NSA whistleblower William Binney: Russiagate is total “crap”

“If the idiots in the intelligence community expect us to believe them after all the crap they have told us (like WMD’s in Iraq and ‘no we don’t collect data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans’) then they need to give clear proof of what they say. So far, they have failed to prove anything.”

6
3680

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

William Binney is a former intelligence official with National Security Agency (NSA). He is also a mathematician. He has recently grabbed the Neocon and Zionist gangsters by the horn and declared that “Russiagate” is complete crap. He said:

If the idiots in the intelligence community expect us to believe them after all the crap they have told us (like WMD’s in Iraq and ‘no we don’t collect data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans’) then they need to give clear proof of what they say. So far, they have failed to prove anything.”

That certainly is fair enough. You simply cannot make an outrageous accusation and then leave the scene without providing an iota of evidence. If you ask Mr. X for the evidence that the Russiagate thing is legitimate, he would respond by saying Mr. Y has it; when you ask Mr. Y, he says Mr. Z has it; when you ask Mr. Z, he says Mr. X has it. The Neocons and Zionist ethnic cleansers have been playing this game for quite a long time. They think that positing an assertion and repeating it over and over again somehow is evidence for the assertion itself.

Binney certainly nailed it precisely because the same Russiagate people are the ones who bled the Middle East to death. Remember what happened in Iraq again? As former CIA officer Paul R. Pillar put it,

“The [Bush] administration realized that a tremendous, noholds-barred sales job was needed to persuade the American public to support a departure from a tradition of nonaggression…The [WMD] campaign was supported by a relentless effort to dig up whatever bits of reporting could be construed as showing that Iraq was an immediate threat.”[1]

In 2001, William Kristol, Francis Fukuyama, Norman Podhoretz, Bill Bennett, Aaron Friedberg, Nicholas Eberstadt, Rudy Boshwitz, Martin Peretz, Stephen P. Rosen, Richard Perle, Henry Sokolski, Donald Kagan, among twenty-eight other neoconservatives, sent a letter to President Bush making a similar request. The letter stated in part:

“But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism. The United States must therefore provide full military and financial support to the Iraqi opposition…

“A serious and victorious war on terrorism will require a large increase in defense spending. Fighting this war may well require the United States to engage a well-armed foe, and will also require that we remain capable of defending our interests elsewhere in the world. We urge that there be no hesitation in requesting whatever funds for defense are needed to allow us to win this war.”[2]

Yet, this emphasis on funding the Iraq War has had overwhelmingly negative consequences for the American economy. Just because we consider Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro to be bad guys doesn’t mean that we go to war with Cuba; so why was the situation with Hussein handled differently? Well, Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, Saddam had…

After months of perpetuating complete lies and fabrications, the Neocons ended up destroying virtually everything in Iraq. The Neocons crafted an essentially diabolical argument that would give the United States legitimate grounds to go to war. Historian George C. Herring says that the Neocons

“formed a sort of ‘cabal’ under the younger Bush…In their view, Saddam Hussein was behind world terrorism and would soon have WMD. Many of them had close ties to Israel and insisted that Saddam’s overthrow would make that vital ally more secure.”[3]

And now the same people want to bleed another country by a total “crap”? Perhaps it is time for the American people to say in unison: We ain’t buying it.


[1] Paul R. Pillar, Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), 14.

[2] Archived at http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm.

[3] George C. Herring, From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 945.


Loading...

EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

6 COMMENTS

  1. The problem is that pleading Morality will just bring ribald laughter from the proponents of Real Politik – what you and I might call Evil. Surely you know by now, in Post “Enlightenement” Thought that “there is no basis for morality in rational thought”.

    The whole of The West has been Brain Washed with Transitional Marxism, Political Correctness and Relativistic Thinking. Most are living within strong Cognitive Dissonance and might as well be in a Parallel Universe. When these guys say that they create reality, then they mean it by promoting Memes that are reality for a Majority of the Populace.

  2. “… cognitive dissonance prevails …” just start a conversation with a neighbor of the criminal ME wars and America’s wrong sided, criminal actions, or just mention the Russian hack story is a hoax, and said neighbor will spit venom. This tells me the MSM is alive and well. Basically all powerful. Crazy but true.

  3. In a just world Pearle and his cronies would be arrested tried for treason, theft, murder etc. Then summarly hanged. End of story.

  4. Meglomaniacs are in denial to think the populace will forever be pliable and ignorant. This indicates a prolonged period of comfort on their part. Discomfort is the cure.

  5. Many of those Neocons are dual citizens (US/Israel) with loyalty to Israel and influence in the US. The Neocons who aren’t dual citizens are almost all Jewish, and pro-Israel. They, too, don’t give a rat’s rump about impacts their policies will have in the US, as long as it’s “good for Israel”. As I’m sure you know, Mr. Alexis, the removal of Saddam Hussein was an Israeli objective from the Oded Yinon plan, as amended by PNAC in their “Clean Break” document, which was written for and given to Bibi NuttyYahoo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm

    Russiagate is just the latest nitwitted Neocon plan to make the Middle East safe for Greater Israel. Russian involvement in Syria stymied Israel’s plans for “regime change” when they were on the verge of success, so now it’s “regime change” time in Russia, if the Neocons have any say, and unfortunately they do.

    What really needs to be changed is the influence of traitorous Neocons – and neolibs – on USG policies.

    • Australia is going through a Political Crisis with Dual Citizens disqualified under The Constitution. Ex Goldman Sachs Billionaire and Prime Minister Turnbull, who as a young man humiliated Thatcher’s UK Secretary of Cabinet Sir Robert Temple Armstrong by having him admit that he was “economical with the truth”, but then took the Faustian Deal, is hanging on by the Skin of His Teeth. The actual wording of The Constitution says something like “is ELIGIBLE for dual citizenship” and this opens a whole can of worms for some people whose mothers and mother’s mothers etc are Jewish Females. Of course this has to be certified by a Rabbi and this may be what is keeping Turnbull himself off the hook as the Rabbi can always hold the Mens Rei Mental Reservation embodied in the Kol Nidre. How can the Western Court system operate with these people? Surely this culture of Kol Nidre would automatically disqualify them from appearing with any credibility in a Court of Justice.

Comments are closed.