…by Jonas E. Alexis
Netanyahu was never revered by any US president in recent memory. Sure, they smiled, laughed, and even joked in public with the mad man in Tel Aviv. But no one was able to say nice things to King Bibi because he never kept his word, lied constantly, and always tried to manipulate US presidents—both past and present.
So when Bill Clinton met the much-debated Netanyahu in the summer of 1996, Netanyahu tried to pull him over the Zionist position. Netanyahu, as usual, attempted to do his Talmudic magic on Clinton, but this time it didn’t seem to work. Clinton responded with outrage:
“Who the fuck does he think he is? Who’s the fucking superpower here?”
Joe Lockhart, the White House spokesman at the time, declared that Netanyahu was “one of the most obnoxious individuals you’re going to come into – just a liar and a cheat. He could open his mouth and you could have no confidence that anything that came out of it was the truth.”
French President Nicolas Sarkozy and former US President Barack Obama came to the same conclusion in 2011. “I cannot bear Netanyahu, he’s a liar,” Sarkozy said to Obama. Obama responded: “You’re fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you.” The Obama administration, as you recalled, ended up calling Netanyahu “a chickeshit.”
Incidentally, this has been a pattern among US presidents for decades. Even George W. Bush, himself a thoroughly Zionist puppet, was getting tired of people like Sheldon Adelson.
When Bush was too slow to catch up with the Zionist project, Adelson was completely upset. Bush responded: “I had this crazy Jewish billionaire, yelling at me.” Harry S. Truman had similar things to say when he was being cornered by the Khazarian Bankster Cult in his administration. He said:
“They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as D[isplaced] P[ersons] as long as the Jews get special treatment. When they have power, physical or political, neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog.”
If you think Truman is out of touch with reality, then pick up R. M. Douglas’ Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War. You will discover that the so-called “Holocaust is unique” doctrine has no historical backbone whatsoever.
If the expulsion of the Germans after World War II is not fresh in your mind, then consider the Iraq invasion in 2003.
We know by now that the war itself, which was based on colossal hoaxes and complete fabrications, will cost America at least six trillion dollars. This doesn’t even count the pain and suffering it has already created. At least “360,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans may have suffered brain injuries.”
As we have documented over the past few years, the war in Iraq has given us sodomy at Abu Ghraib, complete annihilation of families and innocent lives in the region, and the desolation of innocent men, women and children.
But have the Neocons and their brethren even issued an apology for the disaster? Absolutely not. In fact, these people view disasters in the Middle as good things. Listen to Jewish Neocon David Horowitz:
“In four years, George Bush has liberated nearly 50 million people in two Islamic countries. He has stopped the filling of mass graves and closed down the torture chambers of an oppressive regime. He has encouraged the Iraqis and the people of Afghanistan to begin a political process that give them rights they have not enjoyed in 5,000 years. How can one not support this war?”
Isn’t this crazy? What’s so pathetic is that these people want to drink more blood in the Middle East. As Jewish Neocon Jonah Goldberg himself declared,
“Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.”
Well, the United States did exactly that in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Chile, Honduras, El Salvador, Japan, Yemen, Guatemala, Iran, Niger, etc., etc. Many of these covert and diabolical activities in those countries were spearheaded by the Neoconservatives, who think that perpetual wars are good for America.
The same people continue to propound ad nauseam that there is something called Russiagate. But they never have the moral insight to even remotely mention that Israelgate, as former CIA official Philip Giraldi has pointed out, is more plausible than the so-called Russiagate hysteria. “Israel,” Giraldi writes, “colluded with” the “incoming Trump team to subvert U.S. foreign policy.” Giraldi continues:
“The first phone call to Kislyak, on December 22nd, was made by Flynn at the direction of Jared Kushner, who in turn had been approached by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu had learned that the Obama Administrating was going to abstain on a United Nations vote condemning the Israeli settlements policy, meaning that for the first time in years a U.N. resolution critical of Israel would pass without drawing a U.S. veto.
“Kushner, acting for Netanyahu, asked Flynn to contact each delegate from the various countries on the Security Council to delay or kill the resolution. Flynn agreed to do so, which included a call to the Russians. Kislyak took the call but did not agree to veto Security Council Resolution 2334, which passed unanimously on December 23rd…
“[Kushner] and his family have extensive ties both to Israel and to Netanyahu personally, to include Netanyahu’s staying at the Kushner family home in New York. The Kushner Family Foundation has funded some of Israel’s illegal settlements and also a number of conservative political groups in that country.
“Jared has served as a director of that foundation and it is reported that he failed to disclose the relationship when he filled out his background investigation sheet for a security clearance. All of which suggests that if you are looking for possible foreign government collusion with the incoming Trumpsters, look no further.
“And it should be observed that the Israelis were not exactly shy about their disapproval of Obama and their willingness to express their views to the incoming Trump. Netanyahu said that he would do so and Trump even responded with a tweet of his own expressing disagreement with the Obama decision to abstain on the vote, but the White House knew that the comment would be coming and there was no indication from the president-elect that he was actively trying to derail or undo it.”
And now the Neocon jokers want to talk about “Russiagate”? What is so disgusting about all of this is that the Neocons people are never satisfied. Now they are pushing one of their finest puppets, Donald Trump, to wage a bloody war with Iran. As Mark Dankof has recently put it,
“Trump, in contrast to his America-first rhetoric during the election, is pursuing an Israel-first Saudi Arabia-second policy that is quite like to engage the United States in a war with Iran. There is a virtual guarantee that Pence will do anything that the Israeli lobby wants if he in fact ascends into the big chair at the oval office.
“The alternative of course is… a democratic president who will of course be under the same control of the Israeli lobby as his Republican predecessors. The bottom-line is this: I don’t see that we are going to see any substantive changes to the direction that the United States is going in terms of military interventionism.”
-  Akiva Eldar, “Perfect English or Not, Netanyahu Shares No Common Language With Obama,” Haaretz, February 10, 2009.
-  Ibid.
-  Jason Ukman, “Sarkozy to Obama: Netanyahu is a ‘liar,’” Washington Post, November 8, 2011; “Sarkozy: ‘Netanyahu, I can’t stand him. He’s a liar…’ Obama: ‘You’re sick of him, but I have to deal with him every day…,’” Daily Mail, November 9, 2011.
-  Jeffrey Goldberg, “The Crisis in U.S.-Israel Relations Is Officially Here,” Atlantic, October 28, 2014.
-  Connie Bruck, “The Brassing Ring,” New Yorker, June 30, 2008.
-  Toby Harnden, “Truman diary reveals scorn ‘for cruel Jews,’” Telegraph, July 12, 2003.
-  R. M. Douglas, Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012).
-  Ernesto Londono, “Study: Iraq, Afghan war costs to top $4 trillion,” Washington Post, March 28, 2013; Bob Dreyfuss, The $6 Trillion Wars,” The Nation, March 29, 2013; “Iraq War Cost U.S. More Than $2 Trillion, Could Grow to $6 Trillion, Says Watson Institute Study,” Huffington Post, May 14, 2013; Mark Thompson, “The $5 Trillion War on Terror,” Time, June 29, 2011; “Iraq war cost: $6 trillion. What else could have been done?,” LA Times, March 18, 2013.
-  “360,000 veterans may have brain injuries,” USA Today, March 5, 2009.
-  See Mark Kukis, Voices from Iraq: A People’s History, 2003-2009 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011); Dana Priest and Joe Stephens, “Secret World of U.S. Interrogation,” Washington Post, May 11, 2004; for similar reports, see Jane Mayer, “The Black Sites: A Rare Look inside the C.IA.’s Secret Interrogation Program,” New Yorker, August 13, 2007; Craig Whitlock, “Jordan’s Spy Agency: Holding Cell for the CIA,” Washington Post, December 1, 2007; Jane Mayer, The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals (New York: Anchor Books, 2009); Mark Danner, Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror (New York: New York Review of Books, 2004); George W. Bush: War Criminal?: The Bush Administration’s Liability for 269 War Crimes (Westport: Praeger Pubishers, 2009); Lila Rajiva, The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2005). Rebecca Gordon, Mainstreaming Torture: Ethical Approaches in the Post-9/11 United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).
-  Conor Friedersdorf, “The Real Radicals of the Iraq War: Its Proponents,” Atlantic, March 6, 2013.
-  See for example Stephen Kinzer, Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (New York: Times Books, 2006); All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2003 and 2008).