Kurdish forces retreat from Kirkuk, avoiding bloodshed and destruction

4
654
This is something these soldiers will probably never do again
This is something these soldiers will probably never do again

KRG forces collapse in Kirkuk because of intra-Peshmerga tensions, and absence of US support

… from Southfront

Peshmerga fighters, another day of not fighting ISIS

[ Editor’s Note We can breath more easily today celebrating that civil war was avoided in Iraq (for now) with the Peshmerga’s decision to pull back from Kirkuk without a pitched battle.

While once upon a time Kirkuk was a Kurdish city, Saddam changed that by moving Sunnis in. But the current Iraqi constitution changed it more and is the law of the land, one that Iraqi Kurdish leaders signed onto. Baghdad claims it is securing Iraqi property…bases, oil and gas fields, airports and government buildings, after threats had been made on the energy facilities to close them down, or worse.

The Peshmerga has admitted that “lack of US support” and political divisions in their ranks led to their pull back. This is the same Peshmerga where with Mosul occupied by ISIS, an hour away by four lane highway, the Peshmerga was never interested in joining the fight to free the city.

In fact we didn’t really see much conflict with ISIS and the Peshmerga, just the “light kind” that can easily be faked. Frankly the Peshmerga was not only on the sidelines during much of the ISIS war, but ISIS convoys of stolen oil from Syria flowed right past Erbil on the way to the Turkish border, an operation so huge it could be seen from the moon with an amateur telescope.

Turkey, with Erdogan jumping in with his offer to help fight the PPK in Iraq, seems to be doing everything it can to avoid fighting terrorists in Syria’s Idlib province, hiring FSA proxies to do the fighting for them.  Mr. Erdogan has more than a few things in common with Trump. I will let you guess what those are. Let us know in the comments Jim W. Dean ]

Jim’s Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal[email protected]

This includes research, needed field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving, and more – Thanks for helping out

*

The Peshmerga did what fighting it did do with US and Baghdad support. That will not be the case in the next in a civil war

–  First published  …  October 16,  2017 

Amidst growing tensions in the region, Iraqi units have taken control of the city of Kirkuk, the K1 military aiport, the Baba Gurgur oil and gas field, and a state-owned oil company’s offices. Iraqi forces had moved into several major oil fields north of Kirkuk, as well as its airport and an important military base, according to Iraqi sources.

Kurdish party headquarters inside Kirkuk had been abandoned. Baghdad said the Peshmerga had withdrawn “without fighting”, but clashes were reported south of Kirkuk.

While politicians and authorities led by Barzani’s Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) have said they will stand their ground and fight, their rival Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) has been more amenable to an agreement to allow Baghdad to enter.

Barzani and Erodgan were good buddies when they were stealing Syrian oil

Supporters of KRG President Masoud Barzani blamed the PUK for a lose of Kirkuk and US for an absense of the support.

Peshmerga spokesman Brig Gen Bahzad Ahmed told the Associated Press that the fighting south of Kirkuk had caused “lots of casualties”. He alleged that pro-government forces had also “burnt lots of houses and killed many people” in Tuz Khurmatu, 75km south of Kirkuk, and Daquq. However, he was not able to provide any confirmation to his words.

U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad had described the situation as “stable” but said the “heightened tension” was distracting from the fight against ISIS militants. The US consulate in Baghdad said that they support the notion of contentious territories being controlled according to the Constitution.

The US-led coalition against ISIS, that backs both Iraqi Army and Peshmerga forces, has stated that they “strongly urge all sides to avoid escalatory actions,” and has not shown support for either side of the conflict.

Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said in a statement that the operation in Kirkuk was necessary to “protect the unity of the country, which was in danger of partition” because of the referendum.

The Iraqi parliament asked Abadi to deploy troops to Kirkuk and other disputed areas after the referendum result was announced, but he said last week that he would accept them being governed by a “joint administration” and that he did not want an armed confrontation.

Abadi also appointed Rakan al-Jibouri to be the new governor of Kirkuk instead of Najmiddin Karim, who had supported Kurdish independence.

On October 15, his cabinet accused the KRG of deploying non-Peshmerga fighters in Kirkuk, including members of the Turkish Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which it said was tantamount to a “declaration of war”. KRG officials denied these allegations. Then, a video showing PKK members in Kirkuk appeared.

Turkey also accused Erbil of collaborating with PKK forces, and promised to take the necessary measures.Turkey’s National Security Council called for the federal government in Baghdad to take control of the border crossing between Turkey and the Kurdish region in northern Iraq and proposed closing Turkish airspace for flights heading to or departing from Kurdish territory in Iraq.

Kirkuk is an oil-rich province claimed by both the Kurds and the central government.

*


Loading...

EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

4 COMMENTS

  1. I can’t help but think that people on this platform are still reeling from the Ottoman Turkish Siege of Vienna in 1529 (even though they lost!). They just cannot see anything right about Turks and Turkey, except for one article defining Gladio B operations which were carried out in the ’50s & ’60s.

  2. Mr Dean, IMO, it’s more than obvious that two faced Snake Erdo is playing a dangerous double game by still wanting a regime change in Syria just like what Agent Orange wants.

Comments are closed.