‘Immature and weak-minded’: Iran rebukes Saudi crown prince for Hitler comparison


Tehran has responded to controversial comments made by the Saudi Arabian crown prince, in which Prince Mohammad bin Salman compared Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler.

In a statement Friday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahram Qassemi said bin Salman has discredited himself through his remarks. “No one in the world and in the international arena gives credit to him because of his immature and weak-minded behavior and remarks,” he said.

Saudi Crown Prince says Iran’s Ayatollah is the ‘new Hitler’

Saudi Arabia’s crown prince would also do well to remember the fates of other strongmen in the Middle East when they overstepped their boundaries, Qassemi warned.

“Now that he has decided to follow the path of famous regional dictators… He should think about their fate as well.”

In an interview with the New York Times earlier this week, bin Salman claimed that Khamenei is the “new Hitler of the Middle East.”

“But we learned from Europe that appeasement doesn’t work,” bin Salman told the Times. “We don’t want the new Hitler in Iran to repeat what happened in Europe in the Middle East.”

Though the Hitler comparison may seem rather odd, as Iran has not embarked on a genocidal campaign of world conquest, the NYT article attributes his remarks to “Iranian overreach,” particularly in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and Lebanon.

Allegations of Tehran’s regional ambitions follows the intrigue surrounding the short-lived resignation of Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri.

© Joseph Eid
Earlier this month, Hariri suddenly announced his resignation in a televised statement from Saudi Arabia, citing Iranian influence over the Shiite militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon. The move sparked speculation that Hariri made the announcement under duress from his Saudi hosts. Suspicions were further fueled when Hariri withdrew his resignation as soon as he returned to Lebanon Tuesday.

The rivalry between Tehran and Riyadh dates partly back to the ancient schism between Sunni and Shia Islam over the rightful heir to the Prophet Mohammed. But, it is also shaped by more contemporary events.

The Saudi strain of ultraconservative Sunni Islam, known as Wahhabism, considers Shiites to be heretics, and following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the Saudi leadership considered Iran a threat to its own dominance over the Muslim world. In the years since then, the two powers have found themselves backing opposing sides in numerous regional conflicts, most recently in Iraq, Syria and Yemen.

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff

DISCLOSURES: All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. A sure sign that MbS has been talking to Neocons (Kushner): “But we learned from Europe that appeasement doesn’t work,” bin Salman told the Times. “We don’t want the new Hitler in Iran to repeat what happened in Europe in the Middle East.” This is almost, word for word – with the exception of one letter, what Neocons said about Iraq. Hitler- blah-blah – Appeasement – blah-blah – Iraq/Iran – blah-blah – HOLOCAUST! One would hope that US citizens would be smart enough to see through this. But as H.L. Mencken posited “No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.”

  2. Yemen is all we need to see. But there is more. Creating Disneyland in the desert, the ever growing clarity of the effects of a complete lack of physical labor or responsibility, and the cringeworthy behavior of taking a line out of Trumps playbook in a very obvious way, all contribute to the assessment of immaturity. The alliance with Saudi for the US, has never proven to make sense on any moral level of thought. Unless you are an oil billionaire, which has nothing to do with morality. The attacks on secularism do not make any sense for the US either. Secular countries should be our allies.

Comments are closed.