast, October 14, 2017.

[19] “Rose McGowan suspended by Twitter after posting about Ben Affleck,” NY Times, October 12, 2017; Abby Ohlheiser, “Rose McGowan blocked from Twitter after tweeting about Harvey Weinstein and Ben Affleck,” Washington Post, October 12, 2017; Anna Livsey, “Rose McGowan suspended from Twitter after Ben Affleck tweets,” Guardian, October 12, 2017.

[20] Cavan Sieczkowski, “Makeup Artist Annamarie Tendler Claims Ben Affleck Groped Her At 2014 Party,” Huffington Post, October 13, 2017.

[21] “Ben Affleck dubbed ‘Buttman’ as more groping allegations emerge,” Telegraph, October 13, 2017.

[22] Bonnie Malkin, “Donna Karan defends Harvey Weinstein: ‘Are women asking for it?’,” Guardian, October 10, 2017.

[23] Ibid.

[24] Gail Dines, “Is porn immoral? That doesn’t matter: It’s a public health crisis,” Washington Post, April 8, 2016.

Comments Closed

23 COMMENTS

  1. You could fill an auditorium with insiders, a-listers, advisors, fund raisers, schmoozers and entourage of Hillary Clinton who had intimate (no pun intended) knowledge of dear old Harvey – some in that Hillary-audience who were actually raped by him – but not a one of them mentioned it to Hillary. In fact, Hillary was so “shocked and appalled” about Harvey that it took her a week to say she was “shocked and appalled.” Go figure. The Harvey saga says so much, not only about Hillary Clinton, but those who DARED to lecture to us that we were traitors and deserved to burn in a “special place in hell” for not voting for her because, after all. Hillary always stands up for women, with the exception the numerous victims of Hurricane Harvey. Surely, today, she is mad as hell at all those close enough to tell her about Harvey, but didn’t. Not a single one.
    Does someone want to tell us that you’re hanging out with the likes of Robert DeNiro, Jane Fonda, Ellen DeGeneres, Ted Danson, Jamie Foxx … and none of them ever leaned over Hillary’s shoulder at anyone of those schmoozathons and whispered in her ear anything amiss about Harvey Weinstein? There’s a whole lot of two-faced hypocrites running around in a panic today who are also, all-of-a-sudden, “shocked & appalled” over common knowledge.

  2. I believe…and maybe I am wrong–that being circumcised actually keeps some males in a perpetual state of arousal since there is no protective safeguard like the foreskin. Maybe it’s no wonder that these who have carried this ancient war ritual into today’s world are always thinking about having SEX…They’ve been stimulated since they were 9 days old.

    • However, that does NOT give any male the right to force himself on any available female. Some men need to learn some self-restraint and manners–and to not abuse their power.

  3. An interesting way to gain an insight into the “Rock Hard” Harvey episode is to go back to first principles. Comparison between the Babylonian Talmud and the Catholic Catechism would be helpful. The former is a system of casuistry which circumvents the latter, which espouses a whole of society view to develop the Personality of Human Persons. Attacks on the Catholic Church always attempt to blame the whole organisation for the demonstrable sins of the individual. Talmudic Hollywood attempts a Limited Hangout to exonerate the whole industry by laying the blame on one individual at the studio of the smaller independent. One has only to examine the output of the industry and even the actors involved to know that “something is rotten in the State of California”.

  4. Circumcision appears to have begun among the Egyptians and Hebrews (or perhaps earlier) because foreskins were easy “trophies” to take in battle if the person was dead. Whack it off and you could string a bunch on your belt. Moses supposedly did this (in the Old Testament, and his wife objected to it)..and David brought 100 to King Saul so that David could marry Saul’s daughter. Saul is quoted as saying “Bring me 100 enemy foreskins…” so I doubt that circumcision had as much to do with cleanliness or bacteria since the ancients knew nothing about this…than just to keep the enemies from collecting them as battle trophies.

    • (Sigh.) In order to not confuse: Moses was said to be circumcising his sons and his wife was angry with him for doing it–not stringing foreskins on his belt. Sorry it’s unclear.

  5. Well done, Jonas — my Florida homie — your tireless, relentless work in exposing these overpaid creeps is very much appreciated!

    AND…speaking of Quintin “My mom dated Wilt Chamberlain, therefore I’m down for the struggle” Terantino, Pulp Fiction badass Marsellus Wallace prob said it best as to “WHAT NOW?” should happen to the uber-perv Harvey “the Hard-On” Weinstein…

    “What now? Let me tell you what now. I’ma call a coupla hard, pipe-hittin’ niggas, who’ll go to work on the homes here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch. You hear me talkin’, hillbilly boy? I ain’t through with you by a damn sight. I’ma get medieval on your ass.”

    Marsellus Gets Medieval – Pulp Fiction
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVRPz6-Tkww

    Ahhh that scene still gives me chills!

  6. “I need a few more days to process my pain, emotions, anger and memory and then I will speak publicly about it,” Quentin Tarantino speaks!!!!!
    The wet dream perversity of Zionism is found in all of his movies. Wonder why?
    A very special goy Quentin? Maybe he should take a few more years before opening his mouth in public.

  7. I worked for a very brief time years ago at a center which housed people that would otherwise be living on the street. There were people there that had “organic” brain malfunctions (I think it was the adverse reactions to vaccines, but what do I know?!?). Others had “inorganic” brain malfunctions — they huffed gas from an acetylene torch, for example. One woman was so deep in her own brain, she would say the most horrific things — very vulgar. Most were victims of abuse as children. They grow up. Without being able to live through their natural development, due to chronic sexual abuse, they are very damaged. Some grow up and act out what was done to them . . . since that was their first “sexual” experience.
    Child abuse has been around for eons too. In 1957 “Thank Heaven for Little Girls” written by Lerner and Loewe . . . sung by a 69-year old man. Eyeing the little girls, just waiting for them to “ripen”?!? Okay, I’m sure I’m just a prude {rolling eyes}. Read the plot to GIGI (that glamorized the song): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigi_(1958_film)
    Society is replete with tawdry. And the end result?
    Google: FBI press release [put in any city or state of interest] Read it and weep.

  8. I watched Gerald’s Game last week. I thought it was a good movie because it touched on what happened to a woman after becoming an adult . . . after being abused as a young girl. Gerald’s Game was NOT a documentary, and had a short time to convey the message of a childhood abuse victim’s survival, and how it affected her as an adult.

    I lost two childhood friends . . . after they grew up. As children their lives were ruined by childhood sexual abuse and both committed suicide in their late 40’s. Both female and it was the males in their family who hurt them. Each had their own story. This sickness, evil can not be generalized, expect that it typically scares the children for life.

    And what about blaming the freedumb lovers buying the tickets . . . to the peep shows, to the fan dancers, to the pulp (not fiction) rags, to the tawdry shows. I see more men frequenting these places than I do female. So why are you focusing your shameful finger at the actresses?

    I agree with David Odell’s comment.

    You can’t regulate “porn” because it will just go underground, and make them even more money.
    The women that are speaking out are helping to cover up what is much deeper. The child abuse which these perverts gravitate. Stranger danger is a myth . . . abuse is done by someone in the family, and/or close family friend.

  9. Carnaptious, of course it is. Greek literature is full of pedophilia stories. It was the jews who brought genital mutilation as a means of marking the chosen ones thus turning sex into a sin.
    youtu.be/lsQKYXgblHM

  10. Europeans are better versed in Sigmund Freud and tend to seek answers in his diaries where he talks about being his own patient. The concept of libido seems to make sense to the lowly, circumcised schmucks who suffer circumcision nightmares. Circumcision is an attribute of Arabs and Jews only. Germans used this to identify jews during WWII. http://db.yadvashem.org/righteous/family.html?language=en&itemId=4066090
    youtu.be/P-mngp8mrNg
    But more appealing is his explanation of jewish hostility and violence caused by genital mutilation. see salem-news.com/articles/august312012/circumcision-violence-rm.php

    • syphus… sorry to be so blunt but you have no clue about circumcision. Stop with the genital mutilation psychobabble. You are neither circumcised nor are you a psychologist nor a jew nor an Arab what you are is grossly misinformed. Let me try and help out. Circumcision was instigated during the times of the Pharaohs because bathing in the Nile where bilharzia is common and the tendency of the foreskin to retain this bathing water increased the risk of the bug swimming up the member. The Coptic Christian are also circumcised. Circumcision also prevents urine from remaining causing kidney and bladder infections. Now there is a best-kept secret about circumcision and I will let you in on the secret. Firstly. circumcised males whether Western, Jewish or Arabic. laugh at the uncircumcised scientific Western male because they know as he gets older he becomes more and more a speed shooter, leaving his lady unsatisfied. You see the foreskin keeps the member sensitive as the uncircumcised male advances in age, in relation to his circumcised counterpart. A women’s vagina becomes rougher as she grows older. So the one with the sensitive member arrives very early for his lady, the ones with the less sensitive, circumcised member, takes his time arriving with his lady. The creator has thought of everything. The West never learned and what it learned it forgot and what it does not know it dismisses out of hand. Time to look and learn, Western cukture is so myopic it ain’t funny.

  11. In 1973, the movie Charlie Varrick was released. The movie was about a thief, Varrick, who was portrayed in a positive light, while the authorities were shown to be bumbling idiots just out to keep a “good man” down. Varrick, played by Walter Matthau was the thieving protagonist that audiences were supposed to – and did – love, but I can recall leaving the movie theater and thinking that it was the first movie I’d ever seen in which crime clearly paid, and paid very well. It was followed by many more films in which criminal behavior was justified or celebrated by whatever deranged narrative H’Wood was pressing at the time.

    As for McGowan, it’s interesting that she waited until the bloom is clearly off the Rose before exposing the vile and repulsive Weinstein for the serial sexual molester that he is. I doubt that even his dethroning has led Weinstein to think or feel he did anything wrong. After all, when Harvey was casting on his couch, or into a potted plant, his victims usually became rich and famous for just a few minutes worth of degradation.

    According to the politically correct crowd that runs H’Wood, pedophilia is simply another sexual orientation. Here’s a relatively recent video – less than 8 minutes – that outlines why pedophilia may soon become legal in the US, where it is already widely practiced by the sick scum who call themselves “elite”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEeYzW_D5CU

  12. Remember the old warning …. stop masturbating it will make you go blind. Of course we soon realized that the making one blind part was a lie, so why stop doing it, and for that matter why stop doing anything.
    Well for a certain % of the population sex becomes a perversion, an addiction of sorts which leads many to rape and or murder, and many many more to poor choices, and life long obsessions. This is the blindness which mom’s are warning of, but few have the ability to explain intelligently. Sex is a powerful natural drive which is dismissed too easily because, and there it is, the unexplainable because. My guess is the because is fear, and ignorance passed through generations.
    Some experts claim the pedophile, the rapist, and the sexually perverted can not be cured, and I believe those experts. “Waking the Tiger” by Peter Levine is an excellent book to read if one desires an know how traumatic sexual abuse is.
    When a child is sexually abused his life, his soul have been taken from him or her. That is the end of innocense, the end of love. There isn’t a fix for what happened to the child. There is no “getting over it”. The ability to love another, to trust another is gone, it’s all gone. What should the penalty be for the crime of crushing a child’s spirit? Some one answer me.

    • Trying to regulate a natural event . . . making it a “sin” . . . nope, that doesn’t help. Making it “legal” or not, hmmmmmm . . . Having a bastard child, an illegitimate . . . and in the ’60’s making it a free-for-all with “THE PILL.” Most of these measures affect the woman in society, and demonize the female. Whore moans . . . as it were. We form our culture and we’ve tried “saving it until marriage” . . . geez, the Italians were so into it, dangling the white sheet outside the window after the honeymoon to show the blood . . . “She’s a virgin” . . . YEAH!!

      A female marrying a man and god forbid he has money . . . then she’s a gold digger.

      From one extreme . . . to the other. Shame . . . no shame.

      Harvey Swinestein is the sacrificial lamb for the Vegas shoot ’em up, shut ’em up. Here, you can have this Jew . . . says the Kosher Nostra, flinging that whale into the pond, and instead of Jonah being consumed by the whale . . . and having some deep reflections while he’s in the belly of the beast, we just chew this one up, and spit him out in disgust. All the women coming forward now are the distraction to the reality . . . his lust for children. They all know that too . . .

Comments are closed.