Pope St. Pius X Said It & So Can I

Pope St. Pius X exposed the new Vatican II “apostles” as the Sillon movement is pushing the false christ’s agenda. The Conciliarist’s do not work for Jesus but for mankind (Luciferian).


Pope St. Pius X Said It & So Can I
By: Eric Gajewski

I was rereading Pope St. Pius X’s Notre Charge yesterday and every time I read it I learn something new. Has this ever happened to you? This one writing of Pope St. Pius X truly unmasks the plot for a One World Religion coming from those who profess to be Catholic but in reality, are not. In this letter, the “ecumenist’s”, of the Conciliar Church, are perfectly described by Pope St. Pius X. He had very strong language to condemn these “Catholic” pretender’s or insane dreamer’s. However, we live in such a protestant world, wherein, no longer, can we judge any “movement” or even the actions of another.

Heck, I can’t even point out how Cardinal Burke teaches heresy without being labeled some “hater” or “attacker” of the Church.

Pope St. Pius X called out these men of the Conciliar Church, who, objectively speaking, are destroying it and so can I. Please do not let any Sillonist/modernist tell you otherwise.

Pope St. Pius X: “But stranger still, alarming and saddening at the same time, are the audacity and frivolity of men who call themselves Catholics and dream of re-shaping society under such conditions, and of establishing on earth, over and beyond the pale of the Catholic Church, “the reign of love and justice” with workers coming from everywhere, of all religions and of no religion, with or without beliefs, so long as they forego what might divide them – their religious and philosophical convictions, and so long as they share what unites them – a “generous idealism and moral forces drawn from whence they can”.

Yes, that is right. Pope St. Pius X is pointing his finger at the Vatican II’ers. The Conciliarist’s who embrace Sillonism dare to call themselves Catholic whence they are not. They have this dream of a “new world” in their revolutionary thinking which holds to a gospel which is fostering the “false christ’s” religion not the Catholic one.

They involve every false religion and sect and tell them they too have a share in “the church” whence they do not in reality.

Now you ought ask yourself this question. Do I want to lend a hand in the destruction of the Church by communing with these individuals no matter how sincere they may be? Vatican II NewChurch is the promoter of this false love and justice which has in its end Socialism forthcoming. It will accept anyone who accepts them and yet Catholics can not do as such.

For there can be no unity in falsehood.

Sadly, the Sillonist dream world is now being sold to the public as a potential reality. It is not rooted in solid Catholic doctrine and hence this new city of babel will collapse like the one of old.

Pope St. Pius X: I say, of all this, it is frightening to behold new apostles eagerly attempting to do better by a common interchange of vague idealism and civic virtues. What are they going to produce? What is to come of this collaboration? A mere verbal and chimerical construction in which we shall see, glowing in a jumble, and in seductive confusion, the words Liberty, Justice, Fraternity, Love, Equality, and human exultation, all resting upon an ill-understood human dignity. It will be a tumultuous agitation, sterile for the end proposed, but which will benefit the less Utopian exploiters of the people. Yes, we can truly say that the Sillon, its eyes fixed on a chimera, brings Socialism in its train.

It is frightening because what was once taught as Catholic is no more.
It has been replaced by a new theology which is heterodox that sadly the “majority” follow. People, get very upset, when, I say, these heretics are not Catholic objectively speaking but cannot prove me wrong. Clearly, I can demonstrate how these individuals follow doctrines and principles condemned by the Church but who are you to judge, Eric! Yep, more Protestantism folks. As if I need authority to hold an opinion. Ironically it is these same people who have been saying I am a heretic publicly yet they have no authority to do so according to their own false belief system.

It is frightening times, when, the word, “Catholic”, is reinterpreted, to mean something different and then for good measures is hid behind a false “hermeneutics of continuity”.

What is a Catholic to do? Resistance is our defense and proper resistance is not the pseudo trad flavor of still communing in those same buildings simply because they say a latin mass. This is news to the false trads. “ For you cannot be in buildings where the faith is not”, regardless, of whether, they say the Latin Mass or not.

We are a doctrine first peoples.


Comments Closed


  1. Not one Iota shall be changed and yet The Orthodox (John 10: “He shall proceed only from the father”) declare that the Filioque Insertion is invalid claiming that Moscow is the Third Rome. When the Pope declared himself Infallible in about 1870, presumably speaking ex Cathedra and in Consultation, Lord Acton made his famous remark about “..Power tends to corrupt and Absolute Power corrupts absolutely” (best to read that quote in full with the surrounding supplements). I think it was JP II who said “there are seeds of Truth in all religions and his key advisor Ratzinger saw with Danny The Red rioting in Paris in ’68 that the cat might be out of the bag and reverted to conservatism, possibly a little late. The five precepts of Buddhism mirror the seven last commandments and the Mosaic Law came out of Egypt. Hamurabbi made laws in 1800 BC and the Babylonion Talmud is/was a Casuistic distortion and nullification of those and the Mosaic Law, well reflected in the Col Nidra “prayer” for Yom Kippur, hence that was what Jesus was fighting. So John’s Logos really is “the cunning of Logos” and belongs in the heart of men, not to be denied. Maybe The Body of Christ has different body parts (tribes/nations) with some better at thinking than others – yet others “feel it in their bones”. I believe Jesus was the Incarnation of Logos (The Word) and also in First Cause, inexplicable from a Gnostic point of view and known to the Faithful as God the Father.

    • Astrology is associated with Kabbalah and can be classed as a deterministic system that limits Free Will. The basic argument between Catholic (including Orthodox and Roman) and Protestant is “Justification Through Faith Alone”, which means God has chosen a Human Person to be saved and inexorably leads back to pre-destination. Me Too Chosen Race (Tribe as G_d) – Calvin was a Cohen. This can lead to Egoism, Hubris and loss of closeness to First Cause, so is faulty theology. The idea of studying the pattern of the stars and attempting to assume knowledge through that is usually classified as Gnosis. Omniscience is a property of First Cause, known to Christians as God The Father in Heaven. Now Modern Physics had four dimensions after Einstein and other Physicists have speculated with their bucket chemistry insruments and “God playing dice with the universe” mathematics that their are eleven dimensions. Well I just keep it simple and call it; up and down, back and front, left and right, time and Seven Heavens. Ineffible, as the Muslims say.

    • Astrology is ancient and associated with every culture. The modern view of it is always referring to misnomers about stars and planets. The foundation of it, is simply the study of humanities and the recurring changes. Calendrics. In that stars are recurring and regular, they are easily correlated to the changes, but the pervasive changes that occur on a 24 hour schedule tend to lean toward the earths rotation as the “regulator” of the changes, but not the source of them. The Dendera was rededicated by the Romans in 18 CE. The existing stone is a copy of a copy. The stone that is in the Louvre after being dragged for 20 years back to France, is often referred to as a star chart. It is most certainly not. It is a calendar based on changes in human behavior and attributes that follow an unchanging schedule. It would have been quite easy to make a star chart, but none of these exist.

    • The origin of the idea, that a “score” is 20 days or 20 years is rooted in basic calendars. The use of these is not predeterministic or suggestive of an attack on free will. It is actually liberating to know the weather. Ask the elderly that are glued to the weather channel. If I say, tomorrow is the day of “knowledge of position” it is based on millennia of study concerning the humanities. So, if a person is compelled to view maps on that day, it is simply implying that those thoughts are part of the schedule. If the weatherman tells us rain tomorrow, and we plan to stay inside, he did not deprive us of our free will. He gave us useful knowledge. The Dendera stone is the same 36 decans that the 36 chapters of numbers are based on. The same 36 decans that form the thematic content of Genesis and many other books in the Bible. The church vilified astrology to hide this and actually destroyed thousands of years of work in the process. For a person who knows the 20 days and the 36 decans, it is overwhelmingly obvious, and there are many who know this. Academia will not touch it, yet.

    • I should ad, that the evidence that the earth is not the source of the recurring changes is in the correlation to the 20 standard amino acids that have been found to be out in space as well as earth. They correlate to the 20 days by function, as do the primordial elements Tin through Ytterbium. The first 36 primordial elements correlate with the 36 decans. Rubidium through Indium correlate precisely with the 12 sun signs by color and function and order. the Bible, correlates precisely to the descriptors and order of the I-Ching, with many ver-batim entires. Also, the evidence that the church uses this information to schedule ceremonies and align holidays and such, is overwhelming.

    • One example is the ordination of the current pope. remember how sudden and hurried it was ? It was so they could do it on the day of the cross. Day # 12. Same with the Jesuit Superior General. Different orders have secrets and Pius X was obviously not privy. One seminarian told me, that a gathering of priests cardinals and bishops is like a line of bullies beating each other with clubs to get to the front. The only thing we can be sure of, is that we will never know the extent of secrets and atrocities committed by the church. The CIA pales in comparison.

  2. Heretic: One who questions. Old School Catholics: Those wonderful people who gave us the Grand Inquisition. In all this article not one word NOT ONE WORD from Jesus.

  3. What are mysteries to some, may be known as common knowledge to others. The argument that the gap between the natural and supernatural is unbridgeable is the entire core and foundation of this stance. Aquinas at least had some knowledge of astrology and perhaps this is what confounded Pius X as he did not understand or have access to “the mysteries’. But, he was born during the 2nd decan of Gemini which is entirely feminine and he did favor the Mother, so they put his feast day on the last day before Virgin decan. He was beatified the day after his birthday. Perhaps at the time, he served a purpose to those who knew time changes and made a calculated choice to preserve the “conservative aspect” while withholding instruction. But, I don’t think so. I think he was not able to bridge the gap himself, therefore did not entertain the possibility for others to do so. thus, it leads to charges of heresy on flimsy evidence and strong arms enforcing that which they cannot see.

    • There is irony in the beatification and canonization of X by Pius Xii as he well knew the Virgin decan and it’s dates and he moved the Feast of the Queenship of Mary to August 22nd, but knew well enough to keep the feast for Pius X to August 21. And Pius XII also well knew the dates of June 1 -10 being the pubescent feminine, but Virgin being the more “proper” timeframe for the Feast. The trecena of X’s birth clearly illustrates the he would be rigid and quite possibly unable to “walk on the bridge”. He thought he had already crossed it.
      They make much of his humble beginnings, which is another reason I assert, the schemers and connivers chose him to be put out front, while they could continue unnoticed. He was not privy.

Comments are closed.