Possible developments in Syria at the background of ‘al-Omar knot’


By Sophia Mangal for Veterans Today

During all the latest weeks we can observe with anxiety how the developments dashingly have been going on along the Euphrates.
The Syrian Arab Army (SAA) reported on September 15, 2017, on capturing one of the latest ISIS-stronghold in Syria, Al-Mayadin. The area of Al-Amar oil field was designated as a possible next direction of advance then. However, the Islamists damaged river crossing facilities in two points while retreating. This made it difficult to implement the scenario.

Current balance of power

With the support of the U.S. Kurdish military wing of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) took advantage of SAA’s confusion and have established control over al-Amar on September 22, 2017, themselves. According to various Syrian media, the U.S. SOF in concert with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) even organized the transferring of ISIS-fighters from Raqqa towards al-Amar to achieve a 100% result.
It seems that the importance of the largest oil and gas field is beyond controversy. For example, the Jihadists were pumping out at least 25 thousand barrels of oil per day. The forthcoming outcome of the war in Syria and the negotiation position of the sides directly depend on the number of oilfields captured by the sides. In this regard, a question arises on possible strategic initiatives of Kurds (the U.S. in fact) and of the Syrian Government in the struggle for oil and gas fields to the East of Euphrates.

To deliberately avoid giving publicity of the U.S. participation in this struggle, most of the top American media stubbornly report that the American leadership has no long-term strategic plan after Raqqa to be liberated from ISIS. However, it seems to be another fake.

Washington officially is going to continue providing full-scale support of Kurds in clearing the territories East of Euphrates from ISIS. Meanwhile, the main task here is not to stabilize the situation in the Deir-Ezzor Governorate as it may be understood from the official statements, but to capture as many oil and gas field as possible.

Talal Sello, an SDF official, confirmed they are proceeding carrying out the advance in Deir-Ezzor under the support of the U.S.-led coalition. Having said so, Sello gave us evasive answers on the real aims pinpointing main of them among which are providing aid to liberated people, civil protection, and reconciliation between Syrian Kurds and Turkey. He didn’t comment on how the Kurdish advance towards Syrian-Iraqi border might intercede conflicting parties.
The former U.S. ambassador to Iraq and Turkey James F. Jeffrey supposes once Raqqa has been liberated, the United States should continue the deployment of the U.S. Special Forces including military training and liaison detachments to support SDF. The option of arming the FSA must stay on the table and the White House should facilitate reconciliation between Turkey and the YPG (and potentially the PKK).

In its turn, Center for Strategic for International Studies went even further, stating that the U.S. authorities should, first, back Kurdish march towards the Euphrates River Valley and second, U.S. forces should partner with local Sunni tribes located in that area.

An interesting opinion of Washington’s plans was unwittingly expressed by Trump’s national security adviser H.R. McMaster. The representative of the president emphasized one of Administration’s chief objectives is to block Iran and Hezbollah from consolidating their gains in the eastern regions of Syria. He declined to comment the way the task to weaken Iranian influence to be implemented.

Naturally, the support of the Kurds by the U.S. could not help but arouse resentment among various regional leaders. Thus, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said that the United States would provide all possible resistance to Iran and prevent Assad’s troops from regaining control over the Syrian-Iraqi border. Turkish President Erdogan has also repeatedly spoken out against the strengthening of the Kurds.

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff

DISCLOSURES: All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Anyone know who this Talal Sello character from SDF is? The Barzani clan in Iraq has long connection with Mossad, so is it too far-fetched to look into Sello’s history (can’t find anything on the internet). He sure don’t look like the other Kurds.

  2. Whilst the oil fields are potentially very significant economic assets there are a few problems before they can be properly exploited. First, they have received very little maintenance over the past few years plus hit by the occasional bomb or two along with modification to output into tankers due to. Second, all the pipelines away from the fields, as shown in the map above, go west into Syrian Government areas. Third, they are in range from the west bank areas of the Euphrates valley. Last, they are too important for Damascus to walk away from.
    It might take a while but once the SAA and allies have sorted some of the other areas they are tied up in, they will start the ‘One Syria’ campaign in the areas east of the Euphrates. How they get on with that is dependent on what the US does after ISIS is defeated in Deir Province and Anbar. At that point any UN ‘we are fighting ISIS on behalf of the World because Syria doesn’t have the resources’ figleaf that they currently hide behind goes. From then on the US would be taking the side of one party, the Kurds, effectively creating a civil war, their mere presence being a major reason for a non peaceful settlement.
    I say this because whilst the Kurds will want to fight, without US artillery, SF, armour, intel, logistics/supplies and CAS they have very little chance. That pretty dire situation should encourage them and the Syrian Government, who will have Russia (who don’t want a fight with the US) demanding a fair peace at their side, to sit down and do a deal.
    In the meantime watch out for ethnic cleaning in Raqqa as the Kurds stop the locals moving home as they move their own tribes people in, there were few of them there prior to this.

  3. “The energy companies will be playing a far-reaching presence …”.
    This statement is obvious to the most base observer. The cause for concern is why Russia is not being discussed. Are they not aware, or are they so out gunned, that they will not defend their hemisphere. It is obvious that Russia/Iran, Iran/Russia are the next target. You choose the order. This is do or die time, and sadly it seems all with major concerns in Syria, include China, are silent. It’s as if they are buying time. Shortly Assad will get what Saddam, and Gadaffi got, then it will be Putin, and Xi, or vice versus. Maybe they are bought, and paid for too. But they will not live long enough to enjoy it. If nothing else Western history, from Europe to the America’s and back again, is repetitive, and successful. I say make peace with your God, and ask each day for 1 more. Because it’s coming.

Comments are closed.