How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women

David Rockefeller: “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.”

22
3578

…by Jonas E. Alexis and Henry Makow

 

Henry Makow has a Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982 and is the author of the best-selling book Cruel Hoax: Feminism & the New World Order. Makow grew up in a Jewish family.

Makow has been completely misrepresented by thought-police organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center. “The elite operates by fostering division and conflict in the world,” he says. “Thus, we don’t realize who the real enemy is. Idealists in my parent’s generation were disillusioned when the Communist dream of universal brotherhood turned out to be a snare.”

Jonas E. Alexis: The late David Rockefeller unequivocally declared in his Memoirs:

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.”[1]

The Rockefellers were indeed internationalists who sought to project the New World Order ideology on much of the world using Darwin’s survival of the fittest. As one writer puts it, John

“was able to demonstrate that what was good for civilization was also good for business—and vice versa. The large corporation that grew by swallowing up its smaller competitors was merely exhibiting the law of the ‘survival of the fittest…’”[2]

Here again we see that Darwinism does play a role in bringing about the New World Order ideology, which is fundamentally at odds with the moral law or practical reason.[3] As I have argued in the past, Darwin’s entire project was doomed to fail precisely because he deliberately excluded morality from his weltanschauung and substituted things like strife, i.e., survival of the fittest.

Darwin could never solve the moral dilemma without abandoning his metaphysical premise. He therefore had to live in blatant contradictions. To this very day, his intellectual children are still morally and intellectually crippled by his worldview. These people are still toe-dancing around Darwin’s obvious contradictions because they do not want to think or do not want to abandon a morally and intellectually repugnant idea.

Leaving these issues aside, the Rockefellers were what Edward Bernays would have called “invisible governors,” the real people who actually manipulate the masses through propaganda and ideological motives. “Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society,” said Bernays, “constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”[4] Bernays continued to say that

“in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.”[5]

Based on this view, it is pretty obvious to deduce that “democracy” and “freedom” are just buzz words which have no metaphysical meaning in the New World Order. “Democracy” and “freedom” are real only if they represent the views of the rich and powerful. And the Rockefellers worked tirelessly to impose the New World Order democracy upon the masses.

So, what have been the consequences of New World Order democracy? Did the Rockefellers play a role in essentially destroying the family, most specifically women? Expand on those issues for us, Henry Makow.



Henry Makow: In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted.

I will expand on the Rockefeller’s role, but first we need to remember that for a woman, love is an instinctive act of self-sacrifice.

She gives herself to her husband and children and is fulfilled by seeing them thrive and receiving their love, respect and gratitude.

A woman makes this supreme sacrifice to only one man who will cherish her and provide for his family. Men instinctively want to fulfill this responsibility. This is the essence of the heterosexual contract (i.e. marriage): female power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Sex is the symbol of this exclusive bond. Marriage and family may not be for everyone but it is the natural path for most.

Feminism has trained women to reject this model as “an old fashioned, oppressive stereotype” even though it reflects their natural instincts. A British writer reported overhearing two young women:

“All men are useless these days,” one said. “Yeah,” said the other. “The trouble is that they haven’t risen to the challenge of feminism. They don’t understand that we need them to be more masculine, and instead they have just copped out.”

That’s their logic? If women are less feminine, men will be more masculine? Men aren’t designed to fight with women. They need to be affirmed by a woman’s acquiescence and faith. When women constantly challenge them, men will “cop out” of marriage and family.

Now that love and marriage have been “discredited,” women have nothing left to exchange for love but sex. Thus, many are unnaturally obsessed with appearance and pathetically give their bodies to all and sundry.

Permanent love is not based on a woman’s sex appeal, or personality or achievements. Ultimately, it is based on self-sacrifice. We love the people who love us.

THE BIG PICTURE: THE CENTRAL BANKERS

People do not realize that feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive. Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Midler’s movies and “America: From Freedom to Fascism” identified all three confirming what I have been saying.

While trying to recruit Russo for the CFR, Nicholas Rockefeller told him that his family foundation created women’s liberation using mass media control as part of a long-term plan to enslave humanity. He admitted they want to “chip us.” Google “Rockefeller Foundation” and “Women’s Studies” and you’ll get a half million citations.

The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young. Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base. Displacing men in the role of providers also destabilizes the family.

A drastic paradigm shift is required to make sense of the world. The Rockefellers are part of the private world central banking cartel that also controls media, defence, pharmaceutical and other cartels. To protect their monopoly of credit and wealth, they are instituting a world police state (“world government”) using the bogus 9-11 attack and endless war as a pretext. Rockefeller told Russo about this plan a year before 9-11.

Modern Western culture is Masonic. Freemasonry teaches that man and not God determines reality. (Naturally, they need to overrule natural and spiritual laws in order to assert their own control.) They have noticed that people are diffident malleable creatures who prefer to believe what they are told than trust their own reason or perception. Thus, for example, the media successfully promotes homosexual values that conflict with our moral or natural instincts.

MEDIA ERADICATES LOVE

Every facet of the mass media (movies, TV, magazines, music, commercials, news) is used for indoctrination and social control with the ultimate goal of enslavement. There is a connection between what happened in Communist Russia and what is happening in America today. In both cases, the central banking cartel is asserting its totalitarian control.

In order to destroy the family, the media convinced women that they could not rely on the heterosexual contract.

Myrna Blyth was the editor in chief of Ladies Home Journal from 1981 to 2002. In her book “Spin Sisters” (2004) she says the media sold women “a career in exactly the same drum banging way that the Happy Homemaker had been…sold to their mothers.” (38)

The Khazarian Bankster Cult undermined women’s natural loving instincts using the following mantras:

  1. Men can no longer be trusted. Using the Lifetime Network as an example, Blyth concluded “all men are 1) unfaithful rats 2) abusive monsters 3) dishonest scumbags, or 4) all of the above. Women on the other hand were…flinty achievers who triumph despite the cavemen who…want to keep them in their place.” (62-63)
  2. Women are victims by virtue of their sex. Blyth says the media sends “one message loud and clear. Because we are women, we remain victims in our private lives, at work, in society as a whole.” (156) Thus women must have a sense of grievance, entitlement and rebellion. The same tactic was used to manipulate Jews, Blacks, workers and gays.
  3. Women should be selfish. “Liberation and narcissism have merged,” Blyth says. Leisure now means, “time for yourself, spent alone, or perhaps with one’s girlfriends but definitely without spouse and kids…Endless articles preached the new feminist gospel, that indulging yourself is an important part of being a healthy, well adjusted woman.” (65)
  4. Sex is not reserved for love and marriage. Magazines like Glamour and Cosmopolitan urge young women to “put out on their first date, ogle men openly” and be an athlete in bed. There is no discussion of marriage or family. (160) Such women can’t trust a man enough to surrender themselves in love.
  5. Self-fulfillment lies in career success and not husband and family. “The social rewards of holding down a job are critical to one’s sense of dignity and self worth,” Betty Friedan pontificated. In fact, “most work is deeply ordinary,” Blyth observes (35-36.)

Thus many women are schizophrenic as they attempt to reconcile their natural instincts with constant exhortations to do the opposite. The wreckage — broken families and dysfunctional people — is strewn everywhere.

At the same time, Playboy Magazine etc. aimed a similar message at men. You don’t need to get married to have sex. Marriage and children are a bore.

CONCLUSION

This consistent media drumbeat is organized brainwashing. Society has been totally subverted by the central banking cartel, using a Satanic cult, Freemasonry as its primary instrument. Most masons are unaware of the truth but the owners of the mass media certainly are.

We used to say, “as American as motherhood and apple pie.” Only Satanists would trash motherhood. Far from empowering women, feminism has unsexed many. It has deprived them of a secure and valued social role and reduced them to sex objects and replaceable workers.

Satanists promote rebellion because they are defying what is natural and conducive to happiness. Like their symbol, Lucifer, they wish to play God.

God’s love can be seen in a woman’s dedication to her husband and children. Thus the bankers must destroy it.

Jonas E. Alexis: In his study Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, E. Michael Jones produces a plethora of scholarly evidence showing how the Rockefellers essentially destroyed the social fabric of society by advocating population control. What they probably didn’t realize is that they were invariably killing their own children by doing so. Libido Dominandi is indeed a great read.


  • [1] David Rockefeller, Memoirs (New York: Random House, 2002), 405.
  • [2]Quoted in Himmelfarb, Victorian Minds: A Study of Intellectuals in Crisis and Ideologies in Transition (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1952 and 1968), 317.
  • [3] For a historical treatise on this, see for example E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014).
  • [4] Quoted in E. Michael Jones, Monsters from the Id: The Rise of Horror and Fiction and Film (Dallas: Spence Publishing, 2000), 178.
  • [5] Ibid.

22 COMMENTS

  1. The really ironic part is that the “feminist” leaders who have been promoting that zioagenda, have not been women at all! They have been transexuals all along. This sick joke is a hallmark of the Satanic “sense of humor” and the denial of the divine creation by messing with the natural order of masculinity and femininity.
    If you were desensitized about the transgender agenda, you can start opening your eyes by watching these videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZS-WivUpIQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDILliQYaWM, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deg3A_MCvC0, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kMIxmFJOS8, https://youtu.be/U-_q47nAZWM

    • It is always , satan, or gays, or anything but, male domination over women in the workplace. If you have a beautiful wife, and she goes out of town for a business trip, it is not satan or transexuals who should be your concern. If you need to understand natural order, study primates. They are almost always matriarchal. Without oppressive religions that teach women are evil , this problem goes away. Men who lust power and get it, soon go after everything they cannot have. They need to be checked.

    • David,

      If it weren’t for shining examples like Golda Meir, Margaret Thatcher, Madeline Albright, Victoria Nuland, and Hillary Clinton, I might be sold on this matriarchal system you speak of.

      But I guarantee we would wind up with the foulest, most repulsive examples of (-any population-) possible. Again.

      Only they would have female genitalia. Only difference.

      I have no problem with women leaders, I just don’t expect a huge paradigm shift. Or any change, really.

      The BANE of civilization is that benevolent people shun positions of power. It will be our undoing.

  2. And our dear friend Akbar Palace is back with yet another name change. Quite the (((stereotype))).

    He really puts the “Ewww” in Jew.

  3. Excellent article. I had heard several years ago that the Rockefellers funded the Women’s Liberation Movement and those of us who fell for it were scammed – big time! When I was growing up, it was not at all unusual for a factory worker or a construction worker to earn enough money to support a wife and nine kids, and own a house. Now even when both parents are working full time, it is still difficult to make ends meet.

    Those days weren’t all that great either – society was repressive, especially for girls. But with all of the increased wealth and productivity, we ought to be able to have the freedom to stay home to nurture our family and raise kids, or both parents could work way fewer hours and have more time to be together as a family. But now, one parent has to work 30 or more hours a week just to pay for childcare, because the family is so short of money that the few hours extra pay is desperately needed just to make ends meet. It should NOT take 80 or more hours of work each week just to support 3 or 4 people, and still not be able to afford a home. The social fabric has been torn to shreds – morally, socially and economically.

    • All true, and more.

      Note that women’s suffrage shortly followed the Fed Res Act and the expansion of the income tax.

      Empowering women meant making them free range tax slaves in the open plantation of America. Victory!

      It also means nobody is home to raise the kids, so now they are taught what to think by govt institutions. Mom and Dads teachings are marginalized or even ridiculed. Triumph!

      With Mom and Dad at work, and the government raising the kids, driving a wedge and widening the “generation gap” was made much easier. The close knit family unit was destroyed. Excelsior!

      Empowering women means allowing them to exploit their bodies for monetary gain. Strippers and porno actresses are “taking control” and “wielding power”. Huzzah!

      All I know is anytime there is a feminist rally, you’re guaranteed a free peep show. Equal rights means fully exposed boobs, for some reason.

      Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!

      Seriously though, this could have worked out much better for women.

      “But with all of the increased wealth and productivity, we ought to be able to have the freedom to stay home to nurture our family and raise kids, or both parents could work way fewer hours and have more time to be together as a family.”

      Brilliant observation. Societal Progress should include less schlep work and more social and leisure time for the general population.

      Freedom through autonomy was scrapped for imprisonment through never ending work, higher expectations, and very little reward.

      PLUS men and women are now at each others throats. The ultimate divide and conquer ploy…

    • Brilliant observation Johnny America – that the women’s suffragette movement became popular right after he Federal Reserve Act in 1913. I don’t know how that slipped my attention – the only excuse is, I lived in New Zealand for middle school, high school and university. I think New Zealand gave women the right to vote way before the US did – if I can recall, it was about 1893 or so. I wonder if New Zealand also had an equivalent to the Federal Reserve before or by 1893. I was curious and looked it up, and sure enough, they introduced income tax in 1890.

    • “I’ve got one…that can SEE!”

      -They Live (1988)

      Gadzooks! that was fast and effective detective work, Carola…may I suggest a career in intelligence or investigative journalism…?

      The puzzle pieces all click together really well if you dig deep enough…

    • Johnny, if you like puzzles, where does victim blaming occur ? Right after a victim speaks out ? Environmental laws usually accompany bills advocating unrestricted drilling. Fair wage laws usually accompany tax hikes or bills favoring corporations. Each side attaches things and the game is continuous. Cherry picking is not good investigative product.

    • Well…now that’s kind of a straw man argument in this case. No one is advocating victim blaming. Criticizing the MECHANICS of the feminist movement does NOT go hand in hand with victim blaming.

      All I am trying to say is that a legitimate social issue (equality for women) was built up and exploited by the elites into a social movement (feminism) that UNNECESSARILY divided half of all humanity. It’s like my comment on the Rosa Parks Article; Social movements are routinely hijacked and turned into societal schisms by the herders of humanity. In the end, it serves them and NOT us.

    • Alright…I get it, now. The excessive virtue signaling and moral posturing lead me to one conclusion…

      We need to get you a girlfriend, David…

    • I’m happily married. You do not get it yet. Go check the photos from the suffrage march. There are men here who would attack women who come out and accuse their attacker. It is rampant. It is uninformed, and it is counter productive to the protection of our women and children. How is this moral posturing ?
      Am I abnormally moral for protecting women ? Would I be a self righteous prick if I stand up ?
      We need to get you some balls. Johnny.

    • Alright, if you are happily married I assume your wife is reading your posts over your shoulder with a rolled up newspaper in her hand…ha Ha!

      I was just kidding around, I hope you get that.

      All your points are of course valid. I think you generalize men as repressors of women a little too much, though. And the image of the big brutish man beating his wife into submission is a little overemphasized in recalling days of yore.

      Remember, a woman’s financial independence and her ability to leave an abusive marriage was the main argument for women entering the workforce en masse. This very important choice seems to have been swiftly marginalized. Still taking away from the family to pay income tax, though. The temporary solution left behind a permanent problem.

      Unfortunately, even with alimony and child support, two people cannot support a family unit living in two separate homes. So THAT aspect of autonomy is being eliminated rather quickly. Men and women are now stuck in marriages due to financial imprisonment AGAIN…

      I agree with most of your general points.

      I would hope that sexual assault victims would NOT be shamed for speaking out. But serious accusations need verification, lest things turn into another Salem Witch Hunt. It sure seems like there could be better police procedures that treat the victim with more respect. What a nightmare for them. No ideas how to accomplish that.

      I just don’t think that in order to build women UP, we need to tear men DOWN.

  4. One of the best articles I have read on VT!
    This is exactly what has happened in western society. Love has become replaced for loathing in selfishness and superiority. To be equal does not mean to be or feel better, smarter or stronger then the other gender. Female exploitation on behalf of feminism is the underlying agenda while womanhood pretends to be the strong part in the relationship with the opposite sex. The imprints of a female gene might has a different memory!
    In the meantime same confusion is spreading to the testosterone filled male causing further conflict between man and woman while love completely is swiped out of the door and is forgotten. Mr Schweinstein and Co have constructed themselves an almighty perverted playground.
    Men and women are “to wage war” against each other with the mighty weapon feminism one one side and groping and raping contradicting any results of what feminism could have brought to the female gender.
    We all forget here that the world has become a mental asylum with a very unstable human mentality filled by underlying fear contradicting all what human attitudes and moral stand for. To be humane – to explore love and understand life!
    All that what is understood these days is ME, ME, ME, ME. Our “juniors” growing up in this world are the best example of how twisted society has become.
    Humanity explores their deepest nightmares while the “controller of society” have an endless ball.

    • That mental asylum was created, maintained and dominated by Patriarchal religion, Paternal politics, and neanderthal sexual practices. This isn’t just Hollywood, it is the company next door. If I were a woman, I wouldn’t have any confidence in men either. Count the bodies and follow the bow flies.

  5. Men complain when the nipple is withdrawn. War and protection and provision does not make the man. Those who are unable to tolerate sovereign strong women, often are very needy and underdeveloped. Such is the case of the 40 year old man living with his mother, because her nurturing has turned to obedience and excessive mothering. Such is also the case with the new father who gets jealous of the baby sucking the breast. Men who need the role of provider have not examined nature. In times of abundance, what mother would give more food to one child than another ? What provider of any gender would watch as the wealth accumulated by thousands be hoarded by a few ? Capitalism is your culprit. What spiritual authority would spend millions on drapes and paintings while the children go hungry or are bombed by aggressors ? The answer is, the same ones who have condemned women to subservience due to misinterpreting an ancient writing. It is time for the strong woman. There are enough babies. Now is the time for the equal distribution of the massive abundance produced by innovation. It is the case of the jealous male child. He wants the nipple to his servant forever.

    • btw,.. I thought James Corbett did a good job of investigating the Russo interview and debunked the existence of Nikolas Rockefeller. it appears the dude might have been a legend.

    • As an eternal expert of true feminism and equality, maybe you should get yourself a nipple to suck on David as your arguments are more then feminist. Strong men and women with moral and filled with Love are needed not selfish “genderless and deeply confused subjects”. Men and women have to urgently stand together and be united in LOVE to fight this evil which has castrated the human world. There is one origin and one destination ONLY. Love is the carrier to get one there where one came from. To travel this journey together as feminine and masculine energies unite is the goal. Arguing about messed up behavior on both sides of the “gender issue” in an asylum will not help at all.
      The female nipple like the female or male body will fade. Female and masculine energy stay united for all eternity unless they are involved and distracted in an illusionary dream of “war of the sexes” in a mental asylum no entity wants to be in in the first place.

    • Eduardo, last I checked, the woman was walking ten feet behind the man and keeping her mouth shut about lower wages and random groping and pawing. And I certainly said nothing about selfish genderless or deeply confused individuals, a very weak come back. Asking for protection for women in the workplace and high political office is not bowing to feminism. It is simply just. Only ultraconservative men who wish to maintain dominance are affronted by it.

    • The last time I checked David, there were many female victims who could not speak up anymore at all because they were killed by their male rapists or murderer while every evidence is swept under the carpet of our daily way of life system. Children of both sexes are sacrificed on a daily basis. Unwillingly participating in Organ transplants is another matter, selling women and children into slavery in the west is also quite fashionable.
      Though arguing about groping and sometimes being groped willingly to further the career of the female seems to be of more importance than equality. Maybe feminism needs a little change in direction don’t you think?????

Comments are closed.