3 Ways The Tax Reform Bill Would Hit Seniors Hard In Health Costs

1
815

 

 

The Senate’s passage of the Republican-sponsored tax reform bill, which could result in a $1.5 trillion tax cut, is seen by some as a Christmas present to most American taxpayers. Critics of the proposed legislation, however, suggest that the Grinch will have stolen Christmas from some seniors.

Older Americans have some important issues to consider in terms of how the bill could affect their health-care costs.

“For starters, the tax reform proposal would eliminate the tax deduction for medical expenses, and although a relatively small percentage of the population claim this deduction, it has the potential to galvanize a very powerful coalition of opposition to the largest tax reform proposal in a generation,” says Chris Orestis, Executive Vice President of GWG Life (www.gwglife.com) and author of the books Help on the Way and A Survival Guide to Aging.

According to the IRS, about 8.8 million households filed 2015 tax returns that claimed the medical expenses deduction. The American Association of Retired Persons’ (AARP) Public Policy Institute says 69 percent of those taking the deduction had income of under $75,000, and 49 percent were below $50,000.

“The irony of this proposed measure is that it penalizes people who are covering their own costs instead of relying on taxpayer-funded coverage through Medicaid,”  Orestis says.

Orestis narrows down how three pieces of the proposed legislation could adversely impact seniors and their health care:

 

  • Eliminates medical expense deduction. Under current tax law, you can deduct family medical expenses if the cost exceeds 10 percent of your adjusted gross income. The proposed bill, ending this deduction, would particularly impact seniors paying for long-term care. “This tax deduction is especially beneficial for seniors who are paying for long-term care costs not covered by Medicare or private insurance,” Orestis says. “It provides a critical tax break for seniors in this category, and eliminating this deduction would have a disproportionately negative impact on seniors paying for the expensive costs of skilled nursing homes and long-term care.”
  • Eliminates Obamacare’s insurance mandate. The AARP opposes the repeal of the insurance mandate because of the spikes in insurance premiums that could result. “De-incentivizing the young and healthy to get insurance or basically allowing them to drop coverage would make coverage for the old and sick more expensive,” Orestis says.
  • Cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. One reason for the failed efforts to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act: was the likelihood that millions would have lost coverage due to Medicaid cuts. Now members of House and Senate have said future cuts to Medicare and Medicaid will be needed to help pay for the proposed tax cuts. Unless Congress takes action, the tax reform bill would trigger a $25 billion slice to Medicare in 2018 to help to begin accounting for the $1.5 trillion tax cut. Medicaid covers 60 percent of those in nursing homes. “It’s important to recognize the fact that Medicaid is the nation’s primary payer of long-term care services, in the same way that Medicare is the nation’s payer of hospital and doctor visits for anyone over the age of 65,” Orestis says.

“A more sensible approach to tax reform,” Orestis says, “is to look for ways to use the tax code to create incentives for people to take personal responsibility, whenever possible, over relying on taxpayer-funded government programs such as Medicaid.”

About Chris Orestis

Chris Orestis, Executive Vice President of GWG Life (www.gwglife.com), has more than 20 years of experience in the insurance and long-term care industries and is nationally recognized as a healthcare expert and senior care advocate. He is a former Washington, D.C., lobbyist who has provided legislative testimony; the author of two books: “Help on the Way” and “A Survival Guide to Aging”; a frequent columnist with a currently popular series entitled “The Healthcare Hunger Games”; and has been a featured guest on over 50 radio programs and in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Kiplinger’s, Investor’s Business Daily, PBS, and numerous other media outlets.

 

If you’re interested in interviewing Chris Orestis, having him provide comments, or having him write an exclusive article for you let me know and I’ll gladly work out the details.

 

1 COMMENT

  1. Well, the maverick President is now using the age-old tactic of screwing the most vulnerable and bestowing piles of money we don’t have, on the MIC and multinationals. Add this to the unemployable vets that are going to get another round of screwing, while the Pentagram gets more and more and more…no matter that they have stolen Trillions from us…all while corps and the wealthy get some necessary(?) relief, what from I don’t know. We give billions to counties that have no use for us, outside of screwing us or getting our military to do their fighting that is, but we can’t take care of our own people that the vast majority are or have been taxpayers. MAGA, huh? Sounds like the SOS to me.

Comments are closed.