1964: On This Day in History, McNamara says U.S. has no plans to send combat troops to Vietnam

What the Heck? On this 10th day of November in 1964, at a news conference, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara says that the United States has no plans to send combat troops into Vietnam.

9
362

On this 10th day of November in 1964, at a news conference, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara says that the United States has no plans to send combat troops into Vietnam.

When asked whether the United States intended to increase its activities in Vietnam, he replied, “Wait and see.”

By 1969, more than 500,000 American troops were in South Vietnam.

Opps!

Buy Book on Amazon.com – The Secretary of Defense for the Kennedy and Johnson administrations provides a perceptive and candid account of how–and why–America became involved in Vietnam, discussing his own activities and the legacy of decisions made during the 1960s.

During President John F. Kennedy’s term, while McNamara was Secretary of Defense, America’s troops in Vietnam increased from 900 to 16,000 advisers, who were not supposed to engage in combat but rather to train the Army of the Republic of Vietnam.

The number of combat advisers in Vietnam when Kennedy died varies depending upon source. The first military adviser deaths in Vietnam occurred in 1957 or 1959 under the Eisenhower Administration, which had infiltrated Vietnam, through the efforts of Stanley Sheinbaum, with an unknown number of CIA operatives and other special forces in addition to almost 700 advisers.

The Truman and Eisenhower administrations had committed the United States to support the French and native anti-Communist forces in Vietnam in resisting efforts by the Communists in the North to unify the country, though neither administration established actual combat forces in the war.

The U.S. role—initially limited to financial support, military advice and covert intelligence gathering—expanded after 1954 when the French withdrew. During the Kennedy administration, the U.S. military advisory group in South Vietnam steadily increased, with McNamara’s concurrence, from 900 to 16,000.

U.S. involvement escalated after the Gulf of Tonkin incidents in August 1964, involving two purported attacks on a U.S. Navy destroyer by North Vietnamese naval vessels.

Records from the Lyndon Johnson Library have perhaps indicated that McNamara misled Johnson on the attack on a U.S. Navy destroyer by allegedly withholding calls against executing airstrikes from US Pacific Commanders.

McNamara was also instrumental in presenting the event to Congress and the public as justification for escalation of the war against the communists.

In 1995, McNamara met with former North Vietnam Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap who told his American counterpart that the August 4 attack never happened, a conclusion McNamara eventually came to accept.

President Johnson ordered retaliatory air strikes on North Vietnamese naval bases. Congress approved, with only Senators Wayne Morse (D-OR), and Ernest Gruening (D-AK), voting against, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, authorizing the president “to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the U.S. and to prevent further aggression.” Regardless of the particulars of the incident, the larger issue would turn out to be the sweeping powers granted by the resolution.

U.S. President Lyndon Johnson with his Secretary of State McNamara

It gave Johnson virtually unfettered authority to expand retaliation for a relatively minor naval incident into a major land war involving 500,000 American soldiers. “The fundamental issue of Tonkin Gulf involved not deception but, rather, misuse of power bestowed by the resolution,” McNamara wrote later.

In 1965, in response to stepped up military activity by the Viet Cong in South Vietnam and their North Vietnamese allies, the U.S. began bombing North Vietnam, deployed large military forces and entered into combat in South Vietnam. McNamara’s plan, supported by requests from top U.S. military commanders in Vietnam, led to the commitment of 485,000 troops by the end of 1967 and almost 535,000 by June 30, 1968.

The casualty lists mounted as the number of troops and the intensity of fighting escalated. McNamara put in place a statistical strategy for victory in Vietnam. He concluded that there were a limited number of Viet Cong fighters in Vietnam and that a war of attrition would destroy them. He applied metrics (body counts) to determine how close to success his plan was.

McNamara with Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt at The Pentagon in July 1966

McNamara with Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt at The Pentagonin July 1966

Although he was a prime architect of the Vietnam War and repeatedly overruled the JCS on strategic matters, McNamara gradually became skeptical about whether the war could be won by deploying more troops to South Vietnam and intensifying the bombing of North Vietnam, a claim he would publish in a book years later. He also stated later that his support of the Vietnam War was given out of loyalty to administration policy.

He traveled to Vietnam many times to study the situation firsthand and became increasingly reluctant to approve the large force increments requested by the military commanders.

McNamara said that the Domino Theory was the main reason for entering the Vietnam War. In the same interview he stated, “Kennedy hadn’t said before he died whether, faced with the loss of Vietnam, he would [completely] withdraw; but I believe today that had he faced that choice, he would have withdrawn.”


Other Important Events on this Day in History

FaceBook Comments

9 COMMENTS

  1. Ah different faces to day and the war drums keep going. On this day November 11 . What did those poor souls fight for. It is long over due to ask Who did they fight for. The same Bastards are still running the show and the dim witted give them a free pass . So sad

  2. I get the feeling could have McNamara felt, on some subliminal level, that he had it coming to him, and it helped salve his conscience a little re VietNam. I did read some years after that war, that he had said he had not inconsiderable regrets about the role he played in setting it up.

    • Sorry. I mean to preface it with the question: I wonder if any of you have not read this report of a narrow squeak McNamara had on a night ferry to Martha’s Vineyard.

  3. This is the result of congress acting illegally and unconstitutionally by handing over all war powers to a president.
    It all began with Roosevelt.
    To this day the American people continue to be victimized by this decision.
    A violation of the Constitution and an act of cowardice by a congress, now rotted through and through with corruption and malfeasance, a congress totally controlled by a foreign power.
    Americans, too stupefied to realize what has been done to them continue to support the idea of presidential war powers. They continue to support war parties. They continue t send their children into the military. They continue to dutifully pay taxes to support more wars.

  4. Robert McNamara from San Francisco 1916 was a powerful intellect educated at UC Berkeley in Economics, mathematics and philosophy, later at Harvard, became an expert in a relatively new seminal field of statistical quality control while in the U.S. Air Force in WWII under “Tex” Thornton one of the so called “Whiz” kids. This group of about a dozen top analysts was brought into Ford Motor Company to put it on a winning path after Henry died in 1947. McNamara became its President the first one from outside the Ford family. While McNamara is often blamed for the failure of Viet Nam, despite making many trips over there, even if he may have realized the futility of it, he was not a dictator either and many powerful personalities like LBJ were involved. In fact LBJ likely removed him because he did not agree with his recommendations. Read the excellent Wikipedia article on him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_McNamara. Perhaps if he had talked to Gordon Duff or Charley Liteky on one of his trips things would have been different.

LEAVE A REPLY