Balfour at 100: Should Britain celebrate or apologize for its colonial legacy in Palestine? (VIDEO)


November 2 marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration – the colonial-era document that paved the way for the creation of Israel. But is the centenary a cause for celebration, or is it high time for an apology?

In November 1917, at the height of the First World War, Britain’s then-Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour issued a 67-word declaration that would shape the Middle East for a century to come.

As the Ottoman Empire, in alliance with Germany, began to crumble, Britain and France eyed the spoils of war. Among the pickings was Palestine.

Spread across the strategically coveted eastern Mediterranean, the region is home to some of the most fertile land in the Middle East and many of the holiest sites of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

In a letter to Lord Walter Rothschild, a prominent Zionist of his day, Balfour declared Britain’s support for the establishment of “a national home for the Jewish people” in what would later become the State of Israel.

Although the declaration itself was not legally binding, and Britain’s handling of its mandated territories in Palestine after 1920 can be blamed for weakened Arab opposition, Balfour’s symbolic role in Israel’s national story and the fate of the indigenous Arab population leaves a deeply divisive legacy 100 years on.

Simon Johnson, chief executive of the Jewish Leadership Council (JLC), says British Jews should feel proud of the UK’s role in the creation of Israel – today a key regional trade and security partner.

“For the British Jewish community it’s a very significant anniversary,” Johnson told RT.

“We are, as a Jewish community, very proud that it was our government that took the first steps toward the recognition of Jewish aspirations to its own homeland, and during the hundred years, and particularly now, continues to be a strong supporter of the right of the State of Israel as a democratic, Jewish state within the international family of nations.”

Johnson and the JLC have thrown their weight behind Balfour100 , a website and events series aimed at celebrating Britain’s role in the creation of Israel.

“What we want to do is recognize and present the proper story of the Balfour Declaration, put it in its proper historical context, and we’re very happy to debate with people what else might have been the impact from it,” he said.

Ahead of the 100th anniversary, pro-Palestinian groups launched a petition calling on the British government to scrap plans to celebrate. They argue Prime Minister Theresa May should instead use the occasion to issue an apology.

Responding to the petition in April this year, the Foreign Office said: “The Balfour Declaration is an historic statement for which Her Majesty’s Government does not intend to apologize. We are proud of our role in creating the State of Israel. The task now is to encourage moves towards peace.”

Johnson echoes the Foreign Office position. He says those calling for an apology have misunderstood the historical role of the declaration, and warns that denying the State of Israel its right to exist could be construed as anti-Semitism.

“I actually think the government’s response is absolutely right. Things that have happened in the past have happened, the government is rightly proud of the role the British government played in the creation of [the State of Israel], but is rightly now looking to the future and to a long-term and lasting, just peace based on two states for two peoples.

“I think the call for an apology is fundamentally wrong because it’s a misunderstanding of what the Balfour Declaration did … If you’re asking the government to apologize for a non-binding document that ended up leading to the creation of the State of Israel, what you might be saying, some people might be saying, is that they don’t believe there should be a State of Israel.

“Now that position, if you deny the right of the Jewish people to self-determination and you do not deny that right to any other people around the world, there’s a potential for that to be seen as anti-Semitic. It’s certainly delegitimizing of the existence of the State of Israel.”

One of the groups calling for an apology is the Palestinian Return Center (PRC). It argues that government plans to celebrate the centenary will damage the peace process and whitewash Britain’s colonial past.

“This is not a new response that we’ve heard from the British government,” PRC spokesman Pietro Stefanini told RT.

“They said not long ago that they do not intend to apologize and this shows that they are in complete denial over their colonial crimes in Palestine, and they’re still not willing to recognize the huge historical responsibilities they have towards Palestinians for the British occupation of Palestine that led to the mass displacement of the Palestinian nation in 1948.”

Stefanini warns that Palestinians will be deeply offended if any kind of commemoration takes place.

“Marking it with pride is basically the same as celebrating for the Palestinian diaspora. And I can tell you, Palestinians feel very offended by the plans that this government, after a hundred years, that they have been suffering in refugee camps, been occupied, while they are still without any right to self-determination, that this current government would make any sort of plan to celebrate.

“It is very, very offensive for the Palestinian community. And it would certainly not bring the parties any closer to peace and it would only inflame a rather tense situation that we see on the ground, especially for Palestinians who do not have any political hope to move forward in any real sense.”

It would be a gross oversimplification to suggest all British Jews hold the legacy of Balfour with equal reverence. In fact, acknowledging the wider shades of opinion among the community could nourish the spirit of compromise that may nudge the peace process forward.

Jews for Justice for Palestinians, for instance, offers one such a perspective. The group’s parliamentary and diplomatic liaison officer, Arthur Goodman, says the government’s response to the Balfour apology petition is a skew on British history.

“In reality the British government shouldn’t be particularly proud because, more than the Balfour Declaration itself, the way they ran it, in the Mandate, was very detrimental to the Palestinians,” he said.

“If it had been to create a homeland on an equal basis with the already existing indigenous population, that would have been different. But that’s not what the British Mandate did. They created a state for the Zionists, who were Jews, and they excluded the possibility of the Palestinians having a state or having an equal part in a binational state.”

What would an apology actually achieve?

“Very little. In fact, if that’s all the government did, but didn’t actually help the Palestinians create a state, then it would just make Palestinians and Arabs even more convinced that the British government, among others, was being very hypocritical,” said Goodman.

“I think the correct response would be not to celebrate it, not to mark it, except to say that it’s now time for Israel to accept that it already has 78 percent of British Mandate Palestine and that should be enough for it. And the other 22 percent, i.e. the Occupied Territories, rightly belong to the Palestinians.”


  1. Akbar Palace , What I see is a guy using a pseudonym with a bad case of psychological projection. You should buy some crayons and paper. Drawing pictures takes the edge off, and if you do chew them, they are relatively harmless.

  2. It became clear even before Israel was created, that the Balfour Agreement was a deadly mistake.

    After what the Zionists have done over the last 70 years…going back to the Zionist terrorists of the Irgun, Haganah, and Stern gangs…and the 750,000 Palestinians forced out of their homes…
    I think we had the proof we needed.

    Remember British Ambassador Folke Bernadotte?
    He negotiated 99% of what the Zionists wanted, but not 100%.
    So they murdered him.
    And bragged about it after the statute of limitations expired.
    As they sat in High Office in Israel.
    Cold-Blooded KILLERS.

    Taking into account how the Agreement was revealed to the world, does not help. At the Treaty of Versailles when territory was being divided, a group of 117 Jews headed by Bernard Baruch said, “we have a contract, for Palestine”.
    This is when the Germans slapped their foreheads in realization that they had been betrayed by their own Countrymen, because they were Jews first who would do anything to get their hands on the Promised Land. (There is a good lesson there to all countries who have dual citizens from Israel in government offices. Are you reading, this America?)

    Benjamin Freedman was there with the Zionists. His 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel is a fascinating read from a former Zionist insider who converted to Catholicism and joined the lowly goyim as equals.

    The secret agreements, betrayals, assassinations and terrorism, which all continue to this day…lead one to believe there must have been a better way…

    And in NO way can its existence be attributed to “the Will of God”…

    Quite the opposite.

    • To clarify, the Germans suddenly knew how and why Jewish-owned American newspapers had suddenly turned on them, and how Jewish banks who were reluctant to lend money to France and England suddenly changed their minds.

      America had been brought into the war on the side of England just as it looked like they were ready to call off the whole thing.

      Americans died in WWI because the Zionists saw their chance for Palestine, and struck…

      Like a Viper.

      End dual citizenship in America.

  3. An apology in shape of handing out territory for free to Palestinians from its vast four-continent portfolio would be a decent and adequate apology. Anything else will be like Monthy Python apologizing to The Ministry of silly walk. Britain and apology ahh..

    • Good find, Doc.

      “This broad international endorsement of Jewish national self-determination was formally ratified on July 24, 1922, when the League of Nations (the precursor to the United Nations) recognized the “historic connection of the Jewish people” to the Land of Israel and appointed Great Britain as Mandatory power responsible for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.”

      So when did the Nazis appear?

      “One hundred years after Balfour, the conflict caused by Arab rejection of Jewish rights continues unabated, and the hopeful vision of a Jewish homeland living in peaceful cooperation with its Arab neighbors remains just that.”

      A criminal has entered your house under the cloak of darkness. From the good side of a gun barrel, he suggests you live in the basement if you want peace.

      When you do not recognize his right to take your home, he tells you that two THOUSAND years ago, people who believed as he does lived here and YOU are the problem.


  4. I find it high strangeness, how Britain has crept back into the US government and influences our policies along with Israel , more than any other. When I think of illegal war in Iraq, I see Bush and Blair. When I see colonialist aggression, I see US and Britain. When I see global militarism, I see US and Britain. When I see territorial occupation I see US and Britain. The common thread in all is religion and pious fraud. This is closely followed by market controls and blood line fantasies. Britain does not strike me as altruistic, and is the country that burned our capitol to the ground. Isn’t that weird ? We are only 200+ yrs old. Yet here we are dominated by the very forces we sought independence from. With religious fantasy slathered all over it.

    • I believe the strange highness originates in the greedy deceitful minds of the bankers who control the COL.
      AND the FedResBank.
      Therefore, America as well.
      And Israel.
      Since they founded it, built …the Knesset, was it?… and own the most land there.

      You have to wonder, do the Israelis consider Walter Rothschild their Messiah?

Comments are closed.